Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Follow-up to Evaluate the Clinical Usefulness of Gentamicin-coated Titanium Nails in Tibia Fractures (NCT NCT01282294)
NCT ID: NCT01282294
Last Updated: 2015-03-17
Results Overview
The Short Form (SF)-12 health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person. It was administered at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operatively.
COMPLETED
100 participants
3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operatively
2015-03-17
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
100
|
|
Overall Study
Intra-operative
|
99
|
|
Overall Study
Post-operative
|
99
|
|
Overall Study
6 Weeks
|
95
|
|
Overall Study
3 Months
|
95
|
|
Overall Study
6 Months
|
94
|
|
Overall Study
12 Months
|
86
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
81
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
19
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Screening failure
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Patient non-compliance
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Follow-up to Evaluate the Clinical Usefulness of Gentamicin-coated Titanium Nails in Tibia Fractures
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=99 Participants
There is only 1 cohort in this case series.
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating
|
|---|---|
|
Drugs
Drug abuser
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Drugs
Ex-drug abuser
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fracture type
traumatic/pathologic
|
68 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fracture type
revision purposes
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fracture type (open or closed)
Open
|
45 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fracture type (open or closed)
Closed
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
97 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Negroid
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
99 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
26.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Height
|
177.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
82.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Allergies
No or unknown
|
74 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Allergies
Metal
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Allergies
Gentamicin
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Allergies
Other
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking
Yes
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking
No, quit <= 6 Months ago
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking
No, quit > 6 Months ago
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking
No, never smoked
|
45 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Drinking
Never drank
|
22 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Drinking
Drinks small amounts (<3 units/day)
|
76 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Drinking
Drinker
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Drinking
Ex-drinker
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Drugs
Never used drugs
|
84 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fracture type (open or closed)
None
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fracture type (open or closed)
Unknown
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from injury to surgery for traumatic/pathologic patients
|
8.7 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from injury to surgery for revision patients
|
17.1 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Use of systemic antibiotics prophylaxis
Pre-Operative
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Use of systemic antibiotics prophylaxis
Peri-Operative
|
76 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Use of systemic antibiotics prophylaxis
Post-Operative
|
32 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Use of systemic antibiotics prophylaxis
None
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operativelyPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8).
The Short Form (SF)-12 health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person. It was administered at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operatively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=89 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life: SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Score at 3 months, n=74
|
36.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
|
Quality of Life: SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Score at 6 months, n=82
|
41.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
|
|
Quality of Life: SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Score at 12 months, n=74
|
45.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
|
|
Quality of Life: SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Score at 18 months, n=68
|
44.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operativelyPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8).
The SF-12 short form health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person. It was administered at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operatively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=89 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life: SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Score at 3 months, n=74
|
52.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.8
|
|
Quality of Life: SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Score at 6 months, n=82
|
53.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
|
|
Quality of Life: SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Score at 12 months, n=74
|
53.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9
|
|
Quality of Life: SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Score at 18 months, n=68
|
53.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operativelyPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8).
The Euroqol Health Survey (EQ-5D, 3-level) was completed on five dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) to measure health-related quality of life on a scale from 0-1. A higher score indicates better quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=89 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life: EQ-5D
Score at 18 months, n=72
|
0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
|
Quality of Life: EQ-5D
Score at 3 months, n=78
|
0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
|
Quality of Life: EQ-5D
Score at 6 months, n=83
|
0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
|
Quality of Life: EQ-5D
Score at 12 months, n=78
|
0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operativelyPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8).
The Iowa Ankle Score was administered at baseline (retrospective assessment of pre-trauma condition) as well as at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operatively to measures ankle function across four dimensions (function, freedom from pain, gait, range of motion) on a scale of 0-100, where 100 is assigned to full function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=89 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Functional Outcome: IOWA Ankle Score
Score at 18 months, n=73
|
85.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
|
Functional Outcome: IOWA Ankle Score
Score at Baseline, n=52
|
86.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.7
|
|
Functional Outcome: IOWA Ankle Score
Score at 3 months, n=77
|
62.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.1
|
|
Functional Outcome: IOWA Ankle Score
Score at 6 months, n=84
|
76.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.6
|
|
Functional Outcome: IOWA Ankle Score
Score at 12 months, n=77
|
81.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operativelyPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8).
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire was administered at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operatively to assess three dimensions: pain, disability and joint stiffness in the knee. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4). The scores are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-96. A higher score on the WOMAC indicate more functional limitations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=89 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Functional Outcome: WOMAC
Score at 3 months, n=80
|
29.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.5
|
|
Functional Outcome: WOMAC
Score at 6 months, n=84
|
24.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.1
|
|
Functional Outcome: WOMAC
Score at 12 months, n=76
|
19.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.5
|
|
Functional Outcome: WOMAC
Score at 18 months, n=73
|
18.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 - 18 monthsPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8).
