NSAID Phase II for Non-central Involved Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
NCT ID: NCT01331005
Last Updated: 2025-03-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
125 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-05-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Study With Adjunctive Once Daily Topical Nepafenac 0.3% Versus Placebo
NCT03025945
DSAEK/DMEK and Cystoid Macular Edema - the Role for Topical NSAIDs (Nepafenac) (DMEC)
NCT05072262
Nepafenac Once Daily for Macular Edema - Study 1
NCT01853072
Nepafenac Once Daily for Macular Edema - Study 2
NCT01872611
Effect of Topical Nepafenac in Macular Thickening Related to Pan-retinal Photocoagulation
NCT00801905
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is also evidence that inflammation has a role in DME, and that a topical NSAID might have an effect on retinal edema. Topical NSAIDs are in current widespread clinical use and appear to be well tolerated and safe when administered chronically, making them a potentially attractive alternative treatment for DME in patients who would like to delay or avoid laser photocoagulation or intravitreal injections (for example, patients who are willing to use daily eye drops to avoid ocular procedures or patients for whom access to experienced retinal specialists to apply laser photocoagulation or other treatments is limited).
This phase II trial may provide proof of concept evidence that topical NSAID treatment can have a beneficial effect on DME and possibly prevent increases in retinal volume or progression of non central-involved DME into the central subfield of the macula. Furthermore, it could determine the correlation between OCT and fundus photographic documentation of progression of DME into the central subfield in this clinical trial setting. Since effective treatments, including laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injections, already exist for DME treatment, topical NSAIDs would have to demonstrate a substantial effect on DME progression in order to be of sufficient clinical interest for further investigation. If a beneficial effect is apparent in this trial, which utilizes a relatively small sample size and short follow-up period, results from this phase II study might be utilized in planning future phase III trials. These future phase III trials could definitively answer whether or not NSAIDs are an efficacious novel therapeutic approach to the treatment of DME or preventing the progression of DME from extending into the central subfield of the macula.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
Placebo will be given three times per day for one year
Nepafenac Vehicle
Placebo
nepafenac 0.1% drops
Nepafenac drops will be given three times per day for one year
nepafenac 0.1% drops
One drop three times per day for one year
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
nepafenac 0.1% drops
One drop three times per day for one year
Nepafenac Vehicle
Placebo
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
* Only one study eye per subject may be enrolled. The study eye must meet the following:
* Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score ≥ 74 (i.e., 20/32 or better) within 8 days of enrollment.
* On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to DME within 3000 μm of the center of the macula but not involving the central subfield.
* Thickened non-central macular subfields on DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT macular map.
* Central subfield thickness within threshold definition for normal central subfield thickness on DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machine.
* No focal/grid laser within the last 6 months or other treatment for DME within the last 4 months.
* No anticipated need to treat DME during the course of the study, unless the eye meets the criteria for treatment (Central subfield retinal thickness increases to 310 μm or more in spectral domain OCT machine from baseline).
* Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2). Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
* Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes.
* Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes.
* Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association and/or the World Health Organization criteria.
* At least one eye meets the study eye criteria.
* Able and willing to provide informed consent.
* Successful completion of the run-in phase during which level of compliance is more than 80%
* Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score ≥74 (i.e.20/32 or better) within 8 days of randomization.
* On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to DME within 3000 μm of the center of the macula but not involving the central subfield.
* Thickened non-central macular subfields on spectral domain OCT macular map that meet either of the following criteria:
* At least two non-central macular subfields with OCT thickness above threshold (average normal + 2 SD) from DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machines- see below.
* At least one non-central macular subfield with OCT thickness at least 15 μm above threshold (average normal + 2 SD) from DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machines-see DRCR.net procedures manual for threshold details.
* Central subfield thickness \<250 microns obtained by one of the following DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machines:
* Zeiss Cirrus
* Heidelberg Spectralis
* Optovue RTVue
* Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and study participant cooperation sufficient for adequate OCT and fundus photographs.
* If the study participant is on multiple ocular drops, investigator believes that study participant can be compliant with a multi-drop regimen.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects in poor glycemic control who, within the last 4 months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next 4 months should not be enrolled.
* Use of systemic corticosteroids or anti-VEGF therapy.
* Current use of prescription systemic NSAIDs.
* History of auto-immune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis.
* Participation in an investigational trial that involved treatment with any drug within 30 days of randomization that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry.
* Note: study participants cannot receive another investigational drug while participating in the study.
* Known allergy to any component of the study drug.
* Blood pressure \> 180/110 mmHg (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110 mmHg)
* If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, study participant can become eligible.
* Participant is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 12 months of the study.
* For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 12 months.
* Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed.
* History of focal/grid laser within the last 6 months or other treatment for DME within the last 4 months
-Note: Throughout the study, the distribution of subjects with prior treatment for DME will be evaluated, and eligibility criteria may be tailored to add balance between subjects with prior treatment and subjects without prior treatment for DME.
* Anticipated need to treat DME during the course of the study (Any DME treatment during the study should follow criteria in section 4.3).
* History of use of NSAID eye drops within the last 30 days or anticipated need for such drops during the study due to other ocular condition
* History of panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization
* Anticipated need for PRP in the 6 months following randomization
* Anticipated need for cataract extraction surgery in the study eye during the study period
* Lipid in the fovea (center of the macula)
* History of major ocular surgery (including scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or major ocular surgery anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization
* An ocular condition, other than diabetic macular edema, is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity might be affected now (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, non-retinal condition, epiretinal membrane or vitreo-macular traction) or during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.)
* History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization
* Exam evidence of severe external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or substantial blepharitis
* Aphakia
* History of vitrectomy for any reason
* History of cataract surgery within the prior 1 year
* Uncontrolled glaucoma
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Jaeb Center for Health Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Scott M Friedman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Florida Retina Consultants
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
Loma Linda, California, United States
Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
Palm Springs, California, United States
California Retina Consultants
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Bay Area Retina Associates
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Retinal Consultants of Southern California Medical Group, Inc.
Westlake Village, California, United States
Retina Consultants of Southwest Florida
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Central Florida Retina Institute
Lakeland, Florida, United States
Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Retina Associates of Hawaii, Inc.
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
American Eye Institute
New Albany, Indiana, United States
Wolfe Eye Clinic
West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Paducah Retinal Center
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Elman Retina Group, P.A.
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Vitreo-Retinal Associates
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States
Eye Care for the Adirondacks
Plattsburgh, New York, United States
Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
Syracuse, New York, United States
Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Assoc, PA
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
Beachwood, Ohio, United States
Retina Northwest, PC
Portland, Oregon, United States
Family Eye Group
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Texas Retina Associates
Lubbock, Texas, United States
Retinal Consultants of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Friedman SM, Almukhtar TH, Baker CW, Glassman AR, Elman MJ, Bressler NM, Maker MP, Jampol LM, Melia M; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Topical nepafenec in eyes with noncentral diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2015 May;35(5):944-56. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000403.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.