Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of Sub-unit Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccine Administered to Elderly Subjects, Formulation 2011-2012 (NCT NCT01344057)
NCT ID: NCT01344057
Last Updated: 2023-04-28
Results Overview
Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of participants who achieved seroconversion or significant increase in single radial hemolysis (SRH) area, against each of the three vaccine strains, three weeks after vaccination (day 22), evaluated using SRH assay. Seroconversion: proportion of participants with negative pre-vaccination serum and a post-vaccination serum area ≥ 25 mm2. Significant increase: proportion of participants with at least a 50% increase in area from positive pre-vaccination serum. Seroconversion or significant increase: proportion of participants with either seroconversion or significant increase. The European (Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use \[CHMP\]) criterion is met, if percentage of participants achieving seroconversion or significant increase in SRH area is 30% (≥65 years).
COMPLETED
PHASE2
63 participants
day 22
2023-04-28
Participant Flow
Overall, 63 participants were ≥65 years of age were enrolled at 4 sites in Italy.
Blood sample for immunogenicity assays were collected before vaccination (Day 1) and after 21 Days.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
FLUAD
Participants received a single intramuscular (IM) dose of 0.5 milliliter (mL) of FLUAD containing 15μg each of the three influenza antigens into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm during the vaccination visit, according to the study protocol until day 22.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
63
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
62
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
FLUAD
Participants received a single intramuscular (IM) dose of 0.5 milliliter (mL) of FLUAD containing 15μg each of the three influenza antigens into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm during the vaccination visit, according to the study protocol until day 22.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Premature Withdrawal
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of Sub-unit Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccine Administered to Elderly Subjects, Formulation 2011-2012
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
FLUAD
n=63 Participants
Participants received a single IM dose of 0.5 mL of FLUAD containing 15μg each of the three influenza antigens into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm during the vaccination visit, according to the study protocol until day 22.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
73.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: day 22Population: Per protocol (PP) analysis set included all enrolled participants who had correctly received the vaccine, provided evaluable serum samples before and after vaccination, and had no major protocol violations.
Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of participants who achieved seroconversion or significant increase in single radial hemolysis (SRH) area, against each of the three vaccine strains, three weeks after vaccination (day 22), evaluated using SRH assay. Seroconversion: proportion of participants with negative pre-vaccination serum and a post-vaccination serum area ≥ 25 mm2. Significant increase: proportion of participants with at least a 50% increase in area from positive pre-vaccination serum. Seroconversion or significant increase: proportion of participants with either seroconversion or significant increase. The European (Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use \[CHMP\]) criterion is met, if percentage of participants achieving seroconversion or significant increase in SRH area is 30% (≥65 years).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLUAD
n=63 Participants
Participants received a single IM dose of 0.5 mL of FLUAD containing 15μg each of the three influenza antigens into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm during the vaccination visit, according to the study protocol until day 22.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Seroconversion or Significant Increase in Single Radial Hemolysis (SRH) Area Against Each of Three Vaccine Strains After One Vaccination of FLUAD
B (N= 62)
|
26 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.0 to 38.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Seroconversion or Significant Increase in Single Radial Hemolysis (SRH) Area Against Each of Three Vaccine Strains After One Vaccination of FLUAD
A/H1N1 (N= 62)
|
69 Percentage of participants
Interval 56.0 to 80.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Seroconversion or Significant Increase in Single Radial Hemolysis (SRH) Area Against Each of Three Vaccine Strains After One Vaccination of FLUAD
A/H3N2 (N= 62)
|
50 Percentage of participants
Interval 37.0 to 63.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: day 22Population: Analysis was done using PP set.
Geometric mean ratio (GMR) of participants was calculated as the ratio of post-vaccination to pre-vaccination SRH geometric mean areas (GMAs), directed against each of the three vaccine strains, three weeks after FLUAD vaccination (day 22). The CHMP criterion was met if the geometric mean increase (GMR, day 22/day 1) in SRH antibody area is \>2.0 (≥65 years).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLUAD
n=63 Participants
Participants received a single IM dose of 0.5 mL of FLUAD containing 15μg each of the three influenza antigens into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm during the vaccination visit, according to the study protocol until day 22.
|
|---|---|
|
Geometric Mean Ratio of Participants Against Each of the Three Vaccine Strains After One Vaccination of FLUAD
A/H1N1 (N= 62)
|
2.54 Ratio
Interval 2.1 to 3.07
|
|
Geometric Mean Ratio of Participants Against Each of the Three Vaccine Strains After One Vaccination of FLUAD
A/H3N2 (N= 62)
|
1.9 Ratio
Interval 1.63 to 2.2
|
|
Geometric Mean Ratio of Participants Against Each of the Three Vaccine Strains After One Vaccination of FLUAD
B (N= 62)
|
1.36 Ratio
Interval 1.21 to 1.53
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: day 22Population: Analysis was done using PP set.
Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of participants achieving SRH area ≥25 mm2 against each of the three vaccine strains at baseline (day 1) and three weeks after FLUAD vaccination (day 22). This criterion is met according to CHMP guideline if percentage of participants achieving SRH area ≥25 mm2 is 60% (≥65 years).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLUAD
n=63 Participants
Participants received a single IM dose of 0.5 mL of FLUAD containing 15μg each of the three influenza antigens into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm during the vaccination visit, according to the study protocol until day 22.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved SRH Area ≥25mm2 Against Each of the Three Vaccine Strains After One Vaccination of FLUAD
A/H1N1 (N= 62)
|
89 Percentage of participants
Interval 78.0 to 95.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved SRH Area ≥25mm2 Against Each of the Three Vaccine Strains After One Vaccination of FLUAD
A/H3N2 (N= 62)
|
69 Percentage of participants
Interval 56.0 to 80.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved SRH Area ≥25mm2 Against Each of the Three Vaccine Strains After One Vaccination of FLUAD
B (N= 62)
|
94 Percentage of participants
Interval 84.0 to 98.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 to 4 days post-vaccinationPopulation: Analysis was done using the safety dataset; participants who received study vaccination and who provided post-vaccination safety data.
Safety was assessed for participants who reported solicited local and systemic reactions from day 1 up to and including day 4 after the FLUAD vaccination.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FLUAD
n=63 Participants
Participants received a single IM dose of 0.5 mL of FLUAD containing 15μg each of the three influenza antigens into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm during the vaccination visit, according to the study protocol until day 22.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Injection site ecchymosis (N= 62)
|
3 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Injection site erythema (N= 62)
|
7 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Chills Shivering (N= 62)
|
4 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Malaise (N= 62)
|
3 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Myalgia (N= 62)
|
6 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Arthralgia (N= 62)
|
4 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Headache (N= 62)
|
4 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Sweating (N= 62)
|
1 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Fatigue (N= 62)
|
2 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Fever (≥38°C) (N= 61)
|
0 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Injection site induration (N= 62)
|
4 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Injection site swelling (N= 62)
|
7 Number of participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Reactions
Injection site pain (N= 62)
|
21 Number of participants
|
Adverse Events
FLUAD
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
FLUAD
n=63 participants at risk
Participants received a single IM 0.5 mL dose of trivalent subunit inactivated adjuvanted influenza vaccine FLUAD during the vaccination visit, according to the study protocol (follow-up period: until day 22).
|
|---|---|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
4.8%
3/63 • From Day 1 through Day 22.
Adverse events other than local and systemic reactions or solicited reactions lasting longer than 3 days after vaccination were documented during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site haemorrhage
|
3.2%
2/63 • From Day 1 through Day 22.
Adverse events other than local and systemic reactions or solicited reactions lasting longer than 3 days after vaccination were documented during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site induration
|
3.2%
2/63 • From Day 1 through Day 22.
Adverse events other than local and systemic reactions or solicited reactions lasting longer than 3 days after vaccination were documented during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
3.2%
2/63 • From Day 1 through Day 22.
Adverse events other than local and systemic reactions or solicited reactions lasting longer than 3 days after vaccination were documented during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site swelling
|
3.2%
2/63 • From Day 1 through Day 22.
Adverse events other than local and systemic reactions or solicited reactions lasting longer than 3 days after vaccination were documented during the study period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Mastoiditis
|
1.6%
1/63 • From Day 1 through Day 22.
Adverse events other than local and systemic reactions or solicited reactions lasting longer than 3 days after vaccination were documented during the study period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
3.2%
2/63 • From Day 1 through Day 22.
Adverse events other than local and systemic reactions or solicited reactions lasting longer than 3 days after vaccination were documented during the study period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
3.2%
2/63 • From Day 1 through Day 22.
Adverse events other than local and systemic reactions or solicited reactions lasting longer than 3 days after vaccination were documented during the study period.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreement with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publications of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER