Watchful Waiting Versus Repair of Oligosymptomatic Incisional Hernias
NCT ID: NCT01349400
Last Updated: 2024-02-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
636 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Watchful Waiting of Incisional Hernias
NCT00351455
Visible vs. Non-Visible Mesh in Underlay Positon After Repair of Umbilical Hernias
NCT03200405
Outcomes After Epigastric Hernia Repair in Women.
NCT06074146
Inguinal Hernia Management: Watchful Waiting vs. Tension-Free Open Repair
NCT01922674
Predisposing Factors for Chronic Postherniotomy Pain
NCT00649142
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary endpoint is pain during normal activities measured on the Surgical Pain Scales (SPS) after 24 months follow-up. SPS are a numeric analog scale (NAS) from 0 (no pain) to 150 (maximal pain). The primary endpoint will be dichotomized to no/minimal pain (SPS 0-30) and pain interfering with everyday activities (SPS \> 30). Watchful waiting is non-inferior to surgical repair in case the upper border of the 95 % confidence interval will not include the value of 2.
Secondary outcomes are pain and discomfort during during sports, at rest, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and the frequency of incarceration. The investigators hypothesize that pain intensity during everyday activities is not different in the compared groups and that incarceration frequency is low. If this was the case, a watchful waiting strategy could be applied in oligosymptomatic incisional hernias and risks and costs for surgery could be saved.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
watchful waiting
After informed consent and randomization into the watchful waiting group patients will receive standardized verbal information and written instructions on symptoms of acute incarceration. In case of acute symptoms they will be told to visit a physician immediately. On follow-up visits at 1 month, 12 months and 24 months the hernia size will be determined by physical examination, and the pain/ discomfort and the functional status will be monitored.
Control intervention/ reference test:
Open or laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh (non-absorbable or partly-absorbable alloplastic material) or with direct suture repair. For hernias measuring ≥ 3 cm mesh repair is recommended. A wide overlap of the mesh over the fascia margin on each side has to be provided. Divergent types of repair are permitted but have to be documented.
Watchful waiting
Watchful waiting means the observation of the hernia. The patient is informed about signs of deterioration or incarceration. The hernia is controlled clinically on defined follow-up visits.
Hernia repair
Intervention: Open or laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh (non-absorbable or partly-absorbable alloplastic material) or with direct suture repair. For hernias measuring ≥ 3 cm mesh repair is recommended. A wide overlap of the mesh over the fascia margin on each side has to be provided. Divergent types of repair are permitted but have to be documented.
Hernia repair
Open or laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh (non-absorbable or partly-absorbable alloplastic material) or with direct suture repair. For hernias measuring ≥ 3 cm mesh repair is recommended. A wide overlap of the mesh over the fascia margin on each side has to be provided.
These are all standard techniques in incisional hernia repair.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Watchful waiting
Watchful waiting means the observation of the hernia. The patient is informed about signs of deterioration or incarceration. The hernia is controlled clinically on defined follow-up visits.
Hernia repair
Open or laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh (non-absorbable or partly-absorbable alloplastic material) or with direct suture repair. For hernias measuring ≥ 3 cm mesh repair is recommended. A wide overlap of the mesh over the fascia margin on each side has to be provided.
These are all standard techniques in incisional hernia repair.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* asymptomatic/ oligosymptomatic incisional hernia
Exclusion Criteria
* acute incarcerated hernia
* emergency hernia repair
* pain or discomfort associated with the hernia during normal activities
* local or systemic infection
* ASA score \>3
* inability to complete or comprehend the preoperative questionnaire
* repair with biologic prothesis
18 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
German Research Foundation
OTHER
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Johannes Lauscher
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Johannes C Lauscher, M. D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lauscher JC, Martus P, Stroux A, Neudecker J, Behrens U, Hammerich R, Buhr HJ, Ritz JP. Development of a clinical trial to determine whether watchful waiting is an acceptable alternative to surgical repair for patients with oligosymptomatic incisional hernia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Feb 7;13:14. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KS6-233
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.