The Conflicts of Ethics and Law on Patient's Surrogate

NCT ID: NCT01267890

Last Updated: 2010-12-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-12-31

Study Completion Date

2011-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a prospective cross-sectional survey study. The investigators developed self-administrated questionnaire and recruit 120 physicians in two hospitals and 60 lawyers from some law firms to this study.

To realize and compare the opinions of physicians and lawyers about controversial decision-making of surrogate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study provides three real scenarios regarding dilemma between ethics and law when patient's surrogate may not represent patient's best interest:1. Parents ask physician resect their mentally handicapped daughter's uterus. 2. A son refuse physician's suggestion of surgical treatment for his mother, instead, wishes donating his mother's kidney to his son. 3. A mother decides to give up treatment for her son's head injury because of his rebel behavior before.

T-test, ANOVA and Logistic Regression will be used to analyze in this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physician's Role

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

ethics law surrogate conflict

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* resident
* visiting Staff
* chief resident

Exclusion Criteria

* intern
* clerk
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

China Medical University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

China Medical University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

China Medical University Hospital

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Chih-Jaan Tai, Associate Professor

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 04-22053366

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Chih-Jaan Tai, Associate Professor

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CMU-DMR99-IRB-254

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id