Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of Oral Ferric Iron To Treat Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Quiescent Ulcerative Colitis (AEGIS-1) (NCT NCT01340872)
NCT ID: NCT01340872
Last Updated: 2020-10-30
Results Overview
Primary efficacy endpoint, defined as the change in Hb concentration from Baseline to Week 12. Baseline was defined as the pre-dose Hb concentration measured at the Randomisation Visit (Week 0). Missing Randomisation Hb values were replaced by Screening Hb values, if the randomisation was within the protocol-specified window. Hb concentration (g/dL) was analysed by a central laboratory from blood samples collected at every clinic visit: Screening, Randomisation (Week 0), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 36, 48, 64, Weeks 14 to 64 were open-label. The baseline, absolute concentration and change from baseline in Hb at all post-randomisation visits were listed and summarised by week using descriptive statistics. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyse the primary endpoint; this included treatment, gender and disease as factors and baseline Hb as a covariate.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
128 participants
Baseline to Week 12 - double-blind phase
2020-10-30
Participant Flow
Potential subjects were selected from the general population attending each centre in UK, DE, AT or HU for routine care of their IBD and anaemia. Individuals interested in participating were invited for the Screening visit in order to assess eligibility. Written informed consent was obtained prior to conducting any study specific assessments.
Subjects were males or females aged ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of UC, required to be in remission have a mild-to-moderate UC (defined by SCCAI score \<4 at entry); mild-to-moderate IDA (Hb concentration ≥9.5 g/dL and \<12.0 g/dL for females and ≥9.5 g/dL and \<13.0 g/dL for males; serum ferritin levels \<30 μg/L at Screening.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ST10
30mg ST10 capsules BD - double-blind phase
|
Placebo
Matching placebo for ST10 capsules - double-blind phase
|
ST10 - Open-label Continuation From Active Arm in Double-blind
Open-label extension of ST10 active treatment arm from double-blind phase
|
Placebo Switch to Open-label Extension ST10 Treatment
Open-label extension ST10 treatment arm for placebo subjects completing double-blind phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind Phase
STARTED
|
64
|
64
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Phase
COMPLETED
|
55
|
53
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
11
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open-label Phase
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
50
|
47
|
|
Open-label Phase
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
37
|
36
|
|
Open-label Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
ST10
30mg ST10 capsules BD - double-blind phase
|
Placebo
Matching placebo for ST10 capsules - double-blind phase
|
ST10 - Open-label Continuation From Active Arm in Double-blind
Open-label extension of ST10 active treatment arm from double-blind phase
|
Placebo Switch to Open-label Extension ST10 Treatment
Open-label extension ST10 treatment arm for placebo subjects completing double-blind phase
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind Phase
Adverse Event
|
6
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Phase
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Phase
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open-label Phase
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
|
Open-label Phase
Pregnancy
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Open-label Phase
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
4
|
|
Open-label Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
6
|
|
Open-label Phase
Worsening of IBD
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy Study of Oral Ferric Iron To Treat Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Quiescent Ulcerative Colitis (AEGIS-1)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ST10
n=64 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during a 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=64 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during a 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Total
n=128 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.52 • n=5 Participants
|
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=7 Participants
|
39.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
35 participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 participants
n=7 Participants
|
67 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Austria
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of ulcerative colitis (years)
|
9.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.28 • n=5 Participants
|
10.99 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.43 • n=7 Participants
|
9.99 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Time since last IBD flare-up (months)
|
24.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 59.16 • n=5 Participants
|
21.51 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.46 • n=7 Participants
|
23.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Time since last OFP dose (months)
|
36.17 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.1 • n=5 Participants
|
33.34 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.04 • n=7 Participants
|
34.76 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Haemoglobin concentration at baseline
|
11 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03 • n=5 Participants
|
11.1 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85 • n=7 Participants
|
11.05 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Serum Ferritin concentration at baseline
|
8.6 μg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 • n=5 Participants
|
8.2 μg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=7 Participants
|
8.4 μg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
TSAT% at baseline
|
10.6 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=5 Participants
|
9.5 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=7 Participants
|
10.05 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Irritable Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score at baseline
|
175.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.92 • n=5 Participants
|
171.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.56 • n=7 Participants
|
173.02 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.23 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) score at baseline
|
1.8 score on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
1.4 score on a scale
n=7 Participants
|
1.6 score on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - double-blind phasePopulation: Full Analysis Set (FAS)
Primary efficacy endpoint, defined as the change in Hb concentration from Baseline to Week 12. Baseline was defined as the pre-dose Hb concentration measured at the Randomisation Visit (Week 0). Missing Randomisation Hb values were replaced by Screening Hb values, if the randomisation was within the protocol-specified window. Hb concentration (g/dL) was analysed by a central laboratory from blood samples collected at every clinic visit: Screening, Randomisation (Week 0), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 36, 48, 64, Weeks 14 to 64 were open-label. The baseline, absolute concentration and change from baseline in Hb at all post-randomisation visits were listed and summarised by week using descriptive statistics. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyse the primary endpoint; this included treatment, gender and disease as factors and baseline Hb as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=58 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=53 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haemoglobin (Hb) Concentration From Baseline to Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
2.26 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.184
|
0.01 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.764
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Subjects that achieved ≥1 g/dL change from baseline in Hb concentration at Week 12 - double-blind phasePopulation: Full Analysis Set (FAS)
Logistic regression analysis of proportion of subjects that achieved ≥1 g/dL change from baseline in Hb concentration at Week 12 in the double-blind phase
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=64 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=64 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved ≥1 g/dL Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
Yes
|
50 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved ≥1 g/dL Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
No
|
14 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - double-blind phasePopulation: FAS
Logistic regression analysis of proportion of subjects that achieved ≥2 g/dL change from baseline in Hb concentration at Week 12 in the double-blind phase
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=64 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=64 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved ≥2 g/dL Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
Yes
|
36 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved ≥2 g/dL Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
No
|
28 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - double-blind phasePopulation: FAS
Logistic regression analysis of proportion of subjects that achieved Hb concentration within normal range at Week 12 - end of double-blind phase
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=64 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=64 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Hb Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
Yes
|
42 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Hb Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
No
|
22 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4 - double-blind phasePopulation: FAS
ANCOVA analysis of the change in Hb concentration from Baseline to Week 4 of the double-blind phase - Full Analysis Set, multiple imputation
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=59 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Week 4 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
1.08 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.676
|
0 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8 - double-blind phasePopulation: FAS
ANCOVA analysis of Change in Hb concentration from Baseline to Week 8 of double-blind phase - FAS, multiple imputation
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=59 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=56 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline to Week 8 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
1.79 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.037
|
0.04 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.722
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration from Baseline to Week 16 (FAS), after 12-week double-blind phase and first 4 weeks of open-label ST10 treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=46 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=45 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Week 16 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
2.34 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.281
|
1.04 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.023
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 20 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration from Baseline to Week 20 (FAS), after 12-week double-blind phase and then 8 weeks of open-label ST10 treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=43 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Week 20 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
2.45 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.213
|
1.46 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.056
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration from Baseline to Week 24 (FAS), after 12-week double-blind phase and then 12 weeks of open-label ST10 treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=43 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=41 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Week 24 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
2.68 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.127
|
1.87 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.195
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration from Baseline to Week 36 (FAS), after 12-week double-blind phase and then 24 weeks of open-label ST10 treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=41 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Week 36 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
2.85 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.227
|
2.17 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.048
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration from Baseline to Week 48 (FAS), after 12-week double-blind phase and then 36 weeks of open-label ST10 treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=40 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=37 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Week 48 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
3.09 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.339
|
2.0 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.191
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 64 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration from Baseline to Week 64 (FAS), after 12-week double-blind phase and then 52 weeks of open-label ST10 treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=35 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Week 64 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
3.07 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.457
|
2.19 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.605
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 64 EOS - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration from Baseline to Week 64 EOS (FAS) - Week 64 was re-categorised as Week 64 EOS for those subjects who withdrew from the study early and the 'Week 64' visit was outside the visit window of 64 weeks ± 2 days
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=10 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=17 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Week 64 EOS (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
1.32 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.713
|
0.52 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.417
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Proportion of subjects that achieved Haemoglobin Concentration within normal range at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set), after 12-week double-blind phase and first 4 weeks of open-label ST10 treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=46 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=45 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Haemoglobin Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
Yes
|
36 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Haemoglobin Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
No
|
10 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Proportion of subjects that achieved Haemoglobin Concentration within normal range at Week 36 (Full Analysis Set), after 12-week double-blind phase and 24 weeks of open-label ST10 treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=41 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Haemoglobin Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 36 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
No
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Haemoglobin Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 36 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
Yes
|
35 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 64 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Proportion of subjects that achieved Haemoglobin Concentration within normal range at Week 64 (Full Analysis Set), after 12-week double-blind phase and 52 weeks of open-label ST10 treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=36 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Haemoglobin Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 64 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
Yes
|
31 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects That Achieved Haemoglobin Concentration Within Normal Range at Week 64 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
No
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - double-blind phasePopulation: Per-Protocol Analysis Set - sensitivity analysis of primary endpoint
ANCOVA sensitivity analysis of the Primary efficacy endpoint analysis on the PPAS - Change in Haemoglobin Concentration from Baseline to Week 12
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=55 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Week 12 (Per Protocol Analysis Set, PPAS)
|
2.23 g/dL
Standard Error 0.13
|
0.05 g/dL
Standard Error 0.13
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - double-blind phasePopulation: FAS LOCF - sensitivity analysis of primary endpoint
ANCOVA sensitivity analysis of the Primary efficacy endpoint analysis on the FAS LOCF - Change in Haemoglobin Concentration from Baseline to Week 12
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=64 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=64 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Week 12 (Full Analysis Set [FAS] LOCF)
|
2.11 g/dL
Standard Error 0.12
|
-0.03 g/dL
Standard Error 0.12
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - double-blind phasePopulation: FAS
Change in serum Ferritin concentration from Baseline to Week 12 (Full Analysis Set), after 12-week double-blind phase
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=59 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=53 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline to Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
17.3 μg/dL
Standard Deviation 28.3
|
1.2 μg/dL
Standard Deviation 7.85
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 64 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Change in serum Ferritin concentration from Baseline to Week 64 (FAS), after 12-week double-blind phase and 52 weeks open-label ST10 treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=36 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline to Week 64 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
60.4 μg/dL
Standard Deviation 93.35
|
36.6 μg/dL
Standard Deviation 46.8
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - double-blind phasePopulation: FAS
Change in serum TSAT% from Baseline to Week 12 (FAS), after 12-week double-blind phase
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=59 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Serum TSAT% From Baseline to Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
18.0 % serum TSAT
Standard Deviation 20.17
|
-0.4 % serum TSAT
Standard Deviation 7.82
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 64 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Change in serum TSAT% from Baseline to Week 64 (Full Analysis Set), after 12-week double-blind phase and 52 weeks open-label ST10 treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=36 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Serum TSAT% From Baseline to Week 64 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
18.8 % serum TSAT
Standard Deviation 12.46
|
17.7 % serum TSAT
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 - double-blind phasePopulation: FAS
Irritable Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score at Week 12 (FAS), end of double-blind phase. The IBDQ was developed as an activity index for determining the effect of Ulcerative Colitis symptoms on perceived quality of life. It is a 32-item questionnaire with four dimensions: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. Total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. The score of patients in remission usually is between 170 and 190.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=60 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=60 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Irritable Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
178.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.36
|
176.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 64 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Irritable Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score at Week 64 (FAS), after 12-week double-blind phase and 52 weeks of open-label ST10 treatment. The IBDQ was developed as an activity index for determining the effect of Ulcerative Colitis symptoms on perceived quality of life. It is a 32-item questionnaire with four dimensions: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. Total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. The score of patients in remission usually is between 170 and 190.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=37 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Irritable Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 64 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
180.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.14
|
177.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.97
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - double-blind phasePopulation: FAS - participants with UC only
Change from baseline in Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) score at Week 12 (FAS), end of double-blind phase (in subjects with UC). The SCCAI is a diagnostic and research questionnaire used to assess the severity of symptoms in people who suffer from UC. The calculated score ranges from 0 to 19, where active disease is a score of 5 or higher. The score is determined by asking the person with UC questions regarding: * bowel frequency at day/night * urgency of defecation * blood in stool * general health * extracolonic manifestations
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=28 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) Score at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set, FAS)
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -2.0 to 5.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -1.0 to 5.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 64 - open-label phasePopulation: FAS
Change from baseline in Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) score at Week 64 (FAS), after 12-week double-blind phase and 52 weeks open-label ST10 treatment (in participants with UC only). The SCCAI is a diagnostic and research questionnaire used to assess the severity of symptoms in people who suffer from UC. The calculated score ranges from 0 to 19, where active disease is a score of 5 or higher. The score is determined by asking the person with UC questions regarding: * bowel frequency at day/night * urgency of defecation * blood in stool * general health * extracolonic manifestations
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ST10
n=19 Participants
ST10: 30 mg Ferric Maltol capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Matching Placebo capsules taken orally twice a day during 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) Score at Week 64 (Full Analysis Set)
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -3.0 to 2.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -2.0 to 5.0
|
Adverse Events
ST10 - Safety Set, Double-blind Phase
Placebo - Safety Set, Double-blind Phase
ST10 Continuation - Safety Set, Open-label Phase
Placebo Switch to ST10 Treatment-Safety Set, Open-label Phase
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ST10 - Safety Set, Double-blind Phase
n=64 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in the double-blind phase active treatment arm with ST10 (Ferric Maltol). ST10 30 mg capsules taken orally twice a day during a 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo - Safety Set, Double-blind Phase
n=64 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in the double-blind phase placebo treatment arm. Matching placebo capsules for ST10 taken orally twice a day during a 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
ST10 Continuation - Safety Set, Open-label Phase
n=50 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in the open-label extension phase for continuation of active treatment with ST10 (Ferric Maltol) from the double-blind phase active treatment arm.
|
Placebo Switch to ST10 Treatment-Safety Set, Open-label Phase
n=47 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in the open-label extension phase from those subjects continuing treatment from the double-blind placebo arm; subjects commenced ST10 open-label treatment after completion of the double-blind phase at the Week 12 visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Crohn's disease
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal abscess
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cholesteatoma removal
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
General disorders
Hernia
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ST10 - Safety Set, Double-blind Phase
n=64 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in the double-blind phase active treatment arm with ST10 (Ferric Maltol). ST10 30 mg capsules taken orally twice a day during a 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
Placebo - Safety Set, Double-blind Phase
n=64 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in the double-blind phase placebo treatment arm. Matching placebo capsules for ST10 taken orally twice a day during a 12-week double-blind phase. For study participants in the UK, DE and HU only, the 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 52-week open-label ST10 extension treatment phase.
|
ST10 Continuation - Safety Set, Open-label Phase
n=50 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in the open-label extension phase for continuation of active treatment with ST10 (Ferric Maltol) from the double-blind phase active treatment arm.
|
Placebo Switch to ST10 Treatment-Safety Set, Open-label Phase
n=47 participants at risk
Adverse events reported in the open-label extension phase from those subjects continuing treatment from the double-blind placebo arm; subjects commenced ST10 open-label treatment after completion of the double-blind phase at the Week 12 visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.1%
2/64 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
6.2%
4/64 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
3.1%
2/64 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
|
4.7%
3/64 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
4.7%
3/64 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
3.1%
2/64 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
10.9%
7/64 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
7.8%
5/64 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
14.9%
7/47 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.7%
3/64 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
8.5%
4/47 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
7.8%
5/64 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
12.8%
6/47 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Crohn's disease
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
6.2%
4/64 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
10.6%
5/47 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
7.8%
5/64 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
6.2%
4/64 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
12.8%
6/47 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
6.2%
4/64 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
3.1%
2/64 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
4.7%
3/64 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
3.1%
2/64 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.2%
4/64 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
12.5%
8/64 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
24.0%
12/50 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
17.0%
8/47 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
3.1%
2/64 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/64 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
1.6%
1/64 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were solicited after informed consent and until 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (at study completion or early termination).
Subjects were expected to volunteer information about AEs they experienced. The Investigator/designee also questioned the subject at each visit about AEs and recorded these as well as all other AEs apparent. AEs/SAEs were monitored until they were resolved or determined to be due to a subject's on-going condition or inter-current illness.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place