Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin With Dacarbazine in Subjects With Soft Tissue Sarcoma

NCT ID: NCT01327885

Last Updated: 2023-06-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

452 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-10

Study Completion Date

2016-08-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of eribulin with dacarbazine in subjects with advanced soft tissue sarcoma who have disease progression within 6 months prior to study enrolment following standard therapies which must have included an anthracycline, unless contraindicated and then at least one additional regimen after failure of the anthracycline.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2 intravenous

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of eribulin mesylate at a dose of 1.4 mg/m\^2 as an intravenous (IV) bolus infusion over 2-5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days.

Arm B

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dacarbazine of 850 mg/m^2, or 1,000 mg/m^2, or 1,200 mg/m^2 IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of dacarbazine at a dose of 850 mg/m\^2, or 1,000 mg/m\^2, or 1,200 mg/m\^2 selected by the Principal Investigator \[PI\] or designee according to the subject's clinical status as an IV infusion over 15-30 minutes on Day 1 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2 intravenous

Administration of eribulin mesylate at a dose of 1.4 mg/m\^2 as an intravenous (IV) bolus infusion over 2-5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dacarbazine of 850 mg/m^2, or 1,000 mg/m^2, or 1,200 mg/m^2 IV

Administration of dacarbazine at a dose of 850 mg/m\^2, or 1,000 mg/m\^2, or 1,200 mg/m\^2 selected by the Principal Investigator \[PI\] or designee according to the subject's clinical status as an IV infusion over 15-30 minutes on Day 1 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Histologically confirmed diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma of high or intermediate grade with one of the following histological subtypes:

* Adipocytic sarcoma, including:
* Dedifferentiated
* Myxoid
* Round Cell
* Pleomorphic - Leiomyosarcoma
2. Documented evidence of advanced (locally recurrent, locally advanced and/or metastatic) adipocytic (restricted to subtypes listed in Inclusion 1) or leiomyosarcoma, incurable by surgery and/or radiotherapy.
3. Subjects should have received at least two standard systematic regimens for advanced soft tissue sarcoma one of which must have included an anthracycline (unless contraindicated).
4. Radiographic evidence of disease progression by RECIST criteria on or after the last anti-cancer therapy within the 6 months prior to randomization.
5. Presence of measurable disease meeting the following criteria:

* At least one lesion of greater than or equal to 1.0 cm in long-axis diameter for non lymph nodes or greater than or equal to 1.5 cm in short-axis diameter for lymph nodes which is serially measurable according to RECIST 1.1 using either computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging or panoramic and close-up color photography.
* Lesions that have had radiotherapy must show evidence of progressive disease based on RECIST 1.1 to be deemed a target lesion.
6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, performance status of 0, 1 or 2.
7. Adequate renal function defined as calculated creatinine clearance greater than 50 mL/min per the Cockroft and Gault formula.
8. Adequate bone marrow function, defined as:

* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1,500/mm3 or greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10\^9/L.
* Platelet count greater than or equal to 100,000/mm3 or greater than or equal to 100 x 10\^9/L.
* Hemoglobin (Hb) greater than or equal to 10g/dL at baseline (blood transfusions,hematopoietic growth factors and hematinics are allowed during the Prerandomization Phase to correct Hb values less than 10g/dL).
9. Adequate liver function, defined as:

* Bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) except for unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia of Gilbert's syndrome.
* Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) less than or equal to 3 times ULN. For total ALP greater than 3 times ULN, the ALP liver isoenzyme must be less than or equal to 3 times ULN.
10. All female subjects will be considered to be of child-bearing potential unless they are postmenopausal (at least 12 months consecutive amenorrhea, in the appropriate age group and without other known or suspected cause), or have been sterilized surgically (i.e., bilateral tubal ligation greater than or equal to 1 menstrual cycle prior to randomization, or have undergone a hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy).

Female subjects of child-bearing potential must agree to use two forms of highly effective contraception from the last menstrual period prior to randomization (or use a double barrier method as described below until they are on two forms of highly effective contraception for at least one menstrual cycle), during the study treatment, and for 3 months after the final dose of study treatment. Female subjects exempt from this requirement are subjects who practice total abstinence. If currently abstinent, the subject must agree to use a double barrier method of contraception, i.e., condom and occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicide or until they are on two forms of highly effective contraception for at least one menstrual cycle if they become sexually active during the study treatment and for 3 months after the final dose of study treatment. Highly effective contraception includes:
* Placement of intrauterine device or system,
* Barrier methods of contraception: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault cap) with spermicide,
* Established hormonal contraceptive methods: oral, injectable or implant. Female subjects who are using hormonal contraceptives must have been on a stable dose of the same hormonal contraceptive product from the last menstrual period prior to randomization, and must continue to use the same hormonal contraceptive product during study treatment, and for 3 months after the first dose of study treatment.
* Vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia.
11. Male subjects and their female partner who are of child-bearing potential (as defined in Inclusion 10), and are not practicing total abstinence, must agree to use two forms of highly effective contraception from the last menstrual period of their female partner prior to randomization (or use a double barrier method as described above until they are on two forms of highly effective contraception for at least one menstrual cycle), during study treatment, and for 3 months (or 6 months if they received dacarbazine) after the final dose of study treatment. If currently abstinent, must agree to use a double barrier method of contraception if they become sexually active, or until they are on two forms of highly effective contraception as described above.
12. Voluntary agreement to provide written informed consent and the willingness and ability to comply with all aspects of the protocol.
13. Males or females aged greater than or equal to 18 years at the time of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subjects who have received any anti-cancer therapy, including radiotherapy, cytotoxic, hormonal, biological (including humanized antibodies) and targeted agents within 21 days, or five half-lives of the drug (whichever is longer) prior to randomization.
2. Subjects who have not recovered from acute toxicities as a result of prior anti-cancer therapy to less than or equal to Grade 1, according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), except for peripheral neuropathy (see Exclusion 6) and alopecia.
3. Subjects that have previously been treated with dacarbazine or its analogue temozolomide or eribulin.
4. Major surgery within 21 days prior to randomization.
5. Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy greater than CTCAE Grade 2.
6. Significant cardiovascular impairment, defined as:

* Cardiac failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II according to the NYHA Functional Classification,
* Unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 6 months of enrolment,
* Serious and potentially life-threatening arrhythmia.
7. Subjects with a high probability of Long QT Syndrome or QTc interval prolongation of more than or equal to 501 msec on at least two separate ECGs, following correction of any electrolyte imbalance.
8. Subjects with known central nervous system metastases.
9. Any serious concomitant illness or infectious disease requiring treatment, or infectious disease not requiring treatment, but with significant risks for myelosuppressive complications associated with chemotherapy.
10. Any malignancy that required treatment, or has shown evidence of recurrence (except for soft tissue sarcoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, or histologically confirmed complete excision of carcinoma in situ) during the 5 years prior to randomization.
11. Female subjects must not be pregnant as documented by a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) test with a minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent unit of beta-hCG at Screening and Baseline, or breastfeeding.
12. Hypersensitivity to the active substance, or any of the excipients of the eribulin drug product, or dacarbazine, (please refer to the dacarbazine prescribing information).
13. Any medical or other condition which, in the opinion of the PI or designee, will preclude participation in a clinical trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eisai Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Post Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

San Salvador de Jujuy, , Argentina

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Woodville South, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Barretos, , Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

Jaú, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Salvador, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Nový Jičín, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Aviano, Pordenone, Italy

Site Status

Candiolo, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Monza, , Italy

Site Status

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Rozzano (MI), , Italy

Site Status

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Gliwice, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Sibiu, , Romania

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Obninsk, , Russia

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Daejeon, , South Korea

Site Status

Seongnam, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain

Site Status

Badalona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, Thailand

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Pathum Wan, , Thailand

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Swansea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Czechia Denmark France Germany Israel Italy Netherlands New Zealand Poland Romania Russia Singapore South Korea Spain Thailand United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schoffski P, Chawla S, Maki RG, Italiano A, Gelderblom H, Choy E, Grignani G, Camargo V, Bauer S, Rha SY, Blay JY, Hohenberger P, D'Adamo D, Guo M, Chmielowski B, Le Cesne A, Demetri GD, Patel SR. Eribulin versus dacarbazine in previously treated patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma: a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1629-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01283-0. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26874885 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-024483-17

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

E7389-G000-309

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Trial of Dasatinib in Advanced Sarcomas
NCT00464620 COMPLETED PHASE2
Molecular Profiling of Advanced Soft-tissue Sarcomas
NCT03784014 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3
A Study of XmAb23104 in People With Sarcoma
NCT05879185 TERMINATED PHASE2