A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease Who Have Failed or Are Intolerant to Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Antagonist Therapy (UNITI-1)

NCT ID: NCT01369329

Last Updated: 2016-12-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

769 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-07-31

Study Completion Date

2013-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study (UNITI-1) will compare the effects (both positive and negative) of an initial treatment with ustekinumab to placebo over 8 weeks, in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease who have either failed or could not tolerate at least one TNF-antagonist medications in the past (specifically, infliximab, adalimumab, or certolizumab pegol).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study (CNTO1275CRD3001 or "UNITI-1") examines ustekinumab (an antibody medication that inhibits the inflammatory proteins IL-12 and IL-23) versus a placebo (otherwise identical except without the ustekinumab antibody) given intravenously (by an IV) in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease who previously did not respond to, lost response to, or could not tolerate TNF-antagonist medications (specifically, infliximab, adalimumab or certolizumab pegol). Ustekinumab (also known as Stelara) is approved as a treatment for the skin condition of moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis, but this study will examine if ustekinumab can provide benefit in Crohn's disease and also assess for any risks or side effects. Both the positive and negative outcomes of IV placebo versus two different doses of IV ustekinumab will be tracked and compared over eight weeks, in approximately 703 patients. Patients enrolling in this study will be assigned to one of the 3 treatment groups by chance (randomly, like rolling dice), and all will receive a single IV administration of study agent at the first study visit (after the screening period), and then will be asked to return for 3 additional visits through Week 8. Patients who complete this study through the Week 8 visit and remain eligible can enter the maintenance study (CNTO1275CRD3003 or "IM-UNITI'' \[NCT01369355\]), where they will receive additional study agent, including the administration of ustekinumab in patients who receive placebo in this study and have not had improvement in their Crohn's disease. Patients who do not enter the CNTO1275CRD3003 study will have a final safety follow-up visit approximately 20 weeks after they received study agent when they entered into this study at the Week 0 visit. .All patients will receive a single intravenous (IV) administration of study drug (either placebo or ustekinumab) at the first (week 0) visit when they enter the study.There are 3 treatment groups: Group 1: Placebo; Group 2: ustekinumab 130 mg, Group 3: weight-range based ustekinumab doses approximating ustekinumab 6 mg/kg: 260 mg (weight \<= 55 kg), 390 mg (weight \> 55 kg and \<= 85 kg), and 520 mg (weight \> 85 kg).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Crohn's Disease IBD Colitis Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

ustekinumab moderately to severely active Crohn's Disease tumor necrosis factor, Stelara Crohn Crohn's IBD UNITI

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

001

Group 1: Placebo Form=solution for injection route=intravenous use in a single dose.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Group 1: Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Form=solution for injection, route=intravenous use, in a single dose.

002

Group 2 ustekinumab 130 mg Type=exact unit=mg number=130 form=solution for injection route= intravenous use in a single dose.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Group 2 ustekinumab 130 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Type=exact, unit=mg, number=130, form=solution for injection, route= intravenous use, in a single dose.

003

Group 3: ustekinumab approximately 6 mg/kg Type=range unit=mg/kg number=6 form=solution for injection route= intravenous use in a single dose.weight-range based ustekinumab doses approximating ustekinumab 6 mg/kg: 260 mg (weight \<= 55 kg) 390 mg (weight \> 55 kg and \<= 85 kg) and 520 mg (weight \> 85 kg).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Group 3: ustekinumab approximately 6 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Type=range, unit=mg/kg, number=6, form=solution for injection, route= intravenous use, in a single dose.weight-range based ustekinumab doses approximating ustekinumab 6 mg/kg: 260 mg (weight \<= 55 kg), 390 mg (weight \> 55 kg and \<= 85 kg), and 520 mg (weight \> 85 kg).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Group 2 ustekinumab 130 mg

Type=exact, unit=mg, number=130, form=solution for injection, route= intravenous use, in a single dose.

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 3: ustekinumab approximately 6 mg/kg

Type=range, unit=mg/kg, number=6, form=solution for injection, route= intravenous use, in a single dose.weight-range based ustekinumab doses approximating ustekinumab 6 mg/kg: 260 mg (weight \<= 55 kg), 390 mg (weight \> 55 kg and \<= 85 kg), and 520 mg (weight \> 85 kg).

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 1: Placebo

Form=solution for injection, route=intravenous use, in a single dose.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have Crohn's disease of at least 3 months' duration with colitis, ileitis, or ileocolitis, confirmed at some time in the past by radiography, histology, or endoscopy
* Have active Crohn's disease, defined as a baseline Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of \>= 220 and \<= 450
* Have received infliximab, adalimumab, or certolizumab pegol at a dose approved for the treatment of Crohn disease and did not respond initially (ie, primary nonresponse)
* Or responded initially but then lost response with continued therapy (ie, secondary nonresponse)
* Or were intolerant to the medication
* Have screening laboratory test results within protocol-specified parameters.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have had any kind of bowel resection within 6 months
* Are pregnant or planning pregnancy (both men and women) while enrolled in the study or for 20 weeks after receiving study agent
* Patients who have received infliximab, adalimumab or certolizumab pegol \< = 8 weeks before the first administration of study drug
* Patients with certain complications of Crohn's disease that would make it hard to assess response to study drug
* Patients with a history of or ongoing chronic or recurrent infectious disease
* Patients who have previously received a biologic agent targeting IL-12 or IL-23, including but not limited to ustekinumab (CNTO 1275) or briakinumab (ABT-874)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Redwood City, California, United States

Site Status

San Carlos, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Lone Tree, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Weston, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Clive, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Novi, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Ocean Springs, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Lees Summit, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Urbana, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Marlton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Beavercreek, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Bend, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Chesapeake, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Bedford Park, , Australia

