Trial Outcomes & Findings for Preventing Violence Among Veterans in Substance Use Disorder Treatment (NCT NCT01337973)
NCT ID: NCT01337973
Last Updated: 2019-09-06
Results Overview
The CTS-SI is a semi-structured interview assessing interpersonal violence (violence severity, injury and characteristics of interpersonal conflict incidents). Baseline data collection assessed the 180 days prior to enrollment, and follow-up data was collected at 3 and 6 months for the prior 90 days, and at 12 months for the past 180 days. The analysis below compares the month rate of various types of interpersonal aggression from the period pre-baseline to the monthly rate post-intervention (across all 12 months of follow-up) in the form of % difference. Means at baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months were compared resulting in a number with no measure of dispersion. Values were calculated across all participants. There were primary aggression outcomes (overall physical aggression, injuring another person), and secondary aggression outcomes (partner physical aggression and injury, nonpartner physical aggression and injury).
COMPLETED
NA
180 participants
% difference between baseline and the collapsed 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up data
2019-09-06
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from June 2012-June 2015 from outpatient VA mental health programs (Substance Use Disorder, Substance use Disorder Intensive Outpatient, General Mental Health).
Of 1097 eligible for screening, 183 refused participation (17%), 75 (7%) were missed and 839 completed the screening assessment. Of those completing screening, 639 were not eligible for the RCT and 20 refused further participation. Thus, 180 out of 200 eligible veterans (90%) were randomized to one of the three treatment conditions.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1: MI-CBT
MI-CBT (six sessions during acute treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches)
MI-CBT: Six individual psychotherapy sessions during the acute substance use disorder treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches
|
Arm 2: MI-CBT+CC
MI-CBT+CC (acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention)
MI-CBT+CC: Acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention
|
Arm 3: E-TAU
E-TAU (enhanced treatment as usual - includes brief session and provision of resources)
E-TAU: Enhanced Treatment as Usual
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
44
|
45
|
49
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
16
|
15
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm 1: MI-CBT
MI-CBT (six sessions during acute treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches)
MI-CBT: Six individual psychotherapy sessions during the acute substance use disorder treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches
|
Arm 2: MI-CBT+CC
MI-CBT+CC (acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention)
MI-CBT+CC: Acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention
|
Arm 3: E-TAU
E-TAU (enhanced treatment as usual - includes brief session and provision of resources)
E-TAU: Enhanced Treatment as Usual
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
10
|
8
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
missing data on primary outcome
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Preventing Violence Among Veterans in Substance Use Disorder Treatment
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1: MI-CBT
n=60 Participants
MI-CBT (six sessions during acute treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches)
MI-CBT: Six individual psychotherapy sessions during the acute substance use disorder treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches
|
Arm 2: MI-CBT+CC
n=60 Participants
MI-CBT+CC (acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention)
MI-CBT+CC: Acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention
|
Arm 3: E-TAU
n=60 Participants
E-TAU (enhanced treatment as usual - includes brief session and provision of resources)
E-TAU: Enhanced Treatment as Usual
|
Total
n=180 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=93 Participants
|
44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=4 Participants
|
42.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=27 Participants
|
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
55 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
165 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
55 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
167 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
41 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
60 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
180 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: % difference between baseline and the collapsed 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up dataPopulation: Main analyses used General Estimating Equations which accounts for missing data. Results in tables below are from bivariate analyses.
The CTS-SI is a semi-structured interview assessing interpersonal violence (violence severity, injury and characteristics of interpersonal conflict incidents). Baseline data collection assessed the 180 days prior to enrollment, and follow-up data was collected at 3 and 6 months for the prior 90 days, and at 12 months for the past 180 days. The analysis below compares the month rate of various types of interpersonal aggression from the period pre-baseline to the monthly rate post-intervention (across all 12 months of follow-up) in the form of % difference. Means at baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months were compared resulting in a number with no measure of dispersion. Values were calculated across all participants. There were primary aggression outcomes (overall physical aggression, injuring another person), and secondary aggression outcomes (partner physical aggression and injury, nonpartner physical aggression and injury).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: MI-CBT
n=60 Participants
MI-CBT (six sessions during acute treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches)
MI-CBT: Six individual psychotherapy sessions during the acute substance use disorder treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches
|
Arm 2: MI-CBT+CC
n=60 Participants
MI-CBT+CC (acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention)
MI-CBT+CC: Acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention
|
Arm 3: E-TAU
n=60 Participants
E-TAU (enhanced treatment as usual - includes brief session and provision of resources)
E-TAU: Enhanced Treatment as Usual
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Conflict Tactics Scale-Structured Interview (CTS-SI)
Overall physical aggression % change from baseline
|
-90 percentage change
|
-90 percentage change
|
-94 percentage change
|
|
Conflict Tactics Scale-Structured Interview (CTS-SI)
Overall Injury Perpetration % change from baseline
|
-82 percentage change
|
-91 percentage change
|
-86 percentage change
|
|
Conflict Tactics Scale-Structured Interview (CTS-SI)
Partner physical aggression % change from baseline
|
-92 percentage change
|
-91 percentage change
|
-97 percentage change
|
|
Conflict Tactics Scale-Structured Interview (CTS-SI)
Partner injury % change from baseline
|
-100 percentage change
|
-85 percentage change
|
-61 percentage change
|
|
Conflict Tactics Scale-Structured Interview (CTS-SI)
Nonpartner physical aggresion % change from baseli
|
-88 percentage change
|
-89 percentage change
|
-90 percentage change
|
|
Conflict Tactics Scale-Structured Interview (CTS-SI)
Nonpartner injury % change from baseline
|
-76 percentage change
|
-93 percentage change
|
-99 percentage change
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: % difference between baseline and the collapsed 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up dataPopulation: Main analyses used General Estimating Equations which accounts for missing data. Results in data table are from bivariate analyses.
Data was collected via a Time-line Follow Back interview. Semi-structured interview assessing alcohol and drug use. Baseline data collection assessed the 180 days prior to enrollment, and follow-up data was collected at 3 and 6 months for the prior 90 days, and at 12 months for the past 180 days. The analysis below compares the monthly rate of various types of substance use (heavy drinking, cocaine, marijuana, and illicit) from the period pre-baseline to the monthly rate post-intervention (across all 12 months of follow-up) in the form of % difference. (% days use for each substance) Means at baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months were compared resulting in a number with no measure of dispersion. Values were calculated across all participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: MI-CBT
n=60 Participants
MI-CBT (six sessions during acute treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches)
MI-CBT: Six individual psychotherapy sessions during the acute substance use disorder treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches
|
Arm 2: MI-CBT+CC
n=60 Participants
MI-CBT+CC (acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention)
MI-CBT+CC: Acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention
|
Arm 3: E-TAU
n=60 Participants
E-TAU (enhanced treatment as usual - includes brief session and provision of resources)
E-TAU: Enhanced Treatment as Usual
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in the Percentage of Days of Substance Use for Each Substance
Heavy Drinking % change from baseline
|
-68 percentage of change
|
-59 percentage of change
|
-55 percentage of change
|
|
Percent Change in the Percentage of Days of Substance Use for Each Substance
cocaine use % change from baseline
|
-83 percentage of change
|
-86 percentage of change
|
-56 percentage of change
|
|
Percent Change in the Percentage of Days of Substance Use for Each Substance
marijuana use % change from baseline
|
-40 percentage of change
|
-42 percentage of change
|
-44 percentage of change
|
|
Percent Change in the Percentage of Days of Substance Use for Each Substance
Overall illicit drug use % change from baseline
|
-52 percentage of change
|
-50 percentage of change
|
-57 percentage of change
|
Adverse Events
Arm 1: MI-CBT
Arm 2: MI-CBT+CC
Arm 3: E-TAU
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1: MI-CBT
n=60 participants at risk
MI-CBT (six sessions during acute treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches)
MI-CBT: Six individual psychotherapy sessions during the acute substance use disorder treatment phase integrating motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral approaches
|
Arm 2: MI-CBT+CC
n=60 participants at risk
MI-CBT+CC (acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention)
MI-CBT+CC: Acute phase MI-CBT intervention plus a subsequent 12-week phone based continuing care counseling intervention
|
Arm 3: E-TAU
n=60 participants at risk
E-TAU (enhanced treatment as usual - includes brief session and provision of resources)
E-TAU: Enhanced Treatment as Usual
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Social circumstances
Participant Death
|
1.7%
1/60 • Number of events 1
In the event of participant death, cause of death is unknown.
|
3.3%
2/60 • Number of events 2
In the event of participant death, cause of death is unknown.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Number of events 1
In the event of participant death, cause of death is unknown.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place