Diagnosing Perineal Tears, Does Different Assessment Methods Affect the Midwife's Clinical Judgement of Perineal Tears?
NCT ID: NCT01278979
Last Updated: 2013-05-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-01-31
2013-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Device Designed to Protect the Perineum During Labor
NCT01533467
One Plus One Equals Two, Will That do?
NCT03770962
Short Anovaginal Distance is Associated With Obstetric Anal Sphincter Rupture
NCT03039582
Descriptive Evaluation of Expulsive Efforts During Pregnancy in Term Nulliparous Women by Measurement of Intra Bladder Pressure: Pilot Observational Study.
NCT04544488
Perineorraphy Versus Pelvic Floor Exercise - a Randomized Trial
NCT02545218
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this prospective randomised trial consenting women will be randomised in to the common visual and digital assessment of the perineal tear by to different midwives, blinded to each others assessment or visual and digital assessment and measuring of the tear with a small soft ruler, Peri-Rule also by two different midwives.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Assessment of perineal tears
Consenting women sustaining perineal tear after child birth
Objective measurements of perineal tears with "Peri-Rule"
Four measurements will be used in this study.
1. Depth of tear, from the fourchette into the greatest depth of the perineal body.
2. Length of tear, from the fourchette to the apex of the vaginal tear.
3. Length of tear, from the fourchette along perineal skin towards the anus.
4. Length of the perineal body, from the fourchette to outer margin of anus.
Visual and digital assessment
Consenting women that sustained perineal tear after child birth.
Visual and digital assessment
Midwifes assessing perineal tears as standard procedure with visual and digital examination of the perineal tear.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Objective measurements of perineal tears with "Peri-Rule"
Four measurements will be used in this study.
1. Depth of tear, from the fourchette into the greatest depth of the perineal body.
2. Length of tear, from the fourchette to the apex of the vaginal tear.
3. Length of tear, from the fourchette along perineal skin towards the anus.
4. Length of the perineal body, from the fourchette to outer margin of anus.
Visual and digital assessment
Midwifes assessing perineal tears as standard procedure with visual and digital examination of the perineal tear.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women over 18 years of age
* Healthy Child
* Written consent signed by participant
* Spontaneous tear in perineum that involves the perineal skin
Exclusion Criteria
* Bleeding that affected the general condition negatively
* Complex tears that branched out in two or more different directions
* Women delivered instrumentally forceps or ventouse
* Women delivered with Cesarian section
* Women who sustain episiotomy
18 Years
55 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Göteborg University
OTHER
Ostfold Hospital Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ann Morris
authorized midwife and master student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ann IC Morris, Reg. Midwife
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ostfold HT
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Fredrikstad, Østfold fylke, Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ann2010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.