Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Biomarker Study in Active Ulcerative Colitis Patients (NCT NCT01284062)

NCT ID: NCT01284062

Last Updated: 2014-11-18

Results Overview

The fold change from baseline in fecal calprotectin at Week 14, is the ratio of the measurement of fecal calprotectin at Week 14 to baseline measurement; this was calculated as the change from baseline in natural log transformed fecal calprotectin at Week 14.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

84 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, Week 14

Results posted on

2014-11-18

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Overall Study
STARTED
21
21
21
21
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
13
15
7
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
11
8
6
14

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
4
5
0
5
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
3
2
2
1
Overall Study
Medication error without adverse event
0
0
1
0
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
1
0
0
2
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
3
1
2
5
Overall Study
Other
0
0
0
1
Overall Study
Site Closed
0
0
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Biomarker Study in Active Ulcerative Colitis Patients

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Total
n=84 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
36.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5 • n=93 Participants
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=4 Participants
46.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=27 Participants
37.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 • n=483 Participants
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
10 Participants
n=483 Participants
35 Participants
n=36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
14 Participants
n=27 Participants
11 Participants
n=483 Participants
49 Participants
n=36 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT: all randomized participants who received greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 1 dose study drug); Data as Observed (DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint). "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.

The fold change from baseline in fecal calprotectin at Week 14, is the ratio of the measurement of fecal calprotectin at Week 14 to baseline measurement; this was calculated as the change from baseline in natural log transformed fecal calprotectin at Week 14.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=7 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=14 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Fold Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Week 14
0.41 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.29 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.79 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
1.24 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-dose to end of the dosing interval after Day 1, Week 12

Population: All participants with evaluable pharmacokinetic (PK) results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation greater than (\>) 20 percent (%) from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" = participants in PK population; "n" = evaluable participants at specified time point.

Maximum concentration observed during the dosing interval (2 weeks for day 1, 4 weeks for week 12).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=20 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Anrukinzumab
Day 1 (n=19, 20, 20)
54480 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 15027
101200 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 36239
182200 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 64817
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Anrukinzumab
Week 12 (n=15, 16, 13)
68270 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 34360
121400 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 43461
197600 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 80647

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-dose to end of the dosing interval after Day 1, Week 12

Population: All participants with evaluable PK results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation \>20% from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" signifies participants in PK population; "n" signifies evaluable participants at specified time point.

Lowest concentration observed during the dosing interval (2 weeks for day 1, 4 weeks for week 12).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=20 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Minimum Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Cmin) for Anrukinzumab
Day 1 (n=19, 20, 20)
0.0000 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.00000
42.45 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 165.38
51.19 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 201.57
Minimum Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Cmin) for Anrukinzumab
Week 12 (n=15, 16, 13)
13310 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 8314.0
22350 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 14281
31120 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16821

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-dose, within 1 hour post-end of infusion on Day 1; Day 2, 4, 7, pre-dose on Week 2

Population: All participants with evaluable PK results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation \>20% from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Area under the plasma concentration curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (2 weeks) was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=20 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=20 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) for Anrukinzumab
8346000 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 3622500
14670000 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 6055800
24430000 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 7657300

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Within 1 hour post-end of infusion on Week 12; Week 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32

Population: All participants with evaluable PK results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation \>20% from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=7 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) for Anrukinzumab
392.4 hours
Standard Deviation 99.107
470.5 hours
Standard Deviation 361.46
362.4 hours
Standard Deviation 111.18

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-dose, within 1 hour post-end of infusion on Week 12; Week 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32

Population: All participants with evaluable PK results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation \>20% from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Systemic Clearance (CL) for Anrukinzumab
0.2844 liters/day
Standard Deviation 0.15918
0.3090 liters/day
Standard Deviation 0.14268
0.3789 liters/day
Standard Deviation 0.23249

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-dose, within 1 hour post-end of infusion on Week 12; Week 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32

Population: All participants with evaluable PK results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation \>20% from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=7 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Volume of Distribution (Vz) for Anrukinzumab
5.726 liters
Standard Deviation 2.5057
9.704 liters
Standard Deviation 13.186
6.143 liters
Standard Deviation 2.1013

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12

Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in mITT population; "n" signifies participants in mITT DAO population for specified time point.

The fold change from baseline in fecal calprotectin at post-baseline visit, is the ratio of the measurement of fecal calprotectin at post-baseline visit to baseline measurement; this was calculated as the change from baseline in natural log transformed fecal calprotectin at post-baseline visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Fold Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Fold Change at Week 2 (n=15, 17, 18, 13)
0.70 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.81 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.71 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.77 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
Fold Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Fold change at Week 4 (n=14, 18, 19, 16)
0.92 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.47 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.92 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.55 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
Fold Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Fold change at Week 8 (n=10, 16, 17, 16)
0.78 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.36 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
1.14 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.52 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
Fold Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Fold change at Week 12 (n=9, 13, 14, 11)
0.64 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.19 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.96 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.67 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2, 4, 7, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32

Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in mITT population; "n" signifies participants in mITT DAO population for specified time point.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 20 (n=8, 15, 15, 8)
1.5140 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.82370
9.8396 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 25.99516
7.4261 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 8.00205
4.1745 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.84220
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Baseline (n=15, 21, 20, 19)
0.6247 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.97041
1.6231 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.95190
1.2900 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.07219
0.7525 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.59494
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Day 2 (n=21, 19, 17, 18)
0.5980 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.81335
3.6373 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 4.69500
6.6673 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 7.29515
5.0474 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 4.97368
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Day 4 (n=16, 16, 20, 15)
0.7056 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.29166
7.7698 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 9.02951
12.3410 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 11.84611
10.1349 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 10.24068
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Day 7 (n=7, 12, 9, 13)
0.8991 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.15883
15.6742 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 34.90836
16.6700 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 16.73533
11.3600 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 16.79136
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 2 (n=20, 21, 19, 19)
0.7177 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.98373
16.6373 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 54.71391
17.7895 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 18.53571
21.5021 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 27.03784
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 4 (n=18, 21, 19, 17)
0.8949 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.47538
15.1244 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 43.76893
17.1853 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 15.00105
8.7807 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 5.39145
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 8 (n=16, 18, 18, 15)
0.7310 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.09524
21.4964 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 72.31269
16.8200 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 15.47020
6.8027 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 3.44810
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 12 (n=12, 14, 17, 11)
0.8925 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.38386
19.3543 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 52.00880
22.4335 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 27.04635
6.8461 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 4.19321
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 14 (n=12, 14, 16, 13)
1.0545 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.15526
33.6697 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 110.9546
20.0044 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 37.36283
8.9492 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 6.33317
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 16 (n=10, 12, 12, 7)
0.5054 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.29982
15.0002 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 40.41488
16.4423 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 24.54910
3.7570 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.91709
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 24 (n=10, 12, 12, 8)
1.3300 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.41349
3.0140 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 3.23912
6.3665 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 7.85116
3.0913 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.99098
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 28 (n=10, 12, 13, 8)
1.2151 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.23797
0.9936 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.75719
2.8005 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.67967
3.1724 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.15647
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 32 (n=9, 12, 13, 8)
0.4727 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.37875
1.0548 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.80675
1.9379 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.99196
2.4725 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.54141

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 32

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 32 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. All causality AEs included SAEs as well as non-serious AEs, without regard to relationship to the study drug, which occurred during the trial.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
15 participants
19 participants
17 participants
17 participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
4 participants
4 participants
2 participants
4 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 32

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to Adverse Events
4 participants
5 participants
1 participants
5 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1, Week 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32

Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in mITT population; "n" signifies participants in mITT DAO population for specified time point.

Neutralizing antibody was not analyzed as no participant had positive ADA samples.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 14 (n=13, 14, 15, 13)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Day 1 (n=18, 20, 19, 21)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 4 (n=17, 18, 20, 18)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 8 (n=15, 17, 18, 13)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 12 (n=14, 15, 17, 13)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 16 (n=10, 15, 14, 7)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 20 (n=11, 14, 15, 7)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 24 (n=10, 12, 14, 7)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 28 (n=8, 12, 13, 7)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 32 (n=10, 13, 15, 6)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.

Mayo score is used to measure the disease activity of ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy is a sub score of Mayo score. The score for endoscopic subscore ranges from 0 to 3, where higher score indicates more severe disease activity. Participant's score for endoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy at Week 14 was specified as improved (decrease), no change and worsened (increase) compared to their baseline score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Subscore at Week 14
Worsening
3 participants
2 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Subscore at Week 14
Improvement
6 participants
8 participants
11 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Subscore at Week 14
No Change
3 participants
5 participants
5 participants
11 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Week 14

Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.

Clinical response rate is defined as percentage of participants with at least 3 point decrease from baseline in total Mayo score with at least 30% change along with 1 point decrease from baseline or absolute score of 0 or 1 in rectal bleeding. The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on flexible sigmoidoscopy \[endoscopy\] and physician's global assessment), each subscore is graded from 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Clinical Response Rate at Week 14
41.67 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
60.00 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
50.00 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
15.38 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Week 14

Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.

Clinical remission rate is defined as percentage of participants with a total Mayo score less than or equal to 2, with no individual subscore greater than 1 at post baseline visit. The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on flexible sigmoidoscopy and physician's global assessment), each subscore is graded from 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Clinical Remission Rate at Week 14
16.67 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
33.33 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
18.75 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
0.00 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.

The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on flexible sigmoidoscopy \[endoscopy\] and physician's global assessment), each subscore is graded from 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Week 14
-1.32 unit on a scale
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
-2.28 unit on a scale
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
-2.30 unit on a scale
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
-0.79 unit on a scale
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.

Stool frequency is a sub score of Mayo score used to measure the disease activity of ulcerative colitis. The score for stool frequency ranges from 0 to 3, where higher score indicates more severe disease activity. Participant's score for stool frequency at Week 14 was specified as improved (decrease), no change and worsened (increase) compared to their baseline score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency at Week 14
Improvement
4 participants
7 participants
7 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency at Week 14
No Change
8 participants
4 participants
8 participants
6 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency at Week 14
Worsening
0 participants
4 participants
1 participants
4 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.

Mayo score is used to measure the disease activity of ulcerative colitis. Rectal bleeding is a sub score of Mayo score. The score for rectal bleeding ranges from 0 to 3, where higher score indicates more severe disease activity. Participant's score for rectal bleeding at Week 14 was specified as improved (decrease), no change and worsened (increase) compared to their baseline score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding at Week 14
Improvement
4 participants
8 participants
7 participants
5 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding at Week 14
No Change
6 participants
6 participants
6 participants
7 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding at Week 14
Worsening
2 participants
1 participants
3 participants
1 participants

Adverse Events

Placebo

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 12 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Anrukinzumab 200 mg

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 18 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Anrukinzumab 400 mg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 13 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Anrukinzumab 600 mg

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 15 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=21 participants at risk
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis sclerosing
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile infection
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=21 participants at risk
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
19.0%
4/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
19.0%
4/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
19.0%
4/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Eosinophilia
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
33.3%
7/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
23.8%
5/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
38.1%
8/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Chest pain
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Pyrexia
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
19.0%
4/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER