PRO#1278: Fludarabine and Busulfan vs. Fludarabine, Busulfan and Total Body Irradiation

NCT ID: NCT01366612

Last Updated: 2023-06-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

53 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-16

Study Completion Date

2020-08-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a single institution study of fludarabine and busulfan versus fludarabine, busulfan and low dose total body irradiation in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A study population of 80 subjects will be enrolled from The John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center. Subjects who are eligible to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation according to the eligibility criteria will be consented and enrolled. Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive one of 2 conditioning regimen: fludarabine and busulfan, or fludarabine busulfan and low dose total body irradiation (TBI). Subjects will be followed until 1 year post transplantation to assess the relapse rate in each arm and transplant-related toxicity.

The combination of fludarabine and busulfan is the current standard of care for patients with myeloid malignancies (AML, CML and other myeloproliferative disorders, or MDS) undergoing allogeneic transplantation at HUMC. In this study we will be comparing in a randomized fashion the standard regimen to a regimen of fludarabine, busulfan and TBI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a single institution study of fludarabine and busulfan versus fludarabine, busulfan and low dose total body irradiation in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A study population of 80 subjects will be enrolled from The John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center. Subjects who are eligible to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation according to the eligibility criteria will be consented and enrolled. Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive one of 2 conditioning regimen: fludarabine and busulfan, or fludarabine busulfan and low dose total body irradiation (TBI). Subjects will be followed until 1 year post transplantation to assess the relapse rate in each arm and transplant-related toxicity.

The combination of fludarabine and busulfan is the current standard of care for patients with myeloid malignancies (myelogenous leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, other myeloproliferative disorder, or myelodysplastic syndrome) undergoing allogeneic transplantation at HUMC. In this study we will be comparing in a randomized fashion the standard regimen to a regimen of fludarabine, busulfan and TBI.

Primary Objective The primary objective is to compare the relapse rate at 1 year of patients with myeloid malignancies receiving each regimen.

Secondary Objectives The secondary objective is to compare the toxicity of each regimen

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myeloid Malignancies Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Myeloproliferative Disorders Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

FLUDARABINE AND BUSULFAN

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fludarabine and Busulfan plus/minus Total Body Irradiation (low dose)

Intervention Type DRUG

Fludarabine 40mg/m2 and Busulfan 130mg/m2 on days -6, -5, -4 and -3 of transplant.

rATG on days -3, -2 and -1

Group 2

FLUDARABINE, BUSULFAN AND LOW DOSE TOTAL BODY IRRADIATION

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fludarabine and Busulfan + Low Dose Total Body Irradiation (LD TBI)

Intervention Type DRUG

Fludarabine 40mg/m2 and Busulfan 130mg/m2 on days -6, -5, -4 and -3 of transplant.

rATG on days -3, -2 and -1 TBI 200cGY (as randomized) on day -1

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fludarabine and Busulfan plus/minus Total Body Irradiation (low dose)

Fludarabine 40mg/m2 and Busulfan 130mg/m2 on days -6, -5, -4 and -3 of transplant.

rATG on days -3, -2 and -1

Intervention Type DRUG

Fludarabine and Busulfan + Low Dose Total Body Irradiation (LD TBI)

Fludarabine 40mg/m2 and Busulfan 130mg/m2 on days -6, -5, -4 and -3 of transplant.

rATG on days -3, -2 and -1 TBI 200cGY (as randomized) on day -1

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Fludara Busulfex Fludara Busulfex

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of acute myelogenous leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, other myeloproliferative disorder, or myelodysplastic syndrome
* Any stage of disease will be considered for transplantation
* Have a suitable related or unrelated donor (Section 3.3)
* Age ≥18 but \<70 yrs
* KPS of ≥70%
* Recovery from all hematologic and non-hematology toxicities from previous therapies.


HLA 6/6 (HLA-A, B, DrB1) related donor or 7/8 (HLA-A, B, C, DrB1) unrelated donor Related donors will be evaluated in accordance with HUMC standard practice guidelines for the evaluation and management of allogeneic donors Unrelated donors will be identified, evaluated, and managed in accordance with National Marrow Donor Program standards Age ≥18 and \<70 yrs KPS of ≥70% Willing to donate bone marrow using standard techniques or peripheral blood HSC by leukapheresis Have adequate veins for apheresis or agree to placement of a central venous catheter (femoral, subclavian) if donating peripheral blood HSC

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis other than acute myelogenous leukemia, myeloproliferative disorder, or myelodysplastic syndrome
* Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 14 days of initiating treatment in this study with the exception of lenalidomide, decitabine, azacitidine, imatinib mesylate, dasatinib, nilotinib hydrochloride and hydroxyurea
* Prior dose-intense therapy requiring HSC support within 56 days of initiating treatment in this study
* Uncontrolled bacterial, viral, fungal or parasitic infections
* Uncontrolled CNS metastases
* Known amyloid deposition in heart
* Organ dysfunction

