Continuous Soluble Ferric Pyrophosphate (SFP) Iron Delivery Via Dialysate in Hemodialysis Patients

NCT ID: NCT01286012

Last Updated: 2018-10-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical safety and efficacy of SFP in sparing the need for erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) required to maintain hemoglobin (hgb) levels in chronic hemodialysis subjects who receive SFP via the dialysate versus subjects who receive conventional dialysate without iron.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Renal Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SFP in liquid bicarbonate

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Soluble Ferric Pyrophosphate in liquid bicarbonate

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects will receive hemodialysis containing SFP at 2 µM (11 µg iron/dL of dialysate) at every dialysis session, for a total duration of 36 weeks.

Erythrocyte Stimulating Agent (ESA)

Intervention Type DRUG

ESA was administered according to the recommendation of a blinded central anemia management center (CAMC) based on the weekly hemoglobin value and its rate of change.

Intravenous (IV) Iron

Intervention Type DRUG

Approved IV iron preparations were administered per a protocol driven algorithm when patients serum ferritin value decreased below 200 ug/L.

Placebo: Conventional Liquid Bicarbonate

Control concentrate lacking SFP does not contain SFP (total iron = 0)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo: Conventional liquid bicarbonate

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects will receive hemodialysis containing conventional liquid bicarbonate lacking SFP at every dialysis session, for a total duration of 36 weeks.

Erythrocyte Stimulating Agent (ESA)

Intervention Type DRUG

ESA was administered according to the recommendation of a blinded central anemia management center (CAMC) based on the weekly hemoglobin value and its rate of change.

Intravenous (IV) Iron

Intervention Type DRUG

Approved IV iron preparations were administered per a protocol driven algorithm when patients serum ferritin value decreased below 200 ug/L.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Soluble Ferric Pyrophosphate in liquid bicarbonate

Subjects will receive hemodialysis containing SFP at 2 µM (11 µg iron/dL of dialysate) at every dialysis session, for a total duration of 36 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo: Conventional liquid bicarbonate

Subjects will receive hemodialysis containing conventional liquid bicarbonate lacking SFP at every dialysis session, for a total duration of 36 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Erythrocyte Stimulating Agent (ESA)

ESA was administered according to the recommendation of a blinded central anemia management center (CAMC) based on the weekly hemoglobin value and its rate of change.

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous (IV) Iron

Approved IV iron preparations were administered per a protocol driven algorithm when patients serum ferritin value decreased below 200 ug/L.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SFP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male and female subjects ≥ 18 years of age.
2. End-stage renal disease undergoing maintenance hemodialysis 3 to 4 times a week for at least 4 months and expected to remain on this schedule and be able to complete the study. Subjects on a cadaveric transplant list need not be excluded for this reason unless there is an identified donor.
3. Mean Hgb in the range of ≥ 9.5 to ≤ 12.0 g/dL during screening.
4. The difference between the maximum and minimum Hgb values during screening does not exceed 1.0 g/dL.
5. Mean ferritin ≥ 200 to ≤ 1000 µg/L during screening.
6. Mean TSAT ≥ 15% to ≤ 40% during screening.
7. Any and all serum albumin measured during the 2 months preceding randomization must be ≥ 3.0 g/dL.
8. Prescribed ESA dosing remaining in the range of ≥ 4,000 to ≤ 45,000 U/week epoetin or ≥ 12.5 to ≤ 200 µg/week darbepoetin during the 6 weeks preceding randomization.
9. Required IV iron at any time in the 6 months preceding randomization.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Vascular access for dialysis is a catheter.
2. During the 6 months prior to randomization, infection of the vascular access to be used at the time of randomization.
3. Received a total of \> 600 mg IV iron during the 6 weeks prior to randomization.
4. Received any amount of IV or oral iron during the 2 weeks prior to randomization.
5. Change in prescribed ESA dose:

1. Any change in prescribed ESA dose within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
2. The prescribed ESA dose at the time of randomization is \> 25% higher or lower than the prescribed dose at 6 weeks prior to randomization.
3. Change in prescribed type of ESA (e.g., epoetin vs. darbepoetin) or route of administration within 6 weeks prior to randomization.
6. Actual ESA dosing missed or withheld for a cumulative total of ≥ 1 week for any reason during the 6 weeks prior to randomization.
7. Known cause of anemia other than anemia attributable to renal disease (e.g., sickle cell disease, thalassemia, pure red cell aplasia, hemolytic anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, etc.)
8. Scheduled kidney transplant or a donor has been identified but the transplant has not been scheduled.
9. Known ongoing inflammatory disorder (other than Chronic Kidney Disease), such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, other collagen-vascular diseases, etc.

11\. Known active tuberculosis, fungal, viral, or parasitic infection requiring anti-microbial therapy or anticipated to require anti-microbial therapy during the patient's participation in this study. Subjects with hepatitis C, in the absence of cirrhosis, are not excluded from participation in the study if Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels are below 2 times the upper limit of normal on a consistent basis during the 2 months preceding randomization.

12\. Occult tuberculosis requiring prophylactic treatment with anti-tubercular drug(s) that overlaps with the patient's participation in this study.

13\. Cirrhosis of the liver based on histological criteria or clinical criteria (e.g., presence of ascites, esophageal varices, spider nevi, or history of hepatic encephalopathy).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rockwell Medical Technologies, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ray Pratt, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Rockwell Medical

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Investigator

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Granada Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Albany, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Hayden, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Investigator

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Columbus, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Paterson, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Lexington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Columbia, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Duncanville, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Greenville, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator

St. George, Utah, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Taylorsville, Utah, United States

Site Status

Investigator

Fajardo, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gupta A, Lin V, Guss C, Pratt R, Ikizler TA, Besarab A. Ferric pyrophosphate citrate administered via dialysate reduces erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use and maintains hemoglobin in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2015 Nov;88(5):1187-94. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.203. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26154926 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIH-FP-01 PRIME

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.