Trial Outcomes & Findings for A One-Year Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of CP-690,550 For Patients With Moderate To Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis (NCT NCT01309737)
NCT ID: NCT01309737
Last Updated: 2014-09-19
Results Overview
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
960 participants
Week 16
2014-09-19
Participant Flow
Outcome measures reporting results up to Week 16 consist of single placebo arm as reporting group while outcome measures reporting results up to Week 52 consist of 2 separate arms (for participants re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 milligram \[mg\] or 10 mg).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
CP-690,550 (tofacitinib) 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, CP-690,550 5 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and there after received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo,CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Week 0 to 16
STARTED
|
383
|
381
|
196
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 0 to 16
Treated
|
382
|
381
|
196
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 0 to 16
COMPLETED
|
331
|
341
|
152
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 0 to 16
NOT COMPLETED
|
52
|
40
|
44
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 16 to 52
STARTED
|
331
|
341
|
0
|
75
|
77
|
|
Week 16 to 52
COMPLETED
|
198
|
238
|
0
|
41
|
44
|
|
Week 16 to 52
NOT COMPLETED
|
133
|
103
|
0
|
34
|
33
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
CP-690,550 (tofacitinib) 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, CP-690,550 5 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and there after received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo,CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Week 0 to 16
Death
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 0 to 16
Adverse Event
|
11
|
10
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 0 to 16
Lack of Efficacy
|
15
|
2
|
24
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 0 to 16
Lost to Follow-up
|
7
|
8
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 0 to 16
Withdrawal by Subject
|
7
|
6
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 0 to 16
Other
|
10
|
14
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 0 to 16
Randomized, but not treated
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Week 16 to 52
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Week 16 to 52
Adverse Event
|
7
|
7
|
0
|
6
|
5
|
|
Week 16 to 52
Lack of Efficacy
|
107
|
76
|
0
|
25
|
21
|
|
Week 16 to 52
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
4
|
|
Week 16 to 52
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Week 16 to 52
Other
|
10
|
12
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A One-Year Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of CP-690,550 For Patients With Moderate To Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=382 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=196 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Total
n=959 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=93 Participants
|
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=4 Participants
|
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=27 Participants
|
45.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
114 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
124 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
311 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
268 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
257 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
123 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
648 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Full analysis set (FAS): participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to good clinical practices(GCP) compliance issues. Non-Responder Imputation (NRI) method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used.
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' at Week 16
|
46.01 percentage of participants
|
59.09 percentage of participants
|
10.88 percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of body surface area (BSA)" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response at Week 16
|
46.01 percentage of participants
|
59.63 percentage of participants
|
11.40 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of the randomized investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP non-compliance. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Assessment of BSA with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 handprints), upper extremities = 20% (20 handprints), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 handprints), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 handprints)\]. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis. The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=371 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=370 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=188 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 16
|
-54.86 percent change
Standard Error 2.12
|
-67.22 percent change
Standard Error 2.11
|
-9.12 percent change
Standard Error 3.02
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response at Week 16
|
24.47 percentage of participants
|
38.77 percentage of participants
|
5.18 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
The DLQI is a 10-item general dermatology questionnaire that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI item response options are rated by the participant from 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=371 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score
|
13.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.21
|
12.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.18
|
13.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.35
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4,16Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
The DLQI is a 10-item general dermatology questionnaire that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI item response options are rated by the participant from 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=372 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=368 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=188 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 4 and 16
Change at Week 4
|
-5.55 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
|
-6.88 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
|
-2.57 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.35
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 4 and 16
Change at Week 16
|
-7.28 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-8.92 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.31
|
-2.82 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used.
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' at Week 4
|
17.02 percentage of participants
|
27.81 percentage of participants
|
5.18 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response at Week 4
|
7.45 percentage of participants
|
14.17 percentage of participants
|
4.15 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study, received at least 1 dose investigational drug. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) were participants who were evaluable (had nail psoriasis at Baseline and had at least one measurement during follow up) for this measure.
The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores = more severe psoriasis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=227 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=216 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=109 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) at Week 16
|
-21.62 percent change
Standard Error 7.65
|
-25.97 percent change
Standard Error 7.87
|
15.82 percent change
Standard Error 11.27
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: FAS participants who had PGA response at Week 16. Data was not analyzed for participants initially randomized to placebo arm as they were re-randomized to active treatment group at Week 16 and thus maintaining response at Week 52 was not relevant. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants with non-missing post-baseline response data.
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Maintenance of PGA response at Week 52 among participants achieving PGA response at Week 16 is reported. Percent probability and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated based on the product limit estimator in survival analyses. Event is loss of response. Probability of maintaining response is (1-probability of loss of response).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=171 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=215 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Probability of Participants Maintaining Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' at Week 52
|
63.55 percent probability of response
Interval 55.67 to 70.4
|
71.71 percent probability of response
Interval 65.12 to 77.28
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: FAS participants who had PASI 75 response at Week 16. Data was not analyzed for participants initially randomized to placebo arm as they were re-randomized to active treatment group at Week 16 and thus maintaining response at Week 52 was not relevant. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants with non-missing post-baseline response data.
The PASI quantifies severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite scoring by investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 75 response = at least 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. Maintenance of PASI 75 response at Week 52 among participants achieving PASI 75 response at Week 16 is reported. Percent probability and 95% CI were estimated based on the product limit estimator in survival analyses. Event is loss of response. Probability of maintaining response is (1-probability of loss of response).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=171 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=217 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Probability of Participants Maintaining Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response at Week 52
|
74.38 percent probability of response
Interval 66.94 to 80.39
|
78.99 percent probability of response
Interval 72.8 to 83.92
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: FAS participants who had PASI 90 response at Week 16. Data was not analyzed for participants initially randomized to placebo arm as they were re-randomized to active treatment group at Week 16 and thus maintaining response at Week 52 was not relevant. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants with non-missing post-baseline response data.
The PASI quantifies severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite scoring by investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 90 response = at least 90% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. Maintenance of PASI 90 response at Week 52 among participants achieving PASI 90 response at Week 16 is reported. Percent probability and 95% CI were estimated based on the product limit estimator in survival analyses. Event is loss of response. Probability of maintaining response is (1-probability of loss of response).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=92 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=140 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Probability of Participants Maintaining Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response at Week 52
|
70.33 percent probability of response
Interval 59.79 to 78.6
|
63.83 percent probability of response
Interval 55.21 to 71.23
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: FAS participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Median time to achieve a PGA response up to week 16 is reported. The median time to event was estimated based on the probability of event-rate based on life table estimates (not the observed rate as in outcome measure 1). Median time to event is not estimable if the estimated probability of response by Week 16 is less than 50%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=372 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=370 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=188 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear'
|
12.0 weeks
Interval 12.0 to 16.0
|
8.0 weeks
Interval 8.0 to 12.0
|
NA weeks
Data was not estimable because estimated probability of response by Week 16 was less than 50%.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: FAS participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'N' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. The median time to event was estimated based on the probability of event-rate based on life table estimates (not the observed rate as in outcome measure 2). Median time to event is not estimable if the estimated probability of response by Week 16 is less than 50%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=371 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=370 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=188 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response
|
16.0 weeks
Interval 16.0 to
Data was not estimable because estimated probability of response by Week 16 was less than 50%.
|
12.0 weeks
Upper and lower limits were not estimable based on the log-log transformation method.
|
NA weeks
Data was not estimable because estimated probability of response by Week 16 was less than 50%.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: FAS participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'N' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 50 response was defined as at least 50% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. The median time to event was estimated based on the probability of event-rate based on life table estimates (not the observed rate as in outcome measure 26). Median time to event is not estimable if the estimated probability of response by Week 16 is less than 50%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=371 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=370 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=188 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response
|
8.0 weeks
Interval 8.0 to 12.0
|
8.0 weeks
Upper and lower limits were not estimable based on the log-log transformation method.
|
NA weeks
Data was not estimable because estimated probability of response by Week 16 was less than 50%.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used.
