Trial Outcomes & Findings for Iodixanol Versus Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Imaging of Abdomen/Pelvis (NCT NCT01376089)
NCT ID: NCT01376089
Last Updated: 2013-12-19
Results Overview
Number of subjects experiencing any moderate (score of 4 - 7) to severe (score 8 - 10) discomfort for cold or heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
304 participants
Within 10 minutes post contrast administration
2013-12-19
Participant Flow
A total of 304 subjects were enrolled in this study, however, 5 subjects did not receive contrast media due to administrative and /or technical reason leaving 299 subjects included in the analysis.
A total of 304 subjects were enrolled in this study, however, 5 subjects did not receive contrast media due to administrative and /or technical reason leaving 299 subjects included in the analysis.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1-Iodixanol
Subjects were injected with Iodixanol (Visipaque).
|
Arm 2-Iopamidol
Subjects were injected with Iopamidol (Isovue).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
151
|
148
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
148
|
144
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm 1-Iodixanol
Subjects were injected with Iodixanol (Visipaque).
|
Arm 2-Iopamidol
Subjects were injected with Iopamidol (Isovue).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Patient received no contrast media
|
3
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Iodixanol Versus Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Imaging of Abdomen/Pelvis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1-Iodixanol
n=151 Participants
|
Arm 2-Iopamidol
n=148 Participants
|
Total
n=299 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
182 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
117 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.23 • n=5 Participants
|
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.02 • n=7 Participants
|
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.10 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
148 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
151 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
65 participants
n=5 Participants
|
62 participants
n=7 Participants
|
127 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
45 participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 participants
n=7 Participants
|
88 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
35 participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 10 minutes post contrast administrationNumber of subjects experiencing any moderate (score of 4 - 7) to severe (score 8 - 10) discomfort for cold or heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque)
n=151 Participants
Subjects injected with Visipaque contrast media. Number of subjects with any Moderate / Severe discomfort.
|
Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue)
n=147 Participants
Subjects injected with Isovue contrast media. Number of subjects with any Moderate / Severe discomfort.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Subjects With Moderate/Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
|
53 Number of Subjects with discomfort
Interval 27.49 to 42.71
|
99 Number of Subjects with discomfort
Interval 59.77 to 74.93
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 10 minutes post contrast administration.Number of subjects experiencing moderate (score of 4 -7) to severe (score of 8 - 10) discomfort for cold, heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque)
n=151 Participants
Subjects injected with Visipaque contrast media. Number of subjects with any Moderate / Severe discomfort.
|
Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue)
n=147 Participants
Subjects injected with Isovue contrast media. Number of subjects with any Moderate / Severe discomfort.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Subjects With Moderate / Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
Discomfort of Cold
|
5 Number of Subjects with discomfort
Interval 0.46 to 6.17
|
11 Number of Subjects with discomfort
Interval 3.23 to 11.74
|
|
Frequency of Subjects With Moderate / Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
Discomfort of Heat
|
45 Number of Subjects with discomfort
Interval 22.51 to 37.1
|
94 Number of Subjects with discomfort
Interval 56.18 to 71.71
|
|
Frequency of Subjects With Moderate / Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
Discomfort of Pain
|
5 Number of Subjects with discomfort
Interval 0.46 to 6.17
|
3 Number of Subjects with discomfort
Interval 0.0 to 4.33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Ten minutes post contrast administration.Overall Image Quality rated as 'Excellent, Adequate or Poor' by radiologists blinded to the contrast administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque)
n=151 Participants
Subjects injected with Visipaque contrast media. Number of subjects with any Moderate / Severe discomfort.
|
Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue)
n=148 Participants
Subjects injected with Isovue contrast media. Number of subjects with any Moderate / Severe discomfort.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
Image Quality was Poor
|
0 Number of subject images
|
1 Number of subject images
|
|
Comparison of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
Image Quality was Excellent
|
144 Number of subject images
|
133 Number of subject images
|
|
Comparison of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.
Image Quality was Adequate
|
7 Number of subject images
|
14 Number of subject images
|
Adverse Events
Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque 320mgI/mL)
Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue 370mgI/mL)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque 320mgI/mL)
n=151 participants at risk
Subjects injected with Visipaque 320mgI/mL contrast media.
|
Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue 370mgI/mL)
n=148 participants at risk
Subject injected with Isovue 370mgI/mL contrast media.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Acute Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/151
|
0.68%
1/148 • Number of events 1
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1-Iodixanol (Visipaque 320mgI/mL)
n=151 participants at risk
Subjects injected with Visipaque 320mgI/mL contrast media.
|
Arm 2-Iopamidol (Isovue 370mgI/mL)
n=148 participants at risk
Subject injected with Isovue 370mgI/mL contrast media.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal
|
6.6%
10/151 • Number of events 10
|
6.8%
10/148 • Number of events 10
|
|
General disorders
General disorder: Feeling Cold
|
5.3%
8/151 • Number of events 8
|
5.4%
8/148 • Number of events 8
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervousness
|
8.6%
13/151 • Number of events 13
|
6.1%
9/148 • Number of events 9
|
|
General disorders
General Disorders: Feeling Hot
|
51.0%
77/151 • Number of events 77
|
62.2%
92/148 • Number of events 92
|
|
General disorders
Administration Site Conditions: Injection Site Coldness
|
3.3%
5/151 • Number of events 5
|
6.1%
9/148 • Number of events 9
|
|
General disorders
Administration Site Conditions: Injection Site Reaction
|
19.9%
30/151 • Number of events 30
|
21.6%
32/148 • Number of events 32
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place