Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study To Investigate The Relative Bioavailability of OZ439 Formulations In Healthy Volunteers (NCT NCT01383096)
NCT ID: NCT01383096
Last Updated: 2015-01-29
Results Overview
The maximum observed plasma drug concentrations (Cmax)
COMPLETED
PHASE1
52 participants
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post dosing
2015-01-29
Participant Flow
The first subject was randomised on 19-Apr-12; The last subject last visit was on 04-Aug-12. Subjects were recruited at the study site, Nucleus Network.
There was no wash-out, run-in or transition period between enrolment and group assignment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1
Subjects received a single dose of OZ439 800mg PIB Fed, then OZ439 PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 with milk.
|
Cohort 2
Subjects received a single of OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 with milk.
|
Cohort 3
Subjects received a 800mg single dose of OZ439 prototype solution formulation 1 fasted and then a 400mg single dose of OZ439 of prototype solution formulation 1 fasted.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention (8 Days)
STARTED
|
19
|
17
|
16
|
|
First Intervention (8 Days)
COMPLETED
|
19
|
17
|
16
|
|
First Intervention (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention (8 Days)
STARTED
|
19
|
17
|
16
|
|
Second Intervention (8 Days)
COMPLETED
|
19
|
16
|
14
|
|
Second Intervention (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
|
Third Intervention (8 Days)
STARTED
|
19
|
16
|
0
|
|
Third Intervention (8 Days)
COMPLETED
|
15
|
12
|
0
|
|
Third Intervention (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
|
Fourth Intervention (8 Days)
STARTED
|
15
|
12
|
0
|
|
Fourth Intervention (8 Days)
COMPLETED
|
13
|
12
|
0
|
|
Fourth Intervention (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Fifth Intervention (8 Days)
STARTED
|
13
|
0
|
0
|
|
Fifth Intervention (8 Days)
COMPLETED
|
11
|
0
|
0
|
|
Fifth Intervention (8 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cohort 1
Subjects received a single dose of OZ439 800mg PIB Fed, then OZ439 PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 with milk.
|
Cohort 2
Subjects received a single of OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 with milk.
|
Cohort 3
Subjects received a 800mg single dose of OZ439 prototype solution formulation 1 fasted and then a 400mg single dose of OZ439 of prototype solution formulation 1 fasted.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Second Intervention (8 Days)
Vomited Study Drug within 30min of admin
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Second Intervention (8 Days)
Haemoglobin was <13.5 g/dL
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Third Intervention (8 Days)
Elevated AST
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Third Intervention (8 Days)
Vomited Study Drug within 30min of admin
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
|
Third Intervention (8 Days)
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Third Intervention (8 Days)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Third Intervention (8 Days)
QTcF was greater than 450 msec
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Fourth Intervention (8 Days)
Haemoglobin was <13.5 g/dL
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Fourth Intervention (8 Days)
QTcF was greater than 450 msec
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Fifth Intervention (8 Days)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Fifth Intervention (8 Days)
haemoglobin was <13.5 g/dL
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study To Investigate The Relative Bioavailability of OZ439 Formulations In Healthy Volunteers
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=19 Participants
Subjects received a single dose of OZ439 800mg PIB Fed, then OZ439 PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 1 with milk.
|
Cohort 2
n=17 Participants
Subjects received a single dose of OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted, then OZ439 800mg with milk, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 Fasted, OZ439 800mg Prototype 2 with milk.
|
Cohort 3
n=16 Participants
Subjects received a 800mg single dose of OZ439 prototype solution formulation 1 fasted and then a 400mg single dose of OZ439 of prototype solution formulation 1 fasted.
|
Total
n=52 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
29.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 • n=93 Participants
|
27.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=4 Participants
|
25.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=27 Participants
|
27.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 • n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post dosingPopulation: Pharmacokinetic Population: all subjects who received study drug, and completed at least one treatment (provided they had adequate OZ439 plasma concentration data) were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis.
The maximum observed plasma drug concentrations (Cmax)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1 - Treatment A: OZ439 800mg PIB Fed
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to administration. Administered 30 minutes after a standard fatty breakfast.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment B: OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment:OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment D: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment E: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered with milk.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment F: OZ439 800 mg PIB Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment G: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment H: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F2 Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment I: OZ349 800mg Prototype F2 With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered with milk.
|
Cohort 3 - Treatment J: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 3 - Treatment K: OZ439 400mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 400 mg as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OZ439 Cmax
|
1910 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.9
|
827 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.7
|
1930 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.4
|
1440 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.2
|
1830 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.9
|
538 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.2
|
1530 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.2
|
846 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.9
|
1680 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.2
|
1160 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.8
|
719 ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post dosingPopulation: Pharmacokinetic Population: all subjects who received study drug, and completed at least one treatment (provided they had adequate OZ439 plasma concentration data) were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis.
