Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin®) Versus Intravitreal Dexamethasone (Ozurdex™) for Persistent Diabetic Macular Oedema
NCT ID: NCT01298076
Last Updated: 2015-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
61 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-10-31
2014-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* That there is a difference in change in visual acuity resulting from treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab compared with dexamethasone implant in eyes with advanced macular oedema
* That there is a difference in degree of resolution of macular oedema resulting from treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab compared with dexamethasone implant in eyes with advanced macular oedema
* That both intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone implants have a manageable and acceptable safety profile in eyes with diabetic macular oedema
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial of Switching Between Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin®)& Intravitreal Dexamethasone (Ozurdex™) for Persistent Diabetic Macular Oedema
NCT01787669
Comparison of Initial Ozurdex (Dexamethasone Implant) to Avastin (Bevacizumab) for Treatment of Macular Edema Caused by Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO)
NCT01231633
Ozurdex as Adjunct to Avastin Compared to Avastin Alone in Treatment of Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT01309451
Intravitreal Dexamethasone vs Bevacizumab in Aboriginal People With DMO
NCT04619303
Effect of Ozurdex® 0.7 mg on Improvement of Efficacy of Bevacizumab for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
NCT01295112
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is treated with laser photocoagulation of areas of leak in the macula according to established guidelines which take into account the extent of the leak and its proximity to the centre of the macula, the "fovea". This treatment does not always work, however, and is inherently destructive.
New drugs have become available which appear to reduce the risk of loss of vision in eyes with advanced diabetic macular oedema for which further laser treatment is unlikely to be beneficial. Intravitreal injection of slow-release steroid formulations such as Ozurdex™, a slow release formulation of dexamethasone, has been proposed as a new modality to treat clinically significant DMO. We have recently conducted randomised clinical trials which have demonstrated that treatment with intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) leads to reduction of DMO and improved vision in these eyes. Another class of drugs, inhibitors of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) such as bevacizumab (Avastin®), also appear efficacious.
While both drugs appear to reduce macular oedema and improve vision in the short term, they may have differences which could guide how they are best used. Around 1/3 of eyes that receive dexamethasone may develop elevated intraocular pressure and cataract, both of which are manageable but may complicate the picture. Anti-VEGF drugs do not have these local adverse events, however they must be given more frequently (4-6 weekly vs 4-6 monthly for Ozurdex™) and it is suspected they may have a neurotoxic effect on the retina. Some authorities suspect that anti-VEGF treatment may be associated with a small increased risk of having a stroke or heart attack during treatment, even when they are injected into the eye. This has not been proven with a related drug, ranibizumab, but it is still possible that it may occur with bevacizumab.
This will be a, 2 year, phase II, prospective, multicentre, randomised, single-masked clinical trial of sustained release intravitreal dexamethasone (Ozurdex™) versus intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (Avastin®) for diabetic foveal oedema that persists or recurs despite previous laser treatment, or for which the investigator believes laser treatment is unlikely to be helpful.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AVASTIN
intravitreal bevacizumab
bevacizumab
Anti-VEGF drug for intravitreal injection
OZURDEX
intravitreal dexamethasone
dexamethasone
Slow-release steroid formulation for intravitreal injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bevacizumab
Anti-VEGF drug for intravitreal injection
dexamethasone
Slow-release steroid formulation for intravitreal injection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus types 1 or 2
* Diabetic macular oedema affecting the fovea in one or both eyes (phakic or pseudophakic) for which laser treatment is unlikely to be helpful in the opinion of the centre chief investigator
* Best corrected visual acuity of 17-72 letters (6/12 -6/120)
* Retinal thickness \> 250 micron in central 1mm subfield on Stratus (time domain) OCT and 300 on Spectral domain OCT
* Previous macular laser treatment, or the investigator believes laser treatment is unlikely to be helpful
* Intraocular pressure \<22mmHg
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at the screening visit and prior to treatment. A woman is considered of childbearing potential unless she is postmenopausal and without menses for 12 months or is surgically sterilised
* Written informed consent has been obtained.
Exclusion Criteria
* Women who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy, or who are of childbearing potential and not using reliable means of contraception
* Glaucoma which is uncontrolled or is controlled but with more than one medication or with only one medication and with glaucomatous field defects
* Loss of vision due to other causes (e.g. age related macular degeneration, myopic macular degeneration, retinal vein occlusion)
* Macular oedema due to other causes
* An ocular condition that would prevent visual acuity improvement despite resolution of oedema (such as foveal atrophy or substantial premacular fibrosis)
* Treatment with IVTA within the last 6 months or peribulbar TA within the last 3 months or bevacizumab within the last 2 months.
* Cataract surgery within the last 6 months
* Retinal laser treatment within the last 3 months
* History of herpes virus infection in study eye
* Media opacity including cataract that already precludes adequate macular photography and laser treatment, or cataract that is likely to require surgery within 2 years
* Known allergies to dexamethasone or bevacizumab
* Patient is already receiving systemic steroid treatment \> 5mg prednisolone daily or equivalent)
* Intercurrent severe disease such as septicemia, any condition which would affect follow-up or photographic documentation (e.g. geographical, psycho-social)
* History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or renal transplant
* Blood pressure \>180/110
* Patient has a condition or is in a situation that in the investigator's opinion may put the patient at significant risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the patient's participation in the study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
OTHER
University of Sydney
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mark Gillies
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark C Gillies, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sydney
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Save Sight Institute
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
South West Retina
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Centre for Eye Research Australia
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Lions Eye Institute
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rittiphairoj T, Mir TA, Li T, Virgili G. Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 17;11(11):CD005656. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005656.pub3.
Mehta H, Fraser-Bell S, Nguyen V, Lim LL, Gillies MC. The Interval between Treatments of Bevacizumab and Dexamethasone Implants for Diabetic Macular Edema Increased over Time in the BEVORDEX Trial. Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Mar;2(3):231-234. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
Mehta H, Fraser-Bell S, Nguyen V, Lim LL, Gillies MC. Short-term vision gains at 12 weeks correlate with long-term vision gains at 2 years: results from the BEVORDEX randomised clinical trial of bevacizumab versus dexamethasone implants for diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;102(4):479-482. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310737. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
Wickremasinghe SS, Fraser-Bell S, Alessandrello E, Mehta H, Gillies MC, Lim LL. Retinal vascular calibre changes after intravitreal bevacizumab or dexamethasone implant treatment for diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;101(10):1329-1333. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309882. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
Aroney C, Fraser-Bell S, Lamoureux EL, Gillies MC, Lim LL, Fenwick EK. Vision-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in the BEVORDEX Study: A Clinical Trial Comparing Ozurdex Sustained Release Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant and Bevacizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 1;57(13):5541-5546. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19729.
Mehta H, Fraser-Bell S, Yeung A, Campain A, Lim LL, Quin GJ, McAllister IL, Keane PA, Gillies MC. Efficacy of dexamethasone versus bevacizumab on regression of hard exudates in diabetic maculopathy: data from the BEVORDEX randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;100(7):1000-1004. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307797. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
Gillies MC, Lim LL, Campain A, Quin GJ, Salem W, Li J, Goodwin S, Aroney C, McAllister IL, Fraser-Bell S. A randomized clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab versus intravitreal dexamethasone for diabetic macular edema: the BEVORDEX study. Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec;121(12):2473-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-01024
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NHMRC project 632667
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.