Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study To Investigate The Relative Bioavailability of OZ439 Formulations In Healthy Volunteers (NCT NCT01383096)

NCT ID: NCT01383096

Last Updated: 2015-01-29

Results Overview

The maximum observed plasma drug concentrations (Cmax)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1

Target enrollment

52 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post dosing

Results posted on

2015-01-29

Participant Flow

The first subject was randomised on 19-Apr-12; The last subject last visit was on 04-Aug-12. Subjects were recruited at the study site, Nucleus Network.

There was no wash-out, run-in or transition period between enrolment and group assignment.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Cohort 1
Subjects received a single dose of OZ439 800mg PIB Fed, then OZ439 PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 with milk.
Cohort 2
Subjects received a single of OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 with milk.
Cohort 3
Subjects received a 800mg single dose of OZ439 prototype solution formulation 1 fasted and then a 400mg single dose of OZ439 of prototype solution formulation 1 fasted.
First Intervention (8 Days)
STARTED
19
17
16
First Intervention (8 Days)
COMPLETED
19
17
16
First Intervention (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
Second Intervention (8 Days)
STARTED
19
17
16
Second Intervention (8 Days)
COMPLETED
19
16
14
Second Intervention (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
0
1
2
Third Intervention (8 Days)
STARTED
19
16
0
Third Intervention (8 Days)
COMPLETED
15
12
0
Third Intervention (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
4
4
0
Fourth Intervention (8 Days)
STARTED
15
12
0
Fourth Intervention (8 Days)
COMPLETED
13
12
0
Fourth Intervention (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
2
0
0
Fifth Intervention (8 Days)
STARTED
13
0
0
Fifth Intervention (8 Days)
COMPLETED
11
0
0
Fifth Intervention (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
2
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Cohort 1
Subjects received a single dose of OZ439 800mg PIB Fed, then OZ439 PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 with milk.
Cohort 2
Subjects received a single of OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 with milk.
Cohort 3
Subjects received a 800mg single dose of OZ439 prototype solution formulation 1 fasted and then a 400mg single dose of OZ439 of prototype solution formulation 1 fasted.
Second Intervention (8 Days)
Vomited Study Drug within 30min of admin
0
0
1
Second Intervention (8 Days)
Haemoglobin was <13.5 g/dL
0
1
1
Third Intervention (8 Days)
Elevated AST
0
1
0
Third Intervention (8 Days)
Vomited Study Drug within 30min of admin
1
3
0
Third Intervention (8 Days)
Adverse Event
1
0
0
Third Intervention (8 Days)
Withdrawal by Subject
1
0
0
Third Intervention (8 Days)
QTcF was greater than 450 msec
1
0
0
Fourth Intervention (8 Days)
Haemoglobin was <13.5 g/dL
1
0
0
Fourth Intervention (8 Days)
QTcF was greater than 450 msec
1
0
0
Fifth Intervention (8 Days)
Withdrawal by Subject
1
0
0
Fifth Intervention (8 Days)
haemoglobin was <13.5 g/dL
1
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

Study To Investigate The Relative Bioavailability of OZ439 Formulations In Healthy Volunteers

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Cohort 1
n=19 Participants
Subjects received a single dose of OZ439 800mg PIB Fed, then OZ439 PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 with milk.
Cohort 2
n=17 Participants
Subjects received a single dose of OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 with milk.
Cohort 3
n=16 Participants
Subjects received a 800mg single dose of OZ439 prototype solution formulation 1 fasted and then a 400mg single dose of OZ439 of prototype solution formulation 1 fasted.
Total
n=52 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
29.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 • n=93 Participants
27.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=4 Participants
25.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=27 Participants
27.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 • n=483 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants
n=93 Participants
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
16 Participants
n=27 Participants
52 Participants
n=483 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post dosing

Population: Pharmacokinetic Population: all subjects who received study drug, and completed at least one treatment (provided they had adequate OZ439 plasma concentration data) were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis.

The maximum observed plasma drug concentrations (Cmax)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1 - Treatment A: OZ439 800mg PIB Fed
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to administration. Administered 30 minutes after a standard fatty breakfast.
Cohort 1 - Treatment B: OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted.
Cohort 1 - Treatment:OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
Cohort 1 - Treatment D: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
Cohort 1 - Treatment E: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered with milk.
Cohort 2 - Treatment F: OZ439 800 mg PIB Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted
Cohort 2 - Treatment G: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
Cohort 2 - Treatment H: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F2 Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered fasted.
Cohort 2 - Treatment I: OZ349 800mg Prototype F2 With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered with milk.
Cohort 3 - Treatment J: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
Cohort 3 - Treatment K: OZ439 400mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 400 mg as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
OZ439 Cmax
1910 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.9
827 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.7
1930 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.4
1440 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.2
1830 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.9
538 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.2
1530 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.2
846 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.9
1680 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.2
1160 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.8
719 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post dosing

Population: Pharmacokinetic Population: all subjects who received study drug, and completed at least one treatment (provided they had adequate OZ439 plasma concentration data) were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis.

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1 - Treatment A: OZ439 800mg PIB Fed
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to administration. Administered 30 minutes after a standard fatty breakfast.
Cohort 1 - Treatment B: OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted.
Cohort 1 - Treatment:OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
Cohort 1 - Treatment D: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
Cohort 1 - Treatment E: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 With Milk
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered with milk.
Cohort 2 - Treatment F: OZ439 800 mg PIB Fasted
n=10 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted
Cohort 2 - Treatment G: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
Cohort 2 - Treatment H: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F2 Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered fasted.
Cohort 2 - Treatment I: OZ349 800mg Prototype F2 With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered with milk.
Cohort 3 - Treatment J: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
Cohort 3 - Treatment K: OZ439 400mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 400 mg as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
OZ439 AUC0-∞
29200 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.2
10700 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.8
24500 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.0
19000 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.6
25800 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.9
7460 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 34.1
21600 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.0
11700 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.9
22900 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.9
13800 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.0
7410 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.3

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post dosing

Population: Pharmacokinetic Population: all subjects who received study drug, and completed at least one treatment (provided they had adequate OZ439 plasma concentration data) were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis.

Apparent terminal half life (t1/2)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1 - Treatment A: OZ439 800mg PIB Fed
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to administration. Administered 30 minutes after a standard fatty breakfast.
Cohort 1 - Treatment B: OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted.
Cohort 1 - Treatment:OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
Cohort 1 - Treatment D: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
Cohort 1 - Treatment E: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 With Milk
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered with milk.
Cohort 2 - Treatment F: OZ439 800 mg PIB Fasted
n=10 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted
Cohort 2 - Treatment G: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
Cohort 2 - Treatment H: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F2 Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered fasted.
Cohort 2 - Treatment I: OZ349 800mg Prototype F2 With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered with milk.
Cohort 3 - Treatment J: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
Cohort 3 - Treatment K: OZ439 400mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 400 mg as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
OZ439 t1/2
83.5 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.8
82.3 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.9
70.5 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45.9
90.0 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.0
79.8 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.2
84.7 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.3
79.3 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.0
85.7 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.0
70.6 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.7
63.6 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.7
91.1 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.7

Adverse Events

Cohort 1 - Treatment A: OZ439 800mg PIB Fed

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 1 - Treatment B: OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 1 - Treatment C: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 1 - Treatment D: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F1 Fasted

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 8 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 1 - Treatment E: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 With Milk

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 9 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 2 - Treatment F: OZ439 800 mg PIB Fasted

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 2 - Treatment G: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 2 - Treatment H: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F2 Fasted

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 12 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 2 - Treatment I: OZ349 800mg Prototype F2 With Milk

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 3 - Treatment J: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 Fasted

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 3 - Treatment K: OZ439 400mg Prototype F1 Fasted

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Cohort 1 - Treatment A: OZ439 800mg PIB Fed
n=17 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to administration. Administered 30 minutes after a standard fatty breakfast.
Cohort 1 - Treatment B: OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted
n=14 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted.
Cohort 1 - Treatment C: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=15 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
Cohort 1 - Treatment D: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=17 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
Cohort 1 - Treatment E: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 With Milk
n=15 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered with milk.
Cohort 2 - Treatment F: OZ439 800 mg PIB Fasted
n=13 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted.
Cohort 2 - Treatment G: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=15 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
Cohort 2 - Treatment H: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F2 Fasted
n=17 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered fasted.
Cohort 2 - Treatment I: OZ349 800mg Prototype F2 With Milk
n=13 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered with milk.
Cohort 3 - Treatment J: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
Cohort 3 - Treatment K: OZ439 400mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=16 participants at risk
OZ439 400 mg as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
41.2%
7/17 • Number of events 7 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
33.3%
5/15 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
15.4%
2/13 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
30.8%
4/13 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
35.7%
5/14 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
25.0%
4/16 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
26.7%
4/15 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
15.4%
2/13 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Discomfort
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abnormal faeces
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Neck injury
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Investigations
Blood pressure orthostatic decreased
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Sleep paralysis
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal pain
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hypoaesthesia facial
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin burning sensation
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis superficial
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Eye disorders
Photophobia
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.

Additional Information

Peter Hodsman

Nucleus Network

Phone: + 613 9076 8900

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60