The Trial Comparing Dose-dense AC-T With PC as Adjuvant Therapy for TNBC

NCT ID: NCT01378533

Last Updated: 2011-12-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this trial is to compare the 3 years DFS of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as adjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer.

The other purpose of this trial is to observe the patient's tolerance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast cancer are heterogeneous group of tumors with diverse behavior, outcome, and sensitivity to therapy.In recent years, the term triple negative (TN) breast cancer has emerged to describe those cancers which do not express oestrogen (ER) , progesterone (PR) receptors, or Her2. Many studies had estimated that TN cases represents between 12%-20% of all breast cancers. Those TN case constitute one of the most challenging breast cancer groups, with only systemic chemotherapy is currently available for their treatment.

BRCA1 protein normally functions as a negative regulator of the cell cycle, also, BRCA1-positive tumors encompass a heterogeneous group of tumors that show distinctive pathological and clinical features. BRCA1-associated cancers are typically high-grade invasive duct carcinoma and are mostly triple negative.The phenotypic and molecular similarity of the TNBCs to BRCA1-associated BCs might be of use in designing their treatment protocol. There is increasing evidence that the DNA repair defects that are characteristic of BRCA-1 related cancers may provide sensitivity to certain systemic agents to treat TNBC patients such as the bifunctional alkylating agents and platinum drugs.

Dose density refers to the administration of drugs with a shortened intertreatment interval. It is based on the observation that in experimental models, a given dose always kills a certain fraction, rather than a certain number, of exponentially growing cancer cells. Because human cancers in general, and breast cancers in particular, usually grow by nonexponential Gompertzian kinetics, this model has been extended to those situations. Regrowth of cancer cells between cycles of cytoreduction is more rapid in volume-reduced Gompertzian cancer models than in exponential models. Hence it has been hypothesized that the more frequent administration of cytotoxic therapy would be a more effective way of minimizing residual tumor burden than dose escalation. In the INT C9741 trial, the dose-dense schedule is accomplished by using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) to permit every-2-week recycling of the drugs A, T and C at their optimal dose levels rather than at the conventional 3-week intervals.Sequential therapy refers to the application of treatments one at a time rather than concurrently. It does not challenge the concept that multiple drugs are needed to maximally perturb cancers that are composed of cells heterogeneous in drug sensitivity. Rather, it hypothesizes that for slow-growing cancers like most breast cancers, it is more important to preserve dose density than to force a combination, especially if that combination would be more toxic and requires dose-reductions or delays in drug administration. If dose density is the same in a sequential combination chemotherapy regimen and a concurrent combination regimen, theoretical considerations indicate that the therapeutic result should be the same, even if the sequential pattern happens to be less toxic.

In our trial, we want to compare the 3 years DFS of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as adjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer.The other purpose of this trial is to observe the patient's tolerance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

triple-negative breast cancer dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel(AC-T) paclitaxel plus carboplatin(PC) 3 years DFS the tolerance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AC-T(dose-dense)

AC-T(dose-dense) EPI(Pharmorubicin) CTX(cyclophosphamide) PTX(Paclitaxel) G-CSF

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, carboplatin, G-CSF

Intervention Type DRUG

epirubicin 80mg/m2 iv d1 or divide in two days cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 iv d1 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*4cycles paclitaxel 175mg/m2 iv d1 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*4cycles paclitaxel 150mg/m2 iv d1 carboplatin AUC=3 iv d2 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*8cycles

chemotherapy:PC

PTX(Paclitaxel) CBP(carboplatin)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, carboplatin, G-CSF

Intervention Type DRUG

epirubicin 80mg/m2 iv d1 or divide in two days cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 iv d1 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*4cycles paclitaxel 175mg/m2 iv d1 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*4cycles paclitaxel 150mg/m2 iv d1 carboplatin AUC=3 iv d2 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*8cycles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, carboplatin, G-CSF

epirubicin 80mg/m2 iv d1 or divide in two days cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 iv d1 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*4cycles paclitaxel 175mg/m2 iv d1 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*4cycles paclitaxel 150mg/m2 iv d1 carboplatin AUC=3 iv d2 G-CSF 3ug/kg ih d5-9 q14d\*8cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

pharmorubicin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient must accept the modified radical mastectomy
2. Patients with histologically confirmed ER(-) PR(-) and HER-2(-)
3. Positive axillary lymph nodes;negative axillary lymph node with age\< 35 years or Ⅲ grade or intravascular cancer embolus.
4. Age between 18 years to 65 years
5. Able to give informed consent
6. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0 or 1.
7. Not pregnant, and on appropriate birth control if of child-bearing potential.
8. Adequate bone marrow reserve with ANC \> 1000 and platelets \> 100,000.
9. Adequate renal function with serum creatinine \< 2.0.
10. Adequate hepatic reserve with serum bilirubin \< 2.0, AST/ALT \< 2X the upper limit of normal, and alkaline phosphatase \< 5X the upper limit of normal. Serum bilirubin \> 2.0 is acceptable in the setting of known Gilbert's syndrome.
11. No active major medical or psychosocial problems that could be complicated by study participation.

Exclusion Criteria

1. received neo-adjuvant therapy
2. Cardiac dysfunction documented by an ejection fraction less than the lower limit of the facility normal by multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan, or 45% by echocardiogram. -The rate of Disease recurrence
3. Uncontrolled medical problems.
4. Evidence of active acute or chronic infection.
5. Pregnant or breast feeding.
6. Hepatic, renal, or bone marrow dysfunction as detailed above.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

li qing

chief physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

qing li, bachelor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cancer institute and hospital Chinese academy of medical sciences

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

qing li, bachelor

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0086-010-87788120

Email: [email protected]

ying han, master

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0086-010-87788120

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

qing li, bachelor

Role: primary

ying han, master

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CH-BC-012

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CH-BC-012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id