Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training (CRAFT) for Problem Gambling
NCT ID: NCT01340274
Last Updated: 2020-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE2
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-06-03
2012-04-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Very few IPGs access support services for their gambling problems. Some reports (National Gambling Impact Study Commission 1999) have found that only 3% of IPGs seek treatment. The Nova Scotia Gambling Prevalence Study (2004) states: "Overall, 3.5% (26,000 adults) have been motivated to help someone else with a current gambling problem versus 0.5% (3,700 adults) seeking assistance or information for a personal problem". While the CSOs of IPGs are seven times more likely to access professional addiction treatment the options for these individuals are limited and treatment programs often lack evidence in support of their effectiveness.
The Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) (Meyers \& Wolfe 2004) approach provides significant benefits to the CSOs of persons abusing alcohol and other drugs. They benefits include: improvement in the quality of life of the CSOs; increasing the rate of substance abusers entering treatment; and decreased substance use. CRAFT empowers CSOs by providing tools to positively influence theirs and their significant other's behavior.
The current study investigates the applicability and effectiveness of the CRAFT approach to the CSOs of IPGS.
It is predicted that benefits to the CSOs receiving CRAFT will significantly surpass those receiving treatment as usual. The predicted benefits are: improvement in quality of life for the CSO; engagement of IPGs in treatment; and decreased gambling by the IPGs. With these achieved outcomes, this research will provide opportunity for earlier intervention, improved individual and family functioning and a reduction of the negative impact of problem gambling on the community.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minimal and Brief Treatments for Pathological Gamblers
NCT00203645
Online Interventions for Gamblers With and Without Co-occurring Problem Drinking
NCT03323606
Brief Therapies for Problem Gambling Substance Abusers
NCT00685048
Adding Contingency Management to Treatment as Usual for Disordered Gambling.
NCT02613754
Internet Based Self-help for Problem Gambling Concerned Significant Others
NCT06230809
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is known that despite the negative consequence of problem gambling very few IPGs access services for treating their gambling problems. The Nova Scotia Gambling Prevalence Study (2004) has shown that CSOs are seven times more likely to access services than IPGs "Overall, 3.5% (26,000 adults) have been motivated to help someone else with a current gambling problem versus 0.5% (3,700 adults) seeking assistance or information for a personal problem". Despite such findings the treatment options for the CSOs of IPGs are limited (Crisp, B.R. et al. 2001; Shaw, M.C. et al. 2007).
The Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) (Meyers \& Wolfe 2004) model for CSOs of substance abusers has demonstrated significant success with the following outcomes: improvement in the quality of life of CSOs; engagement of the substance abuser in treatment; and decreased substance use. CRAFT empowers CSOs by providing tools to positively influence their own and their significant others behavior through a cognitive behavioral approach.
This current project investigates the applicability and effectiveness of the CRAFT model as a tool for supporting the CSOs of problem gamblers. A comparative analysis will be completed with random assignment of 60 CSOs to either of Group A (CRAFT) or Group B (treatment as usual). Twelve individual treatment sessions will be offered to each of the CSOs. It is predicted the outcomes of from Group A (CRAFT) will significantly surpass those from Group B (treatment as usual). The predicted outcomes are: improvement in quality of life for the CSOs; engagement of the IPGs in treatment; and decreased gambling by the IPGs. All therapists in the CRAFT experimental group have been certified in the CRAFT model. A comparative analysis will be conducted with the CRAFT approach (Group A) and the traditional treatment approach (Group B). Model adherence will be supervised and tested.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment as Usual
Clients will receive 12 sessions of "Treatment as usual ", delivered 1 session per week for 12 consecutive weeks.
Treatment as Usual
Clients will receive Treatment as Usual delivered over 12 session. There will be 1 session per week.
CRAFT Treatment
Clients will receive 12 sessions of "CRAFT", delivered 1 session per week for 12 consecutive weeks.
CRAFT treatment
Clients will receive 12 sessions of CRAFT delivered over a 12 week period. There will be 1 session per week.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CRAFT treatment
Clients will receive 12 sessions of CRAFT delivered over a 12 week period. There will be 1 session per week.
Treatment as Usual
Clients will receive Treatment as Usual delivered over 12 session. There will be 1 session per week.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. CSO must have face-to-face contact with the IPG at least 3 days per week and for at least 1 hour per day with no anticipated relationship change (e.g. separation) over the next 90 days.
3. Impaired functioning of the CSO consequential to their significant other being engaged in problem gambling.
4. Evidence (from the CSOs) that the IPG meets Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) criteria for problem gambling.
5. The CSO's primary motivation for treatment is to influence their IPG's gambling behaviour.
Exclusion Criteria
2. CSO has a condition, including substance dependency and/or significant psychopathology, which could impede the CSO's ability to understand and participate in treatment.
3. The IPG has received treatment for problem gambling in the previous 3 months, is currently willing to receive treatment, or has been court ordered to receive treatment.
4. Domestic violence is a significant risk based on the CSOs report and psychometric measure.
5. The CSO is currently receiving psychotherapy for issues related to their IPG's gambling.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pictou County Health Authority
UNKNOWN
University of Calgary
OTHER
Dalhousie University
OTHER
Colchester East Hants Health Authority
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Greg Purvis, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pictou County Health Authority
David Hodgins, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Addiction Services
Amherst, Nova Scotia, Canada
Addiction Services
Pictou, Nova Scotia, Canada
Addictions Services
Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.