Trial Outcomes & Findings for 3-month Study of MSDC-0160 Effects on Brain Glucose Utilization, Cognition & Safety in Subjects With Alzheimer's Disease (NCT NCT01374438)
NCT ID: NCT01374438
Last Updated: 2014-11-18
Results Overview
Investigate the effect of 150 mg daily MSDC-0160 vs placebo on 3-month change in brain glucose utilization using FDG-PET pre-specified regions of interest analysis referenced to cerebellum, including five bilateral regions: posterior cingulate, parietal cortex (angular gyrus), lateral temporal cortex, medial temporal cortex, and anterior cingulate-medial frontal cortex. Results are reported as Standardized Uptake Value Ratios. A change from baseline in the metabolic rate of glucose that is ≥0 indicates maintenance of brain glucose utilization, whereas values \<0 indicate a decline in brain glucose utilization.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
29 participants
Days 1(baseline) and 91
2014-11-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
MSDC-0160 Capsules
MSDC tablets contained in #00 capsules
MSDC-0160: MSDC-0160 150 mg capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
Placebo Capsules
Placebo tablets contained in #00 capsules
Placebo: Placebo capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
3-month Study of MSDC-0160 Effects on Brain Glucose Utilization, Cognition & Safety in Subjects With Alzheimer's Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
MSDC-0160 Capsules
n=16 Participants
MSDC tablets contained in #00 capsules
MSDC-0160: MSDC-0160 150 mg capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
Placebo Capsules
n=13 Participants
Placebo tablets contained in #00 capsules
Placebo: Placebo capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
Total
n=29 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
72.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=5 Participants
|
71.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=7 Participants
|
71.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Presence of an Apolipoprotein E e4 allele
Apo E e4 allele present
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Presence of an Apolipoprotein E e4 allele
Apo E e4 allelle absent
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Mini-Mental State Examination Score
|
22.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=5 Participants
|
25.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=7 Participants
|
23.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1(baseline) and 91Population: Intent-to-treat
Investigate the effect of 150 mg daily MSDC-0160 vs placebo on 3-month change in brain glucose utilization using FDG-PET pre-specified regions of interest analysis referenced to cerebellum, including five bilateral regions: posterior cingulate, parietal cortex (angular gyrus), lateral temporal cortex, medial temporal cortex, and anterior cingulate-medial frontal cortex. Results are reported as Standardized Uptake Value Ratios. A change from baseline in the metabolic rate of glucose that is ≥0 indicates maintenance of brain glucose utilization, whereas values \<0 indicate a decline in brain glucose utilization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MSDC-0160 Capsules
n=16 Participants
MSDC tablets contained in #00 capsules
MSDC-0160: MSDC-0160 150 mg capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
Placebo Capsules
n=13 Participants
Placebo tablets contained in #00 capsules
Placebo: Placebo capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Effects of MSDC-0160 on Cerebral Metabolic Glucose Rate or Placebo Over 12 Weeks in Pre-specified Regions of Interest Analysis Referenced to Cerebellum
Ant. cing.-frontal cortex
|
0.00 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
-0.03 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
|
Effects of MSDC-0160 on Cerebral Metabolic Glucose Rate or Placebo Over 12 Weeks in Pre-specified Regions of Interest Analysis Referenced to Cerebellum
Posterior cingulate
|
0.01 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
-0.02 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
|
Effects of MSDC-0160 on Cerebral Metabolic Glucose Rate or Placebo Over 12 Weeks in Pre-specified Regions of Interest Analysis Referenced to Cerebellum
Parietal cingulate
|
0.01 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
-0.03 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
|
Effects of MSDC-0160 on Cerebral Metabolic Glucose Rate or Placebo Over 12 Weeks in Pre-specified Regions of Interest Analysis Referenced to Cerebellum
Lateral temporal cortex
|
0.00 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
-0.02 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
|
Effects of MSDC-0160 on Cerebral Metabolic Glucose Rate or Placebo Over 12 Weeks in Pre-specified Regions of Interest Analysis Referenced to Cerebellum
Medial temporal cortex
|
0.01 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
-0.01 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1 (baseline) and 91Change from baseline in cognitive function, as determined by global cognitive function on a neuropsychological battery of 19 tests, following 3 months treatment with MSDC-0160 versus placebo. A summary measure of global cognitive function was constructed by converting raw scores from 19 individual tests into z-scores as described by Bennett DA, et al., The Rush Memory and Aging Project: study design and baseline characteristics of the study cohort, Neuroepidemiology. 2005;25(4):163-175.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MSDC-0160 Capsules
n=16 Participants
MSDC tablets contained in #00 capsules
MSDC-0160: MSDC-0160 150 mg capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
Placebo Capsules
n=13 Participants
Placebo tablets contained in #00 capsules
Placebo: Placebo capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Global Cognitive Function Tests
|
-0.06 z-scores
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.03 z-scores
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1 (baseline) and 91Population: One subject in the MSDC-0160 group and 2 subjects in the placebo group were not able to complete the ADAS-Cog tests at both study time points.
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale, an assessment of cognitive ability. Scores on 11 individual tasks were summed to produce the reported total score, with a possible range of 0 (no impairment) to 70 (severe impairment).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MSDC-0160 Capsules
n=15 Participants
MSDC tablets contained in #00 capsules
MSDC-0160: MSDC-0160 150 mg capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
Placebo Capsules
n=11 Participants
Placebo tablets contained in #00 capsules
Placebo: Placebo capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Determined by the ADAS-Cog Subscale
|
0.69 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.62
|
2.21 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1 (baseline) and 91Population: One subject in the MSDC-0160 group and 2 subjects in the placebo group were not able to complete the executive function tests at both study time points.
Estimate of the effect of 3-months of MSDC-0160 treatment versus placebo on a 9-item executive function scale. A summary measure of executive function was constructed by converting raw scores from 9 individual tests into z-scores as described by Bennett DA, et al., The Rush Memory and Aging Project: study design and baseline characteristics of the study cohort, Neuroepidemiology. 2005;25(4):163-175.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MSDC-0160 Capsules
n=15 Participants
MSDC tablets contained in #00 capsules
MSDC-0160: MSDC-0160 150 mg capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
Placebo Capsules
n=11 Participants
Placebo tablets contained in #00 capsules
Placebo: Placebo capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Estimate With the Executive Function Scale
|
-0.04 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
0.00 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1(baseline) and 91Estimate the effect of 150 mg daily MSDC-0160 versus placebo on levels of high molecular weight adiponectin. Increases in HMW adiponectin suggest improved insulin sensitivity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MSDC-0160 Capsules
n=16 Participants
MSDC tablets contained in #00 capsules
MSDC-0160: MSDC-0160 150 mg capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
Placebo Capsules
n=13 Participants
Placebo tablets contained in #00 capsules
Placebo: Placebo capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HMW Adiponectin of MSDC-0160 or Placebo Over 12 Weeks
|
17822 micromol/L
Standard Deviation 10940
|
795 micromol/L
Standard Deviation 4477
|
Adverse Events
MSDC-0160 Capsules
Placebo Capsules
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
MSDC-0160 Capsules
n=16 participants at risk
MSDC tablets contained in #00 capsules
MSDC-0160: MSDC-0160 150 mg capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
Placebo Capsules
n=13 participants at risk
Placebo tablets contained in #00 capsules
Placebo: Placebo capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
MSDC-0160 Capsules
n=16 participants at risk
MSDC tablets contained in #00 capsules
MSDC-0160: MSDC-0160 150 mg capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
Placebo Capsules
n=13 participants at risk
Placebo tablets contained in #00 capsules
Placebo: Placebo capsules given once daily for 90 days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 2 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/16 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 3 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral Edema
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Laceration
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoechoic nodule
|
0.00%
0/16 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in hip
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Depression
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Scrotal varicose vein rupture
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
0.00%
0/13 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nose bleed
|
0.00%
0/16 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Patent foramen ovale
|
0.00%
0/16 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
QTcB elevation
|
0.00%
0/16 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive decline, subjective
|
0.00%
0/16 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope, vasovagal
|
0.00%
0/16 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • Collection of safety data began in August 2011, when the first subject was randomized, and continued until March 19, 2013, when all 29 subjects had completed all study activities.
Subjects were asked to report any adverse events during each study visit.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Jerry Colca
Metabolic Solutions Development Company
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60