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear'
Week 4
|
17.02 percentage of participants
Interval 13.22 to 20.82
|
27.81 percentage of participants
Interval 23.27 to 32.35
|
6.76 percentage of participants
Interval 1.04 to 12.48
|
5.26 percentage of participants
Interval 0.24 to 10.28
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear'
Week 2
|
5.32 percentage of participants
Interval 3.05 to 7.59
|
9.63 percentage of participants
Interval 6.64 to 12.61
|
2.70 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.4
|
3.95 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.33
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear'
Week 8
|
33.51 percentage of participants
Interval 28.74 to 38.28
|
49.20 percentage of participants
Interval 44.13 to 54.26
|
12.16 percentage of participants
Interval 4.72 to 19.61
|
7.89 percentage of participants
Interval 1.83 to 13.96
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear'
Week 12
|
41.49 percentage of participants
Interval 36.51 to 46.47
|
55.35 percentage of participants
Interval 50.31 to 60.39
|
14.86 percentage of participants
Interval 6.76 to 22.97
|
7.89 percentage of participants
Interval 1.83 to 13.96
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear'
Week 16
|
46.01 percentage of participants
Interval 40.97 to 51.05
|
59.09 percentage of participants
Interval 54.11 to 64.07
|
17.57 percentage of participants
Interval 8.9 to 26.24
|
9.21 percentage of participants
Interval 2.71 to 15.71
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear'
Week 20
|
47.34 percentage of participants
Interval 42.29 to 52.39
|
59.09 percentage of participants
Interval 54.11 to 64.07
|
33.78 percentage of participants
Interval 23.01 to 44.56
|
40.79 percentage of participants
Interval 29.74 to 51.84
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear'
Week 28
|
50.53 percentage of participants
Interval 45.48 to 55.59
|
62.03 percentage of participants
Interval 57.11 to 66.95
|
52.70 percentage of participants
Interval 41.33 to 64.08
|
68.42 percentage of participants
Interval 57.97 to 78.87
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear'
Week 40
|
42.55 percentage of participants
Interval 37.56 to 47.55
|
55.88 percentage of participants
Interval 50.85 to 60.91
|
43.24 percentage of participants
Interval 31.96 to 54.53
|
59.21 percentage of participants
Interval 48.16 to 70.26
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear'
Week 52
|
36.97 percentage of participants
Interval 32.09 to 41.85
|
50.00 percentage of participants
Interval 44.93 to 55.07
|
36.49 percentage of participants
Interval 25.52 to 47.45
|
40.79 percentage of participants
Interval 29.74 to 51.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues.Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). Percentage of participants with each PGA score is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 52: Severe(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0.4 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 8: Mild(n=354,356,74,76)
|
34.7 percentage of participants
|
30.3 percentage of participants
|
27.0 percentage of participants
|
32.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 8: Moderate(n=354,356,74,76)
|
26.6 percentage of participants
|
16.6 percentage of participants
|
51.4 percentage of participants
|
52.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 8: Severe(n=354,356,74,76)
|
3.1 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
6.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Baseline: Clear(n=376,374,74,76)
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 3.05 to 7.59
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 6.64 to 12.61
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.4
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.33
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Baseline: Almost clear(n=376,374,74,76)
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 13.22 to 20.82
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 23.27 to 32.35
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 1.04 to 12.48
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.24 to 10.28
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Baseline: Mild(n=376,374,74,76)
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 28.74 to 38.28
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 44.13 to 54.26
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 4.72 to 19.61
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 1.83 to 13.96
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Baseline: Moderate(n=376,374,74,76)
|
82.4 percentage of participants
Interval 36.51 to 46.47
|
81.6 percentage of participants
Interval 50.31 to 60.39
|
87.8 percentage of participants
Interval 6.76 to 22.97
|
84.2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.83 to 13.96
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Baseline: Severe(n=376,374,74,76)
|
17.6 percentage of participants
Interval 40.97 to 51.05
|
18.4 percentage of participants
Interval 54.11 to 64.07
|
12.2 percentage of participants
Interval 8.9 to 26.24
|
15.8 percentage of participants
Interval 2.71 to 15.71
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 2: Clear(n=370,367,73,76)
|
0.3 percentage of participants
|
0.3 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 2: Almost clear(n=370,367,73,76)
|
5.1 percentage of participants
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
3.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 2: Mild(n=370,367,73,76)
|
30.5 percentage of participants
|
31.1 percentage of participants
|
8.2 percentage of participants
|
15.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 2: Moderate(n=370,367,73,76)
|
55.4 percentage of participants
|
51.5 percentage of participants
|
74.0 percentage of participants
|
71.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 2: Severe(n=370,367,73,76)
|
8.6 percentage of participants
|
7.6 percentage of participants
|
15.1 percentage of participants
|
9.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 4: Clear(n=362,366,74,75)
|
1.7 percentage of participants
|
2.2 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 4: Almost clear(n=362,366,74,75)
|
16.0 percentage of participants
|
26.2 percentage of participants
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 4: Mild(n=362,366,74,75)
|
40.3 percentage of participants
|
39.1 percentage of participants
|
17.6 percentage of participants
|
28.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 4: Moderate(n=362,366,74,75)
|
38.4 percentage of participants
|
29.0 percentage of participants
|
66.2 percentage of participants
|
61.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 4: Severe(n=362,366,74,75)
|
3.6 percentage of participants
|
3.6 percentage of participants
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 8: Clear(n=354,356,74,76)
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
10.1 percentage of participants
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
2.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 8: Almost clear(n=354,356,74,76)
|
28.5 percentage of participants
|
41.6 percentage of participants
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 12: Clear(n=347,348,74,76)
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
20.1 percentage of participants
|
5.4 percentage of participants
|
2.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 12: Almost clear(n=347,348,74,76)
|
33.4 percentage of participants
|
39.4 percentage of participants
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 12: Mild(n=347,348,74,76)
|
32.6 percentage of participants
|
26.4 percentage of participants
|
29.7 percentage of participants
|
38.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 12: Moderate(n=347,348,74,76)
|
19.0 percentage of participants
|
12.6 percentage of participants
|
47.3 percentage of participants
|
46.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 12: Severe(n=347,348,74,76)
|
3.5 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
8.1 percentage of participants
|
7.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 16: Clear(n=340,345,74,76)
|
16.5 percentage of participants
|
27.0 percentage of participants
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
2.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 16: Almost clear(n=340,345,74,76)
|
34.4 percentage of participants
|
37.1 percentage of participants
|
10.8 percentage of participants
|
6.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 16: Mild(n=340,345,74,76)
|
27.4 percentage of participants
|
24.1 percentage of participants
|
25.7 percentage of participants
|
38.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 16 : Moderate(n=340,345,74,76)
|
19.1 percentage of participants
|
9.6 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
47.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 16: Severe(n=340,345,74,76)
|
2.6 percentage of participants
|
2.3 percentage of participants
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 20: Clear(n=327,338,74,76)
|
19.3 percentage of participants
|
30.2 percentage of participants
|
10.8 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 20: Almost clear(n=327,338,74,76)
|
35.2 percentage of participants
|
35.2 percentage of participants
|
23.0 percentage of participants
|
35.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 20: Mild(n=327,338,74,76)
|
29.4 percentage of participants
|
24.0 percentage of participants
|
41.9 percentage of participants
|
40.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 20: Moderate(n=327,338,74,76)
|
15.3 percentage of participants
|
9.8 percentage of participants
|
24.3 percentage of participants
|
18.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 20: Severe(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.9 percentage of participants
|
0.9 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 28: Clear(n=305,328,69,72)
|
22.6 percentage of participants
|
30.8 percentage of participants
|
20.3 percentage of participants
|
30.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 28: Almost clear(n=305,328,69,72)
|
39.7 percentage of participants
|
39.9 percentage of participants
|
36.2 percentage of participants
|
41.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 28: Mild(n=305,328,69,72)
|
25.9 percentage of participants
|
19.2 percentage of participants
|
23.2 percentage of participants
|
18.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 28: Moderate(n=305,328,69,72)
|
10.8 percentage of participants
|
7.9 percentage of participants
|
20.3 percentage of participants
|
9.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 28: Severe(n=305,328,69,72)
|
1.0 percentage of participants
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 40: Clear(n=213,263,46,55)
|
34.3 percentage of participants
|
35.4 percentage of participants
|
32.6 percentage of participants
|
38.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 40: Almost clear(n=213,263,46,55)
|
40.8 percentage of participants
|
44.1 percentage of participants
|
37.0 percentage of participants
|
43.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 40: Mild(n=213,263,46,55)
|
18.8 percentage of participants
|
13.7 percentage of participants
|
21.7 percentage of participants
|
16.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 40: Moderate(n=213,263,46,55)
|
5.2 percentage of participants
|
5.7 percentage of participants
|
6.5 percentage of participants
|
1.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 40: Severe(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.9 percentage of participants
|
1.1 percentage of participants
|
2.2 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 52: Clear(n=194,239,38,42)
|
36.1 percentage of participants
|
39.3 percentage of participants
|
34.2 percentage of participants
|
40.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 52: Almost clear(n=194,239,38,42)
|
35.6 percentage of participants
|
38.9 percentage of participants
|
36.8 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 52: Mild(n=194,239,38,42)
|
22.7 percentage of participants
|
15.9 percentage of participants
|
21.1 percentage of participants
|
21.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Psoriasis Score
Week 52: Moderate(n=194,239,38,42)
|
5.7 percentage of participants
|
5.4 percentage of participants
|
7.9 percentage of participants
|
4.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. Percentage of participants with PASI 75 response is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response
Week 2
|
1.33 percentage of participants
Interval 0.17 to 2.49
|
1.87 percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 3.25
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response
Week 4
|
7.45 percentage of participants
Interval 4.79 to 10.1
|
14.17 percentage of participants
Interval 10.64 to 17.71
|
5.41 percentage of participants
Interval 0.25 to 10.56
|
3.95 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.33
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response
Week 8
|
24.47 percentage of participants
Interval 20.12 to 28.81
|
39.30 percentage of participants
Interval 34.35 to 44.25
|
8.11 percentage of participants
Interval 1.89 to 14.33
|
5.26 percentage of participants
Interval 0.24 to 10.28
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response
Week 12
|
38.56 percentage of participants
Interval 33.64 to 43.48
|
53.48 percentage of participants
Interval 48.42 to 58.53
|
13.51 percentage of participants
Interval 5.72 to 21.3
|
6.58 percentage of participants
Interval 1.01 to 12.15
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response
Week 16
|
46.01 percentage of participants
Interval 40.97 to 51.05
|
59.63 percentage of participants
Interval 54.65 to 64.6
|
16.22 percentage of participants
Interval 7.82 to 24.61
|
11.84 percentage of participants
Interval 4.58 to 19.11
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response
Week 20
|
49.47 percentage of participants
Interval 44.41 to 54.52
|
62.03 percentage of participants
Interval 57.11 to 66.95
|
32.43 percentage of participants
Interval 21.77 to 43.1
|
38.16 percentage of participants
Interval 27.24 to 49.08
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response
Week 28
|
52.13 percentage of participants
Interval 47.08 to 57.18
|
66.31 percentage of participants
Interval 61.52 to 71.1
|
52.70 percentage of participants
Interval 41.33 to 64.08
|
64.47 percentage of participants
Interval 53.71 to 75.23
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response
Week 40
|
46.01 percentage of participants
Interval 40.97 to 51.05
|
60.43 percentage of participants
Interval 55.47 to 65.38
|
50.00 percentage of participants
Interval 38.61 to 61.39
|
59.21 percentage of participants
Interval 48.16 to 70.26
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) Response
Week 52
|
42.02 percentage of participants
Interval 37.03 to 47.01
|
52.41 percentage of participants
Interval 47.34 to 57.47
|
41.89 percentage of participants
Interval 30.65 to 53.13
|
44.74 percentage of participants
Interval 33.56 to 55.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,12,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Week 8 (n=354,356,74,76)
|
10.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.39
|
8.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.65
|
17.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.42
|
18.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.04
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Baseline (n=376,374,74,76)
|
22.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.80
|
21.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.41
|
22.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.62
|
22.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.43
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Week 2 (n=369,367,73,76)
|
18.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.47
|
17.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.94
|
21.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.88
|
19.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.72
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Week 4 (n=363,366,74,76)
|
14.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.27
|
12.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.44
|
19.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.35
|
18.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.86
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Week 12 (n=347,348,74,76)
|
9.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.58
|
6.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.22
|
17.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.27
|
17.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.44
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Week 16 (n=340,345,74,76)
|
8.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.77
|
5.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.71
|
16.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.83
|
16.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.67
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Week 20 (n=327,338,74,76)
|
6.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.71
|
4.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.83
|
10.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.71
|
9.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.20
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Week 28 (n=305,327,69,72)
|
5.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.56
|
4.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.13
|
6.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.41
|
5.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.35
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Week 40 (n=213,263,46,55)
|
3.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.65
|
2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.66
|
4.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.19
|
2.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.92
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
Week 52 (n=194,239,38,42)
|
3.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.16
|
2.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.89
|
3.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.13
|
2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.56
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,12, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the unique participants in the longitudinal model.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=371 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=370 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 2
|
-4.09 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
-4.94 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
-1.04 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.62
|
-2.87 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 4
|
-7.87 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.34
|
-9.47 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.34
|
-3.09 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.76
|
-3.65 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 8
|
-11.68 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.40
|
-13.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.40
|
-5.11 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
-4.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 12
|
-13.35 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
|
-15.56 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
|
-5.46 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
-5.10 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 16
|
-14.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
-16.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
-5.94 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
-5.80 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 20
|
-15.54 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
-17.36 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.40
|
-11.90 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
|
-13.12 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 28
|
-16.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
-17.65 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
-15.08 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
-17.14 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 40
|
-15.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.46
|
-16.98 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
-14.33 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.98
|
-16.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 52
|
-15.40 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.47
|
-16.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
-13.92 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.02
|
-16.16 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues.Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. Basic characteristics of psoriatic lesions: erythema, induration, and scaling (PASI components) are scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) according to a 5-point scale: 0 (no involvement); 1 (slight); 2 (moderate); 3 (marked); 4 (very marked). PASI component score range from 0 to 4 and where higher scores indicate greater severity of psoriatic lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Scaling(Trunk)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
2.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
2.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Erythema(Trunk)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
0.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
2.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Scaling(Trunk)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
2.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
2.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
2.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
1.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
2.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Erythema(Trunk)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
2.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
2.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
1.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
1.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
2.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Induration(Trunk)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
1.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
2.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
2.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
1.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
2.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
2.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
1.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
2.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Scaling(Trunk)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
2.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
2.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 8:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
2.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
2.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
1.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
1.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Erythema(Trunk)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
2.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
1.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
2.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
2.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
2.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Induration(Trunk)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
2.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
1.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
2.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
0.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
1.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
2.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
2.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Scaling(Trunk)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
1.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 12:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
1.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
2.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
1.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
2.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Induration(Trunk)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
0.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
2.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
1.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
1.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
2.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Scaling(Trunk)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
1.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 16:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
2.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
2.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
1.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
1.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Erythema(Trunk)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
1.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
0.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Induration(Trunk)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
0.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
1.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
1.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Scaling(Trunk)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 20:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
1.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
1.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
1.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
1.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
1.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Erythema(Trunk)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
1.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
0.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
0.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
0.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Induration(Trunk)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
0.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
1.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
1.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Scaling(Trunk)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
0.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 28:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
1.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
0.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Erythema(Trunk)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
0.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Induration(Trunk)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
0.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Scaling(Trunk)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
0.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 40:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
0.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
0.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Erythema(Trunk)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
0.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
0.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
0.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
0.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Induration(Trunk)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
0.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Scaling(Trunk)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
0.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 52:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
2.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
2.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
2.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
2.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
2.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Erythema(Trunk)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
2.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
2.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
2.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
3.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
3.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
3.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
3.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
2.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
2.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
2.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
2.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
2.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Induration(Trunk)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
2.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
2.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
2.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
2.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
2.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
2.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
2.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
2.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
2.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
2.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
2.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
2.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Scaling(Trunk)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
2.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
2.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
2.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
2.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Baseline:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=376,374,74,76)
|
3.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
3.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
3.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
3.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
2.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
2.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
2.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
2.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Erythema(Trunk)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
2.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
2.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
2.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
2.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
2.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
3.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
2.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
2.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Induration(Trunk)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
2.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
2.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
2.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
2.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
1.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
2.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
2.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 2:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
2.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
2.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
2.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
1.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Erythema(Trunk)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
2.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
2.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
2.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
2.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
2.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Induration(Trunk)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
2.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
2.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
2.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores
Week 4:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
1.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,12, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. Basic characteristics of psoriatic lesions: erythema, induration, and scaling (PASI components) are scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) according to a 5-point scale: 0 (no involvement); 1 (slight); 2 (moderate); 3 (marked); 4 (very marked). PASI component score range from 0 to 4 where higher scores indicate greater severity of psoriatic lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-2.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-2.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
-0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
-0.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-1.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
-0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-1.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-0.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-1.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-1.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
-1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
-0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
-0.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
-1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
-0.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Induration(Trunk)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Induration(Trunk)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
-2.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-1.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Induration(Trunk)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
-1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Induration(Trunk)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-2.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
-2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-2.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-2.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
-1.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
-2.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
-1.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
-2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
-0.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-1.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
-0.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
-0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-1.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
-1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
-1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
-1.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
-0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
-0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
-0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
-0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
-0.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
-1.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
-0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-1.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-1.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-1.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
-1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-1.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-1.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Erythema(Head\Neck)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
-1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
-0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
-0.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
-0.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
-0.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
-1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Erythema(Trunk)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Erythema(Trunk)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-2.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-0.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Erythema(Trunk)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-2.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
-1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Erythema(Trunk)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-2.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
-2.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Erythema(Trunk)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-2.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
-2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
-2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-2.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-2.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
-0.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
-0.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
-1.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-1.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
-1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
-0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-0.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-0.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-0.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-0.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-2.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
-1.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-2.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Erythema(Lower limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
-2.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
-0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
-0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-1.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
-1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-2.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-1.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Erythema(Upper limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-2.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
-2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Erythema(Trunk)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
-0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
-0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Erythema(Trunk)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
-1.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
-0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
-0.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Erythema(Trunk)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-1.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-0.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Erythema(Trunk)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
-0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
-0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Induration(Trunk)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-2.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
-0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
-1.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
-0.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
-0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
-2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-2.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-2.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Induration(Lower limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-2.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
-2.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
-0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
-0.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
-1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
-0.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
-0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-1.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-1.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Induration(Trunk)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-1.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
-0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
-0.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Scaling(Head\Neck)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
-1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
-1.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
-0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
-0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-2.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
-1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Scaling(Upper limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Scaling(Trunk)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
-0.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
-0.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
-0.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 4:Scaling(Trunk)(n=363,366,74,75)
|
-0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
-1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Scaling(Trunk)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
-0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Scaling(Trunk)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Scaling(Trunk)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
-1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
-0.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Scaling(Trunk)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-2.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-1.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Scaling(Trunk)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-1.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
-1.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Scaling(Trunk)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-2.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Scaling(Trunk)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
-2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
-2.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
-0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
-0.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-0.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
-0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
-2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
-0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-2.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
-1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
-1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-2.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
-2.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Scaling(Lower limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-2.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Induration(Trunk)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
-1.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Induration(Head\Neck)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 8:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=354,356,74,76)
|
-1.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
-1.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
-0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 12:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=347,348,74,76)
|
-1.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
-0.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
-0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 20:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=327,338,74,76)
|
-1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
-1.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
-1.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 28:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=305,327,69,72)
|
-1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
-1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-1.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 40:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=213,263,46,55)
|
-2.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-2.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 52:Induration(Upper limbs)(n=194,239,38,42)
|
-2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-2.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
-1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 2:Induration(Trunk)(n=369,367,73,76)
|
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
-0.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Component Scores at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Week 16:Induration(Trunk)(n=340,345,74,76)
|
-1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
-1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
-0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the unique participants in the longitudinal model.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=371 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=370 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 2
|
-18.21 percent change
Standard Error 1.10
|
-22.15 percent change
Standard Error 1.10
|
-5.07 percent change
Standard Error 2.46
|
-11.41 percent change
Standard Error 2.42
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 4
|
-34.62 percent change
Standard Error 1.44
|
-42.21 percent change
Standard Error 1.44
|
-14.25 percent change
Standard Error 3.20
|
-14.41 percent change
Standard Error 3.17
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 8
|
-50.36 percent change
Standard Error 1.64
|
-61.31 percent change
Standard Error 1.64
|
-22.18 percent change
Standard Error 3.64
|
-17.40 percent change
Standard Error 3.59
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 12
|
-57.96 percent change
Standard Error 1.73
|
-69.63 percent change
Standard Error 1.73
|
-24.39 percent change
Standard Error 3.82
|
-19.37 percent change
Standard Error 3.77
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 40
|
-67.88 percent change
Standard Error 1.90
|
-75.71 percent change
Standard Error 1.83
|
-60.94 percent change
Standard Error 4.06
|
-72.19 percent change
Standard Error 3.95
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 16
|
-62.06 percent change
Standard Error 1.81
|
-73.21 percent change
Standard Error 1.80
|
-25.91 percent change
Standard Error 3.97
|
-22.50 percent change
Standard Error 3.92
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 20
|
-67.66 percent change
Standard Error 1.60
|
-77.82 percent change
Standard Error 1.59
|
-51.51 percent change
Standard Error 3.48
|
-57.68 percent change
Standard Error 3.44
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 28
|
-71.71 percent change
Standard Error 1.59
|
-79.17 percent change
Standard Error 1.56
|
-65.89 percent change
Standard Error 3.40
|
-76.28 percent change
Standard Error 3.36
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 52
|
-63.98 percent change
Standard Error 2.10
|
-71.82 percent change
Standard Error 2.02
|
-56.64 percent change
Standard Error 4.54
|
-69.52 percent change
Standard Error 4.42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
Assessment of BSA with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 handprints), upper extremities = 20% (20 handprints), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 handprints), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 handprints)\]. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis. The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis
Week 2 (n=369,367,73,76)
|
28.25 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.19
|
26.40 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 16.27
|
30.63 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 18.36
|
29.59 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.47
|
|
Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis
Week 4 (n=363,366,74,75)
|
25.09 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.39
|
21.98 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 16.48
|
29.46 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 18.50
|
29.48 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.49
|
|
Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis
Week 8 (n=354,356,74,76)
|
19.03 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 15.59
|
15.63 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 15.38
|
26.95 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.78
|
28.07 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 18.12
|
|
Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis
Week 12 (n=354,356,74,76)
|
15.54 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 15.88
|
11.46 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 14.23
|
25.67 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 18.51
|
26.80 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.99
|
|
Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis
Week 28 (n=305,327,69,72)
|
9.24 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 13.29
|
6.04 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 10.70
|
11.23 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 13.23
|
9.53 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 15.33
|
|
Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis
Week 40 (n=213,263,46,55)
|
5.24 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 9.66
|
3.66 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 7.68
|
6.91 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 13.56
|
4.52 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 8.56
|
|
Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis
Baseline (n=376,374,74,76)
|
30.94 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.97
|
28.49 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 16.27
|
30.10 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.97
|
30.27 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.98
|
|
Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis
Week 16 (n=340,345,74,76)
|
13.40 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 16.30
|
9.11 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 12.62
|
24.95 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 19.27
|
26.04 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 17.73
|
|
Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis
Week 20 (n=327,338,74,76)
|
11.56 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 15.60
|
7.16 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 11.11
|
18.71 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 16.89
|
17.65 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 16.84
|
|
Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis
Week 52 (n=194,239,38,42)
|
4.37 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 7.69
|
3.32 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 7.23
|
4.91 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 7.48
|
3.32 percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 5.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'N'(number of participants analyzed) signifies the unique participants in the longitudinal model.
Assessment of BSA with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 handprints), upper extremities = 20% (20 handprints), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 handprints), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 handprints)\]. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis. The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=371 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=370 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 2
|
-7.62 percent change
Standard Error 0.91
|
-7.80 percent change
Standard Error 0.91
|
1.77 percent change
Standard Error 2.04
|
-1.13 percent change
Standard Error 2.00
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 4
|
-18.73 percent change
Standard Error 1.44
|
-23.68 percent change
Standard Error 1.44
|
-2.52 percent change
Standard Error 3.21
|
-1.70 percent change
Standard Error 3.18
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 8
|
-36.67 percent change
Standard Error 1.86
|
-46.76 percent change
Standard Error 1.86
|
-10.57 percent change
Standard Error 4.12
|
-4.57 percent change
Standard Error 4.07
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 12
|
-47.94 percent change
Standard Error 1.98
|
-60.67 percent change
Standard Error 1.98
|
-15.27 percent change
Standard Error 4.37
|
-7.55 percent change
Standard Error 4.32
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 16
|
-54.90 percent change
Standard Error 2.08
|
-67.16 percent change
Standard Error 2.07
|
-18.31 percent change
Standard Error 4.56
|
-8.13 percent change
Standard Error 4.50
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 20
|
-61.63 percent change
Standard Error 1.98
|
-74.17 percent change
Standard Error 1.97
|
-37.33 percent change
Standard Error 4.30
|
-38.93 percent change
Standard Error 4.24
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 28
|
-68.41 percent change
Standard Error 1.84
|
-77.92 percent change
Standard Error 1.81
|
-57.91 percent change
Standard Error 3.94
|
-67.84 percent change
Standard Error 3.88
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 40
|
-69.93 percent change
Standard Error 1.86
|
-77.78 percent change
Standard Error 1.79
|
-61.08 percent change
Standard Error 3.98
|
-70.79 percent change
Standard Error 3.86
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 52
|
-71.23 percent change
Standard Error 1.86
|
-77.20 percent change
Standard Error 1.76
|
-63.88 percent change
Standard Error 4.03
|
-76.60 percent change
Standard Error 3.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8,12,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of body surface area (BSA)" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 50 response was defined as at least a 50% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. Percentage of participants with PASI 50 response is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response
Week 2
|
9.31 percentage of participants
Interval 6.37 to 12.25
|
12.30 percentage of participants
Interval 8.97 to 15.63
|
2.70 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.4
|
6.58 percentage of participants
Interval 1.01 to 12.15
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response
Week 4
|
28.19 percentage of participants
Interval 23.64 to 32.74
|
41.44 percentage of participants
Interval 36.45 to 46.44
|
9.46 percentage of participants
Interval 2.79 to 16.13
|
11.84 percentage of participants
Interval 4.58 to 19.11
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response
Week 8
|
51.60 percentage of participants
Interval 46.54 to 56.65
|
66.84 percentage of participants
Interval 62.07 to 71.62
|
18.92 percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 27.84
|
14.47 percentage of participants
Interval 6.56 to 22.38
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response
Week 12
|
61.17 percentage of participants
Interval 56.24 to 66.1
|
72.99 percentage of participants
Interval 68.49 to 77.49
|
25.68 percentage of participants
Interval 15.72 to 35.63
|
15.79 percentage of participants
Interval 7.59 to 23.99
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response
Week 16
|
63.30 percentage of participants
Interval 58.43 to 68.17
|
74.33 percentage of participants
Interval 69.9 to 78.76
|
29.73 percentage of participants
Interval 19.32 to 40.14
|
23.68 percentage of participants
Interval 14.13 to 33.24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response
Week 20
|
67.55 percentage of participants
Interval 62.82 to 72.29
|
78.34 percentage of participants
Interval 74.17 to 82.52
|
56.76 percentage of participants
Interval 45.47 to 68.04
|
63.16 percentage of participants
Interval 52.31 to 74.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response
Week 28
|
68.88 percentage of participants
Interval 64.2 to 73.56
|
77.27 percentage of participants
Interval 73.03 to 81.52
|
70.27 percentage of participants
Interval 59.86 to 80.68
|
76.32 percentage of participants
Interval 66.76 to 85.87
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response
Week 40
|
53.46 percentage of participants
Interval 48.42 to 58.5
|
67.65 percentage of participants
Interval 62.91 to 72.39
|
56.76 percentage of participants
Interval 45.47 to 68.04
|
69.74 percentage of participants
Interval 59.41 to 80.07
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 (PASI 50) Response
Week 52
|
48.67 percentage of participants
Interval 43.62 to 53.72
|
62.03 percentage of participants
Interval 57.11 to 66.95
|
48.65 percentage of participants
Interval 37.26 to 60.04
|
52.63 percentage of participants
Interval 41.41 to 63.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8,12,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. Percentage of participants with PASI 90 response is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response
Week 2
|
0.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.79
|
0.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.79
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response
Week 4
|
2.66 percentage of participants
Interval 1.03 to 4.29
|
2.67 percentage of participants
Interval 1.04 to 4.31
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response
Week 8
|
9.04 percentage of participants
Interval 6.14 to 11.94
|
15.24 percentage of participants
Interval 11.6 to 18.88
|
4.05 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.55
|
2.63 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.23
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response
Week 12
|
18.09 percentage of participants
Interval 14.19 to 21.98
|
29.68 percentage of participants
Interval 25.05 to 34.31
|
5.41 percentage of participants
Interval 0.25 to 10.56
|
3.95 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.33
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response
Week 16
|
24.47 percentage of participants
Interval 20.12 to 28.81
|
38.77 percentage of participants
Interval 33.83 to 43.71
|
9.46 percentage of participants
Interval 2.79 to 16.13
|
3.95 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.33
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response
Week 20
|
29.52 percentage of participants
Interval 24.91 to 34.13
|
41.98 percentage of participants
Interval 36.98 to 46.98
|
14.86 percentage of participants
Interval 6.76 to 22.97
|
14.47 percentage of participants
Interval 6.56 to 22.38
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response
Week 28
|
29.52 percentage of participants
Interval 24.91 to 34.13
|
44.12 percentage of participants
Interval 39.09 to 49.15
|
31.08 percentage of participants
Interval 20.54 to 41.63
|
46.05 percentage of participants
Interval 34.85 to 57.26
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response
Week 40
|
28.99 percentage of participants
Interval 24.4 to 33.58
|
40.11 percentage of participants
Interval 35.14 to 45.07
|
27.03 percentage of participants
Interval 16.91 to 37.15
|
43.42 percentage of participants
Interval 32.28 to 54.56
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI 90) Response
Week 52
|
27.39 percentage of participants
Interval 22.89 to 31.9
|
36.36 percentage of participants
Interval 31.49 to 41.24
|
22.97 percentage of participants
Interval 13.39 to 32.56
|
32.89 percentage of participants
Interval 22.33 to 43.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8,12,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. Basic characteristics of psoriatic lesions: erythema, induration, and scaling (PASI components) are scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) according to a 5-point scale: 0 (no involvement); 1 (slight); 2 (moderate); 3 (marked); 4 (very marked).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score of at Least 125% of Baseline PASI Score
Week 2 (n=369,367,73,76)
|
0.54 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.29
|
1.09 percentage of participants
Interval 0.03 to 2.15
|
1.37 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.04
|
1.32 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.88
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score of at Least 125% of Baseline PASI Score
Week 4 (n=363,366,74,75)
|
0.83 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.76
|
1.09 percentage of participants
Interval 0.03 to 2.16
|
2.70 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.4
|
4.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.43
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score of at Least 125% of Baseline PASI Score
Week 8 (n=354,356,74,76)
|
1.13 percentage of participants
Interval 0.03 to 2.23
|
0.84 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.79
|
4.05 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.55
|
7.89 percentage of participants
Interval 1.83 to 13.96
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score of at Least 125% of Baseline PASI Score
Week 12 (n=347,348,74,76)
|
1.15 percentage of participants
Interval 0.03 to 2.28
|
1.15 percentage of participants
Interval 0.03 to 2.27
|
8.11 percentage of participants
Interval 1.89 to 14.33
|
7.89 percentage of participants
Interval 1.83 to 13.96
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score of at Least 125% of Baseline PASI Score
Week 16 (n=340,345,74,76)
|
1.47 percentage of participants
Interval 0.19 to 2.75
|
1.16 percentage of participants
Interval 0.03 to 2.29
|
10.81 percentage of participants
Interval 3.74 to 17.89
|
9.21 percentage of participants
Interval 2.71 to 15.71
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score of at Least 125% of Baseline PASI Score
Week 20 (n=327,338,74,76)
|
0.61 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.46
|
0.30 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.87
|
4.05 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.55
|
1.32 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.88
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score of at Least 125% of Baseline PASI Score
Week 28 (n=305,327,69,72)
|
0.66 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.56
|
0.31 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.9
|
2.90 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.86
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score of at Least 125% of Baseline PASI Score
Week 40 (n=213,263,46,55)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.76 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.81
|
2.17 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.39
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score of at Least 125% of Baseline PASI Score
Week 52 (n=194,239,38,42)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP non-compliance. N(number of participants analyzed) signifies participants (with baseline nail psoriasis) who were evaluable for this measure.
The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores = more severe psoriasis.'n' signifies participants evaluable at specified time point for each arm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=240 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=226 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score
Baseline (n=240,226,43,55)
|
27.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.45
|
26.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.35
|
25.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.60
|
26.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.67
|
|
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score
Week 8 (n=226,214,43,55)
|
22.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.83
|
21.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.29
|
21.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.24
|
25.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.29
|
|
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score
Week 16 (n=218,205,43,55)
|
17.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.86
|
16.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.13
|
22.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.96
|
25.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.37
|
|
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score
Week 20 (n=208,206,43,55)
|
15.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.97
|
14.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.70
|
21.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.32
|
24.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.30
|
|
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score
Week 28 (n=193,197,40,53)
|
11.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.29
|
11.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.90
|
15.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.06
|
17.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.90
|
|
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score
Week 40 (n=118,148,26,39)
|
10.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.71
|
7.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.57
|
7.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.80
|
11.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.41
|
|
Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score
Week 52 (n=108,137,21,30)
|
9.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.43
|
7.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.32
|
5.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.12
|
7.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline,Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP non-compliance. N(number of participants analyzed) signifies participants (with baseline nail psoriasis) who were evaluable for this measure.
The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores = more severe psoriasis. 'n' signifies participants evaluable at specified time point for each arm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=240 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=226 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 8(n=226,214,43,55)
|
-4.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.30
|
-4.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.80
|
-3.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.35
|
-1.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 16(n=218,205,43,55)
|
-8.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.02
|
-9.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.60
|
-2.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.72
|
-1.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 20(n=208,206,43,55)
|
-10.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.48
|
-11.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.74
|
-3.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.31
|
-2.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 28(n=193,197,40,53)
|
-13.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.96
|
-14.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.75
|
-9.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.63
|
-8.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 40(n=118,148,26,39)
|
-16.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.80
|
-18.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.84
|
-21.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.28
|
-15.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 52(n=108,137,21,30)
|
-17.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.36
|
-18.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.27
|
-23.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.97
|
-19.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP non-compliance. 'n' signifies participants evaluable at specified time point for each arm.
Nail psoriasis is evaluated by the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Total number of psoriasis affected nails (presence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix / nail bed) were assessed and reported. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants (with baseline nail psoriasis) who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=240 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=226 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Affected Nails
Baseline (n=240,226,43,55)
|
7.45 nails
Standard Deviation 3.03
|
7.23 nails
Standard Deviation 3.20
|
7.21 nails
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
7.36 nails
Standard Deviation 3.08
|
|
Number of Affected Nails
Week 8 (n=226,214,43,55)
|
6.50 nails
Standard Deviation 3.51
|
6.65 nails
Standard Deviation 3.61
|
6.98 nails
Standard Deviation 3.11
|
7.56 nails
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
|
Number of Affected Nails
Week 16 (n=218,204,43,55)
|
5.83 nails
Standard Deviation 3.58
|
5.37 nails
Standard Deviation 3.91
|
6.79 nails
Standard Deviation 3.53
|
7.56 nails
Standard Deviation 3.02
|
|
Number of Affected Nails
Week 20 (n=207,206,43,55)
|
5.19 nails
Standard Deviation 3.66
|
4.86 nails
Standard Deviation 3.89
|
6.44 nails
Standard Deviation 3.80
|
7.42 nails
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
|
Number of Affected Nails
Week 28 (n=193,197,40,53)
|
4.42 nails
Standard Deviation 3.74
|
4.23 nails
Standard Deviation 3.85
|
5.38 nails
Standard Deviation 4.11
|
6.40 nails
Standard Deviation 3.62
|
|
Number of Affected Nails
Week 40 (n=118,148,26,39)
|
3.79 nails
Standard Deviation 3.75
|
3.03 nails
Standard Deviation 3.53
|
3.12 nails
Standard Deviation 3.56
|
4.41 nails
Standard Deviation 3.89
|
|
Number of Affected Nails
Week 52 (n=108,137,21,30)
|
3.63 nails
Standard Deviation 3.70
|
2.85 nails
Standard Deviation 3.73
|
2.86 nails
Standard Deviation 3.45
|
3.67 nails
Standard Deviation 3.74
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline,Week 8,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues.
The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores = more severe psoriasis. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants with baseline nail psoriasis and who were unique in longitudinal model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=227 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=217 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Percent Change at Week 8
|
-11.95 percent change
Standard Error 6.56
|
0.55 percent change
Standard Error 6.73
|
-14.70 percent change
Standard Error 15.06
|
11.37 percent change
Standard Error 13.31
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Percent Change at Week 16
|
-21.56 percent change
Standard Error 7.65
|
-25.87 percent change
Standard Error 7.83
|
-10.70 percent change
Standard Error 17.32
|
31.51 percent change
Standard Error 15.32
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Percent Change at Week 20
|
-24.02 percent change
Standard Error 9.50
|
-35.56 percent change
Standard Error 9.65
|
-12.19 percent change
Standard Error 21.30
|
37.72 percent change
Standard Error 18.83
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Percent Change Week 28
|
-46.40 percent change
Standard Error 6.80
|
-53.80 percent change
Standard Error 6.85
|
-31.97 percent change
Standard Error 15.17
|
5.38 percent change
Standard Error 13.34
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Percent Change Week 40
|
-54.22 percent change
Standard Error 5.70
|
-60.39 percent change
Standard Error 5.39
|
-67.71 percent change
Standard Error 12.43
|
-51.65 percent change
Standard Error 10.52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Percent Change Week 52
|
-56.38 percent change
Standard Error 5.55
|
-65.06 percent change
Standard Error 5.17
|
-69.87 percent change
Standard Error 12.46
|
-72.94 percent change
Standard Error 10.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used.
The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores = more severe psoriasis. NAPSI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in NAPSI relative to Baseline. Percentage of participants with NAPSI 75 response is reported. N(number of participants analyzed) signifies participants (with baseline nail psoriasis) who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=240 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=226 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 75 (NAPSI 75) Response
Week 8
|
10.83 percentage of participants
Interval 6.9 to 14.77
|
11.95 percentage of participants
Interval 7.72 to 16.18
|
6.98 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.59
|
1.82 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.35
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 75 (NAPSI 75) Response
Week 16
|
18.75 percentage of participants
Interval 13.81 to 23.69
|
26.99 percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 32.78
|
16.28 percentage of participants
Interval 5.24 to 27.31
|
5.45 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.46
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 75 (NAPSI 75) Response
Week 20
|
24.17 percentage of participants
Interval 18.75 to 29.58
|
33.19 percentage of participants
Interval 27.05 to 39.33
|
23.26 percentage of participants
Interval 10.63 to 35.88
|
7.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.41 to 14.14
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 75 (NAPSI 75) Response
Week 28
|
34.58 percentage of participants
Interval 28.57 to 40.6
|
39.82 percentage of participants
Interval 33.44 to 46.21
|
32.56 percentage of participants
Interval 18.55 to 46.56
|
18.18 percentage of participants
Interval 7.99 to 28.38
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 75 (NAPSI 75) Response
Week 40
|
24.58 percentage of participants
Interval 19.14 to 30.03
|
40.71 percentage of participants
Interval 34.3 to 47.11
|
44.19 percentage of participants
Interval 29.34 to 59.03
|
38.18 percentage of participants
Interval 25.34 to 51.02
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 75 (NAPSI 75) Response
Week 52
|
23.75 percentage of participants
Interval 18.37 to 29.13
|
40.71 percentage of participants
Interval 34.3 to 47.11
|
39.53 percentage of participants
Interval 24.92 to 54.15
|
29.09 percentage of participants
Interval 17.09 to 41.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues.
The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores = more severe psoriasis. NAPSI 100 response was defined as at least a 100% reduction in NAPSI relative to Baseline. Percentage of participants with NAPSI 100 response is reported. N(number of participants analyzed) signifies participants (with baseline nail psoriasis) who were evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=240 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=226 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 100 (NAPSI 100) Response
Week 8
|
7.92 percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 11.33
|
7.52 percentage of participants
Interval 4.08 to 10.96
|
2.33 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.83
|
1.82 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.35
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 100 (NAPSI 100) Response
Week 16
|
10.42 percentage of participants
Interval 6.55 to 14.28
|
16.37 percentage of participants
Interval 11.55 to 21.2
|
11.63 percentage of participants
Interval 2.05 to 21.21
|
5.45 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.46
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 100 (NAPSI 100) Response
Week 20
|
14.17 percentage of participants
Interval 9.75 to 18.58
|
21.68 percentage of participants
Interval 16.31 to 27.05
|
16.28 percentage of participants
Interval 5.24 to 27.31
|
3.64 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.58
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 100 (NAPSI 100) Response
Week 28
|
18.75 percentage of participants
Interval 13.81 to 23.69
|
25.22 percentage of participants
Interval 19.56 to 30.88
|
23.26 percentage of participants
Interval 10.63 to 35.88
|
12.73 percentage of participants
Interval 3.92 to 21.54
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 100 (NAPSI 100) Response
Week 40
|
17.08 percentage of participants
Interval 12.32 to 21.84
|
25.66 percentage of participants
Interval 19.97 to 31.36
|
23.26 percentage of participants
Interval 10.63 to 35.88
|
20.00 percentage of participants
Interval 9.43 to 30.57
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nail Psoriasis Severity Index 100 (NAPSI 100) Response
Week 52
|
17.08 percentage of participants
Interval 12.32 to 21.84
|
29.65 percentage of participants
Interval 23.69 to 35.6
|
20.93 percentage of participants
Interval 8.77 to 33.09
|
20.00 percentage of participants
Interval 9.43 to 30.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,12,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
ISI assessed severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis. ISI is a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends for post baseline time points. Baseline ISI is average of scores on 7 days prior to start of study treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score
Baseline (n=364,361,74,71)
|
5.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
|
5.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
5.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
5.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.58
|
|
Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score
Week 2 (n=369,367,73,76)
|
3.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
3.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
|
5.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.72
|
4.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
|
Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score
Week 4 (n=364,365,74,75)
|
3.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
|
2.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
4.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
4.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
|
Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score
Week 8 (n=354,354,74,76)
|
2.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.68
|
1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
4.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
|
4.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.79
|
|
Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score
Week 12 (n=347,349,74,76)
|
2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.75
|
1.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
4.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.94
|
5.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.95
|
|
Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score
Week 16 (n=340,345,74,76)
|
2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.59
|
1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
4.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.19
|
5.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.07
|
|
Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score
Week 20 (n=327,338,74,76)
|
2.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
1.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.47
|
2.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
|
|
Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score
Week 28 (n=304,326,68,72)
|
2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.21
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
|
Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score
Week 40 (n=212,262,46,55)
|
1.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
1.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
|
Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score
Week52 (n=194,238,38,42)
|
1.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
1.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,12,16, 20, 28 , 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the unique participants in the longitudinal model.
ISI assessed severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis. ISI is a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=361 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=359 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=71 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 2
|
-1.72 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-2.05 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
|
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 4
|
-2.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-3.05 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-0.78 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.26
|
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 8
|
-2.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-3.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-0.64 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
-0.31 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 12
|
-2.99 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-3.68 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-0.95 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
-0.21 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 16
|
-3.15 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-3.78 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-0.58 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
-0.00 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 20
|
-3.37 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-3.97 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-3.13 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
-2.87 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 28
|
-3.35 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-3.88 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-3.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
-3.79 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 40
|
-3.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-3.59 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.97 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
-3.69 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 52
|
-3.03 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-3.62 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.71 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.36
|
-3.14 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,12,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI item response options are rated by the participant from 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Baseline (n=376,371,74,76)
|
13.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.21
|
12.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.18
|
13.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.09
|
12.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.01
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Week 2 (n=369,367,73,76)
|
9.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.51
|
8.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.25
|
10.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.09
|
9.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.86
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Week 4 (n=362,365,74,75)
|
7.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.40
|
5.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.48
|
9.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.42
|
9.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.45
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Week 8 (n=352,354,74,76)
|
6.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.35
|
4.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.37
|
8.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.91
|
9.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.45
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Week 12 (n=346,346,74,76)
|
5.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.29
|
3.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.03
|
8.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.74
|
10.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.91
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Week 16 (n=338,342,74,76)
|
5.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.93
|
3.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.93
|
8.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.12
|
10.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.33
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Week 20 (n=327,338,74,76)
|
4.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.46
|
3.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.80
|
4.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.33
|
5.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.07
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Week 28 (n=301,324,68,70)
|
4.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.19
|
2.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.65
|
3.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.22
|
4.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.20
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Week 40 (n=210,256,46,54)
|
3.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.71
|
2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.00
|
4.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.50
|
2.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.85
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Week 52 (n=194,238,38,42)
|
3.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.48
|
2.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.87
|
4.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.85
|
2.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues.
The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI item response options are rated by the participant from 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the unique participants in the longitudinal model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=372 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=368 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 2
|
-3.98 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-4.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.56 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.50
|
-2.95 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 4
|
-5.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
|
-6.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
|
-3.35 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
|
-3.00 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 40
|
-8.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.31
|
-9.38 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-7.75 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
-8.31 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 52
|
-8.18 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.32
|
-9.43 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-7.30 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
|
-8.01 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 8
|
-6.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
-8.08 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
-3.97 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
-2.78 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 12
|
-7.03 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
-8.73 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
-4.67 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.61
|
-2.21 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 16
|
-7.24 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
-8.95 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-4.01 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
|
-2.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 20
|
-7.93 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
-9.21 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
-8.05 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.60
|
-6.49 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 40 and 52
Change at Week 28
|
-8.20 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
-9.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
|
-8.80 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
-8.07 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16, 28, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects are summarized as physical and mental health summary scores. The score range for the physical and mental health scores is 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2, Acute (SF-36)
Baseline:Physical Health(n=375,371,74,76)
|
46.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.59
|
47.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.05
|
47.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.42
|
47.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.57
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2, Acute (SF-36)
Baseline: Mental Health(n=375,371,74,76)
|
43.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.04
|
43.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.54
|
42.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.43
|
43.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.57
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2, Acute (SF-36)
Week 16:Physical Health(n=337,337,74,76)
|
51.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.12
|
51.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.45
|
50.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.56
|
48.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.29
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2, Acute (SF-36)
Week 16:Mental Health (n=337,337,74,76)
|
47.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.61
|
49.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.72
|
45.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.56
|
44.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.62
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2, Acute (SF-36)
Week 28:Physical Health(n=300,322,68,72)
|
51.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.81
|
51.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.70
|
52.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.18
|
50.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.58
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2, Acute (SF-36)
Week 28:Mental Health(n=300,322,68,72)
|
47.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.83
|
49.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.29
|
48.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.17
|
46.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.86
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2, Acute (SF-36)
Week 52:Mental Health(n=194,237,38,42)
|
49.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.18
|
49.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.45
|
46.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.84
|
50.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.31
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2, Acute (SF-36)
Week 52:Physical health(n=194,237,38,42)
|
52.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.25
|
52.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.92
|
53.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.66
|
51.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, 16, 28, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
HADS: 14-item questionnaire that screens for the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms. There are 7 items comprising the anxiety subscale and 7 items comprising the depression subscale. Each item has response options ranging from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total HADS score ranges from 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Baseline:Anxiety subcale(n=376,371,74,76)
|
7.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.14
|
6.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.36
|
7.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.31
|
6.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.14
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Baseline:Depression subcale(n=376,371,74,76)
|
6.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.42
|
5.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.16
|
5.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.38
|
5.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.79
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Week 8:Anxiety subcale(n=351,354,74,76)
|
5.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.00
|
5.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.59
|
6.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.81
|
6.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.06
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Week 8:Depression subcale(n=351,354,74,76)
|
4.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.91
|
3.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.35
|
4.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.02
|
5.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.75
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Week 16:Anxiety(n=337,340,74,76)
|
5.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.08
|
5.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.00
|
5.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.80
|
5.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.22
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Week 16:Depression(n=337,340,74,76)
|
4.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.06
|
3.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.32
|
4.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.20
|
5.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.94
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Week 28:Anxiety(n=300,322,68,72)
|
4.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.92
|
4.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.85
|
4.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.26
|
5.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.11
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Week 28:Depression(n=300,322,68,72)
|
4.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.97
|
3.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.29
|
3.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.91
|
4.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.82
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Week 52:Anxiety(n=194,237,38,42)
|
4.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.94
|
4.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.68
|
4.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.57
|
4.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.53
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Week 52:Depression(n=194,237,38,42)
|
3.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.84
|
3.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.22
|
3.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.50
|
2.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, 16, 28, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: Time Management scale (5-items); Physical Demands scale (6-item); Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (9-items); Output Demands Scale (5-items). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). The WLQ Index score is the weighted sum of the scores from the 4 WLQ scales (total score: 0 \[no loss\] to 100 \[complete loss of work\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Work Limitation Questionnaire (WLQ) Index Score
Baseline (n=324,318,66,68)
|
7.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.94
|
8.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.59
|
7.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.65
|
7.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.32
|
|
Work Limitation Questionnaire (WLQ) Index Score
Week 8 (n=293,302,63,61)
|
6.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.79
|
6.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.68
|
7.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.41
|
8.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.11
|
|
Work Limitation Questionnaire (WLQ) Index Score
Week 16 (n=278,292,64,61)
|
6.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.31
|
6.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.48
|
7.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.97
|
7.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.46
|
|
Work Limitation Questionnaire (WLQ) Index Score
Week 28 (n=249,277,56,61)
|
5.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.03
|
5.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.64
|
6.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.76
|
7.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.27
|
|
Work Limitation Questionnaire (WLQ) Index Score
Week 52 (n=164,205,31,38)
|
5.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.35
|
5.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.03
|
6.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.41
|
5.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.97
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,12,16, 20, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5-point scale (0=clear \[no psoriasis\]; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; 4=severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Baseline:Clear(n=376,372,74,76)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Baseline:Mild(n=376,372,74,76)
|
4.3 percentage of participants
|
3.0 percentage of participants
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
2.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Baseline:Moderate(n=376,372,74,76)
|
33.2 percentage of participants
|
32.8 percentage of participants
|
41.9 percentage of participants
|
34.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Baseline:Severe(n=376,372,74,76)
|
62.0 percentage of participants
|
64.2 percentage of participants
|
55.4 percentage of participants
|
63.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week2:Almost Clear(n=369,366,73,76)
|
2.2 percentage of participants
|
2.2 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 2:Severe(n=369,366,73,76)
|
34.4 percentage of participants
|
31.4 percentage of participants
|
45.2 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 4:Clear(n=363,365,74,75)
|
0.6 percentage of participants
|
0.3 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 4:Almost clear(n=363,365,74,75)
|
7.4 percentage of participants
|
13.7 percentage of participants
|
5.4 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 4:Severe(n=363,365,74,75)
|
23.4 percentage of participants
|
17.3 percentage of participants
|
37.8 percentage of participants
|
46.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 8:Clear(n=352,354,74,76)
|
1.7 percentage of participants
|
4.2 percentage of participants
|
4.1 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 8:Mild(n=352,354,74,76)
|
29.5 percentage of participants
|
30.8 percentage of participants
|
16.2 percentage of participants
|
10.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 8:Moderate(n=352,354,74,76)
|
32.1 percentage of participants
|
22.6 percentage of participants
|
47.3 percentage of participants
|
40.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 12:Clear(n=346,345,74,76)
|
4.3 percentage of participants
|
11.0 percentage of participants
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 12:Almost Clear(n=346,345,74,76)
|
30.1 percentage of participants
|
43.8 percentage of participants
|
8.1 percentage of participants
|
2.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 12:Mild(n=346,345,74,76)
|
24.9 percentage of participants
|
19.7 percentage of participants
|
20.3 percentage of participants
|
7.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 12:Severe(n=346,345,74,76)
|
13.9 percentage of participants
|
7.2 percentage of participants
|
31.1 percentage of participants
|
46.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 16:Clear(n=337,342,74,75)
|
6.2 percentage of participants
|
14.0 percentage of participants
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 16:Mild(n=n=337,342,74,75)
|
27.9 percentage of participants
|
21.9 percentage of participants
|
20.3 percentage of participants
|
14.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 20:Clear(n=327,338,73,76)
|
8.9 percentage of participants
|
15.7 percentage of participants
|
9.6 percentage of participants
|
1.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 20:Almost Clear(n=327,338,73,76)
|
33.6 percentage of participants
|
43.8 percentage of participants
|
13.7 percentage of participants
|
18.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 20:Mild(n=327,338,73,76)
|
25.4 percentage of participants
|
21.3 percentage of participants
|
39.7 percentage of participants
|
34.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 20:Moderate(n=327,338,73,76)
|
23.5 percentage of participants
|
12.7 percentage of participants
|
28.8 percentage of participants
|
30.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 20:Severe(n=327,338,73,76)
|
8.6 percentage of participants
|
6.5 percentage of participants
|
8.2 percentage of participants
|
15.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 28:Clear(n=300,324,68,72)
|
11.3 percentage of participants
|
21.3 percentage of participants
|
19.1 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 28:Almost Clear(n=300,324,68,72)
|
34.3 percentage of participants
|
43.5 percentage of participants
|
36.8 percentage of participants
|
43.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 28:Mild(n=300,324,68,72)
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
17.6 percentage of participants
|
17.6 percentage of participants
|
18.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 40:Clear(n=210,255,46,54)
|
21.0 percentage of participants
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
21.7 percentage of participants
|
20.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 40:Mild(n=210,255,46,54)
|
22.9 percentage of participants
|
16.9 percentage of participants
|
19.6 percentage of participants
|
13.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 40:Severe(n=210,255,46,54)
|
3.3 percentage of participants
|
2.4 percentage of participants
|
8.7 percentage of participants
|
7.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 52:Clear(n=194,238,38,42)
|
14.4 percentage of participants
|
26.9 percentage of participants
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
21.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 52:Almost Clear(n=194,238,38,42)
|
44.8 percentage of participants
|
45.4 percentage of participants
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
52.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week2:Mild(n=369,366,73,76)
|
13.6 percentage of participants
|
21.0 percentage of participants
|
12.3 percentage of participants
|
7.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week2:Moderate(n=369,366,73,76)
|
49.9 percentage of participants
|
45.4 percentage of participants
|
41.1 percentage of participants
|
42.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 4:Mild(n=363,365,74,75)
|
22.3 percentage of participants
|
35.3 percentage of participants
|
10.8 percentage of participants
|
12.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week4:Moderate(n=363,365,74,75)
|
46.3 percentage of participants
|
33.4 percentage of participants
|
45.9 percentage of participants
|
41.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 8:Almost clear(n=352,354,74,76)
|
19.9 percentage of participants
|
32.5 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 8:Severe(n=352,354,74,76)
|
16.8 percentage of participants
|
9.9 percentage of participants
|
31.1 percentage of participants
|
48.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 12:Moderate(n=346,345,74,76)
|
26.9 percentage of participants
|
18.3 percentage of participants
|
37.8 percentage of participants
|
43.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 16:Almost clear(n=337,342,74,75)
|
30.9 percentage of participants
|
41.8 percentage of participants
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 16:Moderate(n=n=337,342,74,75)
|
21.4 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
39.2 percentage of participants
|
34.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 16:Severe(n=n=337,342,74,75)
|
13.6 percentage of participants
|
5.6 percentage of participants
|
31.1 percentage of participants
|
48.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Baseline:Almost Clear(n=376,372,74,76)
|
0.5 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 2:Clear(n=369,366,73,76)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 28:Moderate(n=300,324,68,72)
|
22.0 percentage of participants
|
12.0 percentage of participants
|
17.6 percentage of participants
|
18.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 28:Severe(n=300,324,68,72)
|
6.0 percentage of participants
|
5.6 percentage of participants
|
8.8 percentage of participants
|
8.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 40: Almost Clear(n=210,255,46,54)
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
45.9 percentage of participants
|
37.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 40:Moderate(n=210,255,46,54)
|
12.9 percentage of participants
|
8.6 percentage of participants
|
13.0 percentage of participants
|
9.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 52:Mild(n=194,238,38,42)
|
24.2 percentage of participants
|
16.8 percentage of participants
|
28.9 percentage of participants
|
11.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 52:Moderate(n=194,238,38,42)
|
12.9 percentage of participants
|
8.8 percentage of participants
|
13.2 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale Response
Week 52:Severe(n=194,238,38,42)
|
3.6 percentage of participants
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16, 28, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The PSSM is a single, 7 point item that evaluates overall participant satisfaction with the study treatment. Response options range from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied" with the study treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week16:Not satisfied/dissatisfied(n=337,339,74,76)
|
4.7 percentage of Participants
|
3.8 percentage of Participants
|
17.6 percentage of Participants
|
15.8 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 16:Slightly dissatisfied(n=337,339,74,76)
|
3.3 percentage of Participants
|
1.5 percentage of Participants
|
6.8 percentage of Participants
|
3.9 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 16:Somewhat dissatisfied(n=337,339,74,76)
|
5.3 percentage of Participants
|
1.5 percentage of Participants
|
12.2 percentage of Participants
|
15.8 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 28:Slightly satisfied(n=300,320,68,72)
|
11.0 percentage of Participants
|
5.6 percentage of Participants
|
11.8 percentage of Participants
|
9.7 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week28:Not satisfied/dissatisfied(n=300,320,68,72)
|
3.0 percentage of Participants
|
2.5 percentage of Participants
|
4.4 percentage of Participants
|
4.2 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 28:Very dissatisfied(n=300,320,68,72)
|
3.3 percentage of Participants
|
1.9 percentage of Participants
|
4.4 percentage of Participants
|
4.2 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 52:Slightly dissatisfied(n=194,237,38,42)
|
1.5 percentage of Participants
|
1.7 percentage of Participants
|
0 percentage of Participants
|
2.4 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 52:Somewhat dissatisfied(n=194,237,38,42)
|
2.6 percentage of Participants
|
0.8 percentage of Participants
|
5.3 percentage of Participants
|
0 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 52:Very dissatisfied(n=194,237,38,42)
|
1.0 percentage of Participants
|
0.8 percentage of Participants
|
2.6 percentage of Participants
|
2.4 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 16:Very satisfied(n=337,339,74,76)
|
48.4 percentage of Participants
|
60.5 percentage of Participants
|
10.8 percentage of Participants
|
17.1 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 16:Somewhat satisfied(n=337,339,74,76)
|
24.9 percentage of Participants
|
23.9 percentage of Participants
|
20.3 percentage of Participants
|
14.5 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 16:Slightly satisfied(n=337,339,74,76)
|
8.0 percentage of Participants
|
5.6 percentage of Participants
|
10.8 percentage of Participants
|
13.2 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 16:Very dissatisfied(n=337,339,74,76)
|
5.3 percentage of Participants
|
3.2 percentage of Participants
|
21.6 percentage of Participants
|
19.7 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 28:Very satisfied(n=300,320,68,72)
|
48.7 percentage of Participants
|
58.8 percentage of Participants
|
45.6 percentage of Participants
|
54.2 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 28:Somewhat satisfied(n=300,320,68,72)
|
28.0 percentage of Participants
|
26.3 percentage of Participants
|
25.0 percentage of Participants
|
19.4 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 28:Slightly dissatisfied(n=300,320,68,72)
|
3.3 percentage of Participants
|
2.2 percentage of Participants
|
5.9 percentage of Participants
|
5.6 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 28:Somewhat dissatisfied(n=300,320,68,72)
|
2.7 percentage of Participants
|
2.8 percentage of Participants
|
2.9 percentage of Participants
|
2.8 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 52:Very satisfied(n=194,237,38,42)
|
57.7 percentage of Participants
|
62.9 percentage of Participants
|
50.0 percentage of Participants
|
71.4 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 52:Somewhat satisfied(n=194,237,38,42)
|
29.4 percentage of Participants
|
27.8 percentage of Participants
|
28.9 percentage of Participants
|
16.7 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week 52:Slightly satisfied(n=194,237,38,42)
|
6.2 percentage of Participants
|
4.6 percentage of Participants
|
10.5 percentage of Participants
|
4.8 percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Score Response
Week52:Not satisfied/dissatisfied(n=194,237,38,42)
|
1.5 percentage of Participants
|
1.3 percentage of Participants
|
2.6 percentage of Participants
|
2.4 percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8,16, 28, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The JPA assesses severity of joint pain. The JPA is a horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to "select the number that best describes any joint pain that participant may have experienced over the past 24 hours" with response options ranging from "0-no joint pain" to "10-worst possible joint pain".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joint Pain Assessment (JPA) Score
Baseline (n=376,372,74,76)
|
3.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.13
|
3.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.09
|
3.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89
|
2.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
|
Joint Pain Assessment (JPA) Score
Week 8 (n=351,354,74,76)
|
2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.58
|
2.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.91
|
3.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.00
|
|
Joint Pain Assessment (JPA) Score
Week 16 (n=336,340,74,76)
|
2.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.59
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
|
3.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.16
|
|
Joint Pain Assessment (JPA) Score
Week 28 (n=300,320,68,72)
|
2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
2.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.62
|
2.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
|
Joint Pain Assessment (JPA) Score
Week 52 (n=193,235,38,42)
|
1.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score
Baseline (n=376,372,74,76)
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score
Week 16 (n=337,340,74,76)
|
0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score
Week 40 (n=210,256,46,54)
|
0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score
Week 28 (n=300,322,68,72)
|
0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score
Week 52 (n=194,237,38,42)
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline,Week 16, 28, 40, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeter (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=74 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Baseline (n=373,372,74,76)
|
65.83 mm
Standard Deviation 24.04
|
67.38 mm
Standard Deviation 24.21
|
63.82 mm
Standard Deviation 23.66
|
65.05 mm
Standard Deviation 25.63
|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Week 16 (n=337,339,74,76)
|
76.19 mm
Standard Deviation 18.80
|
78.43 mm
Standard Deviation 17.59
|
72.24 mm
Standard Deviation 20.76
|
70.14 mm
Standard Deviation 22.19
|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Week 28 (n=300,322,69,72)
|
78.48 mm
Standard Deviation 17.46
|
80.65 mm
Standard Deviation 15.31
|
77.00 mm
Standard Deviation 20.77
|
77.53 mm
Standard Deviation 17.49
|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Week 52 (n=195,238,38,42)
|
81.95 mm
Standard Deviation 15.91
|
81.48 mm
Standard Deviation 15.53
|
78.00 mm
Standard Deviation 19.11
|
81.52 mm
Standard Deviation 20.60
|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Week 40 (n=210,255,46,54)
|
81.40 mm
Standard Deviation 17.42
|
82.27 mm
Standard Deviation 15.69
|
79.70 mm
Standard Deviation 19.17
|
82.78 mm
Standard Deviation 18.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from a site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. 'n' signifies participants evaluable at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization (Ps-HCRU) questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work. The first section assesses direct costs associated with healthcare resource use (interactions with healthcare providers such as general practitioners, Dermatologist and Rheumatologist. Baseline is the latest pre-dose measurement. Week 16 includes all reported log data to Week 16 (excluding Baseline). Participants may have response in more than 1 category. Data was not analyzed beyond Week 16 as per study team's decision because Week 0 - 16 period was considered sufficient to provide clear reflection of Ps-HCRU endpoint. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=67 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Baseline:General Practitioner(n=45,45,24)
|
4 events
|
5 events
|
2 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Baseline:Dermatologist(n=45,45,24)
|
44 events
|
44 events
|
22 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Baseline:Rheumatologist(n=45,45,24)
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Baseline:Cardiologist(n=45,45,24)
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Baseline:Gastroenterologist(n=45,45,24)
|
0 events
|
1 events
|
0 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Baseline:Psychiatrist(n=45,45,24)
|
1 events
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Baseline:Surgeon(n=45,45,24)
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
1 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Baseline:Nurse(n=45,45,24)
|
15 events
|
16 events
|
8 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Baseline:Other(n=45,45,24)
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Week 16:General Practitioner(n=67,68,30)
|
31 events
|
34 events
|
17 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Week 16:Dermatologist(n=67,68,30)
|
25 events
|
25 events
|
9 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Week 16:Rheumatologist(n=67,68,30)
|
3 events
|
1 events
|
2 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Week 16:Cardiologist(n=67,68,30)
|
5 events
|
0 events
|
1 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Week 16:Gastroenterologist(n=67,68,30)
|
1 events
|
1 events
|
1 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Week 16:Psychiatrist(n=67,68,30)
|
1 events
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Week 16: Surgeon(n=67,68,30)
|
5 events
|
2 events
|
2 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Week 16:Nurse(n=67,68,30)
|
14 events
|
11 events
|
5 events
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Interaction With Healthcare Professional
Week 16:Others(n=67,68,30)
|
18 events
|
14 events
|
16 events
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization (Ps-HCRU) questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work. The second section assesses indirect costs associated with absenteeism due to psoriasis and the impact of psoriasis on productivity at work. Participants (currently employed \[Emp\]) answered (Yes/No \[Y/N\]): "Were you absent or on sick leave from work due to psoriasis today?", and participants (unemployed \[UEmp\]) answered (Yes/No): "Are you unemployed due to your psoriasis?" Baseline is the latest pre-dose measurement. Week 16 includes all reported log up to Week 16 (excluding Baseline). Data was not analyzed beyond Week 16 as per study team's decision because Week 0 - 16 period was considered sufficient to provide clear reflection of Ps-HCRU endpoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Impact of Psoriasis on Work
Baseline:Emp,Absent/Sick Leave:Y(n=218,234,122)
|
50 participants
|
59 participants
|
27 participants
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Impact of Psoriasis on Work
Baseline:Emp,Absent/Sick Leave:N(n=218,234,122)
|
168 participants
|
175 participants
|
95 participants
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Impact of Psoriasis on Work
Baseline:UEmp,due to Psoriasis:Y(n=120,97,52)
|
28 participants
|
16 participants
|
10 participants
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Impact of Psoriasis on Work
Baseline:UEmp,due to Psoriasis:N(n=120,97,52)
|
92 participants
|
81 participants
|
42 participants
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Impact of Psoriasis on Work
Week 16:Emp,Absent/Sick Leave:Y(n=210,234,109)
|
45 participants
|
53 participants
|
25 participants
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Impact of Psoriasis on Work
Week 16:Emp,Absent/Sick Leave:N(n=210,234,109)
|
165 participants
|
181 participants
|
84 participants
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Impact of Psoriasis on Work
Week 16:UEmp,due to Psoriasis:Y(n=105,80,38)
|
21 participants
|
10 participants
|
8 participants
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Impact of Psoriasis on Work
Week 16:UEmp,due to Psoriasis:N(n=105,80,38)
|
84 participants
|
70 participants
|
30 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable (answered respective question for this measure) for specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
The Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization (Ps-HCRU) questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work. The first section assesses direct costs associated with healthcare resource use, and the second section assesses indirect costs associated with absenteeism due to psoriasis and the impact of psoriasis on productivity at work. Percentage of participants reporting healthcare resource use events and employment status, work impacted events due to psoriasis, and absence or sick leave for work due to psoriasis at Week 16 are reported. Data was not analyzed beyond Week 16 as per study team's decision because Week 0 - 16 period was considered sufficient to provide clear reflection of Ps-HCRU endpoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Healthcare Resource Use Events and Employment Status
Healthcare Resource use events(n=34,42,12)
|
100.00 percentage of participants
|
100.00 percentage of participants
|
100.00 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Healthcare Resource Use Events and Employment Status
Work Impacted events due to Psoriasis(n=105,80,39)
|
20.00 percentage of participants
|
12.50 percentage of participants
|
20.51 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Healthcare Resource Use Events and Employment Status
Absence/Sick leave due to Psoriasis(n=211,234,109)
|
21.33 percentage of participants
|
22.65 percentage of participants
|
22.94 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Healthcare Resource Use Events and Employment Status
Employment(n=315,315,146)
|
66.67 percentage of participants
|
74.60 percentage of participants
|
74.66 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure for specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
The Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization (Ps-HCRU) questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work. The first section assesses direct costs associated with healthcare resource use, and the second section assesses indirect costs associated with absenteeism due to psoriasis and the impact of psoriasis on productivity at work. Baseline is the latest pre-dose measurement. Participants reported hours scheduled to work and hours absent from work. Data was not analyzed beyond Week 16 as per study team's decision because Week 0 - 16 period was considered sufficient to provide clear reflection of Ps-HCRU endpoint. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=50 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=59 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=27 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Work Hours and Absent Hours
Week 16:Hours Scheduled to work(n=45,53,25)
|
8.82 hours
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
8.40 hours
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
8.04 hours
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Work Hours and Absent Hours
Baseline:Hour Absent from work(n=49,58,27)
|
5.86 hours
Standard Deviation 4.24
|
5.74 hours
Standard Deviation 3.01
|
5.74 hours
Standard Deviation 2.78
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Work Hours and Absent Hours
Week 16:Hours Absent from work(n=45,53,25)
|
5.93 hours
Standard Deviation 3.26
|
6.21 hours
Standard Deviation 3.15
|
5.96 hours
Standard Deviation 3.13
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Work Hours and Absent Hours
Baseline:Hour Scheduled to work(n=50,59,27)
|
8.84 hours
Standard Deviation 3.02
|
8.56 hours
Standard Deviation 2.74
|
8.07 hours
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. 'n' signifies participants evaluable for specified timepoint for each arm, respectively.
The Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization (Ps-HCRU) questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work. The first section assesses direct costs associated with healthcare resource use, and the second section assesses indirect costs associated with absenteeism due to psoriasis and the impact of psoriasis on productivity at work. Baseline is the latest pre-dose measurement. Participants reported hours scheduled to work and hours absent from work. Percent absent hours = (hours absent from work/hours scheduled to work) multiplied by 100. Data was not analyzed beyond Week 16 as per study team's decision because Week 0 - 16 period was considered sufficient to provide clear reflection of Ps-HCRU endpoint. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=48 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=58 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=27 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Percent Absent Hours
Baseline (n=48, 58, 27)
|
64.89 percentage of scheduled hours
Standard Deviation 34.42
|
70.32 percentage of scheduled hours
Standard Deviation 35.39
|
73.36 percentage of scheduled hours
Standard Deviation 34.09
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Percent Absent Hours
Week 16 (n=45, 53, 25)
|
68.39 percentage of scheduled hours
Standard Deviation 32.19
|
72.88 percentage of scheduled hours
Standard Deviation 29.69
|
73.82 percentage of scheduled hours
Standard Deviation 34.05
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: FAS included participants who were randomized to study and received at least 1 dose investigational drug (CP-690,550 or placebo). Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization (Ps-HCRU) questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work.The first section assesses direct costs associated with healthcare resource use, and the second section assesses indirect costs associated with absenteeism due to psoriasis and the impact of psoriasis on productivity at work. Baseline is the latest pre-dose measurement. Participants rate how much psoriasis affected their ability to work by reporting a number from 0 to 10, where 0 means "ability to work was not affected by psoriasis", and 10 means "ability to work was completely affected by psoriasis". Data was not analyzed beyond Week 16 as per study team's decision because Week 0 - 16 period was considered sufficient to provide clear reflection of Ps-HCRU endpoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=376 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=374 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Psoriasis Affecting Ability to Work
Baseline (n=223, 232, 124)
|
2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.06
|
2.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
—
|
|
Psoriasis Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire (Ps-HCRU) - Psoriasis Affecting Ability to Work
Week 16 (n=210, 234, 109)
|
1.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.94
|
2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.21
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16, 52Population: FAS. Analysis population for "Placebo, CP-690,550" groups included FAS participants who were re-randomized at Week 16 to receive CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg. Participants from 1 site were excluded due to GCP compliance issues. 'n' signifies participants evaluable at specified time point for each arm, respectively.
The FDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that examine the impact of health-related quality of life issues associated with living with a person with a skin condition (example, emotional distress, personal relationships, reactions of other people, social life, caregiving) over the last month. The FDLQI need to be completed by a family member (for example, spouse or partner, parent) who currently lives with the participant. Each question is scored on a scale from 0 (Not at all/ Not relevant) to 3 (Very much). Total score is calculated by summing the score of each item resulting in a maximum score of '30' and a minimum score of '0'. Higher scores indicate greater impairment to quality of life. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=41 Participants
CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=47 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16. Participants in this group were re-randomized to CP-690,550 5 mg or CP-690,550 10 mg treatment at Week 16.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants who were re-assigned to this group from placebo at Week 16 and thereafter received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) Score
Baseline (n=41,47,14,11)
|
9.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.65
|
9.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.78
|
8.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.26
|
6.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.50
|
|
Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) Score
Week 16 (n=36,32,11,9)
|
4.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.48
|
2.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.48
|
6.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.41
|
7.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.02
|
|
Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) Score
Week52 (n=13,12,4,4)
|
3.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.22
|
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.50
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
Adverse Events
CP-690,550 5mg
CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mg
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=382 participants at risk
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=381 participants at risk
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mg
n=75 participants at risk
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16 and thereafter CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=77 participants at risk
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16 and thereafter CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=44 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16 but were not re-randomized to CP-690,550 treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
General disorders
Drug withdrawal syndrome
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatobiliary disease
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chronic tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Liver abscess
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.52%
2/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia cryptococcal
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Brain contusion
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint dislocation
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic vertebral fracture
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoma
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Mycosis fungoides
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small intestine carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Testis cancer
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Metrorrhagia
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.52%
2/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Jaw lesion excision
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5mg
n=382 participants at risk
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=381 participants at risk
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mg
n=75 participants at risk
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16 and thereafter CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=77 participants at risk
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16 and thereafter CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=44 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16 but were not re-randomized to CP-690,550 treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.4%
9/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.4%
9/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
2.4%
9/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
10/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
0.52%
2/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
1.8%
7/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.1%
8/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
1.8%
7/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
5/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.52%
2/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.1%
8/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.8%
22/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
4.2%
16/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.79%
3/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.79%
3/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
4.0%
3/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.79%
3/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
2.1%
8/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.1%
8/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
0.52%
2/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.6%
6/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
2.1%
8/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.1%
8/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
1.3%
5/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
3.1%
12/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
12.6%
48/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
13.9%
53/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
13.3%
10/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
9.1%
7/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
4.5%
2/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
1.6%
6/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.1%
8/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
2.1%
8/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.6%
6/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
3.9%
3/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.52%
2/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
5/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
1.6%
6/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.1%
8/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
4.0%
3/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea pedis
|
0.52%
2/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.79%
3/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.6%
29/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
7.9%
30/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
6.7%
5/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
11.7%
9/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.4%
9/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.4%
9/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
1.0%
4/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint injury
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.52%
2/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1.6%
6/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
10/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
5.3%
4/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
3.9%
3/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
1.3%
5/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.0%
4/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
4.0%
3/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
2.4%
9/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.6%
6/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
5.2%
4/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
4.7%
18/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
6.8%
26/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
5.3%
4/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
9.1%
7/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
2.6%
10/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.8%
7/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
5.2%
4/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
1.8%
7/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.1%
8/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
5.3%
4/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
5.2%
4/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Investigations
Low density lipoprotein increased
|
3.1%
12/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.4%
9/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
2.6%
10/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
4.5%
17/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
6.3%
24/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
6.6%
25/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
4.0%
3/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
7.8%
6/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
2.1%
8/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.4%
9/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
1.0%
4/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.79%
3/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
4.2%
16/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
4.7%
18/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
5.3%
4/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
3.9%
3/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.52%
2/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
4.2%
16/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
5/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
5.3%
4/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
6.5%
5/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.79%
3/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.6%
6/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
1.3%
5/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.52%
2/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.8%
7/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
5/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
4.0%
3/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
3.9%
3/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.8%
22/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
6.6%
25/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
8.0%
6/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
5.2%
4/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed mood
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.26%
1/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.26%
1/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.52%
2/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
2.4%
9/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
4.5%
17/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
2.6%
10/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
3.1%
12/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
0.79%
3/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
10/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
3.9%
3/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
2.1%
8/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
5/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
0.52%
2/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.0%
4/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.3%
1/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
6.8%
3/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Social circumstances
Treatment noncompliance
|
0.00%
0/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.3%
1/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
3.4%
13/382
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
1.8%
7/381
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.7%
2/75
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
2.6%
2/77
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
0.00%
0/44
Same event may appear as both AE/SAE; distinct events are presented. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 subject and as nonserious in another subject, or 1 subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. Adverse events for participants (n=44) who were not re-randomized at week 16, are reported separately.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER