Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Qure Study: Q-fever Fatigue Syndrome - Response to Treatment (NCT NCT01318356)
NCT ID: NCT01318356
Last Updated: 2021-06-23
Results Overview
The primary outcome measure is the fatigue severity measured by the subscale fatigue severity (8 items, 7-point Likert Scale) of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS questionnaire) with a severity range from 8-56. High scores indicate a high level of fatigue. Patients with a cut-off score of ≥35 are classified as severely fatigued.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
156 participants
24 weeks after start of treatment
2021-06-23
Participant Flow
156 patients signed informed consent and were randomized; of these, 155 started treatment, either doxycycline (n = 52), placebo (n = 52), or CBT (n = 51). One patient refused double-blind randomization after allocation to the medication group, and received no treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Cognitive behavioral therapy: CBT will consist of a protocolized intervention during a period of 24 weeks. It starts with goal setting and psycho-education on the possible role of cognitions and behavior in maintaining the fatigue. The maintaining factors will subsequently be addressed (regulation of sleep-wake cycle, gradual increasing activity, reformulating fatigue related cognitions).
|
Doxycycline
Doxycycline: Antibiotic therapy will consist of doxycycline once daily 200 mg (in 1 capsule) for 24 weeks. Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks after start for side effects (rash, liver enzymes). Antibiotics will be stopped in case of side effects or pregnancy.
|
Placebo
Placebo: Patients in the placebo group will receive once daily 1 placebo capsule identical in appearance to the doxycycline for 24 weeks and have the same visits and monitoring for side effects as the patients randomized to doxycycline (Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
51
|
52
|
52
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
43
|
49
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
3
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
n=51 Participants
Cognitive behavioral therapy: CBT will consist of a protocolized intervention during a period of 24 weeks. It starts with goal setting and psycho-education on the possible role of cognitions and behavior in maintaining the fatigue. The maintaining factors will subsequently be addressed (regulation of sleep-wake cycle, gradual increasing activity, reformulating fatigue related cognitions).
|
Doxycycline
n=52 Participants
Doxycycline: Antibiotic therapy will consist of doxycycline once daily 200 mg (in 1 capsule) for 24 weeks. Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks after start for side effects (rash, liver enzymes). Antibiotics will be stopped in case of side effects or pregnancy.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Placebo: Patients in the placebo group will receive once daily 1 placebo capsule identical in appearance to the doxycycline for 24 weeks and have the same visits and monitoring for side effects as the patients randomized to doxycycline (Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks)
|
Total
n=155 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
43.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 • n=51 Participants
|
43.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=52 Participants
|
44.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=52 Participants
|
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=155 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
25 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=155 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
26 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
81 Participants
n=155 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
51 participants
n=51 Participants
|
52 participants
n=52 Participants
|
52 participants
n=52 Participants
|
155 participants
n=155 Participants
|
|
Sickness Impact Profile 8 total score
|
1369.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 646.7 • n=51 Participants
|
1304.9 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 537.7 • n=52 Participants
|
1295.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 593.7 • n=52 Participants
|
1322.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 591.1 • n=155 Participants
|
|
Checklist Individual Strength, subscale fatigue
|
49.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=51 Participants
|
51.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=52 Participants
|
50.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=52 Participants
|
50.36 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=155 Participants
|
|
Symptom Checklist 90 total score
|
156.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35.0 • n=51 Participants
|
152.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.4 • n=52 Participants
|
159.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.0 • n=52 Participants
|
155.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.0 • n=155 Participants
|
|
Duration of symptoms
|
40 months
n=51 Participants
|
36 months
n=52 Participants
|
37.50 months
n=52 Participants
|
39 months
n=155 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks after start of treatmentPopulation: Intention-to-treat analysis
The primary outcome measure is the fatigue severity measured by the subscale fatigue severity (8 items, 7-point Likert Scale) of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS questionnaire) with a severity range from 8-56. High scores indicate a high level of fatigue. Patients with a cut-off score of ≥35 are classified as severely fatigued.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
n=50 Participants
Cognitive behavioral therapy: CBT will consist of a protocolized intervention during a period of 24 weeks. It starts with goal setting and psycho-education on the possible role of cognitions and behavior in maintaining the fatigue. The maintaining factors will subsequently be addressed (regulation of sleep-wake cycle, gradual increasing activity, reformulating fatigue related cognitions).
|
Doxycycline
n=52 Participants
Doxycycline: Antibiotic therapy will consist of doxycycline once daily 200 mg (in 1 capsule) for 24 weeks. Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks after start for side effects (rash, liver enzymes). Antibiotics will be stopped in case of side effects or pregnancy.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Placebo: Patients in the placebo group will receive once daily 1 placebo capsule identical in appearance to the doxycycline for 24 weeks and have the same visits and monitoring for side effects as the patients randomized to doxycycline (Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Checklist Individual Strength (CIS)
|
31.6 score on a scale
Interval 28.0 to 35.1
|
40.8 score on a scale
Interval 37.3 to 44.3
|
37.8 score on a scale
Interval 34.3 to 41.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks after start of treatmentPopulation: Intention-to-treat analysis
Level of functional impairment measured with the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). The SIP is an instrument that is used to gauge sickness-related dysfunction. The weighted total score on eight subscales of the SIP8 (SIP8 total score) will be used to assess functional disability in all domains of functioning (range 0-5799). A higher score indicates higher levels of functional impairment. A score of 450 or higher on the SIP is defined as being significant disabled because of fatigue.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
n=50 Participants
Cognitive behavioral therapy: CBT will consist of a protocolized intervention during a period of 24 weeks. It starts with goal setting and psycho-education on the possible role of cognitions and behavior in maintaining the fatigue. The maintaining factors will subsequently be addressed (regulation of sleep-wake cycle, gradual increasing activity, reformulating fatigue related cognitions).
|
Doxycycline
n=52 Participants
Doxycycline: Antibiotic therapy will consist of doxycycline once daily 200 mg (in 1 capsule) for 24 weeks. Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks after start for side effects (rash, liver enzymes). Antibiotics will be stopped in case of side effects or pregnancy.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Placebo: Patients in the placebo group will receive once daily 1 placebo capsule identical in appearance to the doxycycline for 24 weeks and have the same visits and monitoring for side effects as the patients randomized to doxycycline (Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) Total Score
|
786.8 score on a scale
Interval 615.3 to 958.3
|
1101.5 score on a scale
Interval 933.5 to 1269.6
|
963.8 score on a scale
Interval 795.8 to 1131.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks after start of treatmentPopulation: Intention-to-treat analysis
The total score of the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL90) measures the level of psychological distress. The SCL90 consists of 90 items scored on a 5-point scale. Scores range from 90 to 450. A low total score reflects high psychological well-being. The SCL-90 is a reliable and valid instrument.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
n=50 Participants
Cognitive behavioral therapy: CBT will consist of a protocolized intervention during a period of 24 weeks. It starts with goal setting and psycho-education on the possible role of cognitions and behavior in maintaining the fatigue. The maintaining factors will subsequently be addressed (regulation of sleep-wake cycle, gradual increasing activity, reformulating fatigue related cognitions).
|
Doxycycline
n=52 Participants
Doxycycline: Antibiotic therapy will consist of doxycycline once daily 200 mg (in 1 capsule) for 24 weeks. Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks after start for side effects (rash, liver enzymes). Antibiotics will be stopped in case of side effects or pregnancy.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Placebo: Patients in the placebo group will receive once daily 1 placebo capsule identical in appearance to the doxycycline for 24 weeks and have the same visits and monitoring for side effects as the patients randomized to doxycycline (Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL90)
|
127.1 score on a scale
Interval 119.4 to 134.7
|
149.2 score on a scale
Interval 141.6 to 156.7
|
142.6 score on a scale
Interval 134.1 to 150.1
|
Adverse Events
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Doxycycline
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
n=50 participants at risk
Cognitive behavioral therapy: CBT will consist of a protocolized intervention during a period of 24 weeks. It starts with goal setting and psycho-education on the possible role of cognitions and behavior in maintaining the fatigue. The maintaining factors will subsequently be addressed (regulation of sleep-wake cycle, gradual increasing activity, reformulating fatigue related cognitions).
|
Doxycycline
n=52 participants at risk
Doxycycline: Antibiotic therapy will consist of doxycycline once daily 200 mg (in 1 capsule) for 24 weeks. Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks after start for side effects (rash, liver enzymes). Antibiotics will be stopped in case of side effects or pregnancy.
|
Placebo
n=52 participants at risk
Placebo: Patients in the placebo group will receive once daily 1 placebo capsule identical in appearance to the doxycycline for 24 weeks and have the same visits and monitoring for side effects as the patients randomized to doxycycline (Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urosepsis
|
0.00%
0/50 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
0.00%
0/52 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
1.9%
1/52 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiological symptoms
|
0.00%
0/50 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
0.00%
0/52 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
1.9%
1/52 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
n=50 participants at risk
Cognitive behavioral therapy: CBT will consist of a protocolized intervention during a period of 24 weeks. It starts with goal setting and psycho-education on the possible role of cognitions and behavior in maintaining the fatigue. The maintaining factors will subsequently be addressed (regulation of sleep-wake cycle, gradual increasing activity, reformulating fatigue related cognitions).
|
Doxycycline
n=52 participants at risk
Doxycycline: Antibiotic therapy will consist of doxycycline once daily 200 mg (in 1 capsule) for 24 weeks. Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks after start for side effects (rash, liver enzymes). Antibiotics will be stopped in case of side effects or pregnancy.
|
Placebo
n=52 participants at risk
Placebo: Patients in the placebo group will receive once daily 1 placebo capsule identical in appearance to the doxycycline for 24 weeks and have the same visits and monitoring for side effects as the patients randomized to doxycycline (Patients will be monitored 4, 8, 16 and 26 weeks)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
58.0%
29/50 • Number of events 54 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
42.3%
22/52 • Number of events 33 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
50.0%
26/52 • Number of events 46 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastointestinal
|
10.0%
5/50 • Number of events 5 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
59.6%
31/52 • Number of events 51 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
51.9%
27/52 • Number of events 33 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muskuloskeletal
|
28.0%
14/50 • Number of events 18 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
42.3%
22/52 • Number of events 28 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
32.7%
17/52 • Number of events 22 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin
|
10.0%
5/50 • Number of events 5 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
38.5%
20/52 • Number of events 29 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
19.2%
10/52 • Number of events 12 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neurological
|
12.0%
6/50 • Number of events 8 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
25.0%
13/52 • Number of events 13 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
19.2%
10/52 • Number of events 11 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone and teeth
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
5.8%
3/52 • Number of events 4 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
|
Immune system disorders
Allergic reaction
|
0.00%
0/50 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
0.00%
0/52 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
0.00%
0/52 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
|
General disorders
Other
|
36.0%
18/50 • Number of events 21 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
46.2%
24/52 • Number of events 34 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
25.0%
13/52 • Number of events 15 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
|
Investigations
Laboratorial
|
0.00%
0/50 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
26.9%
14/52 • Number of events 16 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
13.5%
7/52 • Number of events 8 • Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and concomitant drug use. For patients allocated to the medication condition, AEs were monitored at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (= up to approximately 26 weeks after start of therapy). Furthormore, if applicable, during the trial when reported by the patient. For patients allocated to CBT, AEs were monitored at 8 weeks after start of therapy, and at EOT (up to 26 weeks after start of therapy).
|
Additional Information
S.P. Keijmel, MD PhD
Radboud university medical center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place