Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy of AGN-210669 Ophthalmic Solution Compared With Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension (NCT NCT01291108)
NCT ID: NCT01291108
Last Updated: 2013-11-06
Results Overview
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. The average of the 2 eyes are used for the analyses. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in IOP (worsening). Data are recorded at Hours 0, 4, 8, and 12.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
125 participants
Baseline, Day 57
2013-11-06
Participant Flow
Pts were randomized at Baseline for the entire study. At Mo 1, pts received either AGN-210669 or bimatoprost. At Mo 2, pts who had received AGN-210669, then received either AGN-210669+bimatoprost or AGN-210669+bimatoprost vehicle and pts who had received bimatoprost, then received either bimatoprost+AGN-210669 or bimatoprost+bimatoprost vehicle.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
AGN-210669
AGN-210669 0.05% applied as 1 drop in both eyes every evening during Month 1.
|
AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost
AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost Vehicle
AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
Bimatoprost
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% applied as 1 drop in both eyes every evening during Month 1.
|
Bimatoprost + AGN-210669
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% + AGN-210669 0.05% applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
Bimatoprost + Bimatoprost Vehicle
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Month 1 (Monotherapy)
STARTED
|
65
|
0
|
0
|
60
|
0
|
0
|
|
Month 1 (Monotherapy)
COMPLETED
|
64
|
0
|
0
|
60
|
0
|
0
|
|
Month 1 (Monotherapy)
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Month 2 (Adjunctive Therapy)
STARTED
|
0
|
40
|
24
|
0
|
34
|
26
|
|
Month 2 (Adjunctive Therapy)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
38
|
24
|
0
|
34
|
25
|
|
Month 2 (Adjunctive Therapy)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy of AGN-210669 Ophthalmic Solution Compared With Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
AGN-210669 Followed by AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost
n=44 Participants
AGN-210669 0.05% applied as 1 drop in each eye every evening for Month 1 followed by AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost 0.03% applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening for Month 2.
|
AGN-210669 Followed by AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost Vehicle
n=21 Participants
AGN-210669 0.05% applied as 1 drop in each eye every evening for Month 1 followed by AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening for Month 2.
|
Bimatoprost Followed by Bimatoprost + AGN-210669
n=40 Participants
bimatoprost 0.03% applied as 1 drop in each eye every evening for Month 1 followed by bimatoprost 0.03% + AGN-210669 applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening for Month 2.
|
Bimatoprost Followed by Bimatoprost + Bimatoprost Vehicle
n=20 Participants
bimatoprost 0.03% applied as 1 drop in each eye every evening for Month 1 followed by bimatoprost 0.03% + bimatoprost 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening for Month 2.
|
Total
n=125 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<45 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
45 to 65 years
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>65 years
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 57Population: Modified Intent to Treat: all randomized and treated patients who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline IOP measurement
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. The average of the 2 eyes are used for the analyses. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in IOP (worsening). Data are recorded at Hours 0, 4, 8, and 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
AGN-210669 Followed by AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost Vehicle
n=24 Participants
AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
Bimatoprost Followed by Bimatoprost + Bimatoprost Vehicle
n=26 Participants
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
Combined Adjunctives
n=75 Participants
Combined adjunctives refer to the combined groups of 'AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost' and 'bimatoprost + AGN-210669 0.05%'. The first treatment is applied as 1 drop in each eye every evening for Month 1 followed by AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost 0.03% applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening for Month 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Eye IOP
Change from Baseline at Day 57-Hr 8 (n=24,25,72)
|
-5.57 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.484
|
-7.19 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.198
|
-7.67 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.596
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Eye IOP
Baseline - Hour 0
|
26.16 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.169
|
25.98 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 1.962
|
26.26 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.446
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Eye IOP
Baseline - Hour 4
|
23.91 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.382
|
23.82 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.301
|
23.85 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.553
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Eye IOP
Baseline - Hour 8
|
22.49 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 1.338
|
22.35 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.024
|
22.79 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.391
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Eye IOP
Baseline - Hour 12
|
21.48 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.467
|
22.07 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.596
|
21.73 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.624
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Eye IOP
Change from Baseline at Day 57-Hr 0 (n=24,25,72)
|
-7.57 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.881
|
-10.28 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.190
|
-10.84 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.460
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Eye IOP
Change from Baseline at Day 57-Hr 4 (n=24,25,72)
|
-6.95 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.503
|
-8.95 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.531
|
-8.79 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.330
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Eye IOP
Change from Baseline at Day 57-Hr 12 (n=16,17,56)
|
-5.31 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.690
|
-6.87 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.838
|
-6.03 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.642
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 57Population: Modified Intent to Treat: all randomized and treated patients who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline IOP measurement
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. The worse eye IOP refers to eye with the worse baseline IOP, which is determined as the eye with the higher mean diurnal IOP at baseline. If both eyes have the same mean diurnal IOP at baseline, the right eye is designated as the worse eye. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in IOP (worsening). Data are recorded at Hours 0, 4, 8, and 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
AGN-210669 Followed by AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost Vehicle
n=24 Participants
AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
Bimatoprost Followed by Bimatoprost + Bimatoprost Vehicle
n=26 Participants
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
Combined Adjunctives
n=75 Participants
Combined adjunctives refer to the combined groups of 'AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost' and 'bimatoprost + AGN-210669 0.05%'. The first treatment is applied as 1 drop in each eye every evening for Month 1 followed by AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost 0.03% applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening for Month 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Worse Eye IOP
Baseline - Hour 0
|
26.56 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.305
|
26.40 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.069
|
26.61 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.664
|
|
Change From Baseline in Worse Eye IOP
Baseline - Hour 4
|
24.60 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.754
|
24.25 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.295
|
24.31 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.685
|
|
Change From Baseline in Worse Eye IOP
Baseline - Hour 8
|
23.04 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 1.687
|
22.73 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.290
|
23.17 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.591
|
|
Change From Baseline in Worse Eye IOP
Baseline - Hour 12
|
21.72 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.811
|
22.47 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.598
|
21.93 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.908
|
|
Change From Baseline in Worse Eye IOP
Change from Baseline at Day 57-Hr 0 (n=24,25,72)
|
-7.50 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.989
|
-10.56 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.435
|
-10.96 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.705
|
|
Change From Baseline in Worse Eye IOP
Change from Baseline at Day 57-Hr 4 (n=24,25,72)
|
-7.38 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.841
|
-9.16 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.472
|
-9.01 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.515
|
|
Change From Baseline in Worse Eye IOP
Change from Baseline at Day 57-Hr 8 (n=24,25,72)
|
-5.94 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.817
|
-7.42 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.526
|
-7.92 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.002
|
|
Change From Baseline in Worse Eye IOP
Change from Baseline at Day 57-Hr 12 (n=16,17,56)
|
-5.00 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.696
|
-7.00 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.969
|
-5.99 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.076
|
Adverse Events
AGN-210669
AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost
AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost Vehicle
Bimatoprost
Bimatoprost + AGN-210669
Bimatoprost + Bimatoprost Vehicle
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
AGN-210669
n=65 participants at risk
AGN-210669 0.05% applied as 1 drop in both eyes every evening during Month 1.
|
AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost
n=40 participants at risk
AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost Vehicle
n=24 participants at risk
AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
Bimatoprost
n=60 participants at risk
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% applied as 1 drop in both eyes every evening during Month 1.
|
Bimatoprost + AGN-210669
n=34 participants at risk
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% + AGN-210669 0.05% applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
Bimatoprost + Bimatoprost Vehicle
n=26 participants at risk
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Uveal Prolapse
|
0.00%
0/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
3.8%
1/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
AGN-210669
n=65 participants at risk
AGN-210669 0.05% applied as 1 drop in both eyes every evening during Month 1.
|
AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost
n=40 participants at risk
AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
AGN-210669 + Bimatoprost Vehicle
n=24 participants at risk
AGN-210669 0.05% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
Bimatoprost
n=60 participants at risk
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% applied as 1 drop in both eyes every evening during Month 1.
|
Bimatoprost + AGN-210669
n=34 participants at risk
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% + AGN-210669 0.05% applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
Bimatoprost + Bimatoprost Vehicle
n=26 participants at risk
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% + bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% vehicle applied as 1 drop of each treatment in both eyes every evening during Month 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Foreign Body Sensation in Eyes
|
3.1%
2/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
12.5%
5/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
10.0%
6/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
8.8%
3/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Pain
|
0.00%
0/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
22.5%
9/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
4.2%
1/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
23.5%
8/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
7.7%
2/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Pruritus
|
6.2%
4/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
7.5%
3/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
6.7%
4/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
14.7%
5/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Punctate Keratitis
|
4.6%
3/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
15.0%
6/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
12.5%
3/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
11.7%
7/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
11.8%
4/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
15.4%
4/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Photophobia
|
4.6%
3/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
25.0%
10/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
6.7%
4/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
35.3%
12/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
3.8%
1/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal Thickening
|
29.2%
19/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
25.0%
10/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
16.7%
4/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
3.3%
2/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
44.1%
15/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival Hyperaemia
|
26.2%
17/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
57.5%
23/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
8.3%
2/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
40.0%
24/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
38.2%
13/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
19.2%
5/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Irritation
|
9.2%
6/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
10.0%
4/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
4.2%
1/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
3.3%
2/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
8.8%
3/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
3.8%
1/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Discharge
|
7.7%
5/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
7.5%
3/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
5.0%
3/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
2.9%
1/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
3.8%
1/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision Blurred
|
7.7%
5/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
12.5%
5/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
5.0%
3/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
14.7%
5/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation Increased
|
4.6%
3/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
5.0%
2/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
5.9%
2/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Iritis
|
0.00%
0/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
7.5%
3/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Anterior Chamber Cell
|
0.00%
0/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
5.0%
2/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
2.9%
1/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
7.7%
2/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Asthenopia
|
0.00%
0/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
5.0%
2/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Keratitis
|
0.00%
0/65
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
5.0%
2/40
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/24
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/60
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/34
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/26
The Safety Population was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and included all treated patients. SAEs and AEs are presented by treatment arm not necessarily by individual treatment received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER