Trial Outcomes & Findings for REMEMBER: Reducing Early Mortality & Morbidity by Empiric Tuberculosis (TB) Treatment (NCT NCT01380080)
NCT ID: NCT01380080
Last Updated: 2024-10-15
Results Overview
The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of death or unknown vital status by week 24. The vital status was considered unknown at week 24 if a participant prematurely discontinued from the study before week 24 and no vital status was obtained at week 48.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
851 participants
From study entry to week 24
2024-10-15
Participant Flow
Recruited at AIDS Clinical Trials Units in 10 international countries. Recruitment occurred between October 31, 2011 (date of first participant was randomized) and June 9, 2014 (date of last participant was randomized).
851 were randomized 1:1 to treatment strategies A and B. Results reported for 850 eligible participants; 1 was subsequently found ineligible and excluded from all analyses.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
424
|
426
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
339
|
343
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
85
|
83
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
36
|
44
|
|
Overall Study
Site is closing
|
28
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
Not able to get to clinic
|
7
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Not willing to adhere to requirements
|
6
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
REMEMBER: Reducing Early Mortality & Morbidity by Empiric Tuberculosis (TB) Treatment
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
Total
n=850 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
36 years
n=5 Participants
|
35 years
n=7 Participants
|
36 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
200 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
200 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
400 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
224 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
226 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
450 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black Non-Hispanic
|
375 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
384 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
759 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic (Regardless of Race)
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian, Pacific Islander
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Haiti
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
109 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Malawi
|
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
193 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Zimbabwe
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Uganda
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Zambia
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Kenya
|
77 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
152 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Peru
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
India
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HIV-1 RNA
|
5.4 log10 copies/mL
n=5 Participants
|
5.3 log10 copies/mL
n=7 Participants
|
5.3 log10 copies/mL
n=5 Participants
|
|
CD4+ T-cell count
|
18 cells/mm^3
n=5 Participants
|
19 cells/mm^3
n=7 Participants
|
18 cells/mm^3
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 24Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of death or unknown vital status by week 24. The vital status was considered unknown at week 24 if a participant prematurely discontinued from the study before week 24 and no vital status was obtained at week 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Probability of Death or Unknown Vital Status by Week 24
|
5.2 Cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 3.5 to 7.8
|
5.2 Cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 3.4 to 7.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 24Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
The Kaplan-Meier estimate of cumulative probability of death by week 24
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Probability of Death by Week 24
|
4.8 Cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 3.1 to 7.3
|
5.2 Cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 3.4 to 7.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 96Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of first AIDS progression which was defined as the identification of a new World Health Organization (WHO) stage 3 or 4 condition
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Probability of First AIDS Progression by Week 96
|
16.6 Cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 13.3 to 20.6
|
11.3 Cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 8.6 to 14.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 24Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of death or AIDS progression by week 24. AIDS progression was defined as new WHO stage 3 or 4 conditions occurred after study entry.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Probability of Death or AIDS Progression by Week 24
|
17.1 Cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 13.9 to 21.1
|
12.5 Cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 9.7 to 16.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At weeks 0, 4, 24, and 48Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. Missing data were assumed missing completed at random.
Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA level \<400 copies/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <400 Copies/mL
Week 0
|
0 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.02
|
0.01 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.03
|
|
Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <400 Copies/mL
Week 4
|
0.46 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.41 to 0.51
|
0.49 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.44 to 0.55
|
|
Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <400 Copies/mL
Week 24
|
0.84 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.79 to 0.87
|
0.85 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.81 to 0.89
|
|
Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <400 Copies/mL
Week 48
|
0.87 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.83 to 0.9
|
0.89 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.86 to 0.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At weeks 0, 4, 24, and 48Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: Participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. Missing data were assigned missing completely at random.
The absolute levels of CD4+ T-cell counts (cells/mm\^3)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
CD4+ T-cell Count
Week 0
|
18 cells/ mm^3
Interval 9.0 to 31.0
|
19 cells/ mm^3
Interval 9.0 to 33.0
|
|
CD4+ T-cell Count
Week 4
|
74 cells/ mm^3
Interval 37.0 to 118.0
|
76 cells/ mm^3
Interval 41.0 to 123.0
|
|
CD4+ T-cell Count
Week 24
|
121 cells/ mm^3
Interval 75.0 to 172.0
|
121 cells/ mm^3
Interval 80.0 to 188.0
|
|
CD4+ T-cell Count
Week 48
|
176 cells/ mm^3
Interval 112.0 to 251.0
|
172 cells/ mm^3
Interval 112.0 to 245.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 4, 24 and 48Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. Missing data were assumed missing completely at random.
Change was calculated as the CD4+ T-cell count at the later weeks (4, 24 and 48) minus the baseline (week 0) CD4+ T-cell count.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
CD4+ T-cell Count Change From Baseline
Week 4
|
49 cells/ mm^3
Interval 20.0 to 91.0
|
54 cells/ mm^3
Interval 22.0 to 94.0
|
|
CD4+ T-cell Count Change From Baseline
Week 24
|
96 cells/ mm^3
Interval 55.0 to 147.0
|
102 cells/ mm^3
Interval 60.0 to 159.0
|
|
CD4+ T-cell Count Change From Baseline
Week 48
|
158 cells/ mm^3
Interval 92.0 to 224.0
|
146 cells/ mm^3
Interval 90.0 to 219.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 96Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
Median time to TB treatment initiation since study entry
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Initiation of TB Treatment by Week 96
|
0 Days
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 Days
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 96Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
Proportion of participants with TB diagnosis per current ACTG Diagnosis Appendix 60 by week 96
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With TB Diagnosis by Week 96
|
0.08 Proportion of participants
|
0.05 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
Proportion of participants with at least one new Grade 3 or 4 laboratory or sign or symptom that is at least a one-grade increase from baseline by Week 48. Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-Threatening according to DAIDS AE Grading Table (see references).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With at Least One New Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event That is at Least a One-grade Increase From Baseline by Week 48
|
0.32 Proportion of participants
|
0.30 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48. The lab events were collected at study entry, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 48.Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
Proportion of participants with at least one new Grade 3 or 4 that is at least a one-grade increase from baseline for the following targeted laboratory values by Week 48 The targeted laboratory events include hemoglobin, serum creatinine, ALT and AST
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With at Least One New Grade 3 or 4 Targeted Laboratory Value That is at Least a One-grade Increase From Baseline by Week 48
|
0.11 Proportion of participants
|
0.13 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
Proportion of participants with IRIS (using current ACTG definition Appendix 60, see References) by Week 48. IRIS in participants with TB and other opportunistic infections may occur shortly after the initiation of potent combination ART, particularly in participants with advanced HIV disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS) by Week 48
|
0.04 Proportion of participants
|
0.05 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
Proportion of participants with reportable hospitalization reported by Week 48
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With Reportable Hospitalization by Week 48
|
0.10 Proportion of participants
|
0.12 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
Proportion of participants with premature discontinuation of any component of TB treatment by Week 48
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Who Prematurely Discontinued Any Component of TB Treatment by Week 48
|
0.13 Proportion of participants
|
0.05 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment
Proportion of participants with premature discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) by Week 48
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Who Prematurely Discontinued Antiretroviral Therapy by Week 48
|
0.19 Proportion of participants
|
0.21 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From study entry to week 48Population: Intent to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment.
The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of death or AIDS progression by week 48. AIDS progression was defined as new WHO stage 3 or 4 conditions occurred after study entry.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 Participants
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 Participants
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Probability of Death or AIDS Progression by Week 48
|
19.3 Cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 15.8 to 23.4
|
15.3 Cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 12.2 to 19.1
|
Adverse Events
Arm A: Empiric
Arm B: IPT
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 participants at risk
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 participants at risk
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.7%
7/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
1.6%
7/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.7%
7/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Faecaloma
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.47%
2/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.47%
2/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.47%
2/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
1.9%
8/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Drug-induced liver injury
|
0.94%
4/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.70%
3/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis acute
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis alcoholic
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatotoxicity
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
0.47%
2/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hypertransaminasaemia
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Atypical pneumonia
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial sepsis
|
0.47%
2/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.47%
2/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Central nervous system infection
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cerebral toxoplasmosis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus chorioretinitis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diarrhoea infectious
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Disseminated tuberculosis
|
0.47%
2/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Furuncle
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
1.4%
6/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
1.4%
6/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
HIV infection
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Histoplasmosis disseminated
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome associated tuberculosis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lymph node tuberculosis
|
0.47%
2/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Malaria
|
0.71%
3/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.47%
2/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis bacterial
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.47%
2/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis cryptococcal
|
1.4%
6/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
2.1%
9/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis tuberculous
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
1.2%
5/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis viral
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Neurosyphilis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oesophageal candidiasis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Periorbital cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.7%
7/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.70%
3/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
|
1.2%
5/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.70%
3/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary tuberculosis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Salmonella sepsis
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.47%
2/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.94%
4/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tuberculoma of central nervous system
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tuberculosis
|
0.94%
4/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Typhoid fever
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral vasculitis
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.71%
3/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.47%
2/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
1.2%
5/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.47%
2/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Anogenital warts
|
0.47%
2/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hairy cell leukaemia
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Kaposi's sarcoma
|
0.71%
3/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oesophageal carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.47%
2/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic cerebral infarction
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Acute psychosis
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.47%
2/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Reactive psychosis
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.70%
3/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Chronic kidney disease
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine prolapse
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Stevens-Johnson syndrome
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Abortion induced
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cryptococcal fungaemia
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Abnormal loss of weight
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Brain neoplasm
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
|
0.24%
1/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.00%
0/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
0.23%
1/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Arm A: Empiric
n=424 participants at risk
Study treatment for Arm A participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral treatment as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization plus a 4-drug anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) regimen (defined as rifampin/isoniazid/ethambutol/pyrazinamide) as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 7 days following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. After 2 months (or 8 weeks), the 4-drug ATT will be followed with 4 months (or 16 weeks) of 2-drug ATT (defined as rifampin/isoniazid). All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only
|
Arm B: IPT
n=426 participants at risk
Study treatment for Arm B participants is the strategy of initiating study-provided or other FDA-approved or tentatively approved antiretroviral therapy as soon as possible following randomization and within no more than 3 days following randomization and of initiating anti-TB treatment (ATT) only when indicated according to local standard practice and at the discretion of the site investigator. All participants will be followed through week 96. Drug provision by or through the study will be through week 48 only. Pyridoxine is provided by the sites to all participants while they are receiving isoniazid (INH).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
6.6%
28/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
6.1%
26/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
9.9%
42/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
8.0%
34/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.2%
22/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
5.2%
22/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
9.2%
39/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
12.0%
51/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
10.8%
46/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
12.9%
55/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
|
11.6%
49/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
11.5%
49/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary tuberculosis
|
5.2%
22/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
3.1%
13/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
13.7%
58/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
17.6%
75/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
23.3%
99/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
23.7%
101/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Blood albumin decreased
|
35.6%
151/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
37.3%
159/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
8.5%
36/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
10.1%
43/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bicarbonate decreased
|
15.6%
66/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
16.9%
72/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
5.9%
25/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
10.6%
45/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium decreased
|
7.5%
32/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
7.3%
31/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Blood sodium decreased
|
34.0%
144/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
32.9%
140/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
28.1%
119/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
22.3%
95/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
38.0%
161/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
38.3%
163/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
7.5%
32/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
8.9%
38/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
8.0%
34/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
5.9%
25/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
32.1%
136/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
30.5%
130/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.4%
27/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
10.1%
43/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
|
5.2%
22/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
2.3%
10/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
9.7%
41/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
11.3%
48/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal plaque
|
10.1%
43/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
7.5%
32/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
5.0%
21/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
5.2%
22/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
4.2%
18/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
5.2%
22/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
|
5.4%
23/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
4.9%
21/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Investigations
Blood sodium increased
|
5.2%
22/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
3.3%
14/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
4.2%
18/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
5.4%
23/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.0%
21/424 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
7.3%
31/426 • From treatment dispensation to up to week 96
The protocol required reporting of signs and symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of \>=Grade 2 and all grades of fever. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) and EAE Manual (V2.0) were used.
|
Additional Information
ACTG Clinicaltrials.gov Coordinator
ACTG Network Coordinating Center, Social & Scientific Systems, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee In accordance with the Clinical Trials Agreement between NIAID (DAIDS) and company collaborators, NIAID (DAIDS) provides companies with a copy of any abstract, press release, or manuscript prior to submission for publication with sufficient time for company review and comment. The publication/other disclosure can be delayed for up to 30 additional business days for manuscripts and five (5) business days for abstracts, to preserve U.S. or foreign patent or other intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER