Trial Outcomes & Findings for Benefits of Injectable Abatacept Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients (NCT NCT01351480)
NCT ID: NCT01351480
Last Updated: 2017-03-13
Results Overview
bone edema/osteitis using low-field MRI analysis of 25 anatomical locations in the wrist and hand and scoring the volume of the original articular bone in 0.5 increments from 0-3, with each increment in the scale representing 33% of the volume of the peripheral 1 cm of original (eroded + residual) articular bone.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
34 participants
MRIs at Baseline and Week 48
2017-03-13
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Abatacept
open label use of abatacept for 12 months
abatacept: Abatacept administered SC weekly at 125 mg dose
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Benefits of Injectable Abatacept Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Abatacept
n=34 Participants
open label use of abatacept for 12 months
abatacept: Abatacept administered SC weekly at 125 mg dose
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
34 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: MRIs at Baseline and Week 48Population: osteitis on the MRIs from 27 patients at baseline and week 48
bone edema/osteitis using low-field MRI analysis of 25 anatomical locations in the wrist and hand and scoring the volume of the original articular bone in 0.5 increments from 0-3, with each increment in the scale representing 33% of the volume of the peripheral 1 cm of original (eroded + residual) articular bone.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Abatacept
n=27 Participants
open label use of abatacept for 12 months
abatacept: Abatacept administered SC weekly at 125 mg dose
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With an Improvement in Bone Edema/Osteitis on Low-field MRI in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Weekly SC Abatacept in Combination With Methotrexate Over a 12-month Period.
|
27 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: The DAS 28 score will be performed at baseline and 48Population: There were 34 enrolled patients with 7 patients who early termed so analysis was performed on 27 patients
Patient with a positive change in DAS score were considered responders . The DAS score is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints based upon a 28 joint count, the ESR in mm/hr., and the physician global score
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Abatacept
n=27 Participants
open label use of abatacept for 12 months
abatacept: Abatacept administered SC weekly at 125 mg dose
|
|---|---|
|
Patients With an Improvement in DAS Score Were Considered Responders at Week 48
|
25 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Patient DAS 28 scores will be measured at baseline and weeks 12, 24, 48 and disease activity will be recorded at Week 48Population: the number of participants who reached remission, low disease activity, moderate disease activity and high disease activity will be determined as based upon the DAS scale
DAS 28\> 5.1=high disease activity DAS28 \<3.2=low disease activity DAS28 \<2.6=remission Criteria used in formula are number of tender joints based upon 28 joints, number of swollen joints based on 28 joints, ESR in mm/hr and patient global health core based on 0-10 mm
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Abatacept
n=27 Participants
open label use of abatacept for 12 months
abatacept: Abatacept administered SC weekly at 125 mg dose
|
|---|---|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
clinical remission at week 12
|
2 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
low disease activity at week 12
|
2 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
mod disease activity at week 12
|
12 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
high disease activity at week 12
|
11 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
clinical remission at week 24
|
1 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
low disease activity at week 24
|
2 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
moderate disease activity at week 24
|
14 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
high disease activity at week 24
|
8 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
clinical remission at week 48
|
4 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
low disease activity at week 48
|
6 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
moderate disease activity at week 48
|
8 participants
|
|
To Measure the Change From Baseline in Patient DAS 28 Scores at Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
high disease activity at week 48
|
7 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: week 24 and Week 48Population: There were 34 enrolled patients with 7 patients who early termed so analysis was performed on 27 patients
Patient with a positive change in DAS score were considered responders . The DAS score is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints based upon a 28 joint count, the ESR in mm/hr., and the physician global score (1-10 cm). Total maximum score was at high disease activity at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Abatacept
n=27 Participants
open label use of abatacept for 12 months
abatacept: Abatacept administered SC weekly at 125 mg dose
|
|---|---|
|
the Clinical Outcomes Measurements (American College of Rheumatology Activity Scoring, Health Assessment The Number of Patients With a Clinical Response at Week 24 and 48
clinical response at 6 months
|
20 participants
|
|
the Clinical Outcomes Measurements (American College of Rheumatology Activity Scoring, Health Assessment The Number of Patients With a Clinical Response at Week 24 and 48
clinical response at 12 months
|
25 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: all adverse events will be captured from Day 1 up to 52 weeksPopulation: There were 34 enrolled patients with 7 patients who early termed so analysis was performed on 27 patients
site will report the number of patients with adverse envents from Day 1 up to 52 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Abatacept
n=27 Participants
open label use of abatacept for 12 months
abatacept: Abatacept administered SC weekly at 125 mg dose
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Adverse Events
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
Abatacept
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place