Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Biomarker Study in Active Ulcerative Colitis Patients (NCT NCT01284062)
NCT ID: NCT01284062
Last Updated: 2014-11-18
Results Overview
The fold change from baseline in fecal calprotectin at Week 14, is the ratio of the measurement of fecal calprotectin at Week 14 to baseline measurement; this was calculated as the change from baseline in natural log transformed fecal calprotectin at Week 14.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
84 participants
Baseline, Week 14
2014-11-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
13
|
15
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
8
|
6
|
14
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
5
|
0
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Medication error without adverse event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Site Closed
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Biomarker Study in Active Ulcerative Colitis Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Total
n=84 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
36.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5 • n=93 Participants
|
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=4 Participants
|
46.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=27 Participants
|
37.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 • n=483 Participants
|
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT: all randomized participants who received greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 1 dose study drug); Data as Observed (DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint). "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.
The fold change from baseline in fecal calprotectin at Week 14, is the ratio of the measurement of fecal calprotectin at Week 14 to baseline measurement; this was calculated as the change from baseline in natural log transformed fecal calprotectin at Week 14.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=7 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=14 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Week 14
|
0.41 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.29 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.79 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
1.24 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose to end of the dosing interval after Day 1, Week 12Population: All participants with evaluable pharmacokinetic (PK) results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation greater than (\>) 20 percent (%) from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" = participants in PK population; "n" = evaluable participants at specified time point.
Maximum concentration observed during the dosing interval (2 weeks for day 1, 4 weeks for week 12).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=20 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Anrukinzumab
Day 1 (n=19, 20, 20)
|
54480 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 15027
|
101200 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 36239
|
182200 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 64817
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Anrukinzumab
Week 12 (n=15, 16, 13)
|
68270 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 34360
|
121400 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 43461
|
197600 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 80647
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose to end of the dosing interval after Day 1, Week 12Population: All participants with evaluable PK results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation \>20% from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" signifies participants in PK population; "n" signifies evaluable participants at specified time point.
Lowest concentration observed during the dosing interval (2 weeks for day 1, 4 weeks for week 12).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=20 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Minimum Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Cmin) for Anrukinzumab
Day 1 (n=19, 20, 20)
|
0.0000 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.00000
|
42.45 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 165.38
|
51.19 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 201.57
|
—
|
|
Minimum Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Cmin) for Anrukinzumab
Week 12 (n=15, 16, 13)
|
13310 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 8314.0
|
22350 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 14281
|
31120 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16821
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, within 1 hour post-end of infusion on Day 1; Day 2, 4, 7, pre-dose on Week 2Population: All participants with evaluable PK results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation \>20% from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Area under the plasma concentration curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (2 weeks) was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=20 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=20 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) for Anrukinzumab
|
8346000 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 3622500
|
14670000 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 6055800
|
24430000 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 7657300
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 1 hour post-end of infusion on Week 12; Week 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32Population: All participants with evaluable PK results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation \>20% from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=7 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) for Anrukinzumab
|
392.4 hours
Standard Deviation 99.107
|
470.5 hours
Standard Deviation 361.46
|
362.4 hours
Standard Deviation 111.18
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, within 1 hour post-end of infusion on Week 12; Week 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32Population: All participants with evaluable PK results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation \>20% from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Systemic Clearance (CL) for Anrukinzumab
|
0.2844 liters/day
Standard Deviation 0.15918
|
0.3090 liters/day
Standard Deviation 0.14268
|
0.3789 liters/day
Standard Deviation 0.23249
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, within 1 hour post-end of infusion on Week 12; Week 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32Population: All participants with evaluable PK results were included in PK population. PK samples with time deviation \>20% from nominal time were excluded from statistical summary and PK analysis. "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=7 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Volume of Distribution (Vz) for Anrukinzumab
|
5.726 liters
Standard Deviation 2.5057
|
9.704 liters
Standard Deviation 13.186
|
6.143 liters
Standard Deviation 2.1013
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in mITT population; "n" signifies participants in mITT DAO population for specified time point.
The fold change from baseline in fecal calprotectin at post-baseline visit, is the ratio of the measurement of fecal calprotectin at post-baseline visit to baseline measurement; this was calculated as the change from baseline in natural log transformed fecal calprotectin at post-baseline visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Fold Change at Week 2 (n=15, 17, 18, 13)
|
0.70 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.81 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.71 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.77 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Fold change at Week 4 (n=14, 18, 19, 16)
|
0.92 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.47 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.92 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.55 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Fold change at Week 8 (n=10, 16, 17, 16)
|
0.78 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.36 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
1.14 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.52 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Fold change at Week 12 (n=9, 13, 14, 11)
|
0.64 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.19 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.96 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.67 fold change
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2, 4, 7, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in mITT population; "n" signifies participants in mITT DAO population for specified time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 20 (n=8, 15, 15, 8)
|
1.5140 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.82370
|
9.8396 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 25.99516
|
7.4261 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 8.00205
|
4.1745 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.84220
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Baseline (n=15, 21, 20, 19)
|
0.6247 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.97041
|
1.6231 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.95190
|
1.2900 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.07219
|
0.7525 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.59494
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Day 2 (n=21, 19, 17, 18)
|
0.5980 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.81335
|
3.6373 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 4.69500
|
6.6673 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 7.29515
|
5.0474 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 4.97368
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Day 4 (n=16, 16, 20, 15)
|
0.7056 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.29166
|
7.7698 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 9.02951
|
12.3410 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 11.84611
|
10.1349 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 10.24068
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Day 7 (n=7, 12, 9, 13)
|
0.8991 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.15883
|
15.6742 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 34.90836
|
16.6700 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 16.73533
|
11.3600 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 16.79136
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 2 (n=20, 21, 19, 19)
|
0.7177 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.98373
|
16.6373 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 54.71391
|
17.7895 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 18.53571
|
21.5021 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 27.03784
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 4 (n=18, 21, 19, 17)
|
0.8949 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.47538
|
15.1244 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 43.76893
|
17.1853 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 15.00105
|
8.7807 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 5.39145
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 8 (n=16, 18, 18, 15)
|
0.7310 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.09524
|
21.4964 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 72.31269
|
16.8200 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 15.47020
|
6.8027 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 3.44810
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 12 (n=12, 14, 17, 11)
|
0.8925 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.38386
|
19.3543 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 52.00880
|
22.4335 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 27.04635
|
6.8461 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 4.19321
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 14 (n=12, 14, 16, 13)
|
1.0545 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.15526
|
33.6697 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 110.9546
|
20.0044 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 37.36283
|
8.9492 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 6.33317
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 16 (n=10, 12, 12, 7)
|
0.5054 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.29982
|
15.0002 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 40.41488
|
16.4423 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 24.54910
|
3.7570 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.91709
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 24 (n=10, 12, 12, 8)
|
1.3300 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.41349
|
3.0140 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 3.23912
|
6.3665 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 7.85116
|
3.0913 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.99098
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 28 (n=10, 12, 13, 8)
|
1.2151 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.23797
|
0.9936 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.75719
|
2.8005 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.67967
|
3.1724 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.15647
|
|
Total Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Level
Week 32 (n=9, 12, 13, 8)
|
0.4727 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.37875
|
1.0548 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.80675
|
1.9379 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.99196
|
2.4725 picogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2.54141
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 32Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 32 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. All causality AEs included SAEs as well as non-serious AEs, without regard to relationship to the study drug, which occurred during the trial.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
|
15 participants
|
19 participants
|
17 participants
|
17 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
4 participants
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 32Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to Adverse Events
|
4 participants
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
5 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in mITT population; "n" signifies participants in mITT DAO population for specified time point.
Neutralizing antibody was not analyzed as no participant had positive ADA samples.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 14 (n=13, 14, 15, 13)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Day 1 (n=18, 20, 19, 21)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 4 (n=17, 18, 20, 18)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 8 (n=15, 17, 18, 13)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 12 (n=14, 15, 17, 13)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 16 (n=10, 15, 14, 7)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 20 (n=11, 14, 15, 7)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 24 (n=10, 12, 14, 7)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 28 (n=8, 12, 13, 7)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody
Week 32 (n=10, 13, 15, 6)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.
Mayo score is used to measure the disease activity of ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy is a sub score of Mayo score. The score for endoscopic subscore ranges from 0 to 3, where higher score indicates more severe disease activity. Participant's score for endoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy at Week 14 was specified as improved (decrease), no change and worsened (increase) compared to their baseline score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Subscore at Week 14
Worsening
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Subscore at Week 14
Improvement
|
6 participants
|
8 participants
|
11 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Subscore at Week 14
No Change
|
3 participants
|
5 participants
|
5 participants
|
11 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 14Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.
Clinical response rate is defined as percentage of participants with at least 3 point decrease from baseline in total Mayo score with at least 30% change along with 1 point decrease from baseline or absolute score of 0 or 1 in rectal bleeding. The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on flexible sigmoidoscopy \[endoscopy\] and physician's global assessment), each subscore is graded from 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Response Rate at Week 14
|
41.67 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
60.00 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
50.00 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
15.38 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 14Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.
Clinical remission rate is defined as percentage of participants with a total Mayo score less than or equal to 2, with no individual subscore greater than 1 at post baseline visit. The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on flexible sigmoidoscopy and physician's global assessment), each subscore is graded from 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Remission Rate at Week 14
|
16.67 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
33.33 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
18.75 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on flexible sigmoidoscopy \[endoscopy\] and physician's global assessment), each subscore is graded from 0 to 3 with the higher score indicating more severe disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Mayo Score at Week 14
|
-1.32 unit on a scale
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
-2.28 unit on a scale
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
-2.30 unit on a scale
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
-0.79 unit on a scale
Data is reported in the statistical analysis section because only 80% CI was calculated for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.
Stool frequency is a sub score of Mayo score used to measure the disease activity of ulcerative colitis. The score for stool frequency ranges from 0 to 3, where higher score indicates more severe disease activity. Participant's score for stool frequency at Week 14 was specified as improved (decrease), no change and worsened (increase) compared to their baseline score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency at Week 14
Improvement
|
4 participants
|
7 participants
|
7 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency at Week 14
No Change
|
8 participants
|
4 participants
|
8 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency at Week 14
Worsening
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14Population: mITT: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose study drug; DAO: all mITT participants with all data needed for calculation of specified endpoint. "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants in the mITT DAO population for specified endpoint.
Mayo score is used to measure the disease activity of ulcerative colitis. Rectal bleeding is a sub score of Mayo score. The score for rectal bleeding ranges from 0 to 3, where higher score indicates more severe disease activity. Participant's score for rectal bleeding at Week 14 was specified as improved (decrease), no change and worsened (increase) compared to their baseline score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=15 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=16 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=13 Participants
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding at Week 14
Improvement
|
4 participants
|
8 participants
|
7 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding at Week 14
No Change
|
6 participants
|
6 participants
|
6 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding at Week 14
Worsening
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 participants at risk
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis sclerosing
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile infection
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 participants at risk
Placebo matched to anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 200 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 200 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 400 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 400 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
Anrukinzumab 600 mg
n=21 participants at risk
Anrukinzumab (PF-05230917) 600 mg intravenous infusion over 1 hour on Day 1, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
19.0%
4/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
19.0%
4/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
19.0%
4/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Eosinophilia
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
33.3%
7/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
23.8%
5/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
38.1%
8/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
19.0%
4/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
14.3%
3/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
9.5%
2/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER