Two Approaches to Routine HIV Testing in a Hospital Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT01258582

Last Updated: 2012-06-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1651 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2010-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was initially designed to compare the effectiveness of two different approaches to providing routine HIV counseling, testing, and referral services in an urban hospital emergency department setting. The initial phase was closed in July 2008. The second phase of this trial consists of establishing the differences in acceptability of HIV testing based on the method of testing offered (rapid oral fluid vs. fingerstick).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

About 25% of HIV infected people do not know that they are infected. These people lack medical care that could prolong their lives and access to counseling services that could prevent further spread of HIV. With so many people unaware of their HIV status, there is a clear need for more readily available HIV counseling, testing, and referral services throughout the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends routine HIV testing in U.S. hospitals in which HIV infected patients make up at least 1% of the total patient population for that hospital. In the original proposal, we chose oral rapid HIV testing as we felt that this technique is noninvasive, acceptable to both patients and health care workers (without body fluid risk), and would maximize rates of HIV testing. This study directly compares acceptance rates of HIV testing as a function of the test type offered (oral vs. fingerstick) in a randomized controlled fashion.

Participants in this study will include adults who visit Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency department in Boston, Massachusetts. Participants will be randomly assigned to oral vs. fingerstick HIV testing by a designated HIV counselor and to fill out a questionnaire while waiting in the emergency room. The questionnaire will be anonymous. Participants will then be offered a rapid HIV test. Test results will be available in about 20 minutes and will be provided to participants by the HIV counselor. Participants who test positive for HIV will be offered a more definitive blood test to confirm HIV infection. The blood test results will be available 2 weeks from testing, and participants must return to the hospital to get their test results. Participants who test positive for HIV will be offered counseling support and referral services by either their assigned HIV counselor or emergency department staff member. Follow-up care appointments will also be initiated at this time. For participants who test positive for HIV, the study will last about 6 months. There will be no follow-up visits for participants who do not test positive for HIV during their emergency room visit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oral HIV testing

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oral HIV screening

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will undergo oral HIV screening and, if positive, further study visits for up to 6 months

Fingerstick HIV testing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fingerstick HIV screening

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will undergo fingerstick HIV screening and, if positive, further study visits for up to 6 months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oral HIV screening

Participants will undergo oral HIV screening and, if positive, further study visits for up to 6 months

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fingerstick HIV screening

Participants will undergo fingerstick HIV screening and, if positive, further study visits for up to 6 months

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Waiting to receive care in the Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency room
* English- or Spanish-speaking
* Enters the emergency room when an HIV counselor is available

Exclusion Criteria

* An estimated severity index score of 1 or 2 who have mechanical ventilation or are not deemed alert, awake, and oriented to person, place and time by the triage nurse
* HIV infected
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rochelle Walensky

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rochelle P Walensky, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ganguli I, Collins JE, Reichmann WM, Losina E, Katz JN, Arbelaez C, Donnell-Fink LA, Walensky RP. Missed opportunities: refusal to confirm reactive rapid HIV tests in the emergency department. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053408. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23308216 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01MH073445

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

R01 MH073445 (Phase II)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Test-to-PrEP Study
NCT06927856 RECRUITING NA