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1 - Treatment A: OZ439 800mg PIB Fed
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to administration. Administered 30 minutes after a standard fatty breakfast.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment B: OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment:OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment D: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment E: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 With Milk
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered with milk.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment F: OZ439 800 mg PIB Fasted
n=10 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment G: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment H: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F2 Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment I: OZ349 800mg Prototype F2 With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered with milk.
|
Cohort 3 - Treatment J: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 3 - Treatment K: OZ439 400mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 400 mg as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OZ439 AUC0-∞
|
29200 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.2
|
10700 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.8
|
24500 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.0
|
19000 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.6
|
25800 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.9
|
7460 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 34.1
|
21600 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.0
|
11700 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.9
|
22900 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.9
|
13800 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.0
|
7410 ng.h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post dosingPopulation: Pharmacokinetic Population: all subjects who received study drug, and completed at least one treatment (provided they had adequate OZ439 plasma concentration data) were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis.
Apparent terminal half life (t1/2)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1 - Treatment A: OZ439 800mg PIB Fed
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to administration. Administered 30 minutes after a standard fatty breakfast.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment B: OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment:OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment D: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment E: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 With Milk
n=11 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered with milk.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment F: OZ439 800 mg PIB Fasted
n=10 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment G: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment H: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F2 Fasted
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment I: OZ349 800mg Prototype F2 With Milk
n=12 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered with milk.
|
Cohort 3 - Treatment J: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 3 - Treatment K: OZ439 400mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 Participants
OZ439 400 mg as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OZ439 t1/2
|
83.5 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.8
|
82.3 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.9
|
70.5 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45.9
|
90.0 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.0
|
79.8 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.2
|
84.7 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.3
|
79.3 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.0
|
85.7 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.0
|
70.6 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.7
|
63.6 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.7
|
91.1 hours
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.7
|
Adverse Events
Cohort 1 - Treatment A: OZ439 800mg PIB Fed
Cohort 1 - Treatment B: OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted
Cohort 1 - Treatment C: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
Cohort 1 - Treatment D: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F1 Fasted
Cohort 1 - Treatment E: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 With Milk
Cohort 2 - Treatment F: OZ439 800 mg PIB Fasted
Cohort 2 - Treatment G: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
Cohort 2 - Treatment H: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F2 Fasted
Cohort 2 - Treatment I: OZ349 800mg Prototype F2 With Milk
Cohort 3 - Treatment J: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 Fasted
Cohort 3 - Treatment K: OZ439 400mg Prototype F1 Fasted
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1 - Treatment A: OZ439 800mg PIB Fed
n=17 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to administration. Administered 30 minutes after a standard fatty breakfast.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment B: OZ439 800mg PIB Fasted
n=14 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment C: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=15 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment D: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=17 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 1 - Treatment E: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 With Milk
n=15 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 1. Administered with milk.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment F: OZ439 800 mg PIB Fasted
n=13 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment G: OZ439 800mg PIB With Milk
n=15 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as powder in a bottle (PIB) for reconstitution in a suspension prior to oral administration. Administered following 200 mL milk.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment H: OZ439 800 mg Prototype F2 Fasted
n=17 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 2 - Treatment I: OZ349 800mg Prototype F2 With Milk
n=13 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as a prototype solution formulation 2. Administered with milk.
|
Cohort 3 - Treatment J: OZ439 800mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=14 participants at risk
OZ439 800 mg (as free base) as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
Cohort 3 - Treatment K: OZ439 400mg Prototype F1 Fasted
n=16 participants at risk
OZ439 400 mg as prototype solution formulation 1. Administered fasted.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
41.2%
7/17 • Number of events 7 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
33.3%
5/15 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
15.4%
2/13 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
30.8%
4/13 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
35.7%
5/14 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
25.0%
4/16 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
26.7%
4/15 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
15.4%
2/13 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Discomfort
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abnormal faeces
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Neck injury
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure orthostatic decreased
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sleep paralysis
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hypoaesthesia facial
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin burning sensation
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis superficial
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Photophobia
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse event monitoring throughout the admission period.
The Safety population was comprised of all randomised subjects who received any amount of study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60