Lactated Ringer Versus Albumin in Early Sepsis Therapy

NCT ID: NCT01337934

Last Updated: 2018-04-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

360 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The use of albumin in critical ill patients is a matter of controversy. A large randomized controlled trial reported that albumin was as safe and effective as crystalloid solution for fluid replacement in intensive care unit, although the last one was less expensive. In Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines there are no preference for crystalloids over colloids. But recently, a retrospective analysis of patients with severe sepsis from SAFE study reported that the use of albumin in these patients would be superior, regarding reduction of mortality. The aim of this study is determine whether the use of albumin improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Septic Shock Severe Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lactated Ringer

Patients randomized for this group will receive 500 ml of lactated Ringer solution in early phase of sepsis or septic shock (less than six hour from sepsis onset) if mean arterial pressure was under 65mmHg, or blood lactate concentration higher than 4 mmol/L or base excess under - 4mmol/L until the target of central venous pressure of 8 mmHg or higher or recovery of hypotension.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Lactated Ringer

Intervention Type DRUG

Lactated Ringer

Albumin

Patients randomized for Albumin group will receive 500 ml of 4% Albumin solution in early phase of sepsis (less than six hour from sepsis onset) if mean arterial pressure was under 65mmHg or blood lactate concentration higher than 4 mmol/L or base excess under - 4mmol/L until the target of central venous pressure of 8 mmHg or higher or recovery of hypotension.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Albumin

Intervention Type DRUG

Albumin 4%

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lactated Ringer

Lactated Ringer

Intervention Type DRUG

Albumin

Albumin 4%

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age equal or higher than 18 years-old
* Severe sepsis or septic shock into 6 hours of evolution
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Shock from other causes
* Adverse reactions to human albumin
* Previous fluid resuscitation during current disease
* Previous use of albumin in the last 72 hours
* Religion objection
* Enrollment in another study
* Traumatic brain injury
* Hepatic cirrhosis
* End stage renal disease
* Plasmapheresis
* End of life patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Juliano P Almeida, MD, PhD

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Juliano A Almeida, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Ludhmila Hajjar, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Sao Paulo

Clarice H Park, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sao Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cancer Institute of Sao Paulo, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo

São Paulo, Sao Paulo/SP, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hajjar LA, Vincent JL, Galas FR, Nakamura RE, Silva CM, Santos MH, Fukushima J, Kalil Filho R, Sierra DB, Lopes NH, Mauad T, Roquim AC, Sundin MR, Leao WC, Almeida JP, Pomerantzeff PM, Dallan LO, Jatene FB, Stolf NA, Auler JO Jr. Transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery: the TRACS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Oct 13;304(14):1559-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1446.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20940381 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

360/10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fluids in Sepsis and Septic Shock
NCT02748382 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Gelaspan vs Crystalloid Therapy in Sepsis
NCT07172451 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4