Evaluating the Impact of the Food Support Program (Programa de Apoyo Alimentaria)

NCT ID: NCT01304888

Last Updated: 2012-07-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6687 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-10-31

Study Completion Date

2005-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Programa de Apoyo Alimentaria (PAL) started in 2003 and is targeted to communities in Mexico that do not receive benefits from other federal food aid programs, have less than 2,500 inhabitants and a high level of marginalization. Marginalization is a term used in Mexico for the multidimensional assessment of poverty in a community.

When the program started in 2003 it provided beneficiary households either a cash transfer of 150 Mexican pesos (equivalent to approximately 14 USD at the time) per month or a monthly food basket with a cost to the program of 150 pesos. The size of the cash transfer and the amount of food was the same for all households, i.e. no adjustments for family size or composition were made. The basket contained a number of staple and basic food products and powdered whole milk (Liconsa), which is fortified with Zn, Fe, Vitamin C, and folate (Table 1). The composition of the food basket conformed to the Mexican norm for food aid programs (NOM-169-SSA1-1998), which states that food transfers need to provide at least 20% of the recommended daily energy and protein requirements. Beneficiary households were required to attend nutrition and health education sessions and had to participate in program related logistic activities in order to receive the benefits. These program conditionalities, however, were not strictly enforced.

A community randomized controlled intervention trial was used to evaluate the impact of the intervention. A random sample of 208 rural communities was drawn from the pool of eligible communities in 8 of the poorest states in the South/Eastern region of Mexico (Chiapas, Guerrero, Oaxaca, Quintana Roo, Tabasco, Campeche, Yucatan and Veracruz). Within each community a random sample of 33 households was selected. The baseline survey was conducted from October 2003 to April 2004. After baseline data collection, the 208 selected communities (6,687 households) randomly assigned to one of four study groups: food basket without education (52 communities, 1657 households), food basket with education (52 communities, 1680 households), cash transfer with education (53 communities, 1687 communities) or control (51 communities, 1663 households). Treatment allocation was carried out by the Ministry of Social Development.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malnutrition

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Food consumption

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Food basket w/o nutrition education

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Food basket w/o nutrition education

Intervention Type OTHER

A monthly food basket with a cost to the program of 150 pesos. The amount of food was the same for all households, i.e. no adjustments for family size or composition were made. The basket contained a number of staple and basic food products and powdered whole milk (Liconsa), which is fortified with Zn, Fe, Vitamin C, and folate. The composition of the food basket conformed to the Mexican norm for food aid programs (NOM-169-SSA1-1998). Households received the transfer once every 2 mo. Beneficiary households were not required to attend nutrition and health education sessions.

Food basket + nutrition education

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Food basket + nutrition education

Intervention Type OTHER

Monthly food basket with a cost to the program of 150 pesos. The amount of food was the same for all households, i.e. no adjustments for family size or composition were made. The basket contained a number of staple and basic food products and powdered whole milk (Liconsa), which is fortified with Zn, Fe, Vitamin C, and folate. The composition of the food basket conformed to the Mexican norm for food aid programs (NOM-169-SSA1-1998). Households received the transfer once every 2 mo. Beneficiary households were required to attend nutrition and health education sessions and had to participate in program related logistic activities in order to receive the benefits. These program conditionalities, however, were not strictly enforced.

Control

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Control

Intervention Type OTHER

No benefits were provided

Cash + health and nutrition education

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cash + nutrition education

Intervention Type OTHER

Cash transfer of 150 Mexican pesos (equivalent to approximately 14 USD at the time) per month. The size of the cash transfer and the amount of food was the same for all households, i.e. no adjustments for family size or composition were made. Households received the transfer once every 2 mo. Beneficiary households were required to attend nutrition and health education sessions and had to participate in program related logistic activities in order to receive the benefits. These program conditionalities, however, were not strictly enforced.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cash + nutrition education

Cash transfer of 150 Mexican pesos (equivalent to approximately 14 USD at the time) per month. The size of the cash transfer and the amount of food was the same for all households, i.e. no adjustments for family size or composition were made. Households received the transfer once every 2 mo. Beneficiary households were required to attend nutrition and health education sessions and had to participate in program related logistic activities in order to receive the benefits. These program conditionalities, however, were not strictly enforced.

Intervention Type OTHER

Food basket + nutrition education

Monthly food basket with a cost to the program of 150 pesos. The amount of food was the same for all households, i.e. no adjustments for family size or composition were made. The basket contained a number of staple and basic food products and powdered whole milk (Liconsa), which is fortified with Zn, Fe, Vitamin C, and folate. The composition of the food basket conformed to the Mexican norm for food aid programs (NOM-169-SSA1-1998). Households received the transfer once every 2 mo. Beneficiary households were required to attend nutrition and health education sessions and had to participate in program related logistic activities in order to receive the benefits. These program conditionalities, however, were not strictly enforced.

Intervention Type OTHER

Food basket w/o nutrition education

A monthly food basket with a cost to the program of 150 pesos. The amount of food was the same for all households, i.e. no adjustments for family size or composition were made. The basket contained a number of staple and basic food products and powdered whole milk (Liconsa), which is fortified with Zn, Fe, Vitamin C, and folate. The composition of the food basket conformed to the Mexican norm for food aid programs (NOM-169-SSA1-1998). Households received the transfer once every 2 mo. Beneficiary households were not required to attend nutrition and health education sessions.

Intervention Type OTHER

Control

No benefits were provided

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Live in a community that does not receive benefits from other federal food aid programs, have less than 2,500 inhabitants and a high level of marginalization. Marginalization is a term used in Mexico for the multidimensional assessment of poverty in a community. It takes into account housing quality (including the percent of households without piped water, without sewage and without electricity), income (proportion of household below two times the minimum wage), education (including illiteracy) and urbanization.
* Households within these communities were eligible if they fell below the "needs" poverty line as defined by the Mexican Ministry of Social Development. This corresponds to an income level sufficient to cover basic needs in food consumption, health and education.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (SEDESOL)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Mexico

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Mexico

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Teresa Gonzalez de Cossio, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Institute of public Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica

Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leroy JL, Gadsden P, Rodriguez-Ramirez S, de Cossio TG. Cash and in-kind transfers in poor rural communities in Mexico increase household fruit, vegetable, and micronutrient consumption but also lead to excess energy consumption. J Nutr. 2010 Mar;140(3):612-7. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.116285. Epub 2010 Jan 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20089777 (View on PubMed)

Ramirez-Luzuriaga MJ, Unar-Munguia M, Rodriguez-Ramirez S, Rivera JA, Gonzalez de Cosio T. A Food Transfer Program without a Formal Education Component Modifies Complementary Feeding Practices in Poor Rural Mexican Communities. J Nutr. 2016 Jan;146(1):107-13. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.215962. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26561408 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

INSP01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id