Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy of NNC-0156-0000-0009 in Haemophilia B Patients (NCT NCT01333111)
NCT ID: NCT01333111
Last Updated: 2017-07-28
Results Overview
Inhibitors were analysed with either the Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay or a heat/cold Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay. Number of subjects who developed inhibitory antibodies against factor IX are reported.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
74 participants
52 weeks after treatment start for patients on prophylaxis
2017-07-28
Participant Flow
Of the 40 sites that screened subjects, 39 sites enrolled subjects. The trial was therefore conducted at 39 sites in 13 countries, as follows: France (1); Germany (3); Italy (2); Japan (5); Macedonia (2); Malaysia (1) Netherlands (1); Russia (2); South Africa(1); Thailand (2); Turkey (3); United Kingdom (4) and United States (12).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
On-Demand (28 Weeks)
Subjects enrolled in this on-demand arm were treated for bleeding episodes on demand with nonacog beta pegol during a period of 28 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
29
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
28
|
26
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
On-Demand (28 Weeks)
Subjects enrolled in this on-demand arm were treated for bleeding episodes on demand with nonacog beta pegol during a period of 28 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
patient undergoing major surgery
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
personal reasons
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
unclassified
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
withdrawal criteria
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Ineffective therapy
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy of NNC-0156-0000-0009 in Haemophilia B Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=30 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=29 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
On-Demand (28 Weeks)
n=15 Participants
Subjects enrolled in this on-demand arm were treated for bleeding episodes on demand with nonacog beta pegol during a period of 28 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Total
n=74 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=5 Participants
|
30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8 • n=7 Participants
|
32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=5 Participants
|
31.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
<=17 years
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
18-64 years
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 weeks after treatment start for patients on prophylaxisPopulation: Full analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in prophylaxis arm were included for this analysis.
Inhibitors were analysed with either the Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay or a heat/cold Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay. Number of subjects who developed inhibitory antibodies against factor IX are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=30 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=29 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against Factor IX Defined as Titre Equal to or Above 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units)
|
0 Number of subjects
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0 Number of subjects
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 28 weeks after treatment start on on-demand treatmentPopulation: Full analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in on-demand arm were included for this analysis.
Inhibitors were analysed with either the Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay or a heat/cold Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay. Number of subjects who developed inhibitory antibodies against factor IX are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=15 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against Factor IX Defined as Titre Equal to or Above 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units)
|
0 number of subjects
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 weeks after treatment start for patients on prophylaxisPopulation: Full analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in prophylaxis arm were included for this analysis.
Haemostatic response after treatment of a bleed with nonacog beta pegol was evaluated on a 4 point scale as excellent, good, moderate or poor. A success rate was calculated based on counting good or excellent as successes and poor and moderate as failures. * Excellent - abrupt pain relief and/or clear improvement in objective signs of bleeding within 8 hours after a single injection * Good - noticeable pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within 8 hours after a single injection * Moderate - probable or slight beneficial effect within the first 8 hours after the first injection but requiring more than one injection within 8 hours * Poor - no improvement, or worsening of symptoms within 8 hours after two injections. The success rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=30 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=29 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Haemostatic Effect of NNC-0156-0000-0009 When Used for Prophylaxis of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response
|
86.9 percentage of bleeding episodes
Interval 76.5 to 93.1
|
97.1 percentage of bleeding episodes
Interval 90.0 to 99.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 28 weeks after treatment start on on-demand treatmentPopulation: Full analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in on-demand arm were included for this analysis.
Haemostatic response after treatment of a bleed with nonacog beta pegol was evaluated on a 4 point scale as excellent, good, moderate or poor. A success rate was calculated based on counting good or excellent as successes and poor and moderate as failures. * Excellent - abrupt pain relief and/or clear improvement in objective signs of bleeding within 8 hours after a single injection * Good - noticeable pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within 8 hours after a single injection * Moderate - probable or slight beneficial effect within the first 8 hours after the first injection but requiring more than one injection within 8 hours * Poor - no improvement, or worsening of symptoms within 8 hours after two injections. The success rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=15 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Haemostatic Effect of NNC-0156-0000-0009 When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response
|
95.1 percentage of bleeding episodes
Interval 87.0 to 98.2
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 weeks after treatment start for patients on prophylaxisPopulation: Full analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in prophylaxis arm were included for this analysis.
The number of bleeding episodes per patient during routine prophylaxis was assessed using the individual annualised bleeding rates (spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes per patient per year).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=30 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=29 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Bleeding Episodes Per Patient During Routine Prophylaxis
|
2.93 bleeds/patient/year
Inter-Quartile Range 5.41 • Interval 0.99 to 6.02
|
1.04 bleeds/patient/year
Inter-Quartile Range 7.41 • Interval 0.0 to 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 weeks after treatment start for patients on prophylaxisPopulation: Full analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in prophylaxis arm were included for this analysis.
The mean pre-dose factor IX levels was measured with the one-stage clotting assay during the trial. Lowest factor IX activity recorded during single-dose and steady state, immediately before next dose was given. The analysis was based on a mixed model on the log-transformed plasma factor IX activity with subject as a random effect. The estimated mean factor IX trough level was presented back-transformed to the natural scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=30 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=29 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Factor IX Trough Levels
|
0.085 U/mL
Interval 0.077 to 0.093
|
0.273 U/mL
Interval 0.248 to 0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 56 weeks ±2 weeks for patients on prophylaxisPopulation: Safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in prophylaxis arm were included for this analysis.
The incidence of adverse events were summarised by the rate of AEs (number of AEs per patient years of exposure \[PYE\]). Number of adverse events per PYE is number of adverse events /total time in trial. All adverse events reported are treatment emergent (any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=30 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=29 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
|
2.62 number of AEs per PYE
|
3.83 number of AEs per PYE
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 32 weeks ±2 weeks for patients on on-demand treatmentPopulation: Safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol.Subjects in on-demand arm were included for this analysis.
The incidence of adverse events were summarised by the rate of AEs (number of AEs per PYE). Number of adverse events per PYE is number of adverse events /total time in trial. All adverse events reported are treatment emergent (any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=15 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
|
4.14 number of AEs per PYE
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 56 weeks ±2 weeks for patients on prophylaxisPopulation: Safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in prophylaxis arm were included for this analysis.
SAE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following: death, a life-threatening experience, in-subject hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalisation, persistent/significant disability/incapacity/congenital anomaly/birth defect. The incidence of SAEs were summarised by the rate of SAEs (number of SAEs per PYE). Number of SAEs per PYE is number of SAEs/total time in trial. All SAEs reported are treatment emergent (any serious adverse events which occurred after trial product administration).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=30 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=29 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
|
0.03 number of SAEs per PYE
|
0.11 number of SAEs per PYE
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 32 weeks ±2 weeks for patients on on-demand treatmentPopulation: Safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in on-demand arm were included for this analysis.
SAE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following: death, a life-threatening experience, in-subject hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalisation, persistent/significant disability/incapacity/congenital anomaly/birth defect. The incidence of SAEs were summarised by the rate of SAEs (number of SAEs per PYE). Number of SAEs per PYE is number of SAEs/total time in trial. All SAEs reported are treatment emergent (any serious adverse events which occurred after trial product administration).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=15 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
|
0 number of SAEs per PYE
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 weeks after treatment start for patients on prophylaxisPopulation: Safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in prophylaxis arm were included for this analysis.
Subjects who were positive for anti-Host Cell Protein (HCP) antibodies.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=30 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=29 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Host Cell Proteins (HCP) Antibodies
|
0 number of subjects
|
1 number of subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 28 weeks after treatment start on on-demand treatmentPopulation: Safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects in on-demand arm were included for this analysis.
Subjects who were positive for anti-HCP antibodies.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=15 Participants
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Host Cell Proteins (HCP) Antibodies
|
0 number of subjects
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
On-Demand (28 Weeks)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=30 participants at risk
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=29 participants at risk
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
On-Demand (28 Weeks)
n=15 participants at risk
Subjects enrolled in this on-demand arm were treated for bleeding episodes on demand with nonacog beta pegol during a period of 28 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Retroperitoneal haematoma
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Prophylaxis, Low Dose 10 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=30 participants at risk
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 10 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
Prophylaxis, High Dose 40 U/kg (52 Weeks)
n=29 participants at risk
Subjects were randomised to either prophylaxis 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg arm. Subjects in this arm received 40 U/kg nonacog beta pegol dose once weekly (every 7th day ± 24 hours) for a period of 52 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
On-Demand (28 Weeks)
n=15 participants at risk
Subjects enrolled in this on-demand arm were treated for bleeding episodes on demand with nonacog beta pegol during a period of 28 weeks. Nonacog beta pegol was given as an intravenous bolus injection with the maximum injection rate at 4 mL/min. Mild and moderate bleeding episodes were treated with 40 U/kg. Severe bleeding episodes were treated with 80 U/kg.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 3 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Eosinophilia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 6 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 4 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Groin pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 7 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 3 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 5 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lipoma
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
23.3%
7/30 • Number of events 9 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 4 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngotonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Investigations
Prothrombin level increased
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 4 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/15 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 4 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Speech disorder developmental
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Synovitis
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
|
0.00%
0/30 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/29 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 4 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 4 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • For the subjects treated with prophylaxis, adverse events were assessed for 52 weeks + 4 weeks. For the subjects treated on-demand, adverse events were assessed for 28 weeks + 4 weeks.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as any adverse events which occurred after trial product administration. Analysis was based on the safety analysis set.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of the trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER