Trial Outcomes & Findings for Patient Satisfaction Study of BOTOX® Cosmetic in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Frown Lines (NCT NCT01391312)
NCT ID: NCT01391312
Last Updated: 2012-09-25
Results Overview
Subjects assessed the improvement of their glabellar lines (area between the eyebrows) by answering the question: Compared to before receiving the study treatment, How do you currently feel about the appearance of your glabellar lines? on a 7-point scale where 0=Very much improved, 1=Much improved, 2=Minimally improved, 3=No change, 4=Minimally worse, 5=Much worse, 6=Very much worse. Improvement was defined as responses: 0=Very much improved, 1=Much improved and 2=Minimally improved.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
40 participants
Day 30
2012-09-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Botulinum Toxin Type A
Botulinum toxin Type A 20U (total dose) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
Placebo (Normal Saline)
Normal Saline (placebo) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Patient Satisfaction Study of BOTOX® Cosmetic in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Frown Lines
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Botulinum Toxin Type A
n=20 Participants
Botulinum toxin Type A 20U (total dose) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
Placebo (Normal Saline)
n=20 Participants
Normal Saline (placebo) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
Total
n=40 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
46.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=5 Participants
|
54.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 • n=7 Participants
|
50.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 30Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants) with data available for the time-point.
Subjects assessed the improvement of their glabellar lines (area between the eyebrows) by answering the question: Compared to before receiving the study treatment, How do you currently feel about the appearance of your glabellar lines? on a 7-point scale where 0=Very much improved, 1=Much improved, 2=Minimally improved, 3=No change, 4=Minimally worse, 5=Much worse, 6=Very much worse. Improvement was defined as responses: 0=Very much improved, 1=Much improved and 2=Minimally improved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Botulinum Toxin Type A
n=19 Participants
Botulinum toxin Type A 20U (total dose) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
Placebo (Normal Saline)
n=20 Participants
Normal Saline (placebo) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Subject Global Assessment of Change at Day 30
|
94.7 Percentage of participants
0.84
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
0.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 30Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants) with data available for the time-point.
The Investigator rated the subject's severity of glabellar lines (between the eyebrows) at maximum attempted muscle contraction using the 4-point Facial Wrinkle scale where 0=None (Best), 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe (Worse) at day 30. Responders were defined as participants with a score of 0=None or 1=Mild.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Botulinum Toxin Type A
n=19 Participants
Botulinum toxin Type A 20U (total dose) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
Placebo (Normal Saline)
n=20 Participants
Normal Saline (placebo) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Facial Wrinkle Scale Responders at Maximum Attempted Muscle Contraction at Day 30
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
10 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 60Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants) with data available for the time-point.
The Investigator rated the subject's severity of glabellar lines (between the eyebrows) at maximum attempted muscle contraction using the 4-point Facial Wrinkle scale where 0=None (Best), 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe (Worse) at day 60. Responders were defined as participants with a score of 0=None or 1=Mild.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Botulinum Toxin Type A
n=18 Participants
Botulinum toxin Type A 20U (total dose) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
Placebo (Normal Saline)
n=19 Participants
Normal Saline (placebo) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Facial Wrinkle Scale Responders at Maximum Attempted Muscle Contraction at Day 60
|
77.8 Percentage of participants
|
5.3 Percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Botulinum Toxin Type A
Placebo (Normal Saline)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Botulinum Toxin Type A
n=19 participants at risk
Botulinum toxin Type A 20U (total dose) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
Placebo (Normal Saline)
n=20 participants at risk
Normal Saline (placebo) injected into the glabellar region on Day 0.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Coughing
|
5.3%
1/19
Serious adverse events and adverse events were assessed in all participants with at least 1 post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/20
Serious adverse events and adverse events were assessed in all participants with at least 1 post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Very small bruise
|
5.3%
1/19
Serious adverse events and adverse events were assessed in all participants with at least 1 post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/20
Serious adverse events and adverse events were assessed in all participants with at least 1 post-baseline assessment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER