Trial Outcomes & Findings for Akt Inhibitor MK2206, Bendamustine Hydrochloride, and Rituximab in Treating Patients With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (NCT NCT01369849)
NCT ID: NCT01369849
Last Updated: 2017-09-15
Results Overview
The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) is defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients graded according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Dose-limiting toxicities include non-hematologic events graded 3 or higher and deemed at least possibly related to treatment. A total of 6 patients treated at the MTD will be sufficient to identify common toxicities at the MTD.The number of patients reporting a dose-limiting event are reported.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
15 participants
Up to 35 days
2017-09-15
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
6
|
4
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
3
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Ineligible prior to treatment
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Ineligible after receiving treatment
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Akt Inhibitor MK2206, Bendamustine Hydrochloride, and Rituximab in Treating Patients With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=6 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
n=4 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
n=4 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Total
n=14 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.5 years
n=5 Participants
|
66.5 years
n=7 Participants
|
65 years
n=5 Participants
|
67 years
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 35 daysPopulation: Only the patients registered to the Phase I portion of this study were analyzed for this endpoint. One of the 4 patients accrued to dose level 2 was not eligible for this endpoint. Therefore, 6 patients at Dose Level 1 and 3 patients at Dose Level 2 are included in this endpoint.
The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) is defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients graded according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Dose-limiting toxicities include non-hematologic events graded 3 or higher and deemed at least possibly related to treatment. A total of 6 patients treated at the MTD will be sufficient to identify common toxicities at the MTD.The number of patients reporting a dose-limiting event are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=6 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
n=3 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Phase I Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicity Events (Phase I)
|
1 Patients reporting Dose-Limiting Events
|
2 Patients reporting Dose-Limiting Events
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From registration to response, up to 84 daysPopulation: All eligible patients treated at Dose Level 1 were included in the Phase II primary endpoint. All 6 patients from Phase I, Dose level 1 and 4 of the 5 patients registered to the Phase II portion of the study were eligible for this endpoint.
A Complete Response (CR) is defined by the NCI Working Group criteria and requires all of the following for a period of at least 2 months: * Absence of lymphadenopathy (e.g. lymph nodes \>1.5 cm) by physical examination. * No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly by physical examination. * Absence of constitutional symptoms. * Neutrophils ≥1500/ul. * Platelets \>100,000/ul (untransfused). * Hemoglobin \>11.0 gm/dl (untransfused) * Peripheral blood lymphocytes \<4000/uL Patients who fulfill all criteria for a CR but who have a persistent anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia related to drug toxicity rather than residual CLL will be classified as CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi). The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=10 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Complete Response Defined to be a CR or CRi Noted as the Objective Status (Phase II)
|
50 percentage of participants
Interval 19.0 to 81.0
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: All patients that started treatment and had baseline biomarkers completed were included in this analysis. One of the 4 patients accrued to dose level 2 was not eligible for this endpoint. Therefore, 6 patients at Dose Level 1 and 3 patients at Dose Level 2 and 4 patients accrued to the Phase II portion of the study are included in this endpoint.
IgVH gene mutationwill be evaluated pre-treatment. This factors will be summarized and used to help characterize the types of patients accrued to this trial.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=6 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
n=3 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
n=4 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Biomarker Analysis (IgVH Gene Mutation)
Mutated
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Biomarker Analysis (IgVH Gene Mutation)
Unmutated
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Biomarker Analysis (IgVH Gene Mutation)
Not Done
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: All patients that started treatment and had baseline biomarkers completed were included in this analysis. One of the 4 patients accrued to dose level 2 was not eligible for this endpoint. Therefore, 6 patients at Dose Level 1 and 3 patients at Dose Level 2 and 4 patients accrued to the Phase II portion of the study are included in this endpoint.
CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70 status will be evaluated pre-treatment. These factors will be summarized and used to help characterize the types of patients accrued to this trial.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=6 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
n=3 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
n=4 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)
CD49d · Not Done
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)
ZAP-70 · Positive
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)
ZAP-70 · Negative
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)
ZAP-70 · Not Done
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)
CD38 · Positive
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)
CD38 · Negative
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)
CD38 · Not Done
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)
CD49d · Positive
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Biomarker Analysis (CD38, CD49d, and ZAP-70)
CD49d · Negative
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: All patients that started treatment and had baseline biomarkers completed were included in this analysis. One of the 4 patients accrued to dose level 2 was not eligible for this endpoint. Therefore, 6 patients at Dose Level 1 and 3 patients at Dose Level 2 and 4 patients accrued to the Phase II portion of the study are included in this endpoint.
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is a molecular cytogenetic technique that uses fluorescent probes that bind to only those parts of the chromosome with a high degree of sequence complementarity. It was developed by biomedical researchers in the early 1980s and is used to detect and localize the presence or absence of specific DNA sequences on chromosomes. In this disease group, there are recognized patterns of DNA sequences that play a role in prognostic outcomes. Patterns named 11q-, 13q-, Trisomy 12 may lead to different responses to treatments. Here we report the number of patients with each FISH prognosis evaluated pre-treatment. These factors will be summarized and used to help characterize the types of patients accrued to this trial.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=6 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
n=3 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
n=4 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Biomarker Analysis
13q-
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Biomarker Analysis
11q-
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Biomarker Analysis
Trisomy 12
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Biomarker Analysis
Other
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Biomarker Analysis
Normal
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 39 months and maximum follow-up of 54 monthsPopulation: 12 patients achieved a response and were included in this analysis.
Duration of response is defined for all evaluable patients who have achieved a clinical response as the date at which the patient's objective status is first noted to be a CR, CRi, CCR, nPR, or PR to the earliest date progression is documented. The distribution of duration of response will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=12 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response
|
NA months
Interval 3.0 to
Too few events have occurred to provide a median and upper-level confidence interval.
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 6 assessment (maximum of 231 days post-registration)Population: 5 patients achieved a complete response and were analyzed for MRD
Minimal residual disease (MRD) will be evaluated after treatment in patients who achieve a complete clinical response. Flow cytometry will be used to detect approximately 1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes following induction. A score of positive means CLL cells were found and a negative score means no CLL cells were found. The number of patients with an MRD negative score are reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=5 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Minimal-residual Disease
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months post-treatmentPopulation: All patients that were treated and evaluable for response were included together in this endpoint.
The Overall response rate is estimated by the total number of complete or partial responses (CR, CRi, CCR, nPR, or PR) divided by the total number of evaluate patients. Complete and partial responses were scored using the NCI Working Group criteria. A Complete Response (CR, CRi, and CCR) is characterized by an absence of lymphadenopathy, heptomegaly and splenomegaly with or without normalized blood counts and bone marrow assessment . A PR is defined as having \>50% decrease in lymphocyte count and reduction in sum of the products of measured nodes and an improvement in blood counts. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true overall response rate will be calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=13 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate
|
0.92 proportion of patients
Interval 0.64 to 0.998
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from registration to the date of initiation of subsequent therapy or death, median follow-up time is 37 monthsPopulation: All patients that were treated and evaluable were included in this endpoint.
Treatment free survival is defined to be the time from registration to the date of initation of subsequent therapy or death. The distribution of treatment free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=13 Participants
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment-free Survival
|
24.5 months
Interval 11.3 to 50.6
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Phase I: Dose Level 1
Phase I: Dose Level 2
Phase II
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=6 participants at risk
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
n=4 participants at risk
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
n=4 participants at risk
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemolysis
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Tumor lysis syndrome
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal and urinary disorders - Other, specify
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Surgical and medical procedures - Other, specify
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Phase I: Dose Level 1
n=6 participants at risk
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase I: Dose Level 2
n=4 participants at risk
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 135 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
Phase II
n=4 participants at risk
Patients receive:
Cycle 1:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22)
2. Rituximab IV 375 mg/m\^2 on day 8.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 8 and 9.
Cycles 2-6:
1. Akt inhibitor MK2206 PO 90 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29)
2. Rituximab IV 500 mg/m\^2 on day 1.
3. Bendamustine IV 70 mg/m\^2 on day 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 16
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
100.0%
4/4 • Number of events 21
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Number of events 19
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block complete
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac disorders - Other, specify
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 5
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 9
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 2
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Number of events 5
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 3
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mucositis oral
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Number of events 8
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 3
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 2
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 2
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Investigations
Creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 8
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Number of events 9
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
100.0%
4/4 • Number of events 10
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 16
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
100.0%
4/4 • Number of events 19
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
100.0%
4/4 • Number of events 26
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell decreased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Number of events 4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Number of events 6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 2
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
83.3%
5/6 • Number of events 15
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 7
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Number of events 21
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalemia
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcemia
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash acneiform
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 9
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Number of events 7
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Number of events 4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Surgical and medical procedures - Other, specify
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/6
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
0.00%
0/4
Adverse Events assessments took place at the end of each cycle during treatment. For each event, we are reporting the number of patients that reported the event. The total number of events reported will be defined as the total number of cycles in which the event was reported, not necessarily the number of independent events.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60