Protocol for the Determination of Menstrual Losses in Healthy Women With Apparently Normal Cycles

NCT ID: NCT01276964

Last Updated: 2012-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Multicenter, observational, cross-over study intended to apply an easy and simple system for the quantitative determination of menstrual losses in women with apparently normal menses.The system adopted for the determination of menstrual losses, called QUEM (QUantitative Evaluation of Menses), is based on the collection of tampons and pads in standard bags which are readily vacuum sealed with a simple device for the whole of woman's period. The evaluation will be performed for the whole of one period and the analysis will be performed in comparison to the classical reference method, the Alkaline - Hematin Method, which is still considered the golden standard.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The following is a multicenter, observational, cross-over study intended to apply an easy and simple system for the quantitative determination of menstrual losses in women with apparently normal menses. The problem of heavy periods is associated to an high social and physical morbidity rate; till now there are not routine methods available for the quantitative determination of menstrual discharge, some objective methods have been applied exclusively for research purposes because they are very difficult to perform. If we consider the scientific data available and the frequent application of inadequate procedures for the treatment of this problem, it seems essential to apply a practical system for the accurate quantitative determination of menses.

The system adopted for the determination of menstrual losses, called QUEM (QUantitative Evaluation of Menses), is based on the collection of tampons and pads in standard bags which are readily vacuum sealed with a simple device for the whole of woman's period. QUEM has already been validated in preliminary in vitro and ex vivo studies (both in healthy women and in women with CBDs), by comparing it with the gold standard, the Alkaline Haematin Method. A correlation coefficient close to 1 was obtained.

In the current study QUEM will be applied to at least 100 women in the fertile age (between 20 and 45 years) with apparently normal menses and a negative bleeding history. The evaluation will be performed for the whole of one period and the analysis will be performed in comparison to the classical reference method, the Alkaline - Hematin Method, which is still considered the golden standard. At the enrollment each woman will be tested for complete blood cells count and ferritin levels in order to exclude unknown menorrhagia. The bleeding history (bleeding score) will be performed by applying an international reference method, already validated for von Willebrand Disease type 1 (vWD1). The aim of the study is to make a "normal range" and validate the effective practicality of QUEM as a preliminary step to the clinical studies in patients suffering from menorrhagia and affected by hemorrhagic disorders.

The current study will involve many Italian and International Centers. All the needed materials and equipments will be provided by the Coordinator Centre; patients will be carefully informed about the objectives of the study and they will follow a short course illustrating the use and the characteristics of the method proposed (QUEM).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Validate QUEM Method Quantitative Determination of Menses

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

menses quantitative determination of menstrual losses kinetic definition of menses

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1. Women in the fertile age

Healthy women in the fertile age (between 20-45 years) with apparently normal periods

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women in the fertile age (between 20-45 years), not assuming oral contraceptives from at least three months
* Referred normal menses .Use of the same brand of sanitary protection wear for the whole of the period.
* BMI between 18 and 30

Exclusion Criteria

* Abnormal Bleeding Score
* Positive gynecological history of fibroids, polyps or malignancy
* Treatment with anti-coagulants, antifibrinolytics, non steroidal anti-inflammatory agents
* Use of oral contraceptives in past three months
* Use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) in past three months .Hgb levels \<12 g/dl and Ferritin \<25 ng/ml.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Palermo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of L'Aquila

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Guglielmo Mariani

Prof

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

mariasanta napolitano, md

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

univeristy of perugia, hospital of l'aquila

guglielmo mariani, md

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of L'Aquila

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Palermo

Palermo, Italy, Italy

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza Irccs

San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

University of L'Aquila

L’Aquila, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

guglielmo mariani, md

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0862368208

Email: [email protected]

mariasanta napolitano, md

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0862368741

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

grandone

Role: primary

napolitano

Role: primary

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.sigo.it

The official site of Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology

http://www.acog.org

Official site of the American Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology for women's healthcare physicians

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEVA-1/2007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id