Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of Subjects With Onychomycosis of the Great Toenail (NCT NCT01278394)
NCT ID: NCT01278394
Last Updated: 2018-12-06
Results Overview
Proportion of subjects with a clinical assessment of a clear (completely normal) nail unit plus a negative fungal culture from the treatment-targeted toenail at Day 360.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
29 participants
Day 360
2018-12-06
Participant Flow
Subjects were screened and enrolled and two investigative sites in Mexico. The study population included men and women of any race, 18-65 years of age who had distal, subungual onychomycosis of the great toenail. The first subject visit occurred on March 28, 2007, and the last subject visit occurred on July 11, 2008.
All subjects in Cohort 3 were treated with 5.0% AN2690 Solution.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy Study of Subjects With Onychomycosis of the Great Toenail
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
n=29 Participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
|
29 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age
|
46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.15 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 360Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the last observation was carried forward (LOCF) to impute missing observations.
Proportion of subjects with a clinical assessment of a clear (completely normal) nail unit plus a negative fungal culture from the treatment-targeted toenail at Day 360.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
n=29 Participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Evidence of Complete Clearance of the Treatment-targeted Great Toenail Plus a Negative Fungal Culture at Day 360
Failure
|
27 participants
|
|
Clinical Evidence of Complete Clearance of the Treatment-targeted Great Toenail Plus a Negative Fungal Culture at Day 360
Success
|
2 participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 360Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.
Clear nail was measured on digital images as the distance in millimeters from the proximal nail fold to the proximal limit of the disease as marked by the Investigator. New Clear Nail Growth (CNG) was calculated from the clear nail measurements.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
n=29 Participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Clear Nail Growth of the Targeted Toenail
|
0.5 millimeters
Interval -0.8 to 1.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 90Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.
Number of subjects with negative KOH, and number of subjects with negative fungal cultures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
n=29 Participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
Fungal Culture Result Positive
|
1 participants
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
Fungal Culture Result Negative
|
28 participants
Interval 89.9 to 100.0
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
KOH Result Positive
|
24 participants
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
KOH Result Negative
|
5 participants
Interval 3.5 to 31.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 180Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.
Number of subjects with negative KOH, and number of subjects with negative fungal cultures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
n=29 Participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
Fungal Culture Result Positive
|
0 participants
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
Fungal Culture Result Negative
|
29 participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
KOH Result Positive
|
20 participants
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
KOH Result Negative
|
9 participants
Interval 14.2 to 47.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 270Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.
Number of subjects with negative KOH, and number of subjects with negative fungal cultures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
n=29 Participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
Fungal Culture Result Positive
|
1 participants
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
Fungal Culture Result Negative
|
28 participants
Interval 89.9 to 100.0
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
KOH Result Positive
|
17 participants
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
KOH Result Negative
|
12 participants
Interval 23.5 to 59.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 360Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.
Number of subjects with negative KOH, and number of subjects with negative fungal cultures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
n=29 Participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
Fungal Culture Result Positive
|
1 participants
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
Fungal Culture Result Negative
|
28 participants
Interval 89.9 to 100.0
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
KOH Result Positive
|
23 participants
|
|
Mycological Evaluations (Negative KOH and Negative Fungal Culture) Compared to Baseline
KOH Result Negative
|
6 participants
Interval 5.9 to 35.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 360Population: Efficacy data were analyzed for the ITT population. For efficacy variables, the LOCF was used to impute missing observations.
Length of time to clinical evaluation of clear or at least 5 mm of CNG.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
n=29 Participants
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Length of Time to Clinical Evaluation of Clear or at Least 5 mm of CNG
|
138.0 days
Interval 81.5 to 194.0
|
Adverse Events
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
n=29 participants at risk
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine haemorrhage (unrelated)
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%
n=29 participants at risk
AN2690 Solution, 5.0%: Once daily application for 360 days
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
24.1%
7/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea pedis
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
|
6.9%
2/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vaginal infection
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose abnormal
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Polycystic ovaries
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ingrowing nail
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Onychomadesis
|
3.4%
1/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Tooth extraction
|
10.3%
3/29 • Pre and post treatment to Day 360
AEs were defined as any change (expected or unexpected) in a subject's medical health that occurred during the study. A serious AE was fatal, life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly, or another medically important condition.
|
Additional Information
Sheryl Baldwin, RN/Associate Director
Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Institution or Principal Investigator may only publish Study results after: (i) the results of the multicenter Study in its entirety have been publicly disclosed by the Sponsor in an abstract, manuscript or presentation form, or (ii) two (2) years after conclusion of the Study at all sites, whichever is first to occur.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER