Comparison of Standard and Minidose Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section Operation Using Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy
NCT ID: NCT01303731
Last Updated: 2011-02-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-02-28
2012-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Thus dilution of Bupivacaine with CSF in our study would serve double function: it would speed the recovery from the spinal anesthesia and minimize the expression of the motor block.Addition of opiates to local anesthetics has been widely used . It has been shown that this addition improves quality of spinal anesthesia and prolongs analgesia without significant prolongation of recovery from motor block.
In summary, we would use well known safe local anesthetic Bupivacaine in low dose and low concentration (after dilution with patient's CSF) in conjunction with highly lipophilic opiate Fentanyl. We suppose it will result in effective spinal anesthesia with relatively limited motor block, quick recovery of motor function and relatively long lasting analgesia. We expect lower incidence of side effect with this combination than with convenient dose of Bupivacaine.
Good pain relief and swift restoration of ability to ambulate will be important for prevention of postoperative complications, will diminish the need for systemic analgetic drugs that can affect nursing and will increase patients' satisfaction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard dose Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy
Standard group - will receive spinal anesthesia induced by Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy 12.5 mg (2.5 ml).
Bupivacaine
Spinal anesthesia with Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy 12.5 mg (2.5 ml)
Minidose of Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy
Minidose group - will receive spinal anesthesia induced by Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy 7.5 mg (1.5 ml) diluted in 0.75ml of patient's CSF (0.25 ml)with addition of Fentanyl 12.5 mcg (total 2.5 ml)
Bupivacaine and Fentanyl
Spinal anesthesia with Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy 7.5 mg (1.5 ml) diluted in 0.75ml of patient's CSF (0.25 ml)with addition of Fentanyl 12.5 mcg (total 2.5 ml)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bupivacaine and Fentanyl
Spinal anesthesia with Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy 7.5 mg (1.5 ml) diluted in 0.75ml of patient's CSF (0.25 ml)with addition of Fentanyl 12.5 mcg (total 2.5 ml)
Bupivacaine
Spinal anesthesia with Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy 12.5 mg (2.5 ml)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA class I and II
* Age between 18 and 40 years
* Weight 50-100 kg
* Elective Cesarean Section for singlet pregnancy
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindications for regional anesthesia
* Active pain before surgery
* Non singlet pregnancy
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bnai Zion Medical Center
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Boris Yanovsky, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bnai Zion Medical Center
Haifa, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Boris Yanovsky, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0123-10-BZ
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id