Rapid vs Maintenance Vitamin D Supplementation in Deficient Children With Asthma to Prevent Exacerbations.

NCT ID: NCT01395589

Last Updated: 2017-09-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

597 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-02-28

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The role of vitamin D in respiratory health remains uncertain. Whether vitamin D reduces clinically important exacerbations of childhood asthma remains uncertain. We compared rapid to maintenance vitamin D repletion analyzed by baseline vitamin D level.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recently published Cochrane metaanalysis suggested that vitamin D reduces the risk of severe asthma exacerbations, but only 22 children contributed to that analysis from a study that found no difference in acute care visits or rescue steroid administration. Altogether, randomized trials performed in children show promise solely in meta-analyses that use varied clinical outcomes and analysis approaches.

Were vitamin D supplementation beneficial for children with asthma, it might prevent moderate to severe asthma exacerbations entirely in some children, reduce the overall frequency of exacerbations in a treated group, or both. To examine these possibilities, we designed a randomized explanatory study comparing rapid vs maintenance vitamin D supplementation for children with moderate-to-severe asthma and with low baseline vitamin D levels .

Children presenting to the ED with moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbations and vitamin D levels \< 25 ng/mL underwent masked randomization, and then open dosing to either IM+oral (the latter daily) therapy or daily oral-only therapy, and were followed for 12 months.The primary outcome was patient-initiated unplanned visits for asthma exacerbations,examined two ways: cumulative proportions with an exacerbation, and average exacerbation frequency. As this was a nutrient study, we analyzed treatment groups by quartile of baseline vitamin D level, collecting repeat levels and clinical observations at 3, 6, 9,and 12 months after enrollment.

One hundred and sixteen patients in the IM+oral cohort vs 115 in the oral-only cohort had similar mean (SD) baseline levels: 15.1 (5.4) vs 15.8 (5.2) ng/mL (range, 3-25 ng/mL). There was no difference in the primary outcome over the entire 12-month observation period. However, rapid IM+oral supplementation significantly reduced unplanned visits for asthma exacerbations for children with baseline levels of 3 to 11 ng/mL during the initial 3 months: the relative exacerbation rate for the IM+oral cohort compared with the oral-only cohort at 3 months was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.28-0.89; P ¼ .008); average exacerbation frequency per child analysis, relative rate 0.36 (95% CI, 0.13-0.87; P ¼ .017).

So Rapid compared to maintenance vitamin D supplementation for children with the lowest levels resulted in short- but not long-term reduction in asthma exacerbations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma Vitamin D Deficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Injectable + oral vitamin D

Children with moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbations and vitamin D levels \< 25 ng/mL.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vitamin D

Intervention Type DRUG

Children with moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbations and vitamin D levels \< 25 ng/mL underwent masked randomization, and then open dosing to either IM+oral (the latter daily) therapy or daily oral-only therapy, and were followed for 12 months.

Oral-only Vitamin D

Children with moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbations and vitamin D levels \< 25 ng/mL.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vitamin D

Intervention Type DRUG

Children with moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbations and vitamin D levels \< 25 ng/mL underwent masked randomization, and then open dosing to either IM+oral (the latter daily) therapy or daily oral-only therapy, and were followed for 12 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vitamin D

Children with moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbations and vitamin D levels \< 25 ng/mL underwent masked randomization, and then open dosing to either IM+oral (the latter daily) therapy or daily oral-only therapy, and were followed for 12 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children 2-14 years of age with moderate to severe asthma and proved to be Vitamin D deficient by serum level.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prematurity (Gestational age 34 weeks or less)
* Patients on vitamin D therapy
* Patients on seizure medication or diuretics
* Patients on chronic steroid use for other reasons than asthma
* Patient with chronic liver or kidney disease
* Patients with inherited bone disease
* Patients with hypo or hyper parathyroidism
* Patients with history of chronic lung disease other than asthma
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hamad Medical Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Khalid Ibrahim

Consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr.Khalid Al-Ansari

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hamad Medical Corporation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hamad Medical Corporation, Pediatric Emergency Center,Alsaad.

Doha, , Qatar

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Qatar

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1036

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id