Mechanism and the Effect of Midodrine on Portal Pressures in Patients With Cirrhosis
NCT ID: NCT01331785
Last Updated: 2013-07-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-04-30
2012-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of the study is to assess the utility of midodrine in patients with obvious systemic circulatory dysfunction (hypotension) in improving the outcome of patients with refractory ascites and change in hemodynamic parameters and its mediators.
Specific endpoints include:
1\) an objective reduction of the volume/rate of accumulation of ascites and 2) a decrease in the frequency of LVP.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Vasoconstrictors in patients with ascites and hydrothorax In non azotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites, the addition of octreotide improved diuresis and decreased renin, increased MAP, decreased CO and improved renal function by increasing GFR, increased urine sodium and volume excretion.(25) In patient with massive hydrothorax with mild ascites and no azotemia, addition of midodrine to octreotide improves MAP, increases GFR, RPF and urine sodium and volume; and prevents recurrence of hydrothorax. Vasoconstrictors have been recommended as treatment for hydrothorax (4-6)and has been found beneficial in refractory ascites.(26)
Significance Vasoconstrictors like midodrine have been shown to be beneficial, with improvement of circulatory dysfunction in various groups of patients including patients with HRS type 1, type 2, non azotemic patients and in patients requiring hemodialysis. There are suggestions of decreased body weight in some of these patients. In patients with hydrothorax, addition of vasoconstrictors has helped in relieving the symptoms. The investigators suggest that midodrine could also benefit patients with refractory ascites. By decreasing the rate of ascitic fluid accumulation, it may be possible to decrease the volume of ascites drained or lengthen the interval between paracentesis, giving comfort to the patients. The beneficial effect on portal pressures and ascites could be due to other mechanisms (such as autonomic function) rather than their effect on renal hemodynamics as they are not sustained. There are no studies where this has been systematically analyzed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Midodrine
Midodrine
Midodrine 2.5 mg to 10 mg three times a day to increase systolic BP above 100 mmHgor by 10 mmHg
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Midodrine
Midodrine 2.5 mg to 10 mg three times a day to increase systolic BP above 100 mmHgor by 10 mmHg
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Evidence of ESLD and ascites
* Ascites requiring periodic large volume paracentesis (1+ / month) of more than 3 months duration
* Systolic BP \< 100 mmHg
Exclusion Criteria
* Evaluated for multiple organ transplant
* Malignancies
* Non cirrhotic causes of ascites
* Prior TIPS usage (transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt)
* Primary renal diseases
* Chronic kidney disease (CKD) \>=4
* Grade 3 or 4 encephalopathy
* Child C cirrhosis or model for end stage liver disease (MELD) \> 20
* Patients requiring large volume paracentesis for more than 12 months
* Frequency of paracentesis less than 6 in the preceding 3 months
* Active recreational drug and alcohol usage
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American College of Gastroenterology
OTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Achuthan Sourianarayanane
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Cleveland Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ACG-CR-026-2010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id