* LVEF \<40% or cardiac failure not responsive to therapy
* FVC, FEV1, or DLCO \<50% of predicted and/or receiving supplementary continuous oxygen
* Evidence of hepatic synthetic dysfunction, or total bilirubin \>2x or AST \>3x ULN
* Measured creatinine clearance \<20 ml/min
* Karnofsky score \<70%
* Life expectancy limited by another co-morbid illness
* Diagnosed or treated for another malignancy within 3 years of enrollment, with the exception of complete resection of basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, an in situ malignancy, or low-risk prostate cancer after curative therapy
* Female subject is pregnant or breast-feeding (women) or unwilling to use acceptable birth control methods (men or women) for twelve months after treatment. Confirmation that the subject is not pregnant must be established by a negative serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) pregnancy test result obtained during screening. Pregnancy testing is not required for post-menopausal or surgically sterilized women.
* Documented hypersensitivity to fludarabine or melphalan or to bortezomib, boron or mannitol or any components of the formulation
* Patients unable or unwilling to provide consent
* Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment or has New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure (see section 8.4), uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities. Prior to study entry, any ECG abnormality at screening has to be documented by the investigator as not medically relevant
* Patient has received other investigational drugs with 14 days before enrollment
* Serious medical or psychiatric illness likely to interfere with participation in this clinical study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hackensack Meridian Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michele Donato, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hackensack Meridian Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Muller CI, Ruter B, Koeffler HP, Lubbert M. DNA hypermethylation of myeloid cells, a novel therapeutic target in MDS and AML. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2006 Oct;7(5):315-21. doi: 10.2174/138920106778521523.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17076647 (View on PubMed)

Martin S, Baldock SC, Ghoneim AT, Child JA. Defective neutrophil function and microbicidal mechanisms in the myelodysplastic disorders. J Clin Pathol. 1983 Oct;36(10):1120-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.36.10.1120.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6311878 (View on PubMed)

Martino R, Iacobelli S, Brand R, Jansen T, van Biezen A, Finke J, Bacigalupo A, Beelen D, Reiffers J, Devergie A, Alessandrino E, Mufti GJ, Barge R, Sierra J, Ruutu T, Boogaerts M, Falda M, Jouet JP, Niederwieser D, de Witte T; Myelodysplastic Syndrome subcommittee of the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. Retrospective comparison of reduced-intensity conditioning and conventional high-dose conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using HLA-identical sibling donors in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2006 Aug 1;108(3):836-46. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4503. Epub 2006 Apr 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16597592 (View on PubMed)

Fukuda T, Hackman RC, Guthrie KA, Sandmaier BM, Boeckh M, Maris MB, Maloney DG, Deeg HJ, Martin PJ, Storb RF, Madtes DK. Risks and outcomes of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome after nonmyeloablative and conventional conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2003 Oct 15;102(8):2777-85. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1597. Epub 2003 Jul 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12855568 (View on PubMed)

Diaconescu R, Flowers CR, Storer B, Sorror ML, Maris MB, Maloney DG, Sandmaier BM, Storb R. Morbidity and mortality with nonmyeloablative compared with myeloablative conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation from HLA-matched related donors. Blood. 2004 Sep 1;104(5):1550-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0804. Epub 2004 May 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15150081 (View on PubMed)

de Lima M, Anagnostopoulos A, Munsell M, Shahjahan M, Ueno N, Ippoliti C, Andersson BS, Gajewski J, Couriel D, Cortes J, Donato M, Neumann J, Champlin R, Giralt S. Nonablative versus reduced-intensity conditioning regimens in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: dose is relevant for long-term disease control after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2004 Aug 1;104(3):865-72. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-11-3750. Epub 2004 Apr 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15090449 (View on PubMed)

Andersson BS, de Lima M, Thall PF, Wang X, Couriel D, Korbling M, Roberson S, Giralt S, Pierre B, Russell JA, Shpall EJ, Jones RB, Champlin RE. Once daily i.v. busulfan and fludarabine (i.v. Bu-Flu) compares favorably with i.v. busulfan and cyclophosphamide (i.v. BuCy2) as pretransplant conditioning therapy in AML/MDS. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jun;14(6):672-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.03.009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18489993 (View on PubMed)

Bredeson CN, Zhang MJ, Agovi MA, Bacigalupo A, Bahlis NJ, Ballen K, Brown C, Chaudhry MA, Horowitz MM, Kurian S, Quinlan D, Muehlenbien CE, Russell JA, Savoie L, Rizzo JD, Stewart DA. Outcomes following HSCT using fludarabine, busulfan, and thymoglobulin: a matched comparison to allogeneic transplants conditioned with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Sep;14(9):993-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.06.009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18721762 (View on PubMed)

Russell JA, Savoie ML, Balogh A, Turner AR, Larratt L, Chaudhry MA, Storek J, Bahlis NJ, Brown CB, Quinlan D, Geddes M, Stewart DA. Allogeneic transplantation for adult acute leukemia in first and second remission with a novel regimen incorporating daily intravenous busulfan, fludarabine, 400 CGY total-body irradiation, and thymoglobulin. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007 Jul;13(7):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Apr 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17580259 (View on PubMed)

Cox, DR. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B.1972; 34:187-220.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Cleveland, WS. Robust locally-weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am Stat Assoc. 1979; 74: 829-836.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Suh HC, Rowley SD, Kaur S, Lukasik B, McKiernan P, Boonstra M, Baker M, DiLorenzo M, Skarbnik A, Voss J, Hampson A, DeAgresta B, Boylan B, Nyirenda T, Vesole DH, Donato ML. Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study of Myeloablative Fludarabine/Busulfan and Fludarabine/Busulfan/Total Body Irradiation Conditioning in Myeloid Diseases. Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;17(7):1140. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071140.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40227676 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRO#1278: Flu-Bu-TBI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PRO#0118: Decitabine Plus Mini Flu-Bu
NCT01455506 COMPLETED PHASE1