Transarterial RAdioembolization Versus ChemoEmbolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

NCT ID: NCT01381211

Last Updated: 2022-12-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary malignant tumor of the liver that accounts for an important health problem worldwide. In only 10% - 15% of all patients with HCC, tumors are considered resectable at presentation. In contrast to metastatic liver disease, there is no role for systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of HCC. Today only evidence is available for Sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibiting agent. The arsenal of non-surgical therapies can roughly be divided into local ablative, transarterial and systemic therapies. In well selected patients, local ablative therapy can offer favorable long term results.

For patients with disease confined to the liver, but locally more advanced, transarterial treatment modalities are proposed. These therapies exploit the dual blood supply to the liver. HCC derives its blood supply almost entirely from the hepatic artery, while liver parenchyma derives \> 75% of its blood supply from the portal vein. Antitumoral agents, such as cytotoxic drugs or radionuclides, can be delivered in close proximity of the tumor.

Examples of transarterial therapies are: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), bland transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads (TACE-DEB) and transarterial radioembolization with Iodine-131 or Yttrium-90.

TACE is currently the gold standard for treatment of patients with intermediate stage HCC, with a reported median survival of around 17 months. A novel development in the TACE treatment for HCC is the drug-eluting bead (DEB). Recently performed small clinical trials reported the efficacy of DEBs in the treatment of intermediate stage HCC, which is substantially higher compared to conventional TACE.

Yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE) is a relatively recently developed technique which implements transarterial administration of minimally embolic microspheres loaded with Yttrium-90, a β-emitting isotope, delivering selective internal radiation to the tumor.

In this study the investigators want to prospectively compare TACE-DEB and 90Y-RE, two novel treatments that both have theoretical and/or proven advantages compared to the use of conventional TACE, in patients with intermediate stage HCC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

90Y-RE

Intervention Type DRUG

Glass Yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere®; MDS Nordion Inc.) will be used

Transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads

Transarterial chemoembolization is performed with drug eluting beads, polyvinyl alcohol-based microspheres (DC Beads, Biocompatibles) loaded with the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TACE-DEB

Intervention Type DRUG

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is performed with drug eluting beads (DEB), polyvinyl alcohol-based microspheres loaded with the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TACE-DEB

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is performed with drug eluting beads (DEB), polyvinyl alcohol-based microspheres loaded with the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin.

Intervention Type DRUG

90Y-RE

Glass Yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere®; MDS Nordion Inc.) will be used

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written informed consent.
* The diagnosis HCC is confirmed by typical appearance on imaging or cytohistological evaluation (liver biopsy).
* Accurate staging:

MRI of the liver CT-scan of the abdomen and thorax bone scintigraphy, only in case of clinical symptoms suggestive of skeletal metastases.

Exclusion Criteria

* Hypersensitivity to doxorubicin
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Age under 18 years
* Child-Pugh score \>B7
* ECOG performance status (PST) \> 1
* Bilirubin \> 2.6 mg/dl
* AST/ALT \>5x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* \>50% of liver involvement
* Main portal vein (right, left or common trunk) thrombosis
* Extra-hepatic disease
* Previous treatment of study target lesions
* 99mTc-labelled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) scintigraphy shows lack of MAA uptake in tumor (photopenic lesion)
* Activity \> 610 MBq and activity reduction would imply a liver target dose \> 80 Gy
* patients who are declared incompetent or suffering from physic disorders that make a comprehensive judgement impossible, such as psychosis.
* Unmanageable intolerance for contrast medium
* Life expectancy \< 3 months or otherwise impossible follow-up
* Inadequate bone marrow, liver and/or renal function
* other contraindications to hepatic embolization procedures.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luc Defreyne, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Ghent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dhondt E, Lambert B, Hermie L, Huyck L, Vanlangenhove P, Geerts A, Verhelst X, Aerts M, Vanlander A, Berrevoet F, Troisi RI, Van Vlierberghe H, Defreyne L. 90Y Radioembolization versus Drug-eluting Bead Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results from the TRACE Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial. Radiology. 2022 Jun;303(3):699-710. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211806. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35258371 (View on PubMed)

Seinstra BA, Defreyne L, Lambert B, Lam MG, Verkooijen HM, van Erpecum KJ, van Hoek B, van Erkel AR, Coenraad MJ, Al Younis I, van Vlierberghe H, van den Bosch MA. Transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (TRACE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Aug 23;13:144. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-144.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22913492 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011/050

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id