Infections at the site of ETN PROtect implantation were classified according to Center for Disease Control (CDC) definition into: * superficial incisional surgical site infection (SSI), affecting skin and subcutaneous tissue * deep incisional SSI, affecting deep soft tissue * organ/ space SSI (Osteomyelitis), affecting joint or bursa
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=89 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Infection Adverse Events
superficial incisional SSI at site of ETN PROtect
|
6 number of events
|
|
Infection Adverse Events
deep incisional SSI at site of ETN PROtect
|
5 number of events
|
|
Infection Adverse Events
organ/ space SSI at site of ETN PROtect
|
0 number of events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8). For the anatomic bone union at 12 months, data of 78 patients is available.
Anatomic bone union was assessed according to Johnson et al.\*: A0: pseudoarthrosis; A1: unilateral pseudoarthrosis; A2: insufficient unilateral bone mass; A3: contiguous union without hypertrophy; A4: solid union of the fracture site. \*Johnson EE, Urist MR, Finerman GA. Repair of segmental defects of the tibia with cancellous bone grafts augmented with human bone morphogenetic protein. A preliminary report. Clin.Orthop.Relat Res. 1988;249-57
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=78 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Evidence of Anatomic Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
A0
|
4 participants
|
|
Evidence of Anatomic Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
A1
|
2 participants
|
|
Evidence of Anatomic Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
A2
|
9 participants
|
|
Evidence of Anatomic Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
A3
|
11 participants
|
|
Evidence of Anatomic Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
A4
|
52 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8). For the anatomic bone union at 12 months, data of 78 patients is available.
Economic bone union was assessed according to Johnson et al.\*: E0: complete invalid; E1: no gainful employment; E2: able to work but did not return to previous occupation; E3: returned to previous occupation on a part-time or limited status; E4: returned to previous occupation without restrictions. \*Johnson EE, Urist MR, Finerman GA. Repair of segmental defects of the tibia with cancellous bone grafts augmented with human bone morphogenetic protein. A preliminary report. Clin.Orthop.Relat Res. 1988;249-57
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=78 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Evidence of Economic Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
E0
|
3 participants
|
|
Evidence of Economic Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
E1
|
19 participants
|
|
Evidence of Economic Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
E2
|
8 participants
|
|
Evidence of Economic Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
E3
|
8 participants
|
|
Evidence of Economic Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
E4
|
40 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8). For the anatomic bone union at 12 months, data of 78 patients is available.
Functional bone union was assessed according to Johnson et al.\*: F0: motion at the fracture site; F1: level of pain is the same as before operation but able to perform all daily tasks of living; F2: occasional extremity pain and able to perform activities of daily living; F3: no pain and able to perform all activities except sports; F4: complete recovery, no recurrent episodes of pain, and unrestricted activity. \*Johnson EE, Urist MR, Finerman GA. Repair of segmental defects of the tibia with cancellous bone grafts augmented with human bone morphogenetic protein. A preliminary report. Clin.Orthop.Relat Res. 1988;249-57
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=78 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Evidence of Functional Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
F0
|
4 participants
|
|
Evidence of Functional Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
F1
|
1 participants
|
|
Evidence of Functional Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
F2
|
24 participants
|
|
Evidence of Functional Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
F3
|
17 participants
|
|
Evidence of Functional Bone Union According to Johnson Classification
F4
|
32 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operativelyPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8).
Surgeons' perceived satisfaction was assessed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0 = very satisfied, 100 = disappointed).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=89 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Surgeon's Perceived Satisfaction
Score at 6 weeks, n=84
|
18.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
|
Surgeon's Perceived Satisfaction
Score at 3 months, n=82
|
18.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.8
|
|
Surgeon's Perceived Satisfaction
Score at 6 months, n=84
|
14.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operativelyPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8).
The likelihood to develop a wound infection was assessed by the surgeon on a scale from 0 to 100 (0 = almost nil, 100 = absolutely sure).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=89 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Likelihood to Develop Wound Infection Assessed by Surgeon
Score at 6 months, n=84
|
14.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.1
|
|
Likelihood to Develop Wound Infection Assessed by Surgeon
Score at 6 weeks, n=84
|
19.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.6
|
|
Likelihood to Develop Wound Infection Assessed by Surgeon
Score at 3 months, n=82
|
14.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-operativelyPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8).
The likelihood to develop a non-union was assessed by the surgeon on a scale from 0 to 100 (0 = almost nil, 100 = absolutely sure).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=89 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Likelihood to Develop a Non-union Assessed by Surgeon
Score at 6 weeks, n=84
|
26.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.1
|
|
Likelihood to Develop a Non-union Assessed by Surgeon
Score at 3 months, n=82
|
23.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.7
|
|
Likelihood to Develop a Non-union Assessed by Surgeon
Score at 6 months, n=84
|
19.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operativelyPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8).
Leg pain intensity was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). A score of zero indicated no pain at all, and 100 represented the worst possible pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=89 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Pain by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Score at 6 weeks, n=82
|
19.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.4
|
|
Pain by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Score at 3 months, n=81
|
24.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
|
Pain by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Score at 6 months, n=84
|
27.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.2
|
|
Pain by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Score at 12 months, n=78
|
21.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.3
|
|
Pain by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Score at 18 months, n=73
|
23.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8). Patient satisfaction was completed by 84 patients.
Patient's perceived satisfaction was scored on a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS). A score of zero indicated no satisfaction, while a score of 100 indicated completely satisfied.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=84 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Patient's Perceived Satisfaction
|
63.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 - 18 monthsPopulation: Efficacy is based on the number of patients that were treated with the ETN PROtect according to the protocol. Patients were excluded due to a failure to meet the in-/exclusion criteria (2) and a surgical procedure that was not according to the surgical technique (8). 3 patients never reached full weight bearing, and 1 dropped out before 6 weeks.
The time from surgery to full weight bearing was assessed in days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=85 Participants
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Time to Full Weight Bearing
|
90.0 days
Interval 41.0 to 393.0
|
Adverse Events
ETN PROtect
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=99 participants at risk
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN AGGRAVATED
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
COXARTHRITIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
DEVICE BREAKAGE
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DISORDERS OF MUSCLE, LIGAMENT, AND FASCIA
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ECTOPIC OSSIFICATION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FALL
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FIBULA FRACTURE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
FISTULA
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
FRACTURE DELAYED UNION
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
FRACTURE MALUNION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
FRACTURE NONUNION
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
HAMMER TOE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
HEART ATTACK
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
HEMATOMA
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
HUMERUS FRACTURE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERGLYCAEMIA
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
LOCAL SWELLING
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
LOCALIZED INFECTION
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
LOSS OF RANGE OF MOTION ASSOCIATED WITH DEVICE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LUMBAR VERTEBRAL FRACTURE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
NONUNION OF FRACTURE
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
OSTEOMYELITIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PAIN IN FOOT
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
POST PROCEDURAL HAEMATOMA
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
POST-OPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PSEUDARTHROSIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
PSYCHOSIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
SKIN NECROSIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
SOFT TISSUE NECROSIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
SWELLING
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
THROMBOSIS LEG
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
WOUND DEHISCENCE
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
WOUND HEALING DISTURBANCE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
WOUND INFECTION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ETN PROtect
n=99 participants at risk
ETN PROtect: Expert Tibial Nail PROtect with Gentamicin coating.
|
|---|---|
|
Immune system disorders
ALLERGIC REACTION
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BONE FRACTURE SPONTANEOUS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BONE FRAGILE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
BONE FRAGMENTATION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
BRONCHITIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
BRUISE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
CALF PAIN
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
CHONDROPATHY
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
COXARTHROSIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
COXITIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
DEPRESSION WORSENED(
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
DEPRESSIVE EPISODE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
DEVICE POSITIONED INAPPROPRIATELY
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DUODENITIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ERYTHEMA
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
FRACTURE DELAYED UNION
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTRITIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
GASTROINTESTINAL INFECTION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
HALLUX VALGUS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
HEALING DELAYED
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
HEMATOMA
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
KNEE PAIN
|
4.0%
4/99 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
LOCAL SWELLING
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
LYMPHEDEMA
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
NEUROPATHY
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
NONUNION OF FRACTURE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
NUMBNESS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
NUMBNESS IN LEG
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
OPERATION SITE BLEED
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
OSTEOMYELITIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
PAIN
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PAIN IN FOOT
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
PARASTHESIA
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PATELLAR TENDINITIS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
POLYNEUROPATHY
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
PROLONGED POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
SKIN INFECTION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
SKIN LESION NOS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
SKIN NECROSIS(
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
STAPHYLOCOCCAL SKIN INFECTION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
STRESS FRACTURE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SUBLUXATION PATELLA
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SUTURE GRANULOMA
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
SWELLING
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
SWELLING OF LEGS
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
TIBIA PAIN
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
TOOTHACHE
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
UNEQUAL LEG LENGTH (ACQUIRED)
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
URINARY TRACT DISORDER
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
WHITLOW
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
|
General disorders
WOUND HEALING DISTURBANCE
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 18 months.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A single comprehensive publication may be authored on the procedure and outcomes of the trial. Sites that enroll less than five patients will not be included in the publication. Synthes GmbH will have the right to review prior to submission. Each clinical site that enrolls ten patients will have the option to submit an abstract for publication or presentation at a regional, national, or international conference on their work. Synthes GmbH will have the right to review prior to submission.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER