Bendamustine, Cytarabine, Etoposide and Melphalan (BeEAM) as Conditioning for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) in Aggressive Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL).

NCT ID: NCT01296256

Last Updated: 2016-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Bendamustine in combination with Etoposide, Cytarabine and Melphalan (BeEAM) are effective as conditioning followed by ASCT in patients with aggressive lymphoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BCNU (carmustine is a nitrosurea alkylating agent used for many years in the conditioning of patients with lymphoma however this drug is hardly available in some countries in Europe, moreover to improve conditioning regimens in autologous stem cell transplant is important because the anti-tumoral effect of high dose therapy are responsible for this procedure efficacy. Although for many years few advances have been achieved in this area now new drugs can be tested in these patients.

Bendamustine is a unique cytotoxic agent with structural similarities to alkylating agents and antimetabolites, but which is non-cross-resistant with alkylating agents and other drugs in vitro and in the clinic. Early clinical studies conducted in the German Democratic Republic more than 30 years ago suggested promising activity in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Two North American trials reported responses in more than 70% of patients with chemotherapy- and rituximab-refractory disease, suggesting that bendamustine may be the most effective drug available for this patient population. Response rates of 90% to 92%, with complete remission in 55% to 60%, have been reported in patients with follicular and mantle-cell lymphoma with the combination of bendamustine and rituximab.(Cheson 2009) Leone et all have recently reported results on the characterization of the mechanisms of action of bendamustine and its comparison with structurally related compounds as chlorambucil and phosphoramide mustard have demonstrated that bendamustine displays a distinct mechanisms of action including activation of DNA-damage stress response and apoptosis, inhibition of mitotic checkpoints, and induction of mitotic catastrophe. Also bendamustine activates a base excision DNA repair pathway rather than an alkyltransferase DNA repair mechanism.

These data suggest that bendamustine possesses mechanistic features that differentiate it from other alkylating agents and makes this old new drug an attractive one to combine with other agents in the conditioning transplant setting (Leone 2008).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bendamustine Conditioning Therapy Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Aggressive Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bendamustine-EAM

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bendamustine-EAM

Intervention Type DRUG

Bendamustine 200 mg/m2 starting dose on day -7 and -6 Etoposide 200 mg/m2 from day -5 to day -2 Ara-C 400 mg/m2 from day -5 to day -2 Melphalan 140 mg/m2 on day -1

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bendamustine-EAM

Bendamustine 200 mg/m2 starting dose on day -7 and -6 Etoposide 200 mg/m2 from day -5 to day -2 Ara-C 400 mg/m2 from day -5 to day -2 Melphalan 140 mg/m2 on day -1

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients being able to meet all requirements of the clinical trial, according to the investigator's criteria,
2. Patient giving voluntarily written informed consent before performing any essay test that is not part of routine care of patients.
3. Age \>o=18 years and \>0=70 years
4. Candidate for chemotherapy (QT) at high doses and ASCT

1. Histologically confirmed aNHL:
2. Patients with DLBCL or grade 3 b Follicular lymphoma or PTCL (including anaplastic ALK +) in sensitive relapse, so, in second complete or partial response, after a minimum of 2 cycles of the rescue regimen.
3. Patients with DLBCL or grade 3 b Follicular lymphoma or PTCL (including anaplastic ALK +) in first complete or partial response, if more than one treatment line have been required to reach this first complete or partial response.
4. Transformed B cell lymphoma in first CR
5. Patients with PTCL (other than anaplastic ALK +) in first CR
5. Performance status (ECOG) \<0=2.
6. Adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function (assessed \< 14 days before initiation of the study treatment):

1. Neutrophil count \<o=1.5 x 109/L
2. Platelet count \<o=100 x 109/L
3. Haemoglobin \<o=8.0 g/dL
4. Creatinine serum \>o=1,5 x ULN mg/dl
5. Serum bilirubin \<o=1.5 x ULN and alkaline phosphatase \<o=2.5 x ULN
6. AST, ALT \<o=2.5 x ULN (\<o=5 x ULN in case of liver metastasis).
7. Adequate pulmonary function: forced expiratory volume at 1 second \> 65% of predicted or a diffusing capacity of the lung for CO \>o=50%.
8. Cardiac ejection fraction or greater than 50% by echocardiogram or FEVI.
9. A woman capable of gestation (see definition below) should:

* Have two medically supervised negative pregnancy test (minimum sensitivity of 25 mIU / ml) before starting study therapy (the first pregnancy test should be completed in 10 to 14 days prior to initiating bendamustine and the latter pregnancy test 24 hours before the start of this drug).
* Commit to a continued abstinence of heterosexual relationship or agree to use reliable contraception without interruption, 28 days before starting the study therapy, during the study therapy and for 28 days after stopping therapy study.

A woman capable of gestation is defined as sexually mature woman who:

1. has not undergone hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy and
2. is not naturally postmenopausal (amenorrhea as a result of cancer treatment does not rule the reproductive potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., menses at any time during the previous 24 consecutive months).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Impossibility of collecting, via apheresis, a number of CD34+ cells \>o=2 x 106/kg
2. To receive any of the following treatments in the 28 days before the start the study treatment:

i.chemotherapeutic or antitumor agents ii.radiation therapy, except in limited fields, to a maximum dose of \<o=10 Gy to control serious life-threatening symptoms iii.glucocorticoids, except doses equivalent to \<o=1 mg / kg of prednisolone / day with a duration \<o=7 days iv.any therapeutic agent under investigation.
3. Known involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) by lymphoma
4. Abnormalities in cardiac function or clinically significant heart disease such as acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months prior to the start of study treatment, heart failure NYHA class III or IV, uncontrolled hypertension or a history of antihypertensive treatment poor compliance, uncontrolled arrhythmias with treatment, except extrasystoles or minor conduction disorders.
5. Other serious or uncontrolled medical condition, such as uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled active infection, significant cerebrovascular disease or poorly controlled psychiatric disease.
6. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to any of the agents or excipients of the regime under evaluation.
7. Presence of any limitations that compromise the patient's ability to comply with the study treatment.
8. Positive serology for HIV, HCV or HBV surface antigen (HBsAg). If the HBsAg is negative but anti-core antibodies (HBcAb) are positive and antibody against surface antigen (HBsAb) are negative, there will be a HBV DNA test; If positive results the patient may not be included in the trial. If both types of antibodies HBcAb and HBsAb are positive (indicative of past infection), the patient may be included in the study.
9. Previous history of malignancies other than lymphoma (except basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinoma and carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast) unless the patient is free of disease beyond 5 years.
10. Major surgery procedure within 30 days prior to entering this study.
11. Pregnant or nursing females.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Grupo Español de Linfomas y Transplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mª Dolores Caballero, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Salamanca

Alejandro Martín, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Salamanca

Javier Briones, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Juan Manuel Sancho, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Cristina Barrenetxea, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Vall d'Hebrón

Javier López, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal

Mª José Rodríguez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitario de Canarias

Jorge Gayoso, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Gregorio Marañón Hospital

Miguel Ángel Canales, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitario La Paz

Carlos Grande, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Isidro Jarque, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital La Fe

José Rifón, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Clínica Universitaria Navarra

Andres Sánchez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca

Cristina Castilla, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Morales Meseguer

José Luis Bello, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela

Armando López, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospial Clínic de Barcelona

Eulogio Conde, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla

Reyes Arranz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

Encarnación Monzó, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova de Valencia

Rosario Varela, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña

Mª José Ramírez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Jerez de la Frontera

Fátima de la Cruz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Virgen del Rocío

Ana Pilar González, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Central de Asturias

Luis Palomera, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Clínico de Zaragoza "Lozano Blesa"

Raquel del Campo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Son Llátzer

Mª José Terol, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Clínico de Valencia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago

Santiago, A Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Vall d´Hebron

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinic i Provincial

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

H. de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

H. U. Marqués de Valdecilla.

Santander, Cantabria, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Jerez

Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain

Site Status

H.U. 12 de Octubre,

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

H.U. Gregorio Marañón,

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

H.U. La Paz

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

H.U. La Princesa

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Ramon y Cajal

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Son Llátzer

Palma de Mallorca, Mallorca, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen de Arrixaca

El Palmar, Murcia, Spain

Site Status

Clinica Universitaria de Navarra

Pamplona, Navarre, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Central de Asturias

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

H. Clínico Universitario de Salamanca

Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Canarias

Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico de Valencia

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

H. La Fe

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa

Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-020926-17

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Benda-EAM2010-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.