Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Study on a New Flowable Composite as a Restorative in Adult Teeth (NCT NCT01369108)
NCT ID: NCT01369108
Last Updated: 2024-10-02
Results Overview
Clinical performance reported on 6 parameters as the % of teeth with perfect scores ("A" rating). Cvar \& Ryge scores measure 6 parameters: Anatomic form (rated A,B= satisfactory, C=unsatisfactory); Color Match (A=match, B=mismatch, but within normal, C=mismatch outside normal); Marginal Adaptation (A=no visible crevice, B=no exposure of dentin, C=defect to enamel-dentine junction, D= fracture, missing); Marginal Discoloration (A=none, B= marginal discoloration, C=marginal discoloration to pulpal direction); Surface Integrity (A=smooth, B=slight rough, C=Pitted, D=fracture)'Secondary caries (A=none, D=present).
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months
2024-10-02
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Participants
Each enrolled patient possessed two teeth that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 120 teeth, 60 were allocated to the comparator group (Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal restorative) and 60 were allocated to the experimental group (Filtek Supreme Ultra Flowable.
Flowable composite: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
Conventional composite restorative: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
49
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Study on a New Flowable Composite as a Restorative in Adult Teeth
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Participants
n=60 Participants
Each enrolled patient possessed two teeth that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 120 teeth, 60 were allocated to the comparator group (Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal restorative) and 60 were allocated to the experimental group (Filtek Supreme Ultra Flowable.
Flowable composite: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
Conventional composite restorative: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
52 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
60 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6, 12 and 24 monthsClinical performance reported on 6 parameters as the % of teeth with perfect scores ("A" rating). Cvar \& Ryge scores measure 6 parameters: Anatomic form (rated A,B= satisfactory, C=unsatisfactory); Color Match (A=match, B=mismatch, but within normal, C=mismatch outside normal); Marginal Adaptation (A=no visible crevice, B=no exposure of dentin, C=defect to enamel-dentine junction, D= fracture, missing); Marginal Discoloration (A=none, B= marginal discoloration, C=marginal discoloration to pulpal direction); Surface Integrity (A=smooth, B=slight rough, C=Pitted, D=fracture)'Secondary caries (A=none, D=present).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flowable Composite
n=49 teeth
Flowable composite
Flowable composite: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
|
Conventional Composite
n=49 teeth
Highly filled conventional composite restorative
Conventional composite restorative: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal discoloration 12 Mo
|
90.9 percent of teeth
|
90.1 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Surface Integrity 12 Mo
|
92.7 percent of teeth
|
78.6 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Secondary caries 12 Mo
|
94.5 percent of teeth
|
94.6 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Anatomic form 24 Mo
|
89.8 percent of teeth
|
86.0 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Color match 24 Mo
|
85.7 percent of teeth
|
78.0 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal adaption 24 Mo
|
83.7 percent of teeth
|
80.0 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal discoloraton 24 Mo
|
85.7 percent of teeth
|
80.0 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Surface integrity 24 Mo
|
79.6 percent of teeth
|
78.0 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Secondary caries 24 Mo
|
93.9 percent of teeth
|
94 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal discoloration 6 Mo
|
96.6 percent of teeth
|
95.0 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Color match baseline
|
96.6 percent of teeth
|
88.3 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Anatomic baseline
|
100.0 percent of teeth
|
100.0 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal adaptation baseline
|
96.6 percent of teeth
|
98.3 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal discoloration Baseline
|
98.3 percent of teeth
|
98.3 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Surface Integrity Baseline
|
98.3 percent of teeth
|
96.7 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Secondar carries Baseline
|
100. percent of teeth
|
98.3 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Anatomic form 6 Mo
|
100. percent of teeth
|
98.3 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Color match form 6 Mo
|
96.6 percent of teeth
|
91.7 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal adaptation 6 Mo
|
93.2 percent of teeth
|
88.3 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Surface integrity 6 Mo
|
96.6 percent of teeth
|
90.0 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Secondary caries 6 Mo
|
100. percent of teeth
|
96.7 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Anatomic form 12 Mo
|
96.4 percent of teeth
|
94.6 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Color match 12 Mo
|
92.7 percent of teeth
|
83.9 percent of teeth
|
|
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal adaption 12 Mo
|
81.8 percent of teeth
|
78.6 percent of teeth
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6, 12 and 24 monthsSensitivity to cold was measured by applying a cotton pellet soaked with pulp vitality refrigerant spray (Endo Ice, Coltene/ Whaledent, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USA) to the tooth for three seconds. Sensitivity to biting was measured by having the patient bite on a cotton roll for five seconds. After each test, the subject was asked to place an ''X'' on a 10-mm line labeled ''1'' on the left and ''10'' on the right. Patients were told that a ''10'' represents the worst pain they can imagine (ie, childbirth, major surgery, or kidney stone) and that ''1'' represents no sensation at all.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flowable Composite
n=49 teeth
Flowable composite
Flowable composite: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
|
Conventional Composite
n=49 teeth
Highly filled conventional composite restorative
Conventional composite restorative: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to cold baseline
|
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
|
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitivity to biting baseline
|
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
|
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to cold 6 Mo
|
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
|
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to biting 6 Mo
|
0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
|
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to cold 12 Mo
|
2.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
1.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
|
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to biting 12 Mo
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
|
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to cold 24 Mo
|
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to biting 24 Mo
|
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
Adverse Events
All Participants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place