High Dose Folic Acid Supplementation Throughout Pregnancy for Preeclampsia Prevention

NCT ID: NCT01355159

Last Updated: 2020-07-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2464 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine the efficacy of high dose folic acid supplementation for prevention of preeclampsia in women with at least one risk factor: pre-existing hypertension, pre-pregnancy diabetes (type 1 or 2), twin pregnancy, preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy, or body mass index ≥35. It was hypothesized that high dose (4.0 mg per day) supplementation starting in early pregnancy and continued throughout the entire pregnancy will lower the incidence of preeclampsia in pregnant women at high risk of developing preeclampsia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preeclampsia is a complication of pregnancy which affects at least 5% of all pregnancies worldwide and has serious health consequences to these women and their babies. Preeclampsia is hypertension (high blood pressure) in pregnancy with proteinuria. Proteinuria is when protein is found in the urine, and it is a sign that the kidneys are not functioning properly. The only effective treatment for preeclampsia is delivery of the baby. Because delivery may be required before the anticipated date of delivery; preeclampsia is also one of the leading causes of preterm delivery and accounts for 25% of very low birth weight infants. Recent research has also shown that women who have had preeclampsia during pregnancy are more likely to be at risk for future cardiovascular events later in life.

Recently some studies have shown that supplementation with multivitamins containing folic acid is associated with a reduced risk of developing preeclampsia. These findings also suggested that for the prevention of preeclampsia, a high dose of folic acid (much higher than the amount of folate received from food intake or what is usually taken during pregnancy) may be needed.

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 70 obstetrical centres in 5 countries (Argentina, Australia, Canada, Jamaica, and the UK) to evaluate the effect of high dose folic acid started in early pregnancy on the risk of developing preeclampsia in high-risk women. A sample size of 2464 allowed for 80% power and a 10% loss to follow-up/study withdrawal. Participants received either placebo or four 1.0 mg oral tablets of folic acid.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy Complications Preeclampsia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Folic Acid 4 mg

Folic Acid 1.0 mg x 4 tablets will be taken daily by oral administration. The majority of women in the study will routinely take 1.0 mg folic acid in a prenatal vitamin supplement, as recommended by their primary obstetrical provider; the study requirements do not require that participants change their practice. Therefore the actual total daily dose may be up to 5.1 mg of folic acid

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Folic Acid 4 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Folic Acid 1.0 mg or placebo x 4 tablets will be taken daily by oral administration. The majority of women in the study will routinely take 1.0 mg folic acid in a prenatal vitamin supplement, as recommended by their primary obstetrical provider; the study requirements do not require that participants change their practice. Therefore the actual total daily dose may be up to 5.1 mg of folic acid

Placebo

Women will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to folic acid 4.0 mg or placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo x 4 tablets will be taken daily by oral administration.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Folic Acid 4 mg

Folic Acid 1.0 mg or placebo x 4 tablets will be taken daily by oral administration. The majority of women in the study will routinely take 1.0 mg folic acid in a prenatal vitamin supplement, as recommended by their primary obstetrical provider; the study requirements do not require that participants change their practice. Therefore the actual total daily dose may be up to 5.1 mg of folic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo x 4 tablets will be taken daily by oral administration.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Folate

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Capability of subject to comprehend and comply with study requirements
2. ≥ 18 years of age at time of consent
3. Subject is taking ≤1.1 mg of folic acid daily at the time of randomization
4. Live fetus (documented positive fetal heart prior to randomization)
5. Gestational age between 8+0 and 16+6 weeks of pregnancy (Gestational age (GA) of subjects will be calculated based on the first day of the last menstrual period (LMP) or ultrasound performed before 12+6. If early ultrasound and LMP dates differ by ≤ 7 days, base GA estimate on LMP date; if \> 7 days, use early \< 12+6 ultrasound)
6. Subject plans to give birth in a participating hospital site
7. Pregnant subjects must fulfill at least one of the following identified risk factors for pre-eclampsia (PE):

* Pre-existing hypertension (documented evidence of diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg on two separate occasions or at least 4 hours apart prior to randomization, or use of antihypertensive medication during this pregnancy specifically for the treatment of hypertension prior to randomization)
* Pre-pregnancy diabetes (documented evidence of Type I or type II DM)
* Twin pregnancy
* Documented evidence of history of PE in a previous pregnancy
* BMI \> 35 kg/m2 within 3 months prior to this pregnancy and up to randomization of this pregnancy (documented evidence of height and weight to calculate BMI is required)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known history or presence of any clinically significant disease or condition which would be a contraindication to folic acid supplementation of up to 5 mg daily for the duration of pregnancy
2. Known major fetal anomaly or fetal demise
3. History of medical complications, including:

* renal disease with altered renal function,
* epilepsy,
* cancer, or
* use of folic acid antagonists such as valproic acid
4. Individual who is currently enrolled or has participated in another clinical trial or who received an investigational drug within 3 months of the date of randomization (unless approved by the Trial Coordinating Centre)
5. Known presence of:

* Alcohol abuse (≥ 2 drinks per day) or alcohol dependence
* Illicit drug/substance use and/or dependence
6. Known hypersensitivity to folic acid
7. Multiple Pregnancy (triplets or more)
8. Participation in this study in a previous pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shi Wu Wen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Mark C Walker, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Escuela Eva Perón

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Hospital Provincial

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Hospital Roque Saenz Penia

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Maternidad Martin

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Sanatorio de la Mujer

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Cemic

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Hospital Cullen

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Hosptial Iturraspe

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Nepean

Penrith, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Townsville

Douglas, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Ipswich

Ipswich, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Adelaide

North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Royal Women's Hospital

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Sunshine

St Albans, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Calgary Foothills Medical Center

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton Lois Hole Hospital for Women

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver BC Women's Hospital and Health Center

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

St-Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Fredericton Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital

Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Moncton Hospital

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Saint John Regional Hospital

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg St. Boniface General Hospital

Winnipeg, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg University of Manitoba

Winnipeg, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

St-John's Women's Health Centre

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Civic Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sault Ste- Marie Sault Area Hospital

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Quebec City (CHUL) Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saint-Luc CHUM - Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

McGill University Royal Victoria Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sainte-Justine

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

St-Mary's Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Jubilee

Kingston, , Jamaica

Site Status

Spanishtown

Kingston, , Jamaica

Site Status

University of West Indies

Kingston, , Jamaica

Site Status

Hinchingbrooke

Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Warrington, Cheshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Darlington Memorial Hospital

Darlington, County Durham, United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospital of North Durham

Durham, County Durham, United Kingdom

Site Status

Cumberland Infirmary

Carlisle, Cumbria, United Kingdom

Site Status

West Cumberland Hospital

Whitehaven, Cumbria, United Kingdom

Site Status

Fairfield

Bury, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Rochdale

Rochdale, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Lincolnshire

Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Ormskirk

Southport, Merseyside, United Kingdom

Site Status

Northwick Park Hospital

Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom

Site Status

West Middlesex University Hospital

Isleworth, Middlesex, United Kingdom

Site Status

49 Marine Avenue & CCGs

Whitley Bay, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Site Status

Wansbeck General Hospital

Ashington, Northumberland, United Kingdom

Site Status

St George's Hospital

London, Tooting, United Kingdom

Site Status

Gateshead Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom

Site Status

South Tyneside District Hospital

South Shields, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom

Site Status

The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, New Cross Hospital

Wolverhampton, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Blackburn

Blackburn, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Burnley

Burnley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Manchester

Crumpsall, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

South Tees Hospital

Middlesbrough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Tyneside General Hospital

North Shields, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norfolk & Norwich

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham City Hospital

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham Queens Medical Centre

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oldham

Oldham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Tees Hospital

Stockton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sunderland Royal Hospital

Sunderland, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Hillingdon Hospital

Uxbridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Australia Canada Jamaica United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Muldoon KA, McLean C, El-Chaar D, Corsi DJ, Rybak N, Dagvadorj A, Guo Y, Rennicks White R, Dingwall-Harvey ALJ, Gaudet LM, Walker MC, Wen SW; FACT Collaborating Group. Persisting risk factors for preeclampsia among high-risk pregnancies already using prophylactic aspirin: a multi-country retrospective investigation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(1):2200879. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2200879.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37073421 (View on PubMed)

Rose EG, Murphy MSQ, Erwin E, Muldoon KA, Harvey ALJ, Rennicks White R, MacFarlane AJ, Wen SW, Walker MC. Gestational Folate and Folic Acid Intake among Women in Canada at Higher Risk of Pre-Eclampsia. J Nutr. 2021 Jul 1;151(7):1976-1982. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab063.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33851221 (View on PubMed)

Corsi DJ, Gaudet LM, El-Chaar D, White RR, Rybak N, Harvey A, Muldoon K, Wen SW, Walker M. Effect of high-dose folic acid supplementation on the prevention of preeclampsia in twin pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Feb;35(3):503-508. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1725882. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32067533 (View on PubMed)

Wen SW, White RR, Rybak N, Gaudet LM, Robson S, Hague W, Simms-Stewart D, Carroli G, Smith G, Fraser WD, Wells G, Davidge ST, Kingdom J, Coyle D, Fergusson D, Corsi DJ, Champagne J, Sabri E, Ramsay T, Mol BWJ, Oudijk MA, Walker MC; FACT Collaborating Group. Effect of high dose folic acid supplementation in pregnancy on pre-eclampsia (FACT): double blind, phase III, randomised controlled, international, multicentre trial. BMJ. 2018 Sep 12;362:k3478. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3478.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30209050 (View on PubMed)

Wen SW, Champagne J, Rennicks White R, Coyle D, Fraser W, Smith G, Fergusson D, Walker MC. Effect of folic acid supplementation in pregnancy on preeclampsia: the folic acid clinical trial study. J Pregnancy. 2013;2013:294312. doi: 10.1155/2013/294312. Epub 2013 Nov 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24349782 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ISRCTN23781770

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2009-107

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Oral Cleft Prevention Trial in Brazil
NCT00098319 COMPLETED PHASE3
Oral Cleft Prevention Program
NCT00397917 COMPLETED PHASE3