Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Multiple Dose Study Of PF-04620110 In Type 2 Diabetes Patients (NCT NCT01298518)
NCT ID: NCT01298518
Last Updated: 2012-11-06
Results Overview
Change from baseline in post-prandial area under the plasma glucose concentration time curve as determined by standardized MMTT. Linear trapezoidal method was used to compute AUC.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
48 participants
Baseline (Day -1); 2 to 6 hours post-dose on Day 28
2012-11-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16
|
16
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
16
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Multiple Dose Study Of PF-04620110 In Type 2 Diabetes Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
Total
n=48 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
51.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8 • n=93 Participants
|
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=4 Participants
|
52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 • n=27 Participants
|
52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 • n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
31.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=93 Participants
|
30.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=4 Participants
|
32.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=27 Participants
|
31.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=483 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1); 2 to 6 hours post-dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-MMTT glucose area under the curve (AUC) value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Change from baseline in post-prandial area under the plasma glucose concentration time curve as determined by standardized MMTT. Linear trapezoidal method was used to compute AUC.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial Glucose Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 28
Baseline (n=16, 16, 16)
|
1052.7 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 258.2
|
954.7 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 249.2
|
1005.4 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 190.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial Glucose Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (n=15, 16, 15)
|
-118.3 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 269.0
|
-143.0 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 235.8
|
-117.7 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 157.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1); 24 hours post-dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 APG value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
APG= AUC (0-24)/24. AUC (0-24) was computed using Linear trapezoidal method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Average Plasma Glucose (APG) Post-Dose at Day 28
Baseline (n=16, 16, 16)
|
204.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 52.2
|
188.0 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 53.2
|
187.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 36.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Average Plasma Glucose (APG) Post-Dose at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (n=15, 16, 15)
|
-25.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 60.9
|
-23.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 42.5
|
-18.3 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 29.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1); 2 to 6 hours post-dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-MMTT insulin area under the curve (AUC) value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Change from baseline in post-prandial plasma insulin AUC under the plasma insulin concentration versus time curve as determined by standardized MMTT. Linear trapezoidal method was used to compute AUC.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial Insulin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 28
Baseline (n=16, 16, 16)
|
122.9 micro-IU*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 82.9
|
220.2 micro-IU*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 282.9
|
156.7 micro-IU*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 63.3
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial Insulin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (n=15, 16, 15)
|
12.4 micro-IU*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 63.9
|
0.6 micro-IU*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 159.3
|
41.0 micro-IU*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 46.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1); 2 to 6 hours post-dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-MMTT C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Change from baseline in post-prandial area under the plasma C-peptide concentration time curve as determined by standardized MMTT. Linear trapezoidal method was used to compute AUC.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial C-Peptide Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 28
Baseline (n=16, 16, 16)
|
17.8 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 6.2
|
21.6 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
20.3 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial C-Peptide Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (15, 16, 15)
|
-0.2 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 6.0
|
-4.0 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 6.2
|
-0.2 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1); 2 to 6 hours post-dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-MMTT net triglyceride area under the curve (AUC) value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Change from baseline in post-prandial area under the plasma net triglyceride concentration time curve as determined by standardized MMTT. Linear trapezoidal method was used to compute AUC.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial Net Triglyceride Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 28
Baseline (n=16, 16, 16)
|
860.6 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 456.9
|
1014.4 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 403.5
|
961.2 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 380.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial Net Triglyceride Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (n=13, 16, 15)
|
-185.0 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 436.7
|
-100.5 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 268.4
|
-110.3 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 245.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1); 2 to 6 hours post-dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 total amide GLP-1 and active GLP-1 area under the curve (AUC) value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Change from baseline in total amide GLP-1 and active GLP-1 area under the plasma concentration time curve was computed by Linear trapezoidal method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Amide Glucagon Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) and Active Glucagon Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) at Day 28
Total amide GLP-1: Baseline (n=16, 15, 15)
|
54.4 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 26.8
|
63.2 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 36.4
|
70.2 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 88.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Amide Glucagon Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) and Active Glucagon Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) at Day 28
Total amide GLP-1: Change at Day 28 (n=15, 15, 14)
|
25.3 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 27.9
|
4.7 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 29.5
|
-17.5 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 88.9
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Amide Glucagon Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) and Active Glucagon Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) at Day 28
Active GLP-1: Baseline (n=15, 16, 15)
|
16.3 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 11.5
|
21.0 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 21.5
|
13.9 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Amide Glucagon Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) and Active Glucagon Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) at Day 28
Active GLP-1: Change at Day 28 (n=14, 14, 14)
|
12.5 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 15.0
|
-0.5 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 23.6
|
2.1 pmol*hr/L
Standard Deviation 11.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1); 2 to 6 hours post-dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 GIP area under the curve (AUC) value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Change from baseline in GIP area under the plasma concentration time curve was computed by Linear trapezoidal method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=15 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Gastric Inhibitory Peptide (GIP) Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) at Day 28
Baseline (n=15, 16, 16)
|
1372.8 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 617.2
|
1181.0 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 614.6
|
1619.2 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 627.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Gastric Inhibitory Peptide (GIP) Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (n=14, 16, 15)
|
-141.6 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 726.1
|
-277.1 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 541.4
|
46.8 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 473.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1); 2 to 6 hours post-dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 PYY area under the curve (AUC) value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Change from baseline in PYY area under the plasma concentration time curve was computed by Linear trapezoidal method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=15 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Peptide YY (PYY) Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) at Day 28
Baseline (n=15, 16, 16)
|
409.0 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 192.4
|
540.7 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 273.8
|
395.0 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 114.6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Peptide YY (PYY) Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC 2-6) at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (n=14, 16, 14)
|
196.6 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 242.8
|
96.7 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 194.2
|
24.4 pg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 126.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day -1, Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 fasting glucose value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucose at Day 28
Baseline (n=16, 16, 16)
|
197.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 54.6
|
180.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 54.7
|
194.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 37.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucose at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (16, 16, 15)
|
-46.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 49.5
|
-27.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 34.9
|
-25.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 32.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day -1, Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 fasting insulin value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=9 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=10 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at Day 28
Baseline (n=9, 10, 8)
|
10.2 micro-IU/mL
Standard Deviation 6.9
|
19.8 micro-IU/mL
Standard Deviation 27.2
|
9.2 micro-IU/mL
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (n=8, 9, 8)
|
-0.8 micro-IU/mL
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
-8.0 micro-IU/mL
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
0.2 micro-IU/mL
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day -1, Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 fasting net triglycerides value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Net Triglycerides at Day 28
Baseline (n=16, 16, 16)
|
189.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 111.7
|
234.8 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 116.7
|
187.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 81.6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Net Triglycerides at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (16, 16, 15)
|
-31.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 103.6
|
-18.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 52.1
|
-19.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 56.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1); 6 to 10 hours post-dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-lunch glucose excursion area under the curve (AUC) value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Change from baseline in post-lunch glucose excursion under the plasma concentration time curve was computed by Linear trapezoidal method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Lunch Glucose Excursions Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 6 to 10 Hours (AUC 6-10) Post-dose at Day 28
Baseline (n=16, 16, 16)
|
853.4 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 293.4
|
772.3 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 259.3
|
730.2 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 174.9
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Lunch Glucose Excursions Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 6 to 10 Hours (AUC 6-10) Post-dose at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (n=15, 16, 15)
|
-34.9 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 377.2
|
-41.4 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 202.9
|
-90.4 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 157.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1); 12 to 16 hours post-dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-dinner glucose excursion area under the curve (AUC) value. Here, 'n' is participants evaluable at specified time points for each group.
Change from baseline in post-dinner glucose excursion under the plasma concentration time curve was computed by Linear trapezoidal method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Dinner Glucose Excursions Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 12 to 16 Hours (AUC 12-16) Post-dose at Day 28
Change at Day 28 (n=15, 16, 15)
|
-132.8 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 267.5
|
-104.8 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 210.8
|
-41.4 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 124.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Post-Dinner Glucose Excursions Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 12 to 16 Hours (AUC 12-16) Post-dose at Day 28
Baseline (n=16, 16, 16)
|
851.2 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 217.2
|
763.9 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 215.8
|
759.4 mg*hr/dL
Standard Deviation 180.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours post-morning dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 Cmax value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=15 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-04620110
|
91.0 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 39.3
|
112.0 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 43.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours post-morning dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 Cmin value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=15 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Minimum Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Cmin) of PF-04620110
|
16.2 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
5.2 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 9.2
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours post-morning dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 Tmax value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=15 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) of PF-04620110
|
3.0 hr
Interval 1.7 to 12.0
|
3.0 hr
Interval 1.7 to 12.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours post-morning dose on Day 28Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 AUC(0-24) value.
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) to 24 hours. AUC (0-24) was computed using the linear trapezoidal method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=15 Participants
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 Participants
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve AUC (0-24) of PF-04620110
|
1055 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 397.7
|
1027 ng*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 441.6
|
—
|
Adverse Events
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
PF-04620110 2.5 mg QD, Then PF-04620110 2.5 mg BID
n=16 participants at risk
PF-04620110 2.5 milligram (mg) orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for Week 1 and 2, followed by PF-04620110 2.5 mg orally twice daily (BID) for Week 3 and 4.
|
PF-04620110 5 mg QD
n=16 participants at risk
PF-04620110 5 mg orally once daily (QD) in the morning and matching placebo orally once daily (QD) in the evening for 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=16 participants at risk
Matching placebo orally twice daily (BID) for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye swelling
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Photophobia
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
18.8%
3/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
18.8%
3/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
31.2%
5/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
25.0%
4/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
31.2%
5/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
43.8%
7/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
43.8%
7/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctalgia
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
18.8%
3/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
37.5%
6/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Thirst
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
25.0%
4/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
37.5%
6/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
18.8%
3/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.5%
2/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash macular
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
6.2%
1/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER