Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Mapatumumab in Combination With Sorafenib in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (NCT NCT01258608)
NCT ID: NCT01258608
Last Updated: 2018-12-19
Results Overview
Time to progression is defined as the time from randomization to radiologic disease progression based on blinded independent review (BICR) of imaging scans using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors assessment (mRECIST) for hepatocellular carcinoma. The primary analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods. The median time to progression is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. Analysis was performed on the modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent (mapatumumab/placebo and/or sorafenib) with participants analyzed according to the groups to which they were randomized. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
101 participants
Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months
2018-12-19
Participant Flow
This was a Phase 2, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mapatumumab in combination with sorafenib in participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
A total of 217 participants were screened of which 116 were screen failures and 101 participants were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to any one of the 2 treatment arms. The study was conducted at 29 centers in 6 countries.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
51
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
21
|
19
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Clinical progression
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Sponsor decision
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
6
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of compliance
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
6
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
5
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Mapatumumab in Combination With Sorafenib in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Total
n=101 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.36 • n=5 Participants
|
60.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.93 • n=7 Participants
|
60.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.62 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian - European Heritage
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian-East Asian Heritage
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 monthsPopulation: mITT Population. Only those participants who had their BICR scans read were included in the analysis.
Time to progression is defined as the time from randomization to radiologic disease progression based on blinded independent review (BICR) of imaging scans using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors assessment (mRECIST) for hepatocellular carcinoma. The primary analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods. The median time to progression is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. Analysis was performed on the modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent (mapatumumab/placebo and/or sorafenib) with participants analyzed according to the groups to which they were randomized. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=48 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Progression-Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment
|
5.6 Months
Interval 4.3 to
Upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented
|
4.1 Months
Interval 2.8 to
Upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 monthsPopulation: mITT Population
Time to progression is defined as the time from randomization to radiologic disease progression. The primary analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods based on application of mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The median time to progression is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Progression-Investigator Assessment
|
8.3 Months
Interval 5.4 to
Upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
|
6.4 Months
Interval 5.4 to
Upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 monthsPopulation: mITT Population
Overall survival is defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. The analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods. The median overall survival is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Median Overall Survival
|
10.1 Months
Interval 8.9 to
Upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
|
10.0 Months
Interval 7.3 to
Upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 monthsPopulation: mITT Population. Only those participants who had their BICR scans read were included in the analysis.
Progression free survival is defined as time from randomization to radiologic disease progression or death from any cause. The analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods using BICR assessment of imaging scans. The median progression free survival is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=48 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression Free Survival-BICR Assessment
|
4.3 Months
Interval 3.1 to
Upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
|
3.2 Months
Interval 2.7 to
Upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 monthsPopulation: mITT Population
Progression free survival is defined as time from randomization to radiologic disease progression or death from any cause. The analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods based on application of mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The median progression free survival is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression Free Survival-Investigator Assessment
|
5.4 Months
Interval 3.6 to
Upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
|
4.0 Months
Interval 3.4 to
Upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 monthsPopulation: mITT Population. Only those participants who had their BICR scans read and having available assessment for best response were analyzed.
Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma using BICR assessment of imaging scans. The percentage of participants with objective response is reported along with 95% confidence interval.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=40 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=39 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response-BICR Assessment
|
12.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.2 to 26.8
|
17.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.5 to 33.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 monthsPopulation: mITT Population. Only those participants with available assessment for best response were analyzed.
Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The percentage of participants with objective response is reported along with 95% confidence interval.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=48 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response-Investigator Assessment
|
7.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.2 to 18.9
|
14.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.1 to 27.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 monthsPopulation: mITT Population. Only those participants who had their BICR scans read and having available assessment for best response were analyzed.
Disease control rate is the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response+stable disease according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. The end point was based on BICR assessment of imaging scans. The percentage of participants with disease control is presented along with 95% confidence interval.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=40 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=39 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control-BICR Assessment
|
92.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 79.6 to 98.4
|
71.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 55.1 to 85.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 monthsPopulation: mITT Population. Only those participants with available assessment for best response were analyzed
Disease control rate is the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response+stable disease according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The percentage of participants with disease control is presented along with 95% confidence interval.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=48 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control-Investigator Assessment
|
74.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 60.4 to 85.7
|
68.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 53.7 to 81.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 monthsPopulation: mITT Population. Only responders were included in the analysis.
Time to response is defined as time from randomization to first partial response or complete response in responders only. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=5 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=7 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Response-BICR Assessment
|
44 Days
Interval 41.0 to 85.0
|
48 Days
Interval 41.0 to 188.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 monthsPopulation: mITT Population. Only responders were included in the analysis.
Duration of response is defined as time from first PR or CR to radiologic disease progression; in responders only. CR: Disappearance of intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. Progressive disease (PD): An increase of at least 20% in the sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions recorded since treatment started.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=5 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=7 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response-BICR Assessment
|
123 Days
Interval 55.0 to 325.0
|
127 Days
Interval 42.0 to 372.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Start of study treatment to maximum of 52.9 monthsPopulation: As-Treated Population
An AE is any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that is temporally associated with the use of a study agent but is not necessarily caused by the study agent. An SAE is an adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization, prolongation of an existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or other medically important events that may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes mentioned before. A treatment-emergent AE is an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent pre-treatment, or worsened relative to the pre-treatment state. As-Treated Population comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Non-serious AEs
|
47 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
27 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Start of study treatment to maximum of 52.9 monthsPopulation: As-Treated Population
An AE is any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that is temporally associated with the use of a study agent but is not necessarily caused by the study agent. Severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.0. Grade 1 represents mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 represents moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 represents severe or medically significant but not immediately life -threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 represents life -threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 represents death related to AE. Severe AE is defined as AEs classified by investigator as severe (causing inability to carry out usual activities), life threatening or fatal using NCI-CTCAE Version 4.0 grading.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Severe AEs
|
42 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrolment to maximum of 52.9 monthsPopulation: As-Treated Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (indicated by n=X in category titles).
Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of following chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), amylase, bilirubin, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), calcium, potassium, magnesium, albumin, sodium and creatinine. Laboratory toxicities were graded based on the NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Grade 1 represents mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 represents moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 represents severe or medically significant but not immediately life -threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 represents life -threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Number of participants with worst toxicity grades for any abnormalities observed in any chemistry parameters during the study is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
ALT increased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
ALT increased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
30 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
ALT increased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
8 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
ALT increased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
7 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
ALT increased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
AST increased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
AST increased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
23 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
AST increased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
10 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
AST increased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
16 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
AST increased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
ALP increased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
ALP increased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
31 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
ALP increased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
11 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
ALP increased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
ALP increased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Amylase increased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
30 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Amylase increased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
9 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Amylase increased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
5 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Amylase increased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Amylase increased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Bilirubin increased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
12 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Bilirubin increased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
15 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Bilirubin increased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
17 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Bilirubin increased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
7 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Bilirubin increased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
GGT increased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
GGT increased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
10 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
GGT increased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
14 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
GGT increased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
23 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
GGT increased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypercalcemia; Grade 0, n=49, 47
|
37 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypercalcemia; Grade 1, n=49, 47
|
11 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypercalcemia; Grade 2, n=49, 47
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypercalcemia; Grade 3, n=49, 47
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypercalcemia; Grade 4, n=49, 47
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hyperkalemia; Grade 0; n=51, 50
|
36 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hyperkalemia; Grade 1; n=51, 50
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hyperkalemia; Grade 2; n=51, 50
|
10 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hyperkalemia; Grade 3; n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hyperkalemia; Grade 4; n=51, 50
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypermagnesemia; Grade 0; n=51, 50
|
29 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypermagnesemia; Grade 1; n=51, 50
|
21 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypermagnesemia; Grade 2; n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypermagnesemia; Grade 3; n=51, 50
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypermagnesemia; Grade 4; n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypernatremia; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
18 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypernatremia; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
16 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypernatremia; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypernatremia; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
16 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypernatremia; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypoalbuminemia; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
22 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypoalbuminemia; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
10 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypoalbuminemia; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
18 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypoalbuminemia; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypoalbuminemia; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypocalcemia; Grade 0, n=50, 50
|
16 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypocalcemia; Grade 1, n=50, 50
|
8 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypocalcemia; Grade 2, n=50, 50
|
18 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypocalcemia; Grade 3, n=50, 50
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypocalcemia; Grade 4, n=50, 50
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypokalemia; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
37 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypokalemia; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
11 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypokalemia; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypokalemia; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypokalemia; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypomagnesemia; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
30 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypomagnesemia; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
19 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypomagnesemia; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypomagnesemia; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hypomagnesemia; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hyponatremia; Grade 0, n=49, 47
|
40 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hyponatremia; Grade 1, n=49, 47
|
5 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hyponatremia; Grade 2, n=49, 47
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hyponatremia; Grade 3, n=49, 47
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Hyponatremia; Grade 4, n=49, 47
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Lipase increased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
19 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Lipase increased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Lipase increased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
8 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Lipase increased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
16 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Lipase increased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Renal: Creatinine increased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
36 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Renal: Creatinine increased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
7 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Renal: Creatinine increased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
8 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Renal: Creatinine increased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters
Renal: Creatinine increased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrolment to maximum of 52.9 monthsPopulation: As-Treated Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (indicated by n=X in category titles).
Blood samples were collected for assessment of the following hematology parameters: activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), hemoglobin, international normalized ratio (INR), lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets and white blood cells (WBC). Laboratory toxicities were graded based on the NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Grade 1 represents mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 represents moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 represents severe or medically significant but not immediately life -threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 represents life -threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Number of participants with worst toxicity grades for any abnormalities observed in any hematology parameters during the study is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
APTT prolonged; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
24 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
APTT prolonged; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
19 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
APTT prolonged; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
APTT prolonged; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
APTT prolonged; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Anemia; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
13 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Anemia; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
23 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Anemia; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
9 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Anemia; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Anemia; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Hemoglobin increased; Grade 0, n=46, 44
|
46 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Hemoglobin increased; Grade 1, n=46, 44
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Hemoglobin increased; Grade 2, n=46, 44
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Hemoglobin increased; Grade 3, n=46, 44
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Hemoglobin increased; Grade 4, n=46, 44
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
INR increased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
INR increased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
35 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
INR increased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
12 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
INR increased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
INR increased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Lymphocytes decreased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
24 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Lymphocytes decreased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Lymphocytes decreased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
16 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Lymphocytes decreased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
8 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Lymphocytes decreased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Lymphocytes increased; Grade 0, n=51, 49
|
49 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Lymphocytes increased; Grade 1, n=51, 49
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Lymphocytes increased; Grade 2, n=51, 49
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Lymphocytes increased; Grade 3, n=51, 49
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Lymphocytes increased; Grade 4, n=51, 49
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Neutrophil count decreased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
39 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Neutrophil count decreased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Neutrophil count decreased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
8 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Neutrophil count decreased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Neutrophil count decreased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Platelets decreased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
21 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Platelets decreased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
12 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Platelets decreased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
10 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Platelets decreased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
7 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
Platelets decreased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
WBC decreased; Grade 0, n=51, 50
|
33 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
WBC decreased; Grade 1, n=51, 50
|
10 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
WBC decreased; Grade 2, n=51, 50
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
WBC decreased; Grade 3, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters
WBC decreased; Grade 4, n=51, 50
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 monthsPopulation: As-Treated Population. Only participants with an available immunogenicity assay were analyzed.
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of serum antibodies. The presence of anti-mapatumumab antibodies was assessed using a validated electrochemiluminescent immunoassay. The assay incorporated a tiered testing approach which used screening and confirmation steps. The anti-drug antibody (ADA) confirmed positive participants were separated into transient or persistent antibody positives. Persistent positive refers to positive immunogenic response at 2 or more assessments or at the final assessment. Transient positive refers to positive immunogenic response at only 1 assessment and negative at the final assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=49 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-mapatumumab Antibodies
Transient positive
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-mapatumumab Antibodies
Persistent positive
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-mapatumumab Antibodies
Negative
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)Population: As Treated Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time points were analyzed (indicated by n=X in category titles).
SBP and DBP were obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; Cycle 2 Day 1, n=46, 44
|
2.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.13
|
2.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 18.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 3 DAY 1, n=39, 35
|
6.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 16.81
|
4.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 4; DAY 1; n=33, 32
|
2.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 15.57
|
5.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 5 DAY 1; n=27, 26
|
1.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.05
|
4.9 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 16.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 6 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
1.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.14
|
5.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 7 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
-0.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.02
|
5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 8 DAY 1; n=22, 21
|
-1.6 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.48
|
5.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 9 DAY 1; n=19, 16
|
1.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 16.37
|
7.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 10 DAY 1; n=18, 16
|
1.4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 16.57
|
4.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 16.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 11 DAY 1; n=16, 15
|
2.4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 18.82
|
5.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 18.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 12 DAY 1; n=15, 13
|
2.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.34
|
5.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 13 DAY 1; n=13, 12
|
2.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.26
|
3.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 14 DAY 1; n=12, 12
|
-1.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.13
|
4.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 15 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
1.4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.21
|
6.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 21.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 16 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
1.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 5.79
|
7.9 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 15.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 17 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
1.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.95
|
10.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 17.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 18 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
-2.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.26
|
9.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 19.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 19 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
-4.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.93
|
8.4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 20.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 20 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
1.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.13
|
5.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 19.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 21 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
2.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.23
|
10.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 21.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 22 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
6.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.55
|
5.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 23 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-1.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.80
|
12.9 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 20.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 24 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-3.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 6.38
|
5.6 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 19.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 25 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
1.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.20
|
11.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 20.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 26 DAY 1; n=4, 7
|
6.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.89
|
9.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 22.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 27 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
3.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.44
|
8.4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 18.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 28 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
3.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.41
|
5.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 20.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 29 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-0.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.29
|
3.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 24.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 30 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
2.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 6.43
|
-2.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 31 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-3.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.79
|
2.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 23.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 32 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 4.58
|
3.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 16.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 33 DAY 1; n=2, 4
|
0.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.14
|
-5.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 19.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 34 DAY 1; n=1, 4
|
13.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
-5.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 35 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
-5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 15.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 36 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
