NSAID Phase II for Non-central Involved Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)

NCT ID: NCT01331005

Last Updated: 2025-03-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

125 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is being conducted to assess the effects of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) on macular retinal volume compared with placebo in eyes with non-central diabetic macular edema (DME). A secondary objective of this study is to assess the effects of topical NSAIDs on central subfield thickness and to compare the progression of non-central DME to central DME as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and stereoscopic fundus photographs. Furthermore, this phase II study is being conducted (1) to determine whether the conduct of a phase III trial has merit based on an anatomic outcome, (2) to estimate recruitment potential of a phase III investigation, and (3) to provide information on outcome measures needed to design a phase III trial. The study is not designed to establish the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of non- central DME.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There is strong evidence to indicate that prevention of non-central involved DME from progression into the central subfield of the macula is a good anatomic surrogate for preventing visual acuity loss. Furthermore, the prevalence of macular edema is estimated to be high among patients with diabetes, and it is likely that approximately 25% of non-central involved cases of DME extend into the central subfield of the macula within one year. Thus, if a relatively safe and economical treatment could be identified that reduced the progression of non-central involved edema to central-involved edema by at least 50%, this treatment could have a major public health impact.

There is also evidence that inflammation has a role in DME, and that a topical NSAID might have an effect on retinal edema. Topical NSAIDs are in current widespread clinical use and appear to be well tolerated and safe when administered chronically, making them a potentially attractive alternative treatment for DME in patients who would like to delay or avoid laser photocoagulation or intravitreal injections (for example, patients who are willing to use daily eye drops to avoid ocular procedures or patients for whom access to experienced retinal specialists to apply laser photocoagulation or other treatments is limited).

This phase II trial may provide proof of concept evidence that topical NSAID treatment can have a beneficial effect on DME and possibly prevent increases in retinal volume or progression of non central-involved DME into the central subfield of the macula. Furthermore, it could determine the correlation between OCT and fundus photographic documentation of progression of DME into the central subfield in this clinical trial setting. Since effective treatments, including laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injections, already exist for DME treatment, topical NSAIDs would have to demonstrate a substantial effect on DME progression in order to be of sufficient clinical interest for further investigation. If a beneficial effect is apparent in this trial, which utilizes a relatively small sample size and short follow-up period, results from this phase II study might be utilized in planning future phase III trials. These future phase III trials could definitively answer whether or not NSAIDs are an efficacious novel therapeutic approach to the treatment of DME or preventing the progression of DME from extending into the central subfield of the macula.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Placebo will be given three times per day for one year

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Nepafenac Vehicle

Intervention Type OTHER

Placebo

nepafenac 0.1% drops

Nepafenac drops will be given three times per day for one year

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

nepafenac 0.1% drops

Intervention Type DRUG

One drop three times per day for one year

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

nepafenac 0.1% drops

One drop three times per day for one year

Intervention Type DRUG

Nepafenac Vehicle

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>18 years
* Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
* Only one study eye per subject may be enrolled. The study eye must meet the following:

* Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score ≥ 74 (i.e., 20/32 or better) within 8 days of enrollment.
* On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to DME within 3000 μm of the center of the macula but not involving the central subfield.
* Thickened non-central macular subfields on DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT macular map.
* Central subfield thickness within threshold definition for normal central subfield thickness on DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machine.
* No focal/grid laser within the last 6 months or other treatment for DME within the last 4 months.
* No anticipated need to treat DME during the course of the study, unless the eye meets the criteria for treatment (Central subfield retinal thickness increases to 310 μm or more in spectral domain OCT machine from baseline).
* Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2). Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:

* Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes.
* Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes.
* Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association and/or the World Health Organization criteria.
* At least one eye meets the study eye criteria.
* Able and willing to provide informed consent.
* Successful completion of the run-in phase during which level of compliance is more than 80%


* Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score ≥74 (i.e.20/32 or better) within 8 days of randomization.
* On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to DME within 3000 μm of the center of the macula but not involving the central subfield.
* Thickened non-central macular subfields on spectral domain OCT macular map that meet either of the following criteria:

* At least two non-central macular subfields with OCT thickness above threshold (average normal + 2 SD) from DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machines- see below.
* At least one non-central macular subfield with OCT thickness at least 15 μm above threshold (average normal + 2 SD) from DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machines-see DRCR.net procedures manual for threshold details.
* Central subfield thickness \<250 microns obtained by one of the following DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machines:

* Zeiss Cirrus
* Heidelberg Spectralis
* Optovue RTVue
* Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and study participant cooperation sufficient for adequate OCT and fundus photographs.
* If the study participant is on multiple ocular drops, investigator believes that study participant can be compliant with a multi-drop regimen.

Exclusion Criteria

* A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
* Subjects in poor glycemic control who, within the last 4 months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next 4 months should not be enrolled.
* Use of systemic corticosteroids or anti-VEGF therapy.
* Current use of prescription systemic NSAIDs.
* History of auto-immune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis.
* Participation in an investigational trial that involved treatment with any drug within 30 days of randomization that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry.
* Note: study participants cannot receive another investigational drug while participating in the study.
* Known allergy to any component of the study drug.
* Blood pressure \> 180/110 mmHg (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110 mmHg)
* If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, study participant can become eligible.
* Participant is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 12 months of the study.
* For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 12 months.
* Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed.


* History of focal/grid laser within the last 6 months or other treatment for DME within the last 4 months

-Note: Throughout the study, the distribution of subjects with prior treatment for DME will be evaluated, and eligibility criteria may be tailored to add balance between subjects with prior treatment and subjects without prior treatment for DME.
* Anticipated need to treat DME during the course of the study (Any DME treatment during the study should follow criteria in section 4.3).
* History of use of NSAID eye drops within the last 30 days or anticipated need for such drops during the study due to other ocular condition
* History of panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization
* Anticipated need for PRP in the 6 months following randomization
* Anticipated need for cataract extraction surgery in the study eye during the study period
* Lipid in the fovea (center of the macula)
* History of major ocular surgery (including scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or major ocular surgery anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization
* An ocular condition, other than diabetic macular edema, is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity might be affected now (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, non-retinal condition, epiretinal membrane or vitreo-macular traction) or during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.)
* History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization
* Exam evidence of severe external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or substantial blepharitis
* Aphakia
* History of vitrectomy for any reason
* History of cataract surgery within the prior 1 year
* Uncontrolled glaucoma
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Eye Institute (NEI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jaeb Center for Health Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scott M Friedman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Florida Retina Consultants

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC

Palm Springs, California, United States

Site Status

California Retina Consultants

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Bay Area Retina Associates

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Retinal Consultants of Southern California Medical Group, Inc.

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Southwest Florida

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Central Florida Retina Institute

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Southeast Retina Center, P.C.

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Retina Associates of Hawaii, Inc.

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

American Eye Institute

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Wolfe Eye Clinic

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Paducah Retinal Center

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Elman Retina Group, P.A.

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Joslin Diabetes Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Vitreo-Retinal Associates

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA

Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Eye Care for the Adirondacks

Plattsburgh, New York, United States

Site Status

Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Assoc, PA

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Retina Northwest, PC

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Family Eye Group

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Retina Associates, PC

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas Retina Associates

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retinal Consultants of San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Friedman SM, Almukhtar TH, Baker CW, Glassman AR, Elman MJ, Bressler NM, Maker MP, Jampol LM, Melia M; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Topical nepafenec in eyes with noncentral diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2015 May;35(5):944-56. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000403.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25602634 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U10EY018817-03

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U10EY014231-09

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

DRCR.net Protocol R

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nepafenac 0.3% Two Study
NCT01318499 COMPLETED PHASE2
Confirmatory Study Nepafenac 0.3%
NCT01109173 COMPLETED PHASE3
PCME Prevention in Patients With NPDR
NCT04940338 COMPLETED PHASE4
Cataract DME - Peri vs. Intraop
NCT03920878 WITHDRAWN PHASE2