Safety and Performance of the Elaspine System in the Treatment of the Lumbar Spine

NCT ID: NCT01323543

Last Updated: 2015-11-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The safety and performance of the Elaspine™ Implant System in the treatment of lower back pain will be evaluated with a prospective and nonrandomized, multicenter post-marketing clinical study (PMCS). The study will be enrolled within Germany and Switzerland in 3-5 clinical centres, including in average 10 patients per centre. The study is conducted in accordance with the Standard ISO 14155, where applicable on clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects and other legal requirements.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Elaspine™

Impantation of Elaspine™ device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Elaspine™

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantation of device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Elaspine™

Implantation of device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient has signed and understood the approved Informed Consent form and is able to meet the proposed follow-up and postoperative management program.
2. Patient is skeletally mature and between 21 - 80 years of age.
3. Patient's pre-operative Body Mass Index (BMI) is ≤ 34.
4. Patient's pre-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is ≥ 30% (≥15 out of 50 points).
5. Patient's pre-operative back pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is \>60 (0-100 scale), with or without associated leg pain (leg pain VAS score).
6. Patient has received non-operative treatment for low back pain for \> 6 months and is unresponsive.
7. Patient has one or more of the following structural abnormalities with imaging studies verifying them at one or two contiguous levels within L1-L5:

* Discopathy
* Degenerative disc disease
* Massive or recurrent disc herniation
* Non-isthmic spondylolisthesis ≤ Grade 1 (acc. To Meyerding)
* Spinal stenosis
* Partially defective facet joints
* Retrolisthesis according to one of the following definitions (acc. to Ruch, William J.; Literature Reference 21):

* Complete Retrolisthesis: The body of one vertebra is posterior to both the vertebral body of the segment of the spine above as well as below
* Stairstepped Retrolisthesis: The body of one vertebra is posterior to the body of the spinal segment above, but is anterior to the one below.
* Partial Retrolisthesis: The body of one vertebra is posterior to the body of the spinal segment either above or below.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Degenerative spondylolisthesis greater than Grade 1 as defined by greater than 25 percent vertebral slip forward over the inferior vertebral body (acc. to Meyerding Classification) or significant segmental instability at or adjacent to intended treatment level.
2. Need for more than two-level or two non-contiguous-level surgery in the lumbar spine.
3. Patient has more than 50% defective facet joint (half of the articular joint surface) or laminectomy
4. Patient is scheduled for another lumbar surgery such as but not limited to a fusion
5. Patient has recent vertebral fractures or past fractures which did not heal.
6. Patient has known allergies to titanium alloy and polycarbonate urethane (PCU).
7. Patient has clinically compromised vertebral body structure and morphology at the lumbar spine due to current or past trauma (or pathological vertebral fracture) or significant endplate incompetence such as Schmorl´s node.
8. Patient has spondylolysis at the levels to be treated or an adjacent level.
9. Patient has a frontal curve in the lumbar spine \>10°.
10. Patient has previously been diagnosed osteopenia or metabolic bone diseases or severe osteoporosis - if suspected to be confirmed by bone density being 2.5 SD below normal as assessed using DEXA analysis in:

* Postmenopausal females if suggested by x-ray or other risk factors
* Males over the age of 60 that have sustained a non-traumatic hip or spine fracture
11. Patient is taking medications known to potentially interfere with bone/soft tissue healing, including but not limited to the long term use of corticosteroids. (This is not intended to exclude patients using inhalation medications for asthma.)
12. Patient has an active infection either systemic or at the local site of intended surgery.
13. Patient has been diagnosed with hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disease, or AIDS, ARC, or is HIV positive or any other diseases that according to surgeons may have an impact on the outcome of the surgery.
14. Patients with known malignant diseases or bone tumors.
15. Patients with vascular malformations such as abdominal aneurysm.
16. Patient has a progressive neuromuscular disease. Patient has active malignancy within the last 15 years, unless the malignancy was treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms for at least 5 years.
17. Patient has cervical myelopathy.
18. Patient is pregnant or planning in becoming pregnant in the next 2 years.
19. Patient is currently participating in another investigational study where the endpoints have not yet been achieved. 8/35 Elaspine™ PMCS 01, Clinical Investigation Plan CIP EN Version C, October 1st, 2010 CONFIDENTIAL
20. Patient has mental illness, and/or diagnosed as clinically depressed or belongs to a vulnerable population (e.g., prisoner, severe drug abuser, developmentally disabled) that would compromise ability to provide informed consent or compliance with follow-up requirements. If suspected to be confirmed by classification according to DSM IV.
21. Patient has had another surgical procedure(s) within the last 60 days involving general anesthesia or any surgical procedure that might increase the risk of deep vein thrombosis.
22. Loss of Disk height according to Pfirrmann (\> C) or Frymoyer (\>3) and or severe spondylosis.
23. Patient shows three or more signs of anorganic behaviour (Waddell´s signs).
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UL International GmbH

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Spinelab AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Helios Rosmann Klinik

Breisach, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Stauferklinikum Schwäbisch Gmünd

Mutlangen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

HSK Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Klinik

Wiesbaden, Hessia, Germany

Site Status

Katholisches Klinikum Marienhof

Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

HUG Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève

Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10k002 PMCS 01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id