-1.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 37 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-6.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 23.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 38 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-1.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 18.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 39 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-4.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 21.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 40 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-12.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 41 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 21.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 42 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-7.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 17.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 43 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-17.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 17.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 44 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-10.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 45 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-17.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 17.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 46 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 21.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 47 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-17.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 17.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 48 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 21.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 49 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-17.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 17.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 50 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 21.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 51 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-10.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 21.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 52 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-17.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 17.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 53 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-20.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 54 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-10.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 55 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-30.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 56 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-30.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 57 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-30.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 58 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-25.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 59 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-20.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 60 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-30.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 61 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-25.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 62 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-23.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 63 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-28.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 64 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-25.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 65 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-26.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 66 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-32.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 67 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-33.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 68 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-32.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 69 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-31.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 70 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-25.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 71 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-28.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 72 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-30.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 73 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-27.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 74 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-30.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP; CYCLE 75 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-28.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; Cycle 2 Day 1, n=46, 44
|
-0.6 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.51
|
0.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 3 DAY 1, n=39, 35
|
2.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.20
|
1.4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 4; DAY 1; n=33, 32
|
1.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.52
|
2.4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 5 DAY 1; n=27, 26
|
0.9 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.00
|
3.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 15.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 6 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
3.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.32
|
1.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 7 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
0.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.57
|
2.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 8 DAY 1; n=22, 21
|
0.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.37
|
2.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 9 DAY 1; n=19, 16
|
2.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.67
|
4.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 10 DAY 1; n=18, 16
|
2.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.81
|
2.4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 11 DAY 1; n=16, 15
|
-0.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.25
|
0.9 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 12 DAY 1; n=15, 13
|
0.6 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.80
|
2.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 13 DAY 1; n=13, 12
|
-2.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 6.07
|
-2.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 14 DAY 1; n=12, 12
|
0.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 6.87
|
3.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 15 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
2.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.49
|
1.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 16 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
0.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.68
|
0.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 17 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
-1.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.23
|
5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 18 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
0.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 6.47
|
3.4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 19 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
-2.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 5.82
|
5.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 20 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
2.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.83
|
3.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 21 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
2.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 22 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-1.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.95
|
3.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 23 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
2.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 4.20
|
5.1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 24 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-3.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.17
|
2.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 25 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
3.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.11
|
2.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 15.80
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 26 DAY 1; n=4, 7
|
0.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.27
|
4.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 27 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
-3.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 4.72
|
3.6 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 28 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
2.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
4.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 29 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
1.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.41
|
-2.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 30 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-0.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 4.04
|
-2.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 6.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 31 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
6.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.64
|
0.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 32 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
2.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.51
|
-0.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 33 DAY 1; n=2, 4
|
0.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.78
|
-2.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 34 DAY 1; n=1, 4
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
-1.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 6.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 35 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
-3.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 36 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
1.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 37 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
1.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 38 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-2.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 6.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 39 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
0.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 40 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 41 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-7.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 42 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 43 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-7.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 44 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-2.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 45 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-7.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 46 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 47 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 24.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 48 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 49 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-12.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 50 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 51 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 52 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-10.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 53 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-7.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 54 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-5.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 55 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 56 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-10.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 57 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 58 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-10.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 59 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-10.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 60 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 61 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 62 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-13.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 63 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 64 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-14.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 65 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 66 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-17.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 67 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-14.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 68 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 69 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-17.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 70 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-16.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 71 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 72 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-19.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 73 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-15.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 74 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-14.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
DBP; CYCLE 75 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-17.0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)Population: As Treated Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (indicated by n=X in category titles).
Heart rate was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 51 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-5.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 12.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 52 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-8.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 11.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 53 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-10.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 54 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-2.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 55 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-10.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 56 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-12.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Cycle 2 Day 1, n=46, 44
|
0.7 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.32
|
-1.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 3 DAY 1, n=39, 35
|
1.7 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.69
|
-1.6 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 4; DAY 1; n=33, 32
|
1.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 10.09
|
1.9 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 5 DAY 1; n=27, 26
|
1.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.45
|
0.2 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 10.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 6 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
0.2 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 10.37
|
0.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 7 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
2.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.40
|
-1.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.80
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 57 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-10.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 8 DAY 1; n=22, 21
|
0.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.70
|
-0.4 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 9 DAY 1; n=19, 16
|
2.1 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.04
|
0.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 10 DAY 1; n=18, 16
|
2.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.62
|
0.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 13.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 11 DAY 1; n=16, 15
|
-0.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.51
|
-2.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 12 DAY 1; n=15, 13
|
-0.7 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 4.28
|
0.2 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 13 DAY 1; n=13, 12
|
0.9 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 5.47
|
0.9 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 14 DAY 1; n=12, 12
|
1.6 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.03
|
3.1 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 10.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 15 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
5.6 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 12.39
|
2.2 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 16 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
3.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.06
|
0.7 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 17 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
3.1 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.20
|
1.6 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 10.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 18 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
6.4 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.68
|
-0.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 19 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
-2.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 10.54
|
0.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 20 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
0.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.38
|
0.9 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 21 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
-1.4 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 10.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 22 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
3.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 13.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 23 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-3.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.02
|
2.9 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 24 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-2.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 5.97
|
2.9 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 10.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 25 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-1.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
0.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 11.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 26 DAY 1; n=4, 7
|
-0.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
1.6 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 11.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 27 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
-2.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
2.4 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 11.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 28 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
-1.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 5.56
|
-0.2 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 13.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 29 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
0.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 4.00
|
-3.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 30 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
0.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
-9.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 5.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 31 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-2.7 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.43
|
-0.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 32 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
2.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 4.00
|
-3.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 33 DAY 1; n=2, 4
|
-2.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-5.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 34 DAY 1; n=1, 4
|
0.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
-3.5 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 4.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 35 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
-4.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 4.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 36 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
-8.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 37 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-9.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 38 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-2.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.93
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 39 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-4.7 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 6.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 40 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-4.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 41 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-7.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 42 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-2.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 43 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-6.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 14.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 44 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-2.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 14.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 45 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-4.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 14.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 46 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 18.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 47 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-2.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 14.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 48 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 15.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 49 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-9.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 50 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-5.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 58 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-8.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 59 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-12.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 60 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-10.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 61 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-12.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 62 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-14.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 63 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-15.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 64 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-10.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 65 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-11.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 66 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-12.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 67 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-9.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 68 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-10.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 69 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-12.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 70 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-9.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 71 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-7.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 72 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-10.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 73 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-9.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 74 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-8.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
CYCLE 75 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-9.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)Population: As Treated Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (indicated by n=X in category titles).
Temperature was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
Cycle 2 Day 1, n=46, 43
|
0.02 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.288
|
-0.02 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.242
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 3 DAY 1, n=39, 35
|
-0.01 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.374
|
-0.11 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.340
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 4; DAY 1; n=33, 32
|
0.02 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.354
|
-0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.298
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 5 DAY 1; n=27, 26
|
0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.374
|
-0.04 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.218
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 6 DAY 1; n=23, 22
|
-0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.374
|
-0.07 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.223
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 7 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
0.03 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.334
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.408
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 8 DAY 1; n=21, 21
|
0.01 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.460
|
0.02 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.161
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 9 DAY 1; n=19, 16
|
0.04 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.493
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.171
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 10 DAY 1; n=18, 16
|
0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.539
|
0.04 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.200
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 11 DAY 1; n=16, 15
|
-0.02 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.468
|
-0.09 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.181
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 12 DAY 1; n=15, 13
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.270
|
0.02 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.245
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 13 DAY 1; n=13, 12
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.354
|
0.03 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.176
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 14 DAY 1; n=12, 12
|
0.13 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.380
|
-0.04 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.219
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 15 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
0.11 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.420
|
-0.13 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.269
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 16 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
0.01 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.318
|
-0.04 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.174
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 17 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.227
|
0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.076
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 18 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
-0.14 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.346
|
-0.09 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.189
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 19 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.456
|
0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.207
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 20 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
-0.02 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.397
|
0.01 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.146
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 21 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.13 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.411
|
-0.01 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.304
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 22 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.17 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.206
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.193
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 23 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.03 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.299
|
0.13 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.231
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 24 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.18 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.171
|
0.06 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.119
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 25 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.20 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.432
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.185
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 26 DAY 1; n=4, 7
|
0.15 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.129
|
-0.01 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.308
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 27 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
0.18 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.171
|
0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.173
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 28 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
0.15 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.208
|
-0.02 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.179
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 29 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
0.13 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.153
|
-0.02 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.275
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 30 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.173
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.082
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 31 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-0.07 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.351
|
0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.265
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 32 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.173
|
-0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.265
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 33 DAY 1; n=2, 4
|
0.30 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.424
|
-0.07 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.222
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 34 DAY 1; n=1, 4
|
0.30 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
-0.20 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.283
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 35 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
-0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.058
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 36 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
-0.07 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.150
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 37 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-0.30 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.458
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 38 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.100
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 39 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-0.07 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.058
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 40 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 41 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 42 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.071
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 43 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.212
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 44 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 45 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.283
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 46 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.071
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 47 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.212
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 48 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.000
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 49 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.212
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 50 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 51 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.071
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 52 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 53 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.071
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 54 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-0.05 Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.071
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 55 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.20 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 56 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 57 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 58 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 59 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 60 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 61 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 62 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 63 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 64 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 65 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 66 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.20 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 67 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 68 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 69 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.20 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 70 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.00 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 71 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 72 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.20 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 73 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 74 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.20 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
|
Change From Baseline in Temperature
CYCLE 75 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.10 Celsius
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)Population: As Treated Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (indicated by n=X in category titles).
Respiratory rate was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose.Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 29 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-0.7 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 65 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 2 Day 1, n=46, 44
|
-0.1 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
0.1 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 3 DAY 1, n=39, 35
|
0.2 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
-0.2 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 4; DAY 1; n=32, 32
|
0.2 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.79
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 5 DAY 1; n=26, 26
|
-0.1 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.86
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 6 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
0.5 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.15
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 7 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
-0.1 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
-0.2 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 8 DAY 1; n=21, 21
|
0.6 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
-0.1 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 9 DAY 1; n=19, 16
|
-0.5 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.98
|
-0.2 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 10 DAY 1; n=18, 16
|
-1.7 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.95
|
-0.4 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 11 DAY 1; n=16, 15
|
-0.8 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.97
|
-0.8 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 12 DAY 1; n=15, 13
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
-1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 13 DAY 1; n=13, 12
|
-0.2 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
-0.7 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 14 DAY 1; n=12, 12
|
0.4 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.43
|
-1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 15 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
-0.5 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
-0.9 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 3.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 16 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
-0.5 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
-0.9 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 17 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
0.1 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 18 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
-0.4 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
0.4 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 19 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
0.7 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 20 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
0.2 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 21 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.8 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
-0.1 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 22 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.1 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 23 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
0.5 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
0.4 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 24 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 25 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 26 DAY 1; n=4, 7
|
-0.5 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 27 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 28 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
0.2 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 30 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 31 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
0.7 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 32 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-0.7 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 33 DAY 1; n=2, 4
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.8 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 34 DAY 1; n=1, 4
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
0.8 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 35 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 36 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 37 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 38 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-0.3 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 39 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 40 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 41 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 42 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 43 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 44 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 45 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-1.5 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 46 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 47 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-0.5 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 48 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 49 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 50 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 51 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 52 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 53 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 54 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 55 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 56 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 57 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 58 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 59 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 60 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 61 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 62 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 63 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 64 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 66 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 67 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 68 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 69 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-1.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 70 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 71 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 72 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 73 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 74 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
CYCLE 75 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.0 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)Population: As Treated Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (indicated by n=X in category titles).
Weight was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 21 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-3.03 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 7.950
|
-0.29 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 6.354
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
Cycle 2 Day 1, n=46, 44
|
-1.51 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 2.192
|
-1.55 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 2.405
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 3 DAY 1, n=39, 35
|
-2.54 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 2.734
|
-1.88 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 2.710
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 4; DAY 1; n=33, 32
|
-3.02 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 2.451
|
-1.86 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 3.305
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 5 DAY 1; n=27, 26
|
-3.31 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 2.521
|
-2.01 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 3.301
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 6 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
-3.25 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 3.078
|
-2.61 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.200
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 7 DAY 1; n=24, 22
|
-3.75 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.172
|
-2.14 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.877
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 8 DAY 1; n=22, 21
|
-3.89 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.384
|
-2.61 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.016
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 9 DAY 1; n=19, 16
|
-4.14 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.151
|
-2.14 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.998
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 10 DAY 1; n=18, 16
|
-5.50 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 6.983
|
-1.99 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.478
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 11 DAY 1; n=16, 15
|
-5.70 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 6.045
|
-1.67 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.681
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 12 DAY 1; n=15, 13
|
-5.85 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.206
|
-1.72 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.260
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 13 DAY 1; n=13, 12
|
-6.54 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.795
|
-1.11 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.483
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 14 DAY 1; n=12, 12
|
-7.03 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 6.500
|
-1.23 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 3.899
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 15 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
-7.21 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 7.449
|
-1.09 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.705
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 16 DAY 1; n=10, 9
|
-7.59 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 6.970
|
-0.93 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.519
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 17 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
-8.49 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 8.606
|
-1.24 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.205
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 18 DAY 1; n=8, 8
|
-8.25 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 9.002
|
-0.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 4.888
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 19 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
-8.78 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 9.953
|
-0.19 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.044
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 20 DAY 1; n=6, 8
|
-9.22 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 10.752
|
-0.40 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.986
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 22 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-3.50 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 7.735
|
-0.32 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.370
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 23 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-4.13 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 8.189
|
-0.16 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.297
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 24 DAY 1; n=4, 7
|
-3.38 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 7.273
|
-1.93 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.511
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 25 DAY 1; n=4, 8
|
-3.88 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 8.250
|
0.04 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 5.789
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 26 DAY 1; n=4, 7
|
-3.88 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 6.981
|
0.54 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 6.484
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 27 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
-4.88 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 6.408
|
-2.04 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 2.308
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 28 DAY 1; n=4, 5
|
-5.13 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 6.115
|
-2.20 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.989
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 29 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-5.50 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 7.697
|
-2.18 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.786
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 30 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-5.83 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 7.286
|
-3.25 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.379
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 31 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-5.50 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 7.467
|
-3.38 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.435
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 32 DAY 1; n=3, 4
|
-5.50 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 7.467
|
-3.05 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.100
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 33 DAY 1; n=2, 4
|
-1.75 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.061
|
-3.13 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.150
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 34 DAY 1; n=1, 4
|
-2.50 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
-3.18 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.350
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 35 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
-3.25 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.379
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 36 DAY 1; n=0, 4
|
—
|
-3.38 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.624
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 37 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-3.17 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.961
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 38 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-2.63 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.814
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 39 DAY 1; n=0, 3
|
—
|
-3.00 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.200
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 40 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.40 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.566
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 41 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-2.90 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 42 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.00 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.000
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 43 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-2.90 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 44 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.90 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.273
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 45 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-4.40 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.980
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 46 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.90 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.273
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 47 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.40 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.566
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 48 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.65 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.919
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 49 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-4.40 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.980
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 50 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-4.15 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.626
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 51 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.65 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.919
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 52 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-2.90 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 53 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-4.40 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 1.980
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 54 DAY 1; n=0, 2
|
—
|
-3.65 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 0.919
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 55 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 56 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-1.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 57 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 58 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-1.30 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 59 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.30 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 60 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.30 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 61 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.00 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 62 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.30 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 63 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 64 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.60 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 65 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-2.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 66 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-3.30 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 67 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-3.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 68 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-1.30 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 69 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-1.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 70 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
0.20 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 71 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 72 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 73 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-1.30 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 74 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.80 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
CYCLE 75 DAY 1; n=0, 1
|
—
|
-0.30 Kilograms
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day1 pre-dose(Cycle 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,14,16,17,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34);end of infusion (Cycle 1);Day8 pre-dose(Cycle 1);Day15 pre-dose (Cycle 1,2);Day21(Cycle 2,4,6,8,9,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34);Cycle 99(end of treatment) (21-day cycles)Population: As Treated Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (indicated by n=X in category titles)
Blood samples were collected for determination of serum mapatumumab concentration at the indicated time points. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=50 Participants
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
|
|---|---|---|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 1 Day 1, pre-dose, n=46
|
638.4 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 2668.01
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 1 DAY 1,end of infusion, n=46
|
555157.6 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 260848.85
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 1; DAY 8, pre-dose; n=40
|
250229.9 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 89714.76
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 1 DAY 15, pre-dose; n=1
|
121556.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 2 DAY 1, pre-dose; n=40
|
126588.4 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 149231.45
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 2 DAY 15, pre-dose; n=3
|
128839.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 153667.78
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 2 DAY 21; n=28
|
180606.6 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 109893.28
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 4 DAY 1, pre-dose; n=31
|
194936.8 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 142242.80
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 4, DAY 21; n=23
|
183754.3 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 93584.71
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 5, DAY 1, pre-dose; n=1
|
223681.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 6, DAY 1, pre-dose; n=21
|
160741.5 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 64893.03
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 6, DAY 21; n=20
|
201237.7 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 75352.54
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 8, DAY 1, pre-dose; n=21
|
246616.5 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 204363.04
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 8, DAY 21; n=17
|
187927.6 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 104803.16
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 9, DAY 1, pre-dose; n=1
|
136122.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 10, DAY 1, pre-dose; n=16
|
204147.1 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 103243.21
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 10, DAY 21; n=15
|
219503.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 105968.15
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 12, DAY 1, pre-dose; n=12
|
200141.1 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 93093.68
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 12, DAY 21; n=11
|
256924.5 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 111904.82
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 14, DAY 1, pre-dose; n=9
|
207930.6 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 84247.04
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 14, DAY 21 n=9
|
256779.4 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 127463.67
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 16, DAY 1, pre-dose; n=9
|
196074.3 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 100377.45
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 16, DAY 21; n=8
|
253521.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 87675.77
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 17, DAY 1, pre-dose; n=1
|
156161.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 18, DAY 1, pre-dose; n=8
|
199379.4 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 61011.54
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 18, DAY 21; n=7
|
229539.1 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 86440.46
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 20 DAY 1, pre-dose; n=8
|
189486.6 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 54097.82
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 20, DAY 21; n=7
|
222443.7 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 86046.38
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 22 DAY 1, pre-dose; n=8
|
208485.4 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 80252.29
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 22, DAY 21; n=7
|
212481.1 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 110103.79
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 24 DAY 1, pre-dose; n=8
|
219439.8 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 71740.01
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 24, DAY 21; n=7
|
221249.1 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 73317.41
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 26 DAY 1, pre-dose; n=4
|
223427.3 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 67101.56
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 26, DAY 21; n=4
|
295941.5 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 100208.45
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 28 DAY 1, pre-dose; n=3
|
219802.7 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 115484.98
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 28, DAY 21; n=2
|
173018.5 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 54870.78
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 30 DAY 1, pre-dose; n=2
|
173200.5 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 13447.05
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 30, DAY 21; n=2
|
180484.5 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 14783.48
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 32 DAY 1, pre-dose; n=1
|
178275.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 32, DAY 21; n=1
|
177496.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 34 DAY 1, pre-dose; n=1
|
150553.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 34, DAY 21; n=1
|
134781.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.
|
—
|
|
Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab
CYCLE 99, end of treatment; n=14
|
86640.1 Nanograms per milliliter
Standard Deviation 64981.14
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Sorafenib+Placebo
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 participants at risk
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 participants at risk
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal varices haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric haemorrhage
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer haemorrhage
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic failure
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 4 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oesophageal candidiasis
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 2 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Craniocerebral injury
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 2 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase increased
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 2 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 2 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Malnutrition
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Cachexia
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatocellular carcinoma
|
17.6%
9/51 • Number of events 9 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Number of events 4 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatic cancer metastatic
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hepatic encephalopathy
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhagic stroke
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchitis chronic
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Sorafenib+Placebo
n=51 participants at risk
Participants received sorafenib 400 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Placebo was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
|
Sorafenib+Mapatumumab 30 mg/kg
n=50 participants at risk
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each 21-day cycle. Mapatumumab 30 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered via the intravenous route on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The treatments were administered until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
19.6%
10/51 • Number of events 15 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
16.0%
8/50 • Number of events 13 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
9.8%
5/51 • Number of events 9 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
14.0%
7/50 • Number of events 13 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
37.3%
19/51 • Number of events 46 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
32.0%
16/50 • Number of events 29 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
17.6%
9/51 • Number of events 22 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
16.0%
8/50 • Number of events 11 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
15.7%
8/51 • Number of events 11 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
16.0%
8/50 • Number of events 10 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
13.7%
7/51 • Number of events 23 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Number of events 7 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
11.8%
6/51 • Number of events 11 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Number of events 5 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 5 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 4 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 4 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 4 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 5 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
29.4%
15/51 • Number of events 24 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
12.0%
6/50 • Number of events 10 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
15.7%
8/51 • Number of events 12 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
22.0%
11/50 • Number of events 26 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
17.6%
9/51 • Number of events 12 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
12.0%
6/50 • Number of events 7 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Number of events 8 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Number of events 7 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic pain
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 6 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice hepatocellular
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
43.1%
22/51 • Number of events 41 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
38.0%
19/50 • Number of events 34 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase increased
|
23.5%
12/51 • Number of events 37 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
34.0%
17/50 • Number of events 46 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
21.6%
11/51 • Number of events 37 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
18.0%
9/50 • Number of events 25 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
21.6%
11/51 • Number of events 17 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
16.0%
8/50 • Number of events 12 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
17.6%
9/51 • Number of events 36 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Number of events 14 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
15.7%
8/51 • Number of events 18 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
14.0%
7/50 • Number of events 11 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase increased
|
15.7%
8/51 • Number of events 12 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
14.0%
7/50 • Number of events 29 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
11.8%
6/51 • Number of events 34 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
9.8%
5/51 • Number of events 11 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 4 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 34 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 9 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
23.5%
12/51 • Number of events 17 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
18.0%
9/50 • Number of events 15 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
17.6%
9/51 • Number of events 32 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Number of events 15 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
13.7%
7/51 • Number of events 9 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
14.0%
7/50 • Number of events 9 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
11.8%
6/51 • Number of events 20 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 6 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 7 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
12.0%
6/50 • Number of events 6 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 5 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
11.8%
6/51 • Number of events 8 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 4 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
|
35.3%
18/51 • Number of events 29 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
38.0%
19/50 • Number of events 28 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash papular
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
18.0%
9/50 • Number of events 13 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperkeratosis
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
12.0%
6/50 • Number of events 7 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 5 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
12.0%
6/50 • Number of events 6 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Number of events 4 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Number of events 4 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/51 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Number of events 6 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
23.5%
12/51 • Number of events 16 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
32.0%
16/50 • Number of events 25 • Start of study treatment up to maximum of 52.9 months
Treatment-emergent non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected in the As-Treated Population which comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER