Trial Outcomes & Findings for Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet x Open Microdiskectomy in Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy (NCT NCT01367860)
NCT ID: NCT01367860
Last Updated: 2014-06-04
Results Overview
Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
VAS for Lumbar Pain at 3 Months
2014-06-04
Participant Flow
Patients referred to our tertiary hospital for lumbar back pain were recruited. They were included in the study if they had disc protrusion or small herniation in only one level, with magnetic resonance imaging findings compatible with symptoms, without neurological deficits, and with no resolution after six weeks of conservative treatment.
Exclusion criteria were: neurological changes during conservative treatment, pregnancy, clinical status not adequate for surgical procedures, non-adherence to informed consent form. After inclusion in the study, patients were evaluated for pain and function and then randomly allocated in two groups
Participant milestones
| Measure |
OMicro
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet x Open Microdiskectomy in Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
Total
n=40 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=5 Participants
|
44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=7 Participants
|
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Schooling
>=8 years
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Schooling
<8 years
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Married
Yes
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Married
No
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Manual labor
yes
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Manual labor
no
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Opioid use
yes
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Opioid use
no
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Working currently
yes
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Working currently
no
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Receiving government benefit
yes
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Receiving government benefit
no
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Months away from work
|
4.65 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.52 • n=5 Participants
|
8.67 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4 • n=7 Participants
|
5.8 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.14 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Months feeling pain
|
16.25 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2 • n=5 Participants
|
33.5 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.3 • n=7 Participants
|
24.87 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.96 • n=5 Participants
|
|
VAS for lumbar pain preoperatively
|
77.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27 • n=5 Participants
|
63 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30 • n=7 Participants
|
69.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29 • n=5 Participants
|
|
VAS for leg pain preoperatively
|
84.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23 • n=5 Participants
|
73.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22 • n=7 Participants
|
78.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22 • n=5 Participants
|
|
ODI preoperatively
|
33.65 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33 • n=5 Participants
|
26.35 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=7 Participants
|
30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: VAS for Lumbar Pain at 3 MonthsPopulation: intention to treat
Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Lumbar Pain in 3 Months
|
2.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
4.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.47
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3th monthPopulation: Intention to treat
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -\> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 3th Month
|
17.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9
|
16.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6th monthPopulation: Infection
Will be measured dichotomously: (present or absent) Variables: Infection; residual pain; herniation recurrency
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Evaluation
Infection
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Clinical Evaluation
residual pain
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Clinical Evaluation
herniation recurrency
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1st week from surgeryPain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Lumbar - 1st Week
|
3.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1st month from surgeryPopulation: intention to treat
Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Lumbar 1st Month
|
3.34 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.92
|
4.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3rd month from surgeryPain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Lumbar Pain - 3rd Month
|
2.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
4.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6th month from surgeryPain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Lumbar Pain - 6th Month
|
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
3.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12th month from surgeryPain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Lumbar Pain - 12th Month
|
4.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
3.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1st week minus baselinePopulation: Intention to treat
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -\> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 1st Week
|
23.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.37
|
20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1st month from baselineOswestry Disability Index (ODI) -\> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 1st Month
|
19.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.23
|
10.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6th month from surgeryPopulation: Intention to treat
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -\> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 6th Month
|
15.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.45
|
15.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12th month from surgeryOswestry Disability Index (ODI) -\> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 12th Month
|
11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.82
|
12.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1st week from surgeryPain Score for leg pain- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Leg Pain - 1st Week
|
4.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.92
|
2.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1st month from surgeryPain Score for leg pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Leg Pain - 1st Month
|
2.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
2.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3rd month from surgeryPain Score for leg pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Leg Pain - 3rd Month
|
17.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9
|
16.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6th month from surgeryPopulation: Intention to treat
Pain Score for leg pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -\> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Leg Pain - 6rd Month
|
2.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.82
|
2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12th month from surgerypain scale - VAS for leg pain - 12th month
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OMicro
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy
Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision.
|
SJet
n=20 Participants
This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS for Leg Pain - 12th Month
|
3.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
2.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
Adverse Events
OMicro
SJet
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Alexandre Cristante Fogaça
IOT/HC University of SãoPaulo
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place