Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Two Insulin Degludec Formulations in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT01364428)
NCT ID: NCT01364428
Last Updated: 2017-03-06
Results Overview
Change from baseline in HbA1c after 22 weeks of treatment
COMPLETED
PHASE3
373 participants
Week 0, Week 22
2017-03-06
Participant Flow
The trial was conducted at 44 sites within United States of America.
Subjects who were treated with basal insulin in combination with unchanged dosing of oral antidiabetic drug treatment (e.g. metformin, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor) in any approved dose or combination at unchanged dosing for at least 12 weeks prior to randomisation in a 1:1 manner to IDeg 200 U/mL or IDeg.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
IDeg 200 U/mL
Insulin degludec 200 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment(metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg 200 U/mL was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
IDeg
Insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment (metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
186
|
187
|
|
Overall Study
Exposed
|
184
|
187
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
166
|
172
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
20
|
15
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
IDeg 200 U/mL
Insulin degludec 200 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment(metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg 200 U/mL was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
IDeg
Insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment (metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal Criteria
|
14
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
3
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Comparison of Two Insulin Degludec Formulations in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
IDeg 200 U/mL
n=186 Participants
Insulin degludec 200 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment(metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg 200 U/mL was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
IDeg
n=187 Participants
Insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment (metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
Total
n=373 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
|
8.1 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
8.2 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=7 Participants
|
8.2 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
|
8.3 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=5 Participants
|
8.3 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 • n=7 Participants
|
8.3 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
168 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
117 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
205 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=5 Participants
|
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=7 Participants
|
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 22Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects and missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Change from baseline in HbA1c after 22 weeks of treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDeg 200 U/mL
n=186 Participants
Insulin degludec 200 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment(metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg 200 U/mL was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
IDeg
n=187 Participants
Insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment (metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)
|
-0.79 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-0.70 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 22Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects and missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). For 5 subjects baseline values were missing.
Change from baseline in FPG after 22 weeks of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDeg 200 U/mL
n=182 Participants
Insulin degludec 200 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment(metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg 200 U/mL was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
IDeg
n=186 Participants
Insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment (metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
|
-2.26 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.07
|
-2.40 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 22 + 7 days follow upPopulation: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Corresponds to rate of AEs per 100 patient years of exposure. Severity assessed by investigator. Mild: no or transient symptoms, no interference with subject's daily activities. Moderate: marked symptoms, moderate interference with subject's daily activities. Severe: considerable interference with subject's daily activities, unacceptable. Serious AE: AE that at any dose results in any of the following: death, a life-threatening experience, in-subject hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalisation, persistent/significant disability/incapacity/congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDeg 200 U/mL
n=184 Participants
Insulin degludec 200 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment(metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg 200 U/mL was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
IDeg
n=187 Participants
Insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment (metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Adverse events (AEs)
|
416 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
300 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
|
Rate of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Serious AEs
|
20 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
16 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
|
Rate of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Severe AEs
|
27 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
21 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
|
Rate of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Moderate AEs
|
130 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
107 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
|
Rate of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Mild AEs
|
259 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
172 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
|
Rate of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Fatal AEs
|
0 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
0 Events/100 years of patient exposure
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 22 + 7 days follow upPopulation: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Rate of confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes per 100 patient years of exposure (PYE). Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes consisted of severe hypoglycaemia as well as minor hypoglycaemic episodes. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as requiring assistance to administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDeg 200 U/mL
n=184 Participants
Insulin degludec 200 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment(metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg 200 U/mL was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
IDeg
n=187 Participants
Insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment (metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
|
517 Episodes/100 years of patient exposure
|
566 Episodes/100 years of patient exposure
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 22 + 7 days follow upPopulation: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Rate of confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes per 100 patient years of exposure (PYE). Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes consisted of severe hypoglycaemia as well as minor hypoglycaemic episodes. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as requiring assistance to administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as occurring between 00:01 and 05:59 a.m.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDeg 200 U/mL
n=184 Participants
Insulin degludec 200 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment(metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg 200 U/mL was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
IDeg
n=187 Participants
Insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment (metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Nocturnal Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
|
127 Episodes/100 years of patient exposure
|
170 Episodes/100 years of patient exposure
|
Adverse Events
IDeg 200 U/mL
IDeg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
IDeg 200 U/mL
n=184 participants at risk
Insulin degludec 200 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment(metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg 200 U/mL was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
IDeg
n=187 participants at risk
Insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment (metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
1.1%
2/184 • Number of events 2 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticulum intestinal haemorrhagic
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/184 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Heat stroke
|
0.00%
0/184 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/184 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian epithelial cancer
|
0.00%
0/184 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.00%
0/184 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tongue neoplasm malignant
|
0.00%
0/184 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Alcohol abuse
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/184 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Drug abuse
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.00%
0/184 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
1.1%
2/187 • Number of events 2 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/187 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
IDeg 200 U/mL
n=184 participants at risk
Insulin degludec 200 U/mL (IDeg 200 U/mL) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment(metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg 200 U/mL was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
IDeg
n=187 participants at risk
Insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) in a 3 mL prefilled pen PDS290 was given subcutaneously once daily in combination with pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug treatment (metformin, insulin secretagogue \[sulfonylurea or glinide\], alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, pioglitazone or DPP-IV inhibitor). IDeg was administered at any time of the day but preferably at the same time each day.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
9.2%
17/184 • Number of events 20 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
2.1%
4/187 • Number of events 4 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
9.8%
18/184 • Number of events 19 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
6.4%
12/187 • Number of events 14 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
8.2%
15/184 • Number of events 17 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
5.3%
10/187 • Number of events 10 • The adverse events were collected in a time frame of 22 weeks + 7 days follow up.
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Novo Nordisk maintains the right to be informed of any Investigator plans for publication and to review any scientific paper, presentation, communication or other information concerning the investigation described in this protocol. Any such communication must be submitted in writing to the Novo Nordisk trial manager prior to submission for comments. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the planned communication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER