Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Study on a New Flowable Composite as a Restorative in Adult Teeth (NCT NCT01369108)

NCT ID: NCT01369108

Last Updated: 2024-10-02

Results Overview

Clinical performance reported on 6 parameters as the % of teeth with perfect scores ("A" rating). Cvar \& Ryge scores measure 6 parameters: Anatomic form (rated A,B= satisfactory, C=unsatisfactory); Color Match (A=match, B=mismatch, but within normal, C=mismatch outside normal); Marginal Adaptation (A=no visible crevice, B=no exposure of dentin, C=defect to enamel-dentine junction, D= fracture, missing); Marginal Discoloration (A=none, B= marginal discoloration, C=marginal discoloration to pulpal direction); Surface Integrity (A=smooth, B=slight rough, C=Pitted, D=fracture)'Secondary caries (A=none, D=present).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

60 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months

Results posted on

2024-10-02

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
All Participants
Each enrolled patient possessed two teeth that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 120 teeth, 60 were allocated to the comparator group (Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal restorative) and 60 were allocated to the experimental group (Filtek Supreme Ultra Flowable. Flowable composite: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth Conventional composite restorative: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
Overall Study
STARTED
60
Overall Study
COMPLETED
49
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
11

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Clinical Study on a New Flowable Composite as a Restorative in Adult Teeth

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
All Participants
n=60 Participants
Each enrolled patient possessed two teeth that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 120 teeth, 60 were allocated to the comparator group (Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal restorative) and 60 were allocated to the experimental group (Filtek Supreme Ultra Flowable. Flowable composite: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth Conventional composite restorative: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
52 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months

Clinical performance reported on 6 parameters as the % of teeth with perfect scores ("A" rating). Cvar \& Ryge scores measure 6 parameters: Anatomic form (rated A,B= satisfactory, C=unsatisfactory); Color Match (A=match, B=mismatch, but within normal, C=mismatch outside normal); Marginal Adaptation (A=no visible crevice, B=no exposure of dentin, C=defect to enamel-dentine junction, D= fracture, missing); Marginal Discoloration (A=none, B= marginal discoloration, C=marginal discoloration to pulpal direction); Surface Integrity (A=smooth, B=slight rough, C=Pitted, D=fracture)'Secondary caries (A=none, D=present).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Flowable Composite
n=49 teeth
Flowable composite Flowable composite: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
Conventional Composite
n=49 teeth
Highly filled conventional composite restorative Conventional composite restorative: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal discoloration 12 Mo
90.9 percent of teeth
90.1 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Surface Integrity 12 Mo
92.7 percent of teeth
78.6 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Secondary caries 12 Mo
94.5 percent of teeth
94.6 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Anatomic form 24 Mo
89.8 percent of teeth
86.0 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Color match 24 Mo
85.7 percent of teeth
78.0 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal adaption 24 Mo
83.7 percent of teeth
80.0 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal discoloraton 24 Mo
85.7 percent of teeth
80.0 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Surface integrity 24 Mo
79.6 percent of teeth
78.0 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Secondary caries 24 Mo
93.9 percent of teeth
94 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal discoloration 6 Mo
96.6 percent of teeth
95.0 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Color match baseline
96.6 percent of teeth
88.3 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Anatomic baseline
100.0 percent of teeth
100.0 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal adaptation baseline
96.6 percent of teeth
98.3 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal discoloration Baseline
98.3 percent of teeth
98.3 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Surface Integrity Baseline
98.3 percent of teeth
96.7 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Secondar carries Baseline
100. percent of teeth
98.3 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Anatomic form 6 Mo
100. percent of teeth
98.3 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Color match form 6 Mo
96.6 percent of teeth
91.7 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal adaptation 6 Mo
93.2 percent of teeth
88.3 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Surface integrity 6 Mo
96.6 percent of teeth
90.0 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Secondary caries 6 Mo
100. percent of teeth
96.7 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Anatomic form 12 Mo
96.4 percent of teeth
94.6 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Color match 12 Mo
92.7 percent of teeth
83.9 percent of teeth
Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores
Marginal adaption 12 Mo
81.8 percent of teeth
78.6 percent of teeth

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months

Sensitivity to cold was measured by applying a cotton pellet soaked with pulp vitality refrigerant spray (Endo Ice, Coltene/ Whaledent, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USA) to the tooth for three seconds. Sensitivity to biting was measured by having the patient bite on a cotton roll for five seconds. After each test, the subject was asked to place an ''X'' on a 10-mm line labeled ''1'' on the left and ''10'' on the right. Patients were told that a ''10'' represents the worst pain they can imagine (ie, childbirth, major surgery, or kidney stone) and that ''1'' represents no sensation at all.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Flowable Composite
n=49 teeth
Flowable composite Flowable composite: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
Conventional Composite
n=49 teeth
Highly filled conventional composite restorative Conventional composite restorative: Restoration of small Class V and I cavities in molar and premolar teeth
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to cold baseline
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitivity to biting baseline
0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to cold 6 Mo
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to biting 6 Mo
0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to cold 12 Mo
2.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
1.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to biting 12 Mo
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to cold 24 Mo
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
Clinical Performance by VAS (Pain Scale)
sensitiity to biting 24 Mo
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3

Adverse Events

All Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Rolf Halvorson

3M Oral Care Solutions Division

Phone: 651-733-3384

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place