Bipolar Intervention Study: Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy
NCT ID: NCT01315028
Last Updated: 2014-07-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-11-30
2011-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Young Adults With Bipolar Disorder
NCT01176825
Study Efficacy of Enhancing Cognitive Reserve in Patients With a First Bipolar Episode
NCT06081634
Group Dialectical Behavioural Therapy for Mood Instability Within Bipolar Disorder: An Open Trial
NCT02637401
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Bipolar Disorder
NCT01126827
CBT for Problematic Impulsive Behaviours in Bipolar Disorder: A Case Series / CBT-PIB
NCT06129500
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Population: could appropriate individuals be identified and recruited to a trial of CIT for early bipolar disorder?
2. Intervention: would CIT be an acceptable intervention for individuals following a first or second treated episode of mania and or hypomania? Could we identify any modifications required to the CIT protocol used with this group?
3. Control group: could an appropriate group of participants be recruited to facilitate a comparison with the CIT intervention? Could we explicitly establish the usual care package and its local implementation?
4. Outcomes: which outcomes are appropriate for measuring relevant dimensions of a treatment effect?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Psychological Therapy
Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy (CIT) was a psychological therapy which emphasised assessment, engagement and formulation; normalizing and compassionate understanding; specific cognitive-behavioural and interpersonal strategies; self-management and social rhythm regulation; affect regulation, and staying well (Gumley \& Schwannauer, 2006).
Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy
Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy in Early Bipolar Disorder: Individuals will receive up to six months of individual CIT-BP. CBT will emphasise assessment, engagement and formulation; normalizing and compassionate understanding; specific cognitive and behavioural strategies; self-management and social rhythm regulation; affect regulation, and staying well (Gumley \& Schwannauer, 2006).
Treatment As Usual
All participants continued to receive their usual care from their local community mental health team and other psychological therapies were not withheld during the conduct of the trial.
Treatment As Usual
The comparison group is treatment as usual (TAU). This will comprise of the individuals normal psychiatric care and will vary with individual and locality and is therefore not specified.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy
Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy in Early Bipolar Disorder: Individuals will receive up to six months of individual CIT-BP. CBT will emphasise assessment, engagement and formulation; normalizing and compassionate understanding; specific cognitive and behavioural strategies; self-management and social rhythm regulation; affect regulation, and staying well (Gumley \& Schwannauer, 2006).
Treatment As Usual
The comparison group is treatment as usual (TAU). This will comprise of the individuals normal psychiatric care and will vary with individual and locality and is therefore not specified.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government
OTHER_GOV
University of Glasgow
OTHER
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jamie Kirk
Clinical Psychologist / Chief Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jamie D Kirk, D.Clin.Psy
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde / University of Glasgow
Andrew I Gumley, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Glasgow
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gartnavel Royal Hospital
Glasgow, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CZG/2/472
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GN09CP546
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.