Study to Test Use of a Decision Aid in a Clinical Visit to Help Patients Choose a Diabetes Medication

NCT ID: NCT01293578

Last Updated: 2022-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

550 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to test the relative merits of a decision aid for diabetes medications that we have developed - Diabetes Medication Choice Cards- versus usual care in translating comparative effectiveness research (CER) into real world clinics. This study will involve about 20 primary care practice sites affiliated with Mayo Health System, Park Nicollet, or Hennepin County Medical Center. There will be no recruiting done at the Mayo Clinic.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To conduct a cluster-randomized practical trial to evaluate the impact of our decision aid (Diabetes Medication Choice Cards) versus usual care as strategies to translate CER into practice among patients with poorly controlled diabetes in need of drug intensification (Hemoglobin Alc (HbA1c) \> 7.3%). Patient outcomes including reaching glycemic control target (HbA1c less than or equal to 7.3%), medication choice and adherence, satisfaction and knowledge. From the physician perspective, we will be measuring physician adoption and satisfaction with the decision aid.

To identify, describe, and explain factors that promote or inhibit the uptake of complex interventions such as decision aids in practices participating in the trial.

To conduct an exploratory analysis of the ability of patients to adhere to the medications chosen while exploring the factors that enable or hinder the patients' ability to incorporate these medications into their routine.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Care

Clinicians will present diabetes medication options to patients, in their usual way.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Diabetes Medication Decision Aid

In the decision aid arm, clinicians will use the diabetes medication decision aid cards (if they choose) when discussing diabetes medication options with their patients.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Diabetes Medication Choice Cards

Intervention Type OTHER

Clinician uses the Diabetes Medication Choice Cards to inform and engage patient in discussing the issues they find relevant in choosing a new diabetes medication.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diabetes Medication Choice Cards

Clinician uses the Diabetes Medication Choice Cards to inform and engage patient in discussing the issues they find relevant in choosing a new diabetes medication.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age and older
* Have a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus and on diabetes medication
* Have a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus for 1 year or more if not currently on diabetes medication
* Recognize their primary care provider as their main diabetes care provider
* Use 0, 1, 2, or 3 oral hypoglycemic agents
* Have a recent HbA1c measure (within 12 months) of greater than 7.3, with priority to patients with rising HbA1c levels.

Exclusion Criteria

* Not available for follow-up for 12 months after study visit.
* Unable to read and speak English.
* Has major barriers to providing written informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Victor Montori

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Victor Montori, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Albert Lea Medical Center

Albert Lea, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Kasson

Kasson, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Health System- Immanual St. Joseph's

Mankato, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Hennepin County Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Park Nicollet Institute

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare

La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kunneman M, Branda ME, Ridgeway JL, Tiedje K, May CR, Linzer M, Inselman J, Buffington ALH, Coffey J, Boehm D, Deming J, Dick S, van Houten H, LeBlanc A, Liesinger J, Lima J, Nordeen J, Pencille L, Poplau S, Reed S, Vannelli A, Yost KJ, Ziegenfuss JY, Smith SA, Montori VM, Shah ND. Making sense of diabetes medication decisions: a mixed methods cluster randomized trial using a conversation aid intervention. Endocrine. 2022 Feb;75(2):377-391. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02861-4. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34499328 (View on PubMed)

Montori VM, Ruissen MM, Branda ME, Hargraves IG, Kunneman M. Problem-based shared decision making: The role of canonical SDM steps. Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):282-289. doi: 10.1111/hex.13654. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36448245 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10-006952

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Precision Dosing of Metformin in Youth With T2D
NCT06120881 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1