Trial Outcomes & Findings for Smoking Topography and Harm Exposure in Menthol Cigarettes (NCT NCT01329263)

NCT ID: NCT01329263

Last Updated: 2015-01-06

Results Overview

The total puff volume for a single subject is the sum of puff volumes for a subject's cigarette smoked during the study session. The mean puff volume for the subjects will be used to examine the effect of cigarette menthol on smoking topography. The values provided are the average of subjects at study Day 5 (completion of baseline smoking own cigarettes), Day 20 and Day 35.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

87 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

over 35 day study period

Results posted on

2015-01-06

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited from the local Philadelphia area via newspaper and internet advertising. Former study participants who had agreed to be contacted for future studies were also contacted. Recruitment began October 2010 and was completed November 2011.

Subjects were required to complete a 5 day baseline assessment of smoking their own brand cigarette. Participants who did this were given study cigarettes. 87 participants signed consents at the first session, 3 did not finish the session. 60 subjects did the 5 day baseline smoking, returned on Day 5, were randomized and included for analysis.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Control
Control group: continued to smoke same, own brand cigarette.
Experimental
Menthol to non-menthol : Switch from smoking menthol to non-menthol cigarettes.
Overall Study
STARTED
15
45
Overall Study
Completed Period 1 Own Menthol
15
45
Overall Study
Completed Period 2 Own or CCrush Menthol
10
30
Overall Study
CompletedPer 3 Own or CCrush Non-menthol
10
22
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
22
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
5
23

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Control
Control group: continued to smoke same, own brand cigarette.
Experimental
Menthol to non-menthol : Switch from smoking menthol to non-menthol cigarettes.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
4
21
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
2

Baseline Characteristics

Smoking Topography and Harm Exposure in Menthol Cigarettes

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Experimental
n=45 Participants
Group switched from menthol cigarette to non-menthol cigarette
Control
n=15 Participants
Participants smoked their own menthol brand cigarette throughout the study.
Total
n=60 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
37.13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=5 Participants
37.93 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=7 Participants
37.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
45 participants
n=5 Participants
15 participants
n=7 Participants
60 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: over 35 day study period

Population: Those completing Study session 2 at Day 5.

The total puff volume for a single subject is the sum of puff volumes for a subject's cigarette smoked during the study session. The mean puff volume for the subjects will be used to examine the effect of cigarette menthol on smoking topography. The values provided are the average of subjects at study Day 5 (completion of baseline smoking own cigarettes), Day 20 and Day 35.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental
n=45 Participants
Experimental group switched from menthol cigarette to non-menthol cigarette
Control
n=15 Participants
Control group smoked their own brand cigarette for entire duration of study.
Smoking Topography- Puff Volume
Period 1 Own cigarette
518 mL
Standard Error 37
661 mL
Standard Error 36
Smoking Topography- Puff Volume
Period 2 Own cigarette or CCrush menthol
650 mL
Standard Error 48
620 mL
Standard Error 41
Smoking Topography- Puff Volume
Period 3 Own cigarette or CCrush non-menthol
678 mL
Standard Error 57
645 mL
Standard Error 37

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Measured before and after each cigarette smoked at study sessions

Carbon monoxide content in exhaled breath samples is measured before and after each cigarette smoked during study sessions. CO boost is the amount in parts per million that the subject's CO increases.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental
n=45 Participants
Experimental group switched from menthol cigarette to non-menthol cigarette
Control
n=15 Participants
Control group smoked their own brand cigarette for entire duration of study.
Smoking Topography- Carbon Monoxide Boost
Period 1 Baseline Own cigarette
5.9 parts per million
Standard Error 0.8
5.3 parts per million
Standard Error 0.7
Smoking Topography- Carbon Monoxide Boost
Period 2 Own cigarette or CCrush menthol
3.7 parts per million
Standard Error 0.5
5.7 parts per million
Standard Error 0.6
Smoking Topography- Carbon Monoxide Boost
Period 3 Own cigarette or CCrush non-menthol
3.9 parts per million
Standard Error 0.5
5.5 parts per million
Standard Error 0.8

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 35 days

Population: Those completing Day 5, returning sample for assay

Urine nicotine levels will be measured to examine the effect of cigarette menthol on harm exposure measures. Participants provided samples on the final day of each period. NNK and 1-hop were not analyzed, total nicotine metabolites were assayed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental
n=15 Participants
Experimental group switched from menthol cigarette to non-menthol cigarette
Control
n=45 Participants
Control group smoked their own brand cigarette for entire duration of study.
Nicotine Levels
Period 1 Baseline Own cigarette
2.2 micrograms/mL
Standard Error 0.82
1.7 micrograms/mL
Standard Error 0.3
Nicotine Levels
Period 2 Own cigarette or CCrush non-menthol
3.4 micrograms/mL
Standard Error 1.0
2.7 micrograms/mL
Standard Error 0.54
Nicotine Levels
Period 3 Own cigarette or CCrush non-menthol
2.8 micrograms/mL
Standard Error 1.1
2.49 micrograms/mL
Standard Error .43

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Immediately after a cigarette smoked at the study session

Population: Completed measure

Subjects completed a visual analog scale rating each cigarette smoked at each session. Subjects rated characteristics of the cigarette on a scale represented as a continuous horizontal line 10 cm long. Subjects drew an intersecting line to represent their rating. The rating reported is for the taste of the cigarette at the end of the period averaged across subjects in the group. A rating of 0 corresponds to Very Bad and a rating of 100 to Very Good for taste. There is no better or worse outcome for higher or lower ratings for taste.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental
n=15 Participants
Experimental group switched from menthol cigarette to non-menthol cigarette
Control
n=45 Participants
Control group smoked their own brand cigarette for entire duration of study.
Subjective Rating of Cigarettes
Period 1 Own cigarette
80 units on a scale
Standard Error 8.1
61 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.3
Subjective Rating of Cigarettes
Period 2 Own cigarette or CCrush menthol
72 units on a scale
Standard Error 7.3
52 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.8
Subjective Rating of Cigarettes
Period 3 Own cigarette or CCrush non-menthol
71 units on a scale
Standard Error 6.2
39 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.7

Adverse Events

Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Experimental

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Andrew Strasser

University of Pennsylvania

Phone: 2157465788

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place