Trial Outcomes & Findings for Varenicline for Gait and Balance Impairment in Parkinson Disease (NCT NCT01341080)
NCT ID: NCT01341080
Last Updated: 2022-12-30
Results Overview
Efficacy was measured as a change on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) from baseline to the end of the study after 8 weeks on drug. The BBS is a 14-item measure consisting of basic balance tasks, with a final score indicative of overall balance ability. The maximum score is 56 and minimum is 0. Higher scores reflect better balance.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
40 participants
9 weeks
2022-12-30
Participant Flow
Subjects were recruitment from the Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder clinic at Rush University Medical Center over the course of the study (2011-2018).
40 participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining 32 were used in the analysis.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Varenicline
Varenicline: Varenicline 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation period.
|
Sugar Pill
Sugar pill: 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Varenicline
n=18 Participants
Varenicline: Varenicline 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation period.
|
Sugar Pill
n=18 Participants
Sugar pill: 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation phase.
|
Total
n=36 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
3 Participants
n=15 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
3 Participants
n=17 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
6 Participants
n=32 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
12 Participants
n=15 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
14 Participants
n=17 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
26 Participants
n=32 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
71.93 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=15 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
70.24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 • n=17 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
71.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.134 • n=32 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=15 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
3 Participants
n=17 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
6 Participants
n=32 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=15 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
14 Participants
n=17 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
26 Participants
n=32 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
15 Participants
n=15 Participants • 36 participants were randomized and six participants terminated early. 2 had sufficient data for last observations carried forward. The remaining sample of 32 was used in the analysis.
|
17 Participants
n=17 Participants • 36 participants were randomized and six participants terminated early. 2 had sufficient data for last observations carried forward. The remaining sample of 32 was used in the analysis.
|
32 Participants
n=32 Participants • 36 participants were randomized and six participants terminated early. 2 had sufficient data for last observations carried forward. The remaining sample of 32 was used in the analysis.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
15 participants
n=15 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
17 participants
n=17 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
32 participants
n=32 Participants • Forty participants signed an informed consent form and 36 were randomized. Six participants terminated participation early, with 2 having sufficient data for last observations carried forward intention-to-treat analyses. The remaining sample was 32 participants.Fifteen participants were randomized to receive varenicline and 17 to placebo.
|
|
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
|
33.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=18 Participants
|
35.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=18 Participants
|
34.74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.558 • n=36 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 weeksEfficacy was measured as a change on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) from baseline to the end of the study after 8 weeks on drug. The BBS is a 14-item measure consisting of basic balance tasks, with a final score indicative of overall balance ability. The maximum score is 56 and minimum is 0. Higher scores reflect better balance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Varenicline
n=15 Participants
Varenicline: Varenicline 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation period.
|
Sugar Pill
n=17 Participants
Sugar pill: 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Berg Balance Scale
Baseline
|
43.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.97
|
41.14 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
|
Berg Balance Scale
End Point
|
43.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84
|
45.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 weeksThe change in cognitive functioning was measured with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB, score range 0-18) and the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE, score range 0-30) from baseline to 8 weeks on drug. High scores on both scales indicate better performance. The FAB measures executive functioning and consists of the following 6 sections: conceptualization, mental flexibility, motor programming, sensitivity to interference, inhibitory control, and environmental autonomy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Varenicline
n=15 Participants
Varenicline: Varenicline 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation period.
|
Sugar Pill
n=17 Participants
Sugar pill: 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frontal Assessment Battery
End point
|
17.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
15.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.74
|
|
Frontal Assessment Battery
Baseline
|
17.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
15.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 weeksThe change in cognitive functioning was measured with the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) from baseline to 8 weeks on drug. The maximum score on the MMSE is 30 and lowest score 0, with higher score indicating better cognitive function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Varenicline
n=15 Participants
Varenicline: Varenicline 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation period.
|
Sugar Pill
n=17 Participants
Sugar pill: 1mg twice daily for eight weeks after a one week dose escalation phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)
End point
|
28.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
28.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
|
Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)
Baseline
|
29.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
28.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
Adverse Events
Varenicline
Sugar Pill
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place