GP2013 in the Treatment of RA Patients Refractory to or Intolerant of Standard Therapy

NCT ID: NCT01274182

Last Updated: 2018-01-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

312 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the PK/PD, efficacy and safety of GP2013 in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GP2013

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GP2013

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)

MabThera

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

MabThera

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)

Rituxan

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rituxan

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GP2013

1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

MabThera

1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Rituxan

1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EU-Rituximab US-Rituximab

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Rheumatoid arthritis as defined by the 1987 ACR classification
* Severe active seropositive disease
* Inadequate response or intolerance to other DMARDs and anti-TNFs
* Treatment with Methotrexate

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with systemic manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis
* Female patients nursing
* Women of childbearing potential unless using birth control
* Active infection
* Known immunodeficiency syndrome
* Positive Hepatitis B surface antigen or antibodies to Hepatitis C
* History of cancer
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sandoz

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sandoz

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Miller Clinical Research

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Bluegrass Community Research, Inc.

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Klein & Associates

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Klein & Associates

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Clinical Pharmacology Study Group

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Physician Research Collaboration, LLC

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Innovative Health Research

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

DJL Clinical Research PLLC

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Health Research of Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Altoona Center for Clinical Research

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Clinical Research Center of Reading LLC

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Low Country Rheumatology, PA

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Regional Health Clinical Research

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

West Tennessee Research Institute

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arthritis & Osteoporosis Center of South Texas

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Seattle Arthritis Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Investigative Site

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Investigative Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Investigative site

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Investigative site

Merksem, , Belgium

Site Status

Investigative Site

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

Investigative Site

Goiânia, , Brazil

Site Status

Investigative Site

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Investigative Site

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Investigative site

Cahors, , France

Site Status

Investigative Site

Corbeil-Essonnes, , France

Site Status

Investigative site

La Gaillarde, , France

Site Status

Investigative Site

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Investigative Site

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Investigative Site

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Investigative Site

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Investigative Site

Hildesheim, , Germany

Site Status

Investigative Site

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Investigative Site

München, , Germany

Site Status

Investigative Site

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Investigative Site

Ratingen, , Germany

Site Status

Investigative Site

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Investigative Site

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Pest Megyei Flór Ferenc

Kistarcsa, , Hungary

Site Status

Megyei Csolnoky Ferenc Kórház Nonprofit Zrt.

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Investigative site

Ajmer, , India

Site Status

Investigative Site

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Investigative Site

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Investigative Site

Jaipur, , India

Site Status

Investigative Site

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Investigative Site

Secunderabad, , India

Site Status

Investigative Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Investigative site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Investigative site

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Investigative Site

Mérida, , Spain

Site Status

Investigative site

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Investigative Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Investigative Site

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Investigative Site

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Austria Belgium Brazil Estonia France Germany Hungary India Italy Romania Spain Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Smolen JS, Cohen SB, Tony HP, Scheinberg M, Kivitz A, Balanescu A, Gomez-Reino J, Cen L, Zhu P, Shisha T. A randomised, double-blind trial to demonstrate bioequivalence of GP2013 and reference rituximab combined with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Sep;76(9):1598-1602. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211281. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28637670 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-021184-32

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GPN013A2301

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GP13-201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.