Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Neuroprotective Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemic Cerebral Vascular Disease (NCT NCT01321749)
NCT ID: NCT01321749
Last Updated: 2012-04-25
Results Overview
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
196 participants
at the time points of baseline and 1, 15 and 30 days after BLIPC treatment
2012-04-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
RIPC+Stroke Secondary Prevension
Procedure/Surgery: RIPC The detail of RIPC included five cycles of bilateral upper limbs 5/5 min. of ischemia and reperfusion alternation. Limb ischemia was induced by inflating tourniquets to 200 mmHg. This process was placed on both arms every day.
Procedure:stroke secondary prevention
|
Stroke Secondary Prevention
Procedure:stroke secondary prevention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
51
|
52
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
38
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
22
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
RIPC+Stroke Secondary Prevension
Procedure/Surgery: RIPC The detail of RIPC included five cycles of bilateral upper limbs 5/5 min. of ischemia and reperfusion alternation. Limb ischemia was induced by inflating tourniquets to 200 mmHg. This process was placed on both arms every day.
Procedure:stroke secondary prevention
|
Stroke Secondary Prevention
Procedure:stroke secondary prevention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
4
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
The Neuroprotective Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemic Cerebral Vascular Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
RIPC+Stroke Secondary Prevension
n=51 Participants
Procedure/Surgery: RIPC The detail of RIPC included five cycles of bilateral upper limbs 5/5 min. of ischemia and reperfusion alternation. Limb ischemia was induced by inflating tourniquets to 200 mmHg. This process was placed on both arms every day.
Procedure:stroke secondary prevention
|
Stroke Secondary Prevention
n=52 Participants
Procedure:stroke secondary prevention
|
Total
n=103 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=5 Participants
|
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=7 Participants
|
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
China
|
51 participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 participants
n=7 Participants
|
103 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: at the time points of baseline and 1, 15 and 30 days after BLIPC treatmentOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: the time points of baseline and 1, 15 and 30 days after BLIPC treatmentblood samples were collected one hour after every times of BLIPC procedure ended, and assayed with the immuno-turbidimetry assay on the coagulation laboratory autoanalyzer
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 300 days after treatmentWe compared the number of patients who got new lesions in the Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RIPC+Stroke Secondary Prevension
n=38 Participants
Procedure/Surgery: RIPC The detail of RIPC included five cycles of bilateral upper limbs 5/5 min. of ischemia and reperfusion alternation. Limb ischemia was induced by inflating tourniquets to 200 mmHg. This process was placed on both arms every day.
Procedure:stroke secondary prevention
|
Stroke Secondary Prevention
n=30 Participants
Procedure:stroke secondary prevention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Who Got New Brain Lesions
|
3 participants
|
8 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At the 300-day after the initial treatmentThese patients underwent MRI/DWI at the time of first recurrence; patients without symptoms recurrence underwent follow-up MRI/DWI at 300 days.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 300-day after treatmentBrain perfusion status were evalvated by SPECT SPECT scanning was performed using a dual headed rotating gamma camera at 30 minutes after intravenous 99mTc-ECD (25mCi) bolus injection and at 40 minutes after 18F -FDG bolus injection.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
RIPC+Stroke Secondary Prevension
Stroke Secondary Prevention
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
RIPC+Stroke Secondary Prevension
n=51 participants at risk
Procedure/Surgery: RIPC The detail of RIPC included five cycles of bilateral upper limbs 5/5 min. of ischemia and reperfusion alternation. Limb ischemia was induced by inflating tourniquets to 200 mmHg. This process was placed on both arms every day.
Procedure:stroke secondary prevention
|
Stroke Secondary Prevention
n=52 participants at risk
Procedure:stroke secondary prevention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
transient sporadic subcutaneous bleeding points
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3
|
0.00%
0/52
|
Additional Information
Xunming Ji, M.D.,Ph.D.
XuanWu Hospital, Capital Medical University
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place