Site Status

Box Hill, , Australia

Site Status

Central Queensland M C, , Australia

Site Status

Concord, , Australia

Site Status

Garran, , Australia

Site Status

Liverpool, , Australia

Site Status

Malvern, , Australia

Site Status

Parkville, , Australia

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Sankt Pölten, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Brandon, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Silkeborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Reims, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Lÿneburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Minden, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Akureyri, , Iceland

Site Status

Reykjavik, , Iceland

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Litwinsky, , Israel

Site Status

Chikushino-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Hamamatsu, , Japan

Site Status

Kagoshima, , Japan

Site Status

Nishinomiya, , Japan

Site Status

Ohtsu, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Ōita, , Japan

Site Status

Sakura, , Japan

Site Status

Sapporo, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Yokkaichi, , Japan

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Grafton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Overport, , South Africa

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Sagunto, , Spain

Site Status

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Exeter, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Gloucester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Harrow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottinghamshirecc, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Shropshire, , United Kingdom

Site Status

South Shields, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Czechia Denmark France Germany Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Japan Netherlands New Zealand Poland Serbia South Africa South Korea Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Adedokun OJ, Xu Z, Gasink C, Kowalski K, Sandborn WJ, Feagan B. Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses of Ustekinumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease. Clin Ther. 2022 Oct;44(10):1336-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36150926 (View on PubMed)

Huan PW, Mehta A, Wong ECL, Dulai PS, Marshall JK, Reinisch W, Narula N. A Review of the Modified Multiplier of Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease and How to Use It in Clinical Trials and Practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003373. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39996607 (View on PubMed)

Ghosh S, Feagan BG, Ott E, Gasink C, Godwin B, Marano C, Miao Y, Ma T, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ, Danese S, Abreu MT, Sands BE. Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis Through 5 Years in Crohn's Disease and 4 Years in Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Aug 6;18(7):1091-1101. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae013.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38310565 (View on PubMed)

Colombel JF, Sands BE, Gasink C, Yeager B, Adedokun OJ, Izanec J, Ma T, Gao LL, Lee SD, Targan SR, Ghosh S, Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ. Evolution of Symptoms After Ustekinumab Induction Therapy in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan;22(1):144-153.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.06.014. Epub 2023 Jun 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37391056 (View on PubMed)

Dubinsky M, Ma C, Griffith J, Crowell M, Neimark E, Kligys K, O'Connell T. Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Between Risankizumab and Ustekinumab for Induction and Maintenance Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease. Adv Ther. 2023 Sep;40(9):3896-3911. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02546-6. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37368103 (View on PubMed)

Narula N, Wong ECL, Dulai PS, Marshall JK, Jairath V, Reinisch W. Comparative Effectiveness of Biologics for Endoscopic Healing of the Ileum and Colon in Crohn's Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;117(7):1106-1117. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001795. Epub 2022 Apr 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35435862 (View on PubMed)

Narula N, Aruljothy A, Wong ECL, Homenauth R, Alshahrani AA, Marshall JK, Reinisch W. The impact of ustekinumab on extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease: A post hoc analysis of the UNITI studies. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Jun;9(5):581-589. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12094. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34077627 (View on PubMed)

Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Danese S, O'Brien CD, Ott E, Marano C, Baker T, Zhou Y, Volger S, Tikhonov I, Gasink C, Sands BE, Ghosh S. Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis of Results from Phase 2/3 Studies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Jun 15;27(7):994-1007. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa236.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32964215 (View on PubMed)

Li K, Friedman JR, Chan D, Pollack P, Yang F, Jacobstein D, Brodmerkel C, Gasink C, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, De Hertogh G. Effects of Ustekinumab on Histologic Disease Activity in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology. 2019 Oct;157(4):1019-1031.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.037. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31279870 (View on PubMed)

Ghosh S, Gensler LS, Yang Z, Gasink C, Chakravarty SD, Farahi K, Ramachandran P, Ott E, Strober BE. Ustekinumab Safety in Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Crohn's Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Phase II/III Clinical Development Programs. Drug Saf. 2019 Jun;42(6):751-768. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00797-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30739254 (View on PubMed)

Rutgeerts P, Gasink C, Chan D, Lang Y, Pollack P, Colombel JF, Wolf DC, Jacobstein D, Johanns J, Szapary P, Adedokun OJ, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ. Efficacy of Ustekinumab for Inducing Endoscopic Healing in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1045-1058. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.035. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29909019 (View on PubMed)

Adedokun OJ, Xu Z, Gasink C, Jacobstein D, Szapary P, Johanns J, Gao LL, Davis HM, Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Ghosh S, Sandborn WJ. Pharmacokinetics and Exposure Response Relationships of Ustekinumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology. 2018 May;154(6):1660-1671. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.043. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29409871 (View on PubMed)

Hibi T, Imai Y, Murata Y, Matsushima N, Zheng R, Gasink C. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease: a subpopulation analysis of phase 3 induction and maintenance studies. Intest Res. 2017 Oct;15(4):475-486. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.475. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29142515 (View on PubMed)

Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Gasink C, Jacobstein D, Lang Y, Friedman JR, Blank MA, Johanns J, Gao LL, Miao Y, Adedokun OJ, Sands BE, Hanauer SB, Vermeire S, Targan S, Ghosh S, de Villiers WJ, Colombel JF, Tulassay Z, Seidler U, Salzberg BA, Desreumaux P, Lee SD, Loftus EV Jr, Dieleman LA, Katz S, Rutgeerts P; UNITI-IM-UNITI Study Group. Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1946-1960. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602773.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27959607 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CNTO1275CRD3001

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2010-022758-18

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